into the following
five Zones:
i. Zone-I (AGMUT, Jammu and Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Punjab,
Rajasthan and Haryana)
ii. Zone-II (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar ... Zone-III (Gujarat, Maharashtra, Madhya
Pradesh and Chhattisgarh)
iv. Zone-IV (West Bengal, Sikkim, Assam-
Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura and Nagaland)
v. Zone-V (Telangana, Andhra
which, zones were allocated to
the candidates primarily on the basis of their permanent home address i.e. the
allocated zone was nearest to their ... zone to them on their initial appointment in the year 2005. The main
grievance of the applicants was that zone was allocated to them without
which, zones were allocated to
the candidates primarily on the basis of their permanent home address i.e. the
allocated zone was nearest to their ... zone to them on their initial appointment in the year 2005. The main
grievance of the applicants was that zone was allocated to them without
zone maintains the seniority list of Inspectors allotted to that zone. There is no
common seniority list of the Inspectors working in different zones ... seniority of Inspectors in one zone vis-d-vis Inspectors in any
other zone.
(v) After allocation of the zone, the zone of an Inspector
perpetual right to carry out vending activity in the vending
zone allocated. Provisions of Section 29 (1) are inapplicable to a stationary
vendor if temporary
zone 1 on the one hand, and
does not confer equal preference to zone 2 units in the zone 2 areas. Such
geographical allocation ... offered in Zone 1 and Zone 2 were
almost 45%: 55%, however, the ratio of units situated in Zone 1 and Zone 2
were around
particular zone for nine years or more to give their preferences for
any zone or to state exemptions, if any. It had been pointed ... portal was opened in the best interest of the officers to allocate
zones in the order of preference. But however, again, it had been stated
particular zone for nine years or more to give their preferences for
any zone or to state exemptions, if any. It had been pointed ... portal was opened in the best interest of the officers to allocate
zones in the order of preference. But however, again, it had been stated
perpetual right to carry out vending
activity in the vending zone allocated. Provisions of Section 29
(1) are inapplicable to a stationary vendor if temporary
hookah tobacco to its customers even in
the smoking zone allocated for that purpose. That the
petitioner is not entitled to take shelter
