that the claimant aged 63 years
was crossing the cross and when he was about to
cross the road completely and only remaining 6 feet ... place where the pedestrian crossed the road was
not the zebra crossing. Therefore, it amounts to
5 MFA NO.7918/2018
negligence. Therefore, submitted that
falsely implicated in
the case. Further, submitted that the deceased while
crossing the road met with accident. Therefore, some
contributory negligence is to be fastened ... place where the deceased was crossing the road was
not zebra crossing point, but considering the fact that
the road is in the Mysuru city
then for crossing the road, there is zebra crossing, but
the deceased without crossing the zebra crossing had tried to
cross in the middle
then for crossing the road, there is zebra crossing, but
the deceased without crossing the zebra crossing had tried to
cross in the middle
process of crossing the
road where there was no zebra crossing. Ex.P.3 is the spot
mahazar ... that the deceased was crossing the road where
there was no zebra crossing and it is the observation of the
Tribunal that the rider
supposed
to cross the road where there is no zebra crossing.
Hence, the deceased is completely negligent and has
contributed negligence to the accident. Further ... road of Bengaluru
City. Just because there is no zebra crossing and if a
person is crossing the road that does not always amount
supposed
to cross the road where there is no zebra crossing.
Hence, the deceased is completely negligent and has
contributed negligence to the accident. Further ... road of Bengaluru
City. Just because there is no zebra crossing and if a
person is crossing the road that does not always amount
company
that the respondent No.1-claimant was crossing the road,
where there was no zebra ... crossing, therefore prays to hold
atleast 50% negligence on the part of respondent No.1.
Just because respondent No.1 was not crossing on zebra
standing by the side of road, near Konappana Agrahara
Signal Zebra crossing to cross the Road, at that time,
the driver of BMTC bus bearing
ground that since the appellant was not
crossing the road at zebra crossing, attributed 20:80
of contributory negligence between the appellant and
the driver ... ought to be cautious
while crossing the road which is not zebra crossing.
Therefore, this court is of the opinion that the
appellant has also
