road
unmindfully without observing the traffic rules where there was no
zebra cross and he was sole architect of the accident and he has
denied ... zebra cross nor to take defence that the petitioner was crossed
the road as there was no zebra cross. If the alleged road comes
within
injured in his cross examination has categorically admitted that
he was crossed the road where there was no zebra cross.
Therefore, the contributory negligence ... whether
there were any zebra crossing. So, the claimant had crossed the
road where he was not supposed to cross certain degree of
contributory negligence
zebra
cross in the place of accident and the deceased was crossed the
road where there was no zebra cross. The learned counsel ... whether there were any zebra crossing. So, the
claimant had crossed the road where he was not supposed to
cross certain degree of contributory negligence
crossing at the spot. PW4, on the other hand,
has deposed in his cross examination that he did not remember whether
there was any zebra ... also zebra crossing at the spot. PW5
in his cross examination has however deposed that he had not
mentioned the zebra crossing
time of accident, the Petitioner was
crossing the road, wherein, there was no pedestrian cross or
zebra cross.
17. The contents ... time of accident,
the Petitioner was crossing the road, wherein, there was no
pedestrian cross or zebra cross or no provision for crossing the
road
movements and he
was crossing the road where there was no zebra cross
and he himself dashed against the tempo. Because of
(SCCH ... move. He has denied the suggestion that there was no
zebra cross at the accident spot.
11. To the question that as per the spot
Petitioner was crossing the road, wherein, there
was no pedestrian or zebra cross. Therefore, the contributory
negligence is attributed on the part of the Petitioner ... pedestrian or zebra cross. If the Petitioner could not crossing
the road, where there was no zebra cross or pedestrian cross,
the said road traffic
suggested the PW1 while cross
examination that she has crossed the road where there was no
zebra cross for which she has admitted the same ... However, the PW1 in her cross
examination has admitted that she was crossed the road where
there was no zebra cross. The learned counsel
cross-examination has
stated that, when he was crossing the road, there was no
pedestrian cross or zebra cross and before the accident ... dashed to the Petitioner, when
he was crossing the road, wherein, Zebra Cross and there was no
negligence on the part of the Petitioner
cross-
examination reflects that the petitioner was crossed the
road where there was no zebra cross. Thus, this Court
drawn its attention on the judgement ... whether there were any zebra crossing. So, the
claimant had crossed the road where he was not
supposed to cross certain degree of contributory
negligence
