Madras High Court
R.Rajesh vs The Chairman on 3 November, 2023
Author: J.Nisha Banu
Bench: J.Nisha Banu
W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.11.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023
and W.M.P.Nos.31222, 31225 & 31229 of 2023
R.Rajesh ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31593 of 2023
A. Sellamuthu ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31597 of 2023
Vellaiyammal ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31601 of 2023
Vs.
1. The Chairman
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board,
No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy,
Chennai 600032
2. State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority,
No,9, Jeenis Road,
Saidapet, Chennai 15
3. The District Collector,
Salem District,
Salem.
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No. 1 of 11
W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023
4. The Deputy Director,
Department of Geology and Mining,
Salem. ... Respondents in all W.P.s
PRAYER in W.P.No.31593 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the fourth respondent to permit the petitioner herein to carry on
quarrying operation in the land measuring 1.00.00 Hectare, comprised in
Survey No.446/1(Part), Marakkottai Village, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem
District, by issuing necessary transport permits until the date of expiry of
environmental clearance obtained from the District Level Environment Impact
Assessment Authority vide Lr.No.DEIAA-DIA/TN/MIN/18659/2018 SLM-
E.C.No.50/2018 dated 05.12.2018 i.e. 07.03.2024 without insisting
environmental clearance appraised by SEIAA.
PRAYER in W.P.No.31597 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the fourth respondent to permit the petitioner herein to carry on
quarrying operation in the land measuring 0.92.00 Hectares, comprised in
Survey No.15/2(Part) and 25/1, Pukkampatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem
District, by issuing necessary transport permits until the date of expiry of
environmental clearance obtained from the District Level Environment Impact
Assessment Authority vide Lr.No.DEIAA-DIA/TN/MIN/19137/2018-SLM-
E.C.No.71/2018 dated 07.12.2018 i.e. 07.03.2024 without insisting
environmental clearance appraised by SEIAA.
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No. 2 of 11
W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023
PRAYER in W.P.No.31601 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the fourth respondent to permit the petitioner herein to carry on
quarrying operation in the land measuring 1.00.00 Hectare, comprised in
Survey No.232(Part-4), Nadupatti Village, Kadayapatti Taluk, Salem District,
by issuing necessary transport permits until the date of expiry of
environmental clearance obtained from the District Level Environment Impact
Assessment Authority vide Lr.No.DEIAA-DIA/TN/MIN/19342/2018-SLM-
E.C.No.77/2018 dated 07.12.2018 i.e.13.09.2025 without insisting
environmental clearance appraised by SEIAA.
In all writ petitions:
For Petitioners : Mr.V.P. Senguttuvel, Senior Counsel
For Mr.P.S.Prabu
For R-1 : Mrs.Shanmugavalli Sekar
Standing Counsel
For R-2 : Mr.K.Srinivasamoorthy,
Central Government Standing Counsel
For R-3 : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu,
Additional Government Pleader
******
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.,) These Writ Petitions have been filed to direct the fourth respondent to permit the petitioners to carry on quarrying operation in their respective lands _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 3 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 by issuing necessary transport permits until the date of expiry of environmental clearance obtained from the District Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, without insisting environmental clearance appraised by SEIAA.
2. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions are one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order.
3. The petitioners herein are granted with quarrying Lease for their respective lands in Salem District. The Lease Agreements came to be executed by the third respondent in favour of the petitioners herein on 08.03.2019, 08.03.2019 and 14.09.2020 respectively for a period of ten years and Environmental Clearance (hereinafter referred to as 'EC') was granted by the District Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'DEIAA') for a period of five years, in each case, vide separate orders dated 05.12.2018, 07.12.2018 and 07.12.2018.
4. In these circumstances, the Government of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change issued an Office Memorandum, _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 4 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 dated 28.04.2023 directing the second respondent to re-appraise the EC granted by DEIAA from 15.01.2016 to 13.09.2018 within one year and a direction to DEIAA to forward all the EC granted by them to the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioners is that the second respondent has not come forward to carry out the above said exercise till date.
5. The contention of the petitioners is that without proper appreciation of the directions issued in the aforesaid Official Memorandum, the fourth respondent had arbitrarily stopped issuing transport permits to the petitioners. The petitioners have also applied before the second respondent vide separate applications on 07.08.2023, 03.08.2023 and 28.05.2023 and the same is pending consideration before the second respondent. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioners have filed the present writ petitions.
6. Heard both sides and this Court, perused all the materials placed before this Court.
7. Perusal of records show that the National Green Tribunal (Principal Bench), New Delhi, vide order dated 13.09.2018 in O.A.No.186 of 2016 in Satendra Pandey vs. Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 5 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 and another had observed that, the Ministry's Notification in S.O.141(E) dated 15.01.2016 was not in consonance with the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Deepak Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and others, and directed that the mining projects are to be re-evaluated by the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for recommendation and grant of Environmental Clearance by State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) instead of DEIAA.
8. In compliance with the above said directions, the Ministry issued an Official Memorandum, dated 12.12.2018 directing to comply with the directions of the National Green Tribunal. Subsequently, the National Green Tribunal vide its order dated 07.12.2022 in O.A.No.142 of 2022 in the matter of Jayant Kumar vs. Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change inter-alia observed that, mining leases in which environment clearance was granted by DEIAA in view of amendment notification, dated 15.01.2016 are still continuing even after passing of order dated 13.09.2018 by the Tribunal in Satendra Pandey's case (stated supra) and issuance of an Official Memorandum, dated 12.12.2018 by MoEF & EC without any re-appraisal by SEIAA and appropriate remedial action on the basis of such re-appraisal. All _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 6 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 such mining leases in which EC was granted by DEIAA need to be brought in consonance with the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Deepak Kumar's case (cited supra) and order dated 13.09.2018 by the Tribunal in Satendra Pandey's case (cited supra) by re-appraisal by SEIAA and only such mining leases can be continued which have been on re-appraisal granted environmental clearance by SEIAA.
9. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change was directed to take appropriate steps for compliance by issuance of requisite direction in exercise of the statutory powers under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Accordingly, the Ministry examined the above issue by taking into consideration the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Deepak Kumar's case (cited supra) and the National Green Tribunal order dated 07.12.2022 in O.A.No.142 of 2022, and issued an Official Memorandum dated 28.04.2023 wherein it examined all the issues and accordingly decided that all valid EC issued by the DEIAA shall be re- appraised through SEIAA/SEAC, in compliance to the order of the National Green Tribunal in O.A.No.142 of 2022 and directed that all concerned SEAC's shall re-appraise the EC issued by the DEIAA's between 15.01.2016 and _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 7 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 13.09.2018 (including both dates) and all fresh EC in this regard shall be granted only by SEIAA's based on such appraisal and also the said exercise shall be completed within a time period of one year from the date of issue of the Official Memorandum.
10. It also directed all DEIAA's to transfer all files, where EC's have been granted to the concerned SEIAA's within a time period of one month from the issuance of the Official Memorandum and also directed the State Government to assess the existing workload of SEIAA/SEAC's and send proposal for constitution of additional SEIAA/SEAC's for a specific period, to deal with such additional workload.
11. Accordingly, by the above Official Memorandum, the EC's which have been granted between 15.01.2016 and 13.09.2018 (including both dates) alone were directed to be re-appraised by the SEIAA within a period of one year and all fresh EC's issued thereafter, i.e. after 13.09.2018, has to be granted only by the concerned SEIAA's.
12. Therefore, now, it is very very clear that for the EC's granted between 15.01.2016 and 13.09.2018 (including both dates) shall only apply _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 8 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 for re-appraisal by the SEIAA's and fresh EC granted after 13.09.2018 has to be granted only by the SEIAA's.
13. Here in the present cases on hand, as the DEIAA has granted EC's on 05.12.2018, 07.12.2018 and 07.12.2018, i.e. after the cut-off dates mentioned in the Official Memorandum, dated 28.04.2023 as, 'between 15.01.2016 and 13.09.2018 (including both dates)', the said Official Memorandum will not be applicable to the petitioners herein and they necessarily have to apply only before the SEIAA. The petitioners, without getting EC from SEIAA, cannot do any quarrying operations till then. Therefore, the prayer sought for in these these writ petitions fail. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
(J.N.B, J.) (N.M, J.)
3.11.2023
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Speaking order/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
sts
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No. 9 of 11
W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023
Note: Registry is directed to issue order copy on 06.11.2023 To:
1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600032
2. State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, No,9, Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai 15
3. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
4. The Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Salem.
_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 10 of 11 W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 J. NISHA BANU, J.
and N.MALA, J.
sts Common order made in W.P.Nos.31593, 31597 & 31601 of 2023 Dated:
03.11.2023 _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 11 of 11