Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Aastanaben Sattarbhai Jumabhai ... vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 24 February, 2016

Author: Sonia Gokani

Bench: Sonia Gokani

                 R/SCR.A/1084/2016                                             ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 1084 of 2016

         ==========================================================
              AASTANABEN SATTARBHAI JUMABHAI KAIYADA....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & 3....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR MM TIRMIZI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR HK PATEL, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI

                                     Date : 24/02/2016


                                      ORAL ORDER

1. This   Court   on   February   18,   2016   had   passed   the  following order :

"The   petitioner   herein   is   the   complainant  who lodged  First Information  Report on 28th  January 2016, being CR­I­15/2016 with Gondal  Police   Station,   Rajkot   for   the   offence  punishable   under   Sections   376,   344,   144   &  506   (2)   IPC   alleging   that   the   accused­ Umedbhai   Prakashbhai   Makwana,   on   giving  false   promises   to   the   petitioner­victim,  developed   physical   relation   which   made   her  pregnant.   On   25th  November   2015   also,   when  she realized that she need to get pregnancy  Page 1 of 9 HC-NIC Page 1 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/1084/2016 ORDER terminated,   by   ensuring   her   to   get   it  terminated, she was taken away from her home  and was confined for about two months. This  delay   has   resulted   into   pregnancy   having  become   of   18   weeks.   It   is   urged   by   the   petitioner   that   medical   termination   of  pregnancy is permitted, where the length of  pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks, but does not  exceed twenty weeks; subject to opinion from  the   registered   medical   practitioners   that  continuance of pregnancy would involve risk  to   the   life   of   the   pregnant   woman   or   of  grave   injury   to   her   physical   or   mental  health,   or   where   there   is   substantial   risk  that if the child is born, it would suffer   from   such   physical   or   mental   abnormalities  as to be seriously handicapped. Explanation­ I to Section 3 of the Medical Termination of   Pregnancy   Act,   1971   states   that   where   any   pregnancy is alleged by a woman to have been   caused  by  rape,  the   anguish  caused   to  such  pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a   grave   injury   to   the   mental   health   of   the  pregnant woman.  
  Having   heard   learned   advocate   Shri   MM  Tirmizi   appearing   for   the   applicant   and  learned APP Shri HK Patel appearing for the  respondent­State,   in   wake   of   decisions  rendered  by  the  Apex  Court  and  followed  by  this   Court,   in   the   considered   opinion   of  Page 2 of 9 HC-NIC Page 2 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/1084/2016 ORDER this Court, the applicant is required to be  referred   to   the   Medical   Superintendent,  Civil   Hospital,   Rajkot­respondent   no.   3  herein   and   a   detailed   medical   report   needs  to   be   called   for   before   permission   of  termination of pregnancy is acceded to. And   therefore,   the   respondent   no.3­Medical  Superintendent,   Civil   Hospital,   Rajkot   is  hereby   directed   to   cause   to   examine   the   applicant   by   a   panel   of   senior­most  Gynecologists of the Hospital. The aforesaid  team of doctors shall examine the victim on  22nd  February 2016 and after an interaction  with  her,  shall  give  in  writing   opinion  at  the   earliest,   bearing   in   mind   the   advanced  stage   of   pregnancy   and   her   physical   and   mental   condition,   whether   there   will   be   a  substantial  risk   to  her  life,  if  the  child  was   born,   or   that   the   child   would   suffer  from   such   physical   or   mental   abnormalities  as to be seriously handicapped. 
  For   the   purpose   of   examination   of   the  applicant,   as   ensured   by   her   learned  advocate,   she   should   remain   present   before  the   Medical   Superintendent,   Civil   Hospital,  Rajkot on 22nd February 2016 at 10:00 am.    A copy of this order shall be furnished  to   the   learned   advocates   appearing   for   the  respective sides for follow up action.  



                                   Page 3 of 9

HC-NIC                          Page 3 of 9      Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016
              R/SCR.A/1084/2016                                            ORDER



  Intimation of this order shall be sent  to   the   Medical   Superintendent   of   Civil  Hospital,   Rajkot  forthwith  by   the   learned  APP   Shri   HK   Patel   appearing   for   the  respondent­State. 
  Let this matter appear on 24th February   2016  with the report of the experts,  which  should be provided in a sealed cover.    Direct service permitted forthwith."

2. The   report   of   the   Head   of   the   Department,  Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, P.D.U.  Medical   College   and   Hospital,   Rajkot,   addressed  to   the   office   of   the   Public   Prosecutor,   High  Court   of   Gujarat,   Ahmedabad,   is   tendered   before  this   Court   in   a   sealed   cover,   wherein   after  thorough   assessment,   the   following   details   have  been provided :

"1.  From   her   history   and   clinical  examination   it   is   stated   that   she   is   conscious, cooperative and well oriented to  time, place and person. 
2. From   her   history   and   clinical  examination   she   is   having   4.5   months   of  amenorrhea   which   is   corresponding   to  clinically 18 to 20 weeks of pregnancy.


                                     Page 4 of 9

HC-NIC                            Page 4 of 9      Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016
          R/SCR.A/1084/2016                                             ORDER




3. She   is   referred   to   Radiologist   for   favour of Ultrasonography to know the exact  gestational age and fetal viability. As per  the   Radiologist's   opinion   Dr.Maulik   &  Dr.Jagruti   she   having   single   live   intra  uterine   fetus   with   mean   gestational   age   of   19 weeks and 3 days.
4. She   is   referred   to   Psychiatrist,  Dr.Mukesh   Patel   who   has   opined   as   follows.   As per observation she is in sound state to  take decision about her unwanted pregnancy.
5. She   is   referred   to   Physician   Dr.P.J.  Dudhrejia,   who   has   examined   her   cardio  respiratory   status   and   her   blood   reports  i.e.   Hemoglobin   Blood   group   and   urine  reports which are within normal range.
6. Hence,   considering   above   panel   of  doctors opinion it can be stated that she is  at present having pregnancy which under MTP  Act can be terminated and this may not pose  any injury to the mother or the fetus. 
7. It is advisable that since pregnancy is   19 weeks and 3 days on 22nd  of Feb 2016 she  is to be considered  urgently within 4 days   to   report   back   to   our   institute   for   the  termination   of   pregnancy   procedure   with  Page 5 of 9 HC-NIC Page 5 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/1084/2016 ORDER required   documents   and   on   consent   of   the   victim and her guardians."

3. Bearing in mind the decision rendered by the Apex  Court   in   the   case   of  Chandrakant   Jayantilal   Suthar   and   another   v.   State   of   Gujarat,  while  dealing   with   Special   Leave   to   Appeal   (Criminal)  No.6013 of 2015, arising out of Special Criminal  Application No.4255 of 2015, so also a decision  of   the   Apex   Court   in   the   case   of  Suchita   Srivastava   and   another   v.   Chandigarh   Administration,   reported   in   2009   (3)   GLH   468,  this   Court   needs   to   keep   in   mind   the   'best  interests'   test   of   the   victim.   After   careful  inquiry of the medical opinion as also bearing in  mind   the   social   circumstances   faced   by   the  victim, who is the victim of a rape, this Court's  decision is guided by the interest of the victim  rather   than   those   of   the   society   and   the  guardians of the victim.

4. Even   otherwise,   the   provisions   of   section   3   of  the   Medical   Termination   of   Pregnancy   Act,   1971  provides   for   termination   of   pregnancy   by  Page 6 of 9 HC-NIC Page 6 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/1084/2016 ORDER registered   medical   practitioners.   It   provides  that the continuance of pregnancy would involve a  risk to the life of a pregnant woman or of grave  injury to her physical or mental health, or there  is a substantial risk that if a child were born,  it   would   suffer   from   such   physical   or   mental  abnormalities   as   to   be   seriously   handicapped.  Such pregnancy as per Explanation 1 to section 3  provides that where any pregnancy is alleged by  the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape,  the   anguish   caused   by   such   pregnancy   shall   be  presumed   to   constitute   a   grave   injury   to   the  mental health of the pregnant woman, it is being  directed that the team of doctors, who has given  the   opinion   shall   on   consulting   the   petitioner  decide the termination of foetus she is carrying.  As   can   be   noted   from   the   report   that   the  termination   of   pregnancy,   according   to   the  doctors,   would   be   immediately   required   on   once  again verifying from the victim if she desires to  go   through   the   process   of   abortion   without  further waiting for any communication or order.





                                  Page 7 of 9

HC-NIC                         Page 7 of 9      Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016
                R/SCR.A/1084/2016                                            ORDER



5. The   doctors   shall   undertake   the   exercise   of  termination   of   pregnancy   forthwith.   It   is   also  further directed that the copy of this order be  forwarded   to   the   Medical   Superintendent,   Civil  Hospital,   Rajkot,   forthwith   by   the   Registry   of  this   Court   and   even   a   copy   of   this   order   be  provided   to   the   learned   Additional   Public  Prosecutor Shri H.K. Patel, for them to carry out  termination   of   pregnancy   following   all   the  scientific   practices   and   guidelines   available.  The concerned doctor is also directed to take the  sample   of   tissue   from   the   foetus   for   DNA  analysis/identification and hand over the same to  the   Investigating   Officer,   Gondal   Taluka   Police  Station,   who   in   turn   shall   forward   it   to   the  Forensic   Science   Laboratory   for   DNA   analysis/  identification   as   per   due   procedure   prescribed.  The remaining abortus also be handed over to the  Investigating   Officer,   Gondal   Taluka   Police  Station   for   carrying   out   necessary   scientific  tests. 

  Let the report be sent to this Court for  Page 8 of 9 HC-NIC Page 8 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/1084/2016 ORDER its appraisal and for knowing the well­being of  the petitioner­victim. For this limited purpose,  let the matter appear on March 01, 2016.    Direct   Service   is   permitted,  TODAY.   A  copy   of   this   order   also   be   provided   to   the  learned Additional Public Prosecutor forthwith.

(MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) Aakar Page 9 of 9 HC-NIC Page 9 of 9 Created On Sun Feb 28 03:44:31 IST 2016