Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 260 (0.70 seconds)

Jai Parkash vs Union Of India on 22 April, 2014

meaning thereby that the candidates having better merit were to be allocated zones as per their preference before considering the preference of candidates having lesser ... applicants came to know that their merit position was ignored while allocating zones and it resulted in allocation of choice zones to such candidates
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Priyanka Garg vs Union Of India on 20 May, 2014

principal of merit-cum-preference and declare their act of allocating zones against the rules as illegal and unjustified and accordingly set aside such orders ... against the vacancies reserved for SC/ST/OBC, were to be allocated zones strictly by following the principle of merit-cum-preference. Since some
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tamanna Rani vs Union Of India on 20 May, 2014

principal of merit-cum-preference and declare their act of allocating zones against the rules as illegal and unjustified and accordingly set aside such orders ... against the vacancies reserved for SC/ST/OBC, were to be allocated zones strictly by following the principle of merit-cum-preference. Since some
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pravesh Kumar Dabas vs Union Of India on 2 May, 2014

against the vacancies reserved for SC/ST/OBC, were to be allocated zones strictly by following the principle of merit-cum-preference. Since some ... mistake. However, this Tribunal cannot go into the exercise of actually allocating zones as per the stated principles. The respondents are, therefore, directed to reconsider
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next