Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 241 (0.66 seconds)

Nikhil Kumar vs M/O Finance on 29 March, 2016

which, zones were allocated to the candidates primarily on the basis of their permanent home address i.e. the allocated zone was nearest to their ... zone to them on their initial appointment in the year 2005. The main grievance of the applicants was that zone was allocated to them without
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manish Kumar Pintu vs M/O Finance on 29 March, 2016

which, zones were allocated to the candidates primarily on the basis of their permanent home address i.e. the allocated zone was nearest to their ... zone to them on their initial appointment in the year 2005. The main grievance of the applicants was that zone was allocated to them without
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Atul Goyal vs M/O Finance on 9 August, 2016

seeking the following reliefs :- "i) To direct the respondents to allocate the Zone to the applicant as per his merit and by following ... principal of merit-cum-preference and declare their act of allocating zones against the rules as illegal and unjustified and accordingly set aside such orders
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak vs M/O Finance on 3 October, 2016

Shillong Zone, 3rd Floor, Crescens Building, M.G. Road, Shillong-793001. 4. The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Zone, C.R. Building ... applicant joined as Inspector under the respondents on 02.09.2005 and was allocated Shillong Zone. On 01.11.2011, he submitted an application for Inter-Commissionerate transfer
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs M/O Finance on 3 June, 2016

Delhi. ... Respondents ORDER (ORAL) The applicant is aggrieved by allocation of Vadodra Zone instead of Delhi Zone. According to him, one similarly placed person Shri ... have passed order dated 08.12.2014 by which Shri Aejaz Ahmad was allocated Delhi Zone. 2. The applicant herein also submitted a representation to the respondents
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next