Magistrate, Patiala House
Court, New Delhi. Pursuant to the recommendation of
Justice Nanavati Commission, the Government of India
entrusted the investigation to the Central Bureau ... follow-up
action based on the recommendation of Justice Nanavati
Commission is also impermissible at this juncture; viii)
many remarks/observations made by the High
Nanavati vs State Of Maharashtra on 24 November, 1961
Equivalent citations: 1962 AIR 605, 1962 SCR SUPL. (1) 567, AIR 1962 SUPREME COURT ... Bench: S.K. Das , Raghubar Dayal
PETITIONER:
K. M. NANAVATI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
24/11/1961
BENCH:
SUBBARAO, K.
BENCH
Mahendra Manilal Nanavati vs Sushila Mahendra Nanavati on 18 March, 1964
Equivalent citations: 1965 AIR 364, 1964 SCR (7) 267, AIR 1965 SUPREME COURT ... Bench: Raghubar Dayal , N. Rajagopala Ayyangar , J.R. Mudholkar
PETITIONER:
MAHENDRA MANILAL NANAVATI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SUSHILA MAHENDRA NANAVATI
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
18/03/1964
BENCH
ground which was incorporated as paragraph 4-A in the petition. Mr. Nanavaty, the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, at the time ... support of this petition. At the commencement of his arguments, Mr. Nanavaty fomulated also five other points for our decision
Nanavati vs The State Of Bombay on 5 September, 1960
Equivalent citations: 1961 AIR 112, 1961 SCR (1) 497, AIR 1961 SUPREME COURT ... Kapur , P.B. Gajendragadkar , K.N. Wanchoo
PETITIONER:
K.M. NANAVATI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF BOMBAY
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
05/09/1960
BENCH:
SINHA
construed in relation to Standing Order 22(m), Mr. Nanavati said that the case of the respondents in that the petitioner was guilty of gross ... gross negligence ? Before we travel into this, which according to Mr. Nanavati is a forbidden field, let us clear the ground as to under what
18th December, 1989.
3. I heard at length Mr. J. R. Nanavati, senior counsel appearing with Mr. A. R. Mehta for the appellants ... learned advocate for respondents Nos. 2 and 3. The argumetns of Mr. Nanavati for the appellants have been adopted by Mr, Y. S. Lakhani
Chief Minister on
27.2.2002. On 27.4.2011, the petitioner was summoned by Justice Nanavati
and Mehta Commission of Inquiry (for short ‘Justice Nanavati Commission’)
directing ... party. While being cross-
examined by the opposition parties before Justice Nanavati Commission,
petitioner has send e-mail that the performance of the advocate
Special Civil Application No. 347 of 1968.
5. Mr. K.S. Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner Dhari Gram Panchayat formulated the following propositions ... workmen as their compulsory retirement led to the dispute.
8. Mr. Nanavati however very strenuously urged that notwithstanding the fact that at the relevant time
contrary to the dictum
of the Constitution Bench decision in K.M.Nanavati Vs. State of
Bombay : AIR 1961 SC 112. For a comprehension ... Thereafter, the Bench observed that in
K.M.Nanavati (supra), the question for consideration before the
Constitution Bench was as to whether for the period
