respondents-Zoom Airways has made a
fair submission to the effect that the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of
Zoom Airways due to some medical exigency ... have been some developments after the meeting held
and all efforts are made to explore the possibility of operation of Zoom
1
Airways CRJ200
responsible Officer of the Ministry of Civil Aviation and the
representative of Zoom Airways so as to work out a solution to the problem ... developments, serious efforts were made so as to pave way for operation of the
flights. In the process, we appreciate the desire of Zoom Airways
covered with tiles, cracks have been developed at several places.
Cracks also generated on the boundary wall of Zoom Enterprise
Ltd. adjacent to the plot
Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti & Anr vs Union Of India on 21 September, 2020
Author: Adarsh
Prius Auto Industries Ltd & Ors vs Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha on 23 December, 2016
Delhi High Court in the case of Zoom Communication Pvt. Ltd.
reported in 2010) 40 DTR (Del) 249, dated May 24, 2010 have observed ... Page 6 of 21
ITA No- 1002/Del/2014
Padmini infrastructure Developers India Ltd.
only incorrect...... that would give a license to unscrupulous assessee
Niit Foundation, New Delhi vs Cit(E), New Delhi on 27 May, 2020
INCOME TAX
name and addresses of the lenders along with
3
Shree Laxmi Developers
ITA No.7459/Mum/2014
supporting evidence to prove the identity and capacity ... profit of
Rs.50,32,743/- (Rs.28,73,874/- from Zoom Plaza and
Rs.21,58,869/- from Aurum Park) as against
Plaintiffs TV
channels.
5. The plaintiff has spent huge amount on developing and creating
the various artistic logos of the mark NOW in combination ... which is
suffixed with each of their channel title except "Zoom" and all viewers
from across the world recognize the channels as Plaintiff
Delhi High Court in the
case of CIT vs. Zoom Communication (P) Ltd 327 ITR 510 (Del). His second
limb of argument is that ... Harsh International (P)
Ltd. 431 ITR 118 (Del), CIT vs. NayanBuilders and Developers 368 ITR 722
(Del) and CIT vs. Rahul Mehta