Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Parul Bharatkumar Modi vs Regional Passport Officer on 5 April, 2016

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

              C/SCA/4421/2016                                                                                                                                        ORDER



                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 4421 of 2016

         =============================================
                                         PARUL BHARATKUMAR MODI....Petitioner(s)
                                                        Versus
                                        REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER....Respondent(s)
         =============================================
         Appearance:
         MR.S.N.SHELAT, SENIOR ADVOCATE  for MRS VD NANAVATI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner No. 1
         =============================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI
          
                                                                       Date : 05/04/2016
          
                                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard   Mr.S.N.Shelat,   learned   senior   advocate   assisted   by   Ms.  V.D.Nanavati   learned  advocate  appearing  for   the  petitioner  and  Mr. Kshitij Amin, learned advocate for the respondent.

2. By way of the present petition filed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and  226   of   the   Constitution   of   India,   the   petitioner   has   prayed   as  under:

"[A] Your   Lordship   may   be   pleased   to   admit   and   allow   the  present petition;
 [B] Your Lordship may be pleased to issue writ in the nature of  mandamus   or   any   other   appropriate   writ,   order   or  direction   directing   the   respondent   to   process   the  application of the petitioner for grant of passport and not  to insist upon correction of the discrepancy found in the  School Leaving Certificate and Birth Certificate as regards  petitioner's surname.
 [C] Pending, hearing and / or final disposal of this petition,  this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent  authority  to  process  the  application  of the  petitioner  for  grant of passport and not to insist upon correction of the  discrepancy  found   in   the   School  Leaving   Certificate  and  Birth Certificate as regards petitioner's surname Page  1 of  3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Tue Apr 12 00:30:49 IST 2016 C/SCA/4421/2016                                                                                                                                        ORDER  [D] Any other and further relief that may be deemed fit and  proper may please be granted in the interest of justice."

3. Pursuant to notice issued by this Court, the respondent ­ authority  has filed an affidavit­in­reply dated 04.04.2016.

4. Short question in the present case is with regard to non­issuance  of passport to the petitioner on the ground of different surnames  of the petitioner mentioned in the school leaving certificate and in  the birth certificate as well as in the other documents. The correct  surname   of  the   petitioner,   prior   to  her   marriage  was  'Modi'.   In  birth certificate, name of the petitioner has also been mentioned  as   Parul   daughter   of   Ramchandra   Prabhudas   Modi.   In   Birth  certificate and Aadhar Card, correct surname of petitioner 'Modi'  has been mentioned as well as in Election Card, also surname of  the   father   of   the   petitioner   has   also   been   mentioned   as   'Modi'.  However, in School Leaving Certificate issued by C.U.Shah High  Secondary School, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, the surname of the  petitioner is mentioned as 'Banker'.

5. Mr.S.N.Shelat,   learned   senior   advocate   assisted   by   Ms.  V.D.Nanavati, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner  has  relied upon the decision in case of Cidco V. Vasudha Gorakhnath  Mandevlekar  reported   in  2009(7)  SCC  283  in   which   the   Apex  Court has held that the deaths and births register maintained by  the statutory authorities raises a presumption of correctness. He,  therefore, would submit that the authority shall not insist for any  other documents for issuing of passport to the petitioner.

6. Considering   the   above   facts   and   circumstances   and   also   the  decision   in   case   of  Cidco   V.   Vasudha   Gorakhnath   Mandevlekar  (supra), the passport authority is hereby directed to process the  application of the petitioner without insisting for correction of the  Page  2 of  3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Tue Apr 12 00:30:49 IST 2016 C/SCA/4421/2016                                                                                                                                        ORDER discrepancy   found   in   the   School   Leaving   Certificate   and   Birth  Certificate as regards surname of the petitioner. The said exercise  shall be undertaken within a period of two weeks from today. 

7. In   view   of   the   above,   the   present   petition   stands   disposed   of. 

Direct service is permitted.

(A.J.DESAI, J.)  *Kazi...

Page  3 of  3

HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Tue Apr 12 00:30:49 IST 2016