stated that the deceased
crossed the road wherein there was no zebra crossing or
any other marks according to the Traffic Rules,
however, respondents have
sketch (Ex.P5) drawn by the Investigating Agency
indicates that, while crossing the road at the relevant
point of time of the accident ... because, where the
deceased was crossing the road, there was no zebra
crossing and he was not much diligent in observing the
road traffic while
occurred
on the National High way, while the deceased
recklessly/carelessly crossing the road and hence,
the Tribunal was justified in apportioning
contributory negligence ... zebra crossing just few meters away from
the place of the accident, the deceased crossed the
said road just few meters before such zebra crossing
claimant are that on
28.06.2014 at about 7.20 p.m., claimant was crossing
road near Santhe Bridge at Yelahanka. At that time, he
met with ... immediately applied the break and stopped the vehicle.
There was no zebra crossing at the place of incident to
cross the road by pedestrian
claimant are that on
28.06.2014 at about 7.20 p.m., claimant was crossing
road near Santhe Bridge at Yelahanka. At that time, he
met with ... immediately applied the break and stopped the vehicle.
There was no zebra crossing at the place of incident to
cross the road by pedestrian