Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 29]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Tej Singh vs State Of H.P. And Others on 25 February, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                CWP Nos.888 to 899 of 2015
                                Decided on: February 25, 2015.




                                                        .

    1. CWP No.888 of 2015:

    Tej Singh                                ..........Petitioner.





                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.

    2. CWP No.889 of 2015:





    Sohan Singh                              ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.

    3. CWP No.890 of 2015:

    Tara Devi                                ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.



    4. CWP No.891 of 2015:

    Hari Singh                               ..........Petitioner.




                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.





    5. CWP No.892 of 2015:





    Jamana Devi                              ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.

    6. CWP No.893 of 2015:

    Om Chand                                 ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                ...........Respondents.

    7. CWP No.894 of 2015:




                                     ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:38:49 :::HCHP
                                       ...2...


    Thakur Singh                                    ..........Petitioner.
                       versus




                                                               .

    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.

    8. CWP No.895 of 2015:





    Kushma Devi                                     ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.





    9. CWP No.896 of 2015:

    Dina Nath                                       ..........Petitioner.
                       versus

    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.

    10. CWP No.897 of 2015:

    Chandermani                                     ..........Petitioner.
                       versus



    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.

    11. CWP No.898 of 2015:




    Shyam Lal                                       ..........Petitioner.
                       versus





    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.

    12. CWP No.899 of 2015:





    Mag Singh                                       ..........Petitioner.
                       versus
    State of H.P. and others.                       ...........Respondents.

    ___________________________________________________________________
    Coram
    The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
    The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?




                                            ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:38:49 :::HCHP
                                       ...3...


    For the Petitioner(s):       Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate.




                                                               .
    For the Respondents:         Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General,





                                 with M/s Romesh Verma & Anup Rattan,
                                 Addl.A.Gs. and Mr.J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G.
    ____________________________________________________________





    Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J. (Oral)

It is contended that the case of the writ petitioners is covered by the judgment of this Court, dated 5th January, 2015, passed in CWP No.9519 of 2014, titled Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, and connected matters.

2. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of with a command to the respondents to examine the cases of the writ petitioners in light of the judgment referred to above and make a decision within six weeks from today.

3. It goes without saying that in case the decision is made against the writ petitioners, they are at liberty to challenge the same.

4. Pending CMPs also stand disposed of.

Copy dasti.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.

25th February, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (Tilak) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:38:49 :::HCHP