State Bank Of India vs Ashish Kumar on 28 November, 2018

[Cites 10, Cited by 56]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

State Bank Of India vs Ashish Kumar on 28 November, 2018

Author: Sangeet Lodha

Bench: Sangeet Lodha, Dinesh Mehta

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1063/2018

1     State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
      Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2.    The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate
      Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3.    The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C-
      Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4.    The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative
      And Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5.    The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative
      And Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6.    The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
      Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellants
                              Versus
1.    Ashish Kumar S/o Shri Megha Ram Singh, Aged About 41
      Years, Kheri, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist- Churu (Raj.).
2.    Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Naresh Kumar, Aged About 20
      Years, Village Ghanau, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist- Churu (Raj.)
3.    Narpat Singh S/o Shri Surendra Singh, Aged About 28
      Years, Village Jori, Dist- Churu (Raj.).
4.    Tarachand S/o Shri Chimna Ram, Aged About 48 Years,
      Village Raiya Tunda, Tehsil Taranagar, Dist- Churu (Raj.)
5.    Randheer Singh Ruyal S/o Shri Tiku Ram Ruyal, Aged
      About 43 Years, Village Khansoli, Tehsil Churu, Dist-
      Churu (Raj.)
6.    Rajendra Tak S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
      Village Sidhmukh, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist- Churu (Raj.).
7.    Ratan Singh S/o Shri Govind Singh, Aged About 47 Years,
      R/o Village Karanpura, Tehsil Churu, Dist- Churu (Raj.)
8.    Jitendra Joshi S/o Shri Murari Lal Joshi, Aged About 22
      Years, R/o Village Sidhmukh, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist- Churu
      (Raj.).
9.    Suresh Kumar Poonia S/o Shri Surat Singh Poonia,Aged
      About 27 Years, Village Gwalisar, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist
      Churu (Raj.)
                                   (2 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


10.   Kailash Chand S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 28
      Years, Village Norangsar, Tehsil Sujangarh, Dist Churu
      (Raj.)
11.   Laxman Singh S/o Shri Ugam Singh, Aged About 36
      Years, Village Kanjan, Tehsil Rajgarh, Dist- Churu (Raj.)
12.   Shri Kishan S/o Raja Ram, Village Post Chandrakh Tehsil
      Baori, District Jodhpur.
13.   Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Jeta Ram,, B/c Jat, Basni
      Lachha Manaklav, District Jodhpur.
14.   Pemp Singh S/o Ganpat Singh, B/c Rajput, Raimalwara
      Tehsil Osian, District Jodhpur.
15.   Sarvan Puri S/o Manak Puri,, B/c Goswami, Barnow,
      Balesar District Jodhpur.
16    Mahendra Singh S/o Narayan Singh,, B/c Rajput, R/o
      Kalyan Singh Ki Seed, Tehsil Bap, District Jodhpur.
                                                 ----Respondents
                         Connected With
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1072/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Hanuman Prasad S/o Shri Budharamji Bishnoi, Aged About 38
Years, By Caste Bishnoi, R/o Bhanwar, Tehsil Sedwa, District
Barmer (Raj.)
                                                  ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1149/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
                                (3 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Sukha Ram Kumawat S/o Kesra Ram, Aged About 36 Years, B/c
Kumawat, R/o Village Post Kapuriya Tehsil Fatehgarh, District
Jaisalmer.
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1157/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Devi Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 29 Years, B/c
Rajput R/o Nawatala Jetmal, Tehsil Chouhatan, Destrict Barmer-
(Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1158/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
                                 (4 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Tulsa Ram S/o Shri Vehna Ram Meghwal, Aged About 34 Years,
B/c Meghwal, R/o Meghwalo Ki Dhani, Nakoda, Tehsil Sindhari,
District Barmer (Raj.). (B.c. Code 685660001.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1159/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Rawta Ram S/o Shri Surta Ram, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Sen,
R/o Tarla, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer.
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1160/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
                                (5 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Suresh Dhobi S/o Shri Keshar Lal Dhobi, Aged About 29 Years,
B/c Dhobi R/o C/o Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur (B.c. Code
69830001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1161/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Dhan Raj Meena S/o Shri Ramswaroop Meena, Aged About 26
Years, Aged About 26 Years, B/c Meena, R/o C/o Kanwara Ram
Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao,
District Jodhpur (B.c. Code 6A430001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1162/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
                                (6 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Mahavir Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh, Aged About 23 Years, B/c
Rajput, R/o Village Rohidi, Post Rohidi, Tehsil Gadra Road,
District Barmer (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1163/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Lekhpal Singh S/o Shri Mahipal Swaroop Singh, Aged About 32
Years, By Caste Bheel, R/o Amarawas Konra, Tehsil Chouhatan,
District- Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1164/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
                                (7 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Deepak Vaishnav S/o Shri Murlidhar Vaishnav, Aged About 29
Years, Aged About 29 Years, B/c Vaishnav, R/o C/o Kanwara
Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji Basni Lachha, Manaklao,
District Jodhpur (B.c. 6A40001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1165/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ashik Ali S/o Shri Sohrab Khan, Aged About 30 Years, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o 257, Badhe Khan Ki Dhani, Bahla, District
Jaisalmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1166/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                (8 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Padma Ram S/o Shri Kewa Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Village Post Suwada, Tehsil Ramsar, District Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1167/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ramniwas Saini S/o Shri Dharma Ram Saini, Aged About 36
Years, B/c Saini, R/o C/o Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1168/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                                   (9 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


                               Versus
Pata Ram S/o Shri Mula Ram, Aged About 29 Years, B/c Jat, R/o
Village Post Kumbhoniyon Ka Tala, Post Shreeramwala, Tehsil
Chouhatan, District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1169/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Babu Lal Gayri S/o Shri Nand Lal Gayari, Aged About 26 Years,
B/c Gayri, R/o Hanuman Chowk, Maharaj Ki Khedi, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1170/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Kachru Lal Bhagora S/o Shri Shambhu Lal Bhagora, Aged About
                                 (10 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


33 Years, B/c Bhagora, R/o Village Bhagoron Ka Kheda, Post
Roopaji Ka Khera, Tehsil Ghatol, District Banswara (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1171/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ahsan Khan S/o Shri Gandhi Khan, Aged About 35 Years, B/c
Musalman, R/o Harpaliya, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer.
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1173/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Jabbar Khan S/o Shri Abdul Khan, Aged About 41 Years, Aged
41 Years, B/c Muslim, R/o Gram Barudi, Post Bhakhapura, Tehsil
Gudamalani, District Barmer-(Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                                 (11 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1174/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Kapil Joshi S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, B/c
Joshi, R/o Village Post 621- Nehru Nagar, Chouhatan, Tehsil
Chouhatan, District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1175/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Shankar Lal Ninama S/o Shri Jadava Ninama, Aged About 37
Years, B/c Ninama, R/o Village Kanadoli Ka Pada, Post Vadagun,
Tehsil Ghatol, District Banswara (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1177/2018
                                (12 of 80)             [SAW-1063/2018]


1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                             Versus
Komal D/o Shri Radha Vallabh W/o Shri Bhartendra Pandya,
Aged About 26 Years, B/c Pandya R/o Village Post Bhuwasa,
Tehsil Ganoda, District Banswara-(Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1178/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                             Versus
Pawan Kumar Choudhary S/o Shri Chimna Ram Ji, B/c Jat R/o
Village Post Sarla Teh. Sedwa Distt. Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1185/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
                                 (13 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                              Versus
Mukesh Kumar Gamar S/o Shri Dadam Chand Gamar, Aged
About 29 Years, B/c Gamar, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur-
(Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1186/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                              Versus
Satyanarayan Salvi S/o Shri Ram Lalji Salvi, Aged About 28
Years, B/c Salvi, R/o Nimadi, Po Sarangpura, Via Kanore, Tehsil
Vallabh Nagar, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1187/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
                                   (14 of 80)         [SAW-1063/2018]


Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                               Versus
Prem Chand Khokharia S/o Shri Dub Lalji Khokhariya, Aged
About 35 Years, B/c Khokhariya, R/o Village Upli Sigri, Post Nisli
Sigri, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur (Raj.)
                                                  ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1189/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                               Versus
Virendra Parihar S/o Shri Baga Ram, Aged About 22 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Village Narnawas, Post Office Bagra, Tehsil And
District Jalore (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1190/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
                                 (15 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                              Versus
Ramesh Kumar S/o Bhala Ram, Aged About 27 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o V/p Karola, Teh. Sanchore, Distt. Jalore (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1191/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                              Versus
Ganesh Dangi S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Dangi, Aged About 45
Years, B/c Dangi , R/o Ranchhodpura , Vallabh Nagar, Tehsil
Ballabhnagar , Udaipur(Raj)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1192/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                   (16 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Sanwala Ram S/o Kheema Ram, Aged About 41 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o 94, Bavatara Sarak, Chourav, Teh. Sayala,
Districtjalore (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1193/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Basanti Lal Vadera S/o Virmalji Vadera, Aged About 35 Years,
B/c Vedera, R/o Sada, Post Nichli Sigri, Tehsil Jhadol, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1194/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                     (17 of 80)         [SAW-1063/2018]


                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Jitendra Kumar Upadhyaya S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 26
Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Village Neemdi Post Charagadiya, Tehsil
Bhinder, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1195/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Basanti Lal Kasota S/o Shri Amrit Lal Kasota, Aged About 32
Years, B/c Kasota, R/o Karel, Post Amaliya, Tehsil Jhadol, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1196/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
                                  (18 of 80)             [SAW-1063/2018]


Salauddin Qureshi S/o Suban Khan Qureshi, B/c Qureshi, R/o
1475, Kapurdhi Raipur, Tehsil Raipur, District Pali.
                                                       ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1197/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                         ----Appellant
                              Versus
Kalyan Singh S/o Shri Deravar Singh, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Rajput, R/o Village Post Gora, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer-
(Raj.).
                                                       ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1198/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                         ----Appellant
                              Versus
Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Dana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Jivaniyon Ki Dhani , Gram Post Barasan , Tehsil
Gudamalani , Dist. Barmer (Raj.)
                                 (19 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1199/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Bansi Lal Dangi S/o Shri Punaji Dangi, Aged About 29 Years, B/c
Dangi, R/o Tus Dangiyan, Dabok, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1200/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Govind Ram Parmar S/o Pratapji, Aged About 48 Years, B/c
Prajapat, R/o 382, Kumaharo Ki Seri, Doodsi, Teh And Distt.
Jalore (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1201/2018
                                  (20 of 80)         [SAW-1063/2018]


1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Prabhu Lal Sangawat S/o Shri Onkar Lal Sangawat, Aged About
45 Years, B/c Menaria, R/o VPO Menar, Tehsil Vallabh Nagar,
District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1202/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Vinod Kumar S/o Madan Lal S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 23
Years, B/c Mali , R/o Near Shiv Temple , Samdari Station ,
Samdari , Distt. Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1203/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
                                 (21 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Goverdhan Ram S/o Tulchha Ram, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Jat , R/o Village Bhinyasar , Post Rewari , Branch Fatehgarh.
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1204/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Azad Khan S/o Nathu Khan, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Muslim,
R/o V/p Ramaniya, Teh. Siwana, Distt. Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1205/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                   (22 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Babulal Jat S/o Shri Ram Narayan Jat, Aged About 26 Years,
C/o- Kawraram Choudhary, Basni Lacha, Manaklao, District
Jodhpur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1206/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Devi Lal Khardi S/o Shri Ramaji Kharadi, Aged About 43 Years,
B/c Kharadi, R/o Bhamti, Post Som, Tehsil Jhadol, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1208/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                (23 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Chaina Ram S/o Shri Moda Ramji, B/c Jat, R/o Village Siyolo Ka
Der (Ramji Ka Gol Fanta), Post Peeprali, Tehsil Gudamalani,
District Barmer.
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1209/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Dileep Kumar S/o Shri Dharma Ram, Aged About 33 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Civil Lines, Merta City, Tehsil Merta City, District
Nagaur.
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1210/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                  (24 of 80)         [SAW-1063/2018]


6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                              Versus
Kalu Singh Sarangdevot S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 40
Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Village Gopalpura, Post Charagadiya,
Tehsil Bhinder, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1211/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                              Versus
Govind Singh Sarangdevot S/o Shri Narayan Singh Sarangdevot,
Aged About 38 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o VPO Bhinder Gayatri
Nagar, Dharta Road, Tehsil Bhinder, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1212/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                 (25 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Dungar Ram, Aged About 24 Years, B/c
Regar, R/o Sindhari Chosira, Near Sbi Bank, Sindhari, District
Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1213/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Mahesh Chand Suthar S/o Shri Prem Shankar Suthar, Aged
About 27 Years, B/c Suthar, R/o Salera Kalan, Mavli, District
Udaipur- (Raj,).
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1214/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
                                  (26 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Madan Lal Salvi S/o Shri Babu Lalji Salvi, Aged About 31 Years,
B/c Salvi, R/o Salviyon Ka Mohalla, Karanpur, Tehsil Vallabh
Nagar, District Udaipur.
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1215/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Amrit Lal Yadav S/o Shri Nagji Yadav, Aged About 42 Years, B/c
Yadav, R/o V.P. Dariyati, T. Chikhli, District Dungarpur
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1216/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Manohar Lal Lohar S/o Shri Chhagan Lal Lohar, Aged About 27
Years, B/c Lohar, R/o Village Agoriya, P.o. Barodiya, Tehsil
Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur- (Raj.),
                                (27 of 80)              [SAW-1063/2018]


                                                      ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1218/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                             Versus
Prakash Chandra Vadera S/o Veshaji Vadera, Aged About 33
Years, B/c Vadera, R/o Lunnavato Ka Kheda, Tehsil Jhadol,
District Udaipur- (Raj.).
                                                      ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1219/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                             Versus
Mahesh Chand Ameta S/o Shri Durga Shankar Ameta, Aged
About   46   Years,   B/c   Ameta,    R/o   Village    Antri,   Tehsil
Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand (Raj.)
                                                      ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1220/2018
                                (28 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Mahaveer Prasad Sevak S/o Shri Dhuri Lalji Sevak, Aged About
47 Years, B/c Sevak , R/o Ward No 5 , Dev Somnath District And
Tehsil Dungarpur (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1221/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Jas Ram Gurjar S/o Shri Hari Narayan Gurjar, Aged About 25
Years, B/c Gurjar, At Present Resided At C/o Kanwara Ram
Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji , Basni Lachha , Manaklao ,
Distt. Jodhpur (B.c Code 6A340001)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1222/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
                                 (29 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ramesh Chandra S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 49 Years, B/c
Brahmin , R/o Village Garaniya , Tehsil Jaitaran , Distt. Pali
(Raj.) (B.c. Code 6900001)
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1223/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ridmal Singh S/o Shri Heer Singh, B/c Sodha, R/o Village Prem
Singh Ki Dhani (Chohtan), Post Chohtan , Tehsil Chohtan , Distt.
Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1224/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
                                (30 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ram Gopal S/o Shri Bheru Lal Meghwal, Aged About 32 Years,
B/c Meghwal , R/o C/o Kanwara Ram Choudhary , S/o Shri Jaita
Ram Ji , Basni Lachha, Manaklao , Distt. Jodhpur B.c. Code
6C230001
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1225/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Gulaba Ram S/o Shri Chhatra Ram, Aged About 34 Years, B/c
Saragra, R/o V/p Ghana, Teh. Ahore, Distt. Jalore (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1226/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
                                (31 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Deepa Ram S/o Shri Bijla Ram, Aged About 36 Years, B/c
Meghwal , Nayapura , R/o Village Post Padroo, Tehsil Siwana ,
Dist. Barmer (Raj.)
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1227/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
1. Idan Ram S/o Shri Jetha Ram, Aged About 31 Years, B/c Jat,
R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary, S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni
Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
2. Dhanraj Meena S/o Ganga Ram Meena, Aged About 45 Years,
B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
3. Kuldeep Singh S/o Baldev Singh, Aged About 31 Years, B/c
Sikh, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary, S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
4. Suraj Singh S/o Birdhi Lal, Aged About 33 Years, B/c Jat, R/o
C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni
Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
                                (32 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


5. Manish Kumar Shakyawal S/o Pooran Mal, Aged About 29
Years, B/c Koli, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
6. Chandramohan Meena S/o Tola Ram, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary, S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni
Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
7. Hari Mohan S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 32 Years, B/c
Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
8. Chandra Mohan S/o Narayan Lal, Aged About 30 Years, B/c
Kuswah, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
9. Ram Babu Yadav S/o Balkishan Yadav, Aged About 27 Years,
B/c Aheer, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
10. Girish Prasad Meena S/o Nand Bihari, Aged About 28 Years,
B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
11. Deepak Soni S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 29 Years, B/c
Soni, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
12. Uddhav Galav S/o Bhagirath, Aged About 29 Years, B/c
Galav, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur
13. Dhanraj Malav S/o Rampratap Malav, Aged About 32 Years,
B/c Malav, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
14. Naveen Kumar Galav S/o Jai Shankar Galav, Aged About 30
Years, B/c Galav, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
15. Umar Farook S/o Abdul Samad, Aged About 34 Years, B/c
Muslim, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
16. Giriraj Prasad S/o Mangi Lal Meghwal, Aged About 28 Years,
B/c Meghwal, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
17. Devi Shankar Meena S/o Ram Karan Meena, Aged About 34
Years, B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
18. Manmohan Kapoor S/o Chandra Prakash Kapoor, Aged About
27 Years, B/c Kapoor, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o
Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
19. Arvind Kumar Prajapati S/o Jugal Kishore, Aged About 25
                                (33 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Years, B/c Prajapati, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
20. Irshad Mohammed S/o Mumtaj Mohammed, Aged About 36
Years, B/c Muslim, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
21. Vijay Raj Meena S/o Bansheedhar Meena, Aged About 30
Years, B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
22. Ram Kalyan Lodha S/o Shri Durga Lal, Aged About 38 Years,
B/c Lodha, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
23. Lalit Rathore S/o Ramdayal Rathore, Aged About 26 Years,
B/c Rathore, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
24. Lekhraj Meena S/o Murlidhar, Aged About 38 Years, B/c
Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
25. Purshottam Sharma S/o Radhaballabh, Aged About 50
Years, B/c Sharm, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri
Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur
26. Jitendra Kumar Sen S/o Kalyan Singh Sen, Aged About 32
Years, B/c Sen, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
27. Gajanand Ojha S/o Kalyan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, B/c
Ojha, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
28. Raja Ram Meena S/o Ram Nath, Aged About 33 Years, B/c
Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
29. Pradeep Suman S/o Heera Lal Suman, Aged About 22 Years,
B/c Suman, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
30. Kamal Singh Meena S/o Shri Ramgopal Meena, Aged About
26 Years, B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o
Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
31. Bhura Lal Meena S/o Dhanalal Meena, Aged About 31 Years,
B/c Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
32. Narendra Carpenter S/o Hari Shankar, Aged About 29 Years,
B/c Carpenter, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita
Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
33. Lokesh Meena S/o Nandlal Meena, Aged About 26 Years, B/c
Meena, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
                                 (34 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
34. Prahalad Nagar S/o Radhakishan, Aged About 34 Years, B/c
Dhakad, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
35. Mahendra Singh S/o Kedar Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
House No. 15, Jarda Bazar, Pali (Raj.).
36. Surendra Nagar S/o Bhagchand, Aged About 23 Years, B/c
Dhakad, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
37. Heera Ram Choudhary S/o Samratha Ram Choudhary, Aged
About 43 Years, B/c Choudhary, R/o Jelatra Tehsil Sanchore,
District Jalore (Raj.).
38. Prahalad Raj Sharma S/o Kasi Ram, Aged About 51 Years,
C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary, S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni
Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
39. Narayanram S/o Kesha Ram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o C/o:
Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha,
Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
40. Ishak Khan S/o Sadik Khan, Aged About 29 Years, B/c
Muslim, R/o C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
41. Sumer Singh S/o Madho Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
C/o: Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni
Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
                                                 ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1228/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                              Versus
Babu Singh S/o Shri Sati Dan Singh, B/c Rajput, R/o Gohad Ka
                                 (35 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


Tala, Tehsil Chouhatan, District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1229/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Bagda Ram S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 40 Years, B/c
Mali, R/o Village Bera Luyat, Agewa Road, Tehsil Jaitaran,
District Pali (Raj.) (Bc Code 66870001)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1230/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Megh Raj Ninama S/o Shri Moti Lalji Bheel, Aged About 25
Years, B/c Bheel, R/o Village Padoli Gordhan, District Banswara
(Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                                 (36 of 80)             [SAW-1063/2018]


               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1231/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ramesh Ahari S/o Shri Prabhu Lalji, Aged About 34 Years, B/c
Ahari, R/o Gorchha, Post Bhungra, Tehsil Ghatol, District
Banswara (Raj.)
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1232/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                             Versus
Deva Ram S/o Shri Dana Ram, Aged About 59 Years, B/c
Kumawat, R/o 436- Maru Kumaro Ka Bas, Village Manihari,
Tehsil And District Pali (Raj.) (B.c. Code 67190001)
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1233/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
                                   (37 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Bapu Lal Meena S/o Shri Nathu Lal Meena, Aged About 27 Years,
B/c Meena, R/o Village Post Raipur Jungle, Tehsil Arnod, District
Pratapgarh- (Raj.) (Bc Code 67570001)
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1237/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Baluram Gurjar S/o Shri Kishan Lal Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years,
B/c Gurjar, R/o Village Bokhada, Tehsil Gogunda, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1238/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
                                  (38 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Dinesh Teli S/o Shri Nand Lal Teli, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Teli,
R/o Village Sindu, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1239/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Sanwarmal Saini S/o Shri Jagdev Saini, B/c Saini, R/o C/o
Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha,
Manaklao, District Joddhpur.
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1240/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                 (39 of 80)              [SAW-1063/2018]


4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                              Versus
Laxman Ram S/o Shri Gepar Ram, Aged About 39 Years, B/c
Kumawat, R/o Bera Muliyawali, Village Post Khinawari, Tehsil
Jaitaran, District- Pali (Raj.) (B.c. Colde 6C290001)
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1241/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                              Versus
Prakash Chand Meena S/o Shri Devanand Meena, Aged About 34
Years, B/c Meena, R/o Village Haregja Ka Khera, Post Roopji Ka
Khera, Tehsil Ghatol, District Banswara (Raj.)
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1242/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                 (40 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Gopal Lal Sain S/o Shri Ram Prasad Sain, Aged About 34 Years,
B/c Sain, R/o C/o Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji,
Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur.
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1243/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                             Versus
Padam Singh S/o Shri Bakhtawar Singh, Aged About 40 Years,
B/c Rajput, R/o Jalila, Sedwa, District Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1244/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
                                   (41 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Madan Raj S/o Shri Basara Ram, Aged About 39 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Village Post Ramsar, Tehsil Ramsar, District
Barmer-(Raj.)
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1245/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Lalit Patel S/o Shri Rup Lal Patel, Aged About 23 Years, B/a
Patel, R/o 123, Near Jain Mandir, Seepur, Tehsil Semari, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1246/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                                (42 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


                             Versus
Harchand Ram S/o Shri Merama Ram, B/c Meghwal, R/o VPO
Loonwa Jagir Teh. Guda Malani, Distt. Barmer.
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1247/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Khabar Khan Dhareja S/o Shri Kabool Khan, Aged About 40
Years, B/c Musalman, R/o Village Poonjasar, Tehsil Chouhtan,
District Barmer (Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1248/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Shiv Pratap Joshi S/o Shri Anand Lal Ji Joshi, Aged About 32
Years, B/c Brahmin , R/o Village Post Chhapi ,tehsil And Distt.
                                (43 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Dungarpur (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1249/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Shri Mohan Lal Jain, Aged About 23
Years, B/c Jain, At Present Resided At C/o Kanwara Ram
Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao,
District Jodhpur (B.c. Code 6A360001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1250/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Man Singh Meena S/o Shri Bharat Lal Meena, Aged About 29
Years, B/c Meena, At Present Resided At C/o Kanwara Ram
Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao,
                                (44 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


District Jodhpur (B.c. Code 6A350001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1251/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Bal Singh S/o Shri Sang Singh, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Rajput, R/o Gumane Ka Tala, Tehsil Chouhatan, District Barmer
(Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1252/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Lal Chand Ninama S/o Shri Bhemaji Ninama, B/c Ninama, R/o
Village Muthiya, P.o. Vadgun, Tehsil Ghatol, District Banswara
(Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                                  (45 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1253/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Hazrat Ali S/o Shri Noor Mohammed, Aged About 26 Years, B/c
Musalman, R/o Village Post Binjasar, Tehsil Chouhatan, District
Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1254/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Jagdish Chander Nai S/o Shri Dhulji Nai, Aged About 38 Years,
B/c Nai, R/o Ward No. 1, Khichadiya Fala, Paddra, Sagwara,
District Dungarpur (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1255/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
                                (46 of 80)            [SAW-1063/2018]


Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                             Versus
Heera Ram S/o Shri Naru Ramji, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Meghwal,    R/o   Bhimwas,   Post     Ramjan   Ki   Gafan,   Tehsil
Chouhatan, District Barner (Raj.)
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1256/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                             Versus
Banshi Lal Meghwal S/o Shri Takhta Ram Meghwal, Aged About
51 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Villlage Post Karda, Tehsil Gogunda,
District Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1257/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
                                   (47 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Ratan Singh Rajput S/o Shri Babu Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
B/c Rajput, R/o Village And Post Varda, Tehsil Badgaon, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1258/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Kalulal Patel (Dangi) S/o Shri Punja Ji Patel (Dangi), Aged About
32 Years, B/c Patel , R/o Nimboda , Tehsil Sarada , Distt.
Udaipur (Raj.)
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1259/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
                                  (48 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Pancha Ram S/o Shri Sagta Ramji, Aged About 28 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Village Post Bhojariya, Tehsil Chouhatan, District
Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1260/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Bhagwati Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Pratap Singh Chouhan, Aged
About 33 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Village Rathoron Ka Semaliya,
Post Khunta, Tehsil Dhariyawad, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1261/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
                                  (49 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                               Versus
Jagdish Kumar S/o Shri Jawana Ram, B/c Meghwal, R/o Village
Sindhasawa    Harniyan,   Post    Sindhasawa     Harniyan,   Tehsil
Gudamalani, District Barmer.
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1262/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                               Versus
Ramchandra Nai S/o Shri Ghamanda Ram Nai, Aged About 40
Years, B/c Nai, R/o Gangasara, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer.
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1263/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                (50 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Inayatullah Khan S/o Shri Meer Khan, Aged About 26 Years, B/c
Muslim , R/o Village Post Meethe Ka Tala, Tehsil Chouhatan ,
District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1264/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Kesha Ram S/o Shri Purkha Ram, Aged About 44 Years, B/c
Vishnoi, R/o Vishnoiyon Ki Dhani, Bodha, Sedwa, District Barmer
(Raj.).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1265/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                   (51 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Aditya Kumawat S/o Shri Deepakji Kumawat, B/c Kumawat, R/o
Ward No. 03, Bus Stand, Arnod, District Pratapgarh. (Raj.)
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1266/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
Khuma Lal S/o Shri Dauji Meghwal, Aged About 37 Years, B/c
Meghwal, R/o Village Post Bagdunda, Tehsil Gogunda, District
Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                   ----Respondent
                  D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1267/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                       ----Appellant
                               Versus
                                  (52 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Bhanwari Devi S/o Shri Lichhanman Ram, Aged About 25 Years,
B/c Jat, R/o Dioniyon Ki Dhani , Rateu , Tehsil Baitu , Distt.
Barmer (Raj.)
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1268/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Navab Khan S/o Shri Sajjan Khan, Aged About 25 Years, B/c
Muslin, R/o Village Post Agasadi, Tehsil Gadra Road, District
Barmer (Raj.).
                                                  ----Respondent
                 D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1269/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
Kamal Kishore Parmar S/o Shri Phool Shankar Parmar, Aged
About 38 Years, B/c Parmar , R/o Vill. Kanpura, Badhana , Tehsil
                                   (53 of 80)        [SAW-1063/2018]


Ghatol , Distt. Banswara (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1270/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Lalu Ram Meena S/o Shri Heera Lalji Meena, Aged About 27
Years, B/c Meena, R/o Village Post Mandvi , Tehsil Dhariyawad ,
Distt. Pratapgarh (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1271/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Ishwar Singh S/o Shri Bheem Singh, Aged About 27 Years, B/c
Rajput , R/o Kelnor, Village Post Kelnor , Tehsil Chouhatan ,
Distt. Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
                                   (54 of 80)              [SAW-1063/2018]


               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1274/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                          ----Appellant
                                Versus
Narayan Lal Patel
                                                        ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1275/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                          ----Appellant
                                Versus
Shanti Lal Meena S/o Shri Rup Lal Meena, Aged About 30 Years,
B/c   Meena,   R/o    Village   Hingladh,      Tehsil   Arnod,   District
Pratapgarh- (Raj.). (Bc Code 67560001)
                                                        ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1393/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
                                  (55 of 80)             [SAW-1063/2018]


Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                              Versus
Mansingh Meena S/o Shri Bharat Lal Meena, Aged About 29
Years, B/c Meena, At Present Resided At C/o Kanwara Ram
Choudhary S/o Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao,
District Jodhpur (B.c. Code 6A350001).
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1394/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                              Versus
Vikram Singh S/o Shri Bhom Singhji, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Village Binjwariya, Tehsil Tinwari, District Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1399/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
                                  (56 of 80)         [SAW-1063/2018]


Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                               Versus
Kushala Ram S/o Shri Kharta Ram, Aged About 41 Years, B/c
Jat, R/o Near Vodaphone Tower, Baitu Bhopji, Tehsil Baitu,
District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1400/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                               Versus
Jasvindar Choudhary S/o Shri Taja Ram Choudhary, Aged About
28 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Village Post Kharda Bharat Singh, Tehsil
Gida, District Barmer (Raj.)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1454/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
                                 (57 of 80)          [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Sohan Singh S/o Puran Singh, Aged About 43 Years, B/c Rawat,
Resident Of Khokhato Ka Badiya, Panchanpura Tehsil Raipur,
District Pali (Raj.), (Bc Id Code 6B790001)
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1460/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Appellant
                             Versus
Puran Singh S/o Shri Babu Singh, Aged About 44 Years, B/c
Rajput, R/o Village Post Balana, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali
(Raj.). (Bc Id Code No. 69620001).
                                                 ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1461/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
                                 (58 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                              Versus
Mahendra Singh S/o Chhagan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, B/c
Rajpurohit, R/o Village Siner, Tehsil Sivana, District Barmer
(Raj.). (Bc Id Code No. 68860001)
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1462/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                     ----Appellant
                              Versus
Oma Ram Patel S/o Budha Ram Patel, Aged About 31 Years, B/c
Patel, R/o VPO Kalali, Tehsil Rohat, District Pali (Raj.). (Bc Code
6A640001).
                                                   ----Respondent
               D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1463/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
                                    (59 of 80)           [SAW-1063/2018]


Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                               Versus
Gopi Lal Kumawat S/o Shri Mangi Lal Kumawat, Aged About 41
Years, B/c Kumawat Resident Of Village Narayan Ganj, Oda, Post
Chowkdi,    Tehsil    Railmagra,   District-    Rajsamand   (Bc   Code
68610001)
                                                      ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1464/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                        ----Appellant
                               Versus
Shankar Saini S/o Shri Shiv Raj Saini, Aged About 23 Years, B/c
Mali, At Present Resided At C/o Kanwara Ram Choudhary S/o
Shri Jaita Ramji, Basni Lachha, Manaklao, District Jodhpur (Bc
Code 6A630001)
                                                      ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1465/2018
1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
Navy Mumbai, 400614.
3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
                                  (60 of 80)              [SAW-1063/2018]


 Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                         ----Appellant
                               Versus
 Rajkumar Bomb S/o Shri Sundar Lal Bomb, Aged About 36
 Years, R/o Rawaliya Kalan, Tehsil Gogunda, District Udaipur,
 (Raj.)
                                                    ----Respondent
                D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1467/2018
 1. State Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman, Corporate
 Centre, Navy Mumbai, 400614.
 2. The Chief General Manager, (FI And MF) Corporate Centre,
 Navy Mumbai, 400614.
 3. The General Manager, (F.I.) State Bank Of India, C- Scheme,
 Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
 4. The Deputy General Manager, (Outreach) Administrative And
 Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
 5. The Deputy General Manager, (B And O) Administrative And
 Business Office, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
 6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank Of India, A-3,
 Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.
                                                         ----Appellant
                               Versus
 Dhanna Ram S/o Shari Amara Ramji, Aged About 51 Years, B/c
 Kumhar, R/o Jetiwas, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur.
                                                    ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)        :   Mr. R.N.Mathur, Sr.Advocate assisted
                            by Mr.Sridhar Mehta & Mr. Chayan
                            Bothra
For Respondent(s)       :   Mr. Ravi Bhansali, Sr.Advocate
                            assisted by Mr.Sukesh Bhati



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment Per Hon'ble Mr.Sangeet Lodha,J.



28th November, 2018
                                  (61 of 80)             [SAW-1063/2018]

1. These special appeals are directed against judgments dated 31.5.18/1.6.18/20.6.18 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court, whereby the writ petitions preferred by the respondents questioning the action of the appellants in corporatization of Individual Business Correspondents (BCs) have been allowed and the appellants herein are directed to continue the respondents as BCs directly with the appellant-Bank and not to terminate their services so as to replace them by another set of contractual employees or Corporate Business Correspondents, unless there is a performance deficit on their part.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that with an aim and object to promote and provide banking services to the customers at the remote areas of villages, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) permitted scheduled commercial banks including Regional Rural Banks and Local Area Banks to engage BCs subject to the compliance of the guidelines issued in this regard. Vide circular dated 28.9.10, RBI decided to permit banks to engage companies registered under the Companies Act,1956, excluding Non Banking Financial Companies as BCs in addition to the individuals/entities permitted earlier.

3. As per the circular issued, banks were permitted to formulate a policy for engaging BCs with the approval of Board of Directors. The banks were directed to carry out due diligence exercise on the individuals/entities to be engaged as BCs prior to engagement, inter alia covering the aspects such as (i) reputation/market standing (ii) financial soundness (iii) management and corporate governance (iv) cash handling ability and (v) ability to implement technology solutions in rendering financial services.

(62 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018]

4. The individuals/entities eligible to be engaged as BC were specified under clause 2 of the Guidelines as under:

"The banks may engage the following individuals/entities as BC .

i) Individuals like retired bank employees, retired teachers, retired government employees and ex-

servicemen, Individual owners of kirana/medical/Fair Price Shops, individual Public Call Office (PCO) operators, agents of Small Saving schemes of Government of India/Insurance Companies, individuals who own Petrol Pumps, authorized functionaries of well run Self Help Groups (SHGs) which are linked to banks, any other individual including those operating Common Service Centres (CSCs);

ii) NGOs/MFIs set up under Societies/Trust Acts and Section 25 Companies;

iii) Cooperative Societies registered under Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Acts/Cooperative Societies Acts of States/Multi State Cooperative Societies Act;

iv) Post Offices and

v) Companies registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 with large and widespread retail outlets excluding Non Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)."

5. The scope of activities for which the BCs were permitted to be engaged were delineated under clause 4 of the Guidelines as under:

"The scope of activities may include (i) identification of borrowers; (ii) collection and preliminary processing of loan applications including verification of primary information/ data; (iii) creating awareness about savings and other products and education and advice on managing money and debt counselling; (iv) processing and submission of applications to banks; (v) promoting, nurturing and monitoring of Self Help Groups/Joint Liability Groups/Credit Groups/others; (vi) post-sanction monitoring, (vii) follow up for recovery; (viii) disbursal of small value credit; (ix) recovery of principal/ collection of interest; (x) collection of small value deposits;(xi) sale of micro insurance/mutual fund products/pension products/other third part products and (xii) receipt and delivery of small value remittances/ other payment instruments."

6. The role of the BCs was intended to be an intermediary of the bank which will bring in the advantage of its outreach through (63 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] its existing network to offer banking services to the society. The BCs engaged were permitted to appoint/have employees/contact workers, members agents etc. for rendering services as defined hereinabove. It was responsibility of the BCs to ensure that Member carries out activities as per the procedure laid down. The BCs were to be paid reasonable commission/fee, the rate and quantum of which was to be reviewed periodically.

7. Pursuant to the Circulars/Guidelines issued by the RBI, the State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (SBBJ) issued an advertisement for engaging BCs which are also known as Service Provider (SP) and Bank Mitra. The respondents who were interested in providing such services, applied for engagement as BCs/SPs. After scrutiny of the applications, an interview was conducted and thereafter, after due verification of documents, they were selected for engagement as BCs.

8. The SBBJ entered into an agreement with each of the respondents separately to take their services as BC, referred to in the agreement executed as SP. The agreement entered into between the concerned candidate and the appellant Bank provides for various details including scope of services, the duties of SP, maintenance of record by SP and monitoring/inspection by the bank, confidentiality, relationship of the parties, payments, terminations and other relevant aspects.

9. Clause 4 of the agreement deals with relationship between the parties, which reads as under:

"4.1 It is specifically agreed that the SP shall act as independent service provider and shall not be deemed to be the Agent of the Bank except in respect of the transactions/services which give rise to Principal Agent relationship by implication.

(64 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] 4.2 SP shall not hold out or represent himself/herself as agent or employee of the Bank. The SP shall not be entitled to claim permanent absorption or any other claim or benefit against the Bank. The relation is on principal-to-principal basis. The SP is not entitled to engage any person as his/her employee, agent, representative or sub-contractor. He/She shall perform all the work of the Business Correspondent (BC) under this agreement himself/herself.

4.3 The SP shall not be eligible to raise any industrial dispute either directly or indirectly against the Bank in respect of condition of service, engagement or employment etc. It is made clear that there shall not be any employer- employee, principal-agent and/or master-servant relation between SP and the Bank."

10. Inter alia the SBBJ which engaged the respondents as BCs was merged in State Bank of India (SBI) vide notification dated 1.4.17. Accordingly, an undertaking was obtained by SBI from the respondents to the effect that after merger, they undertake to work in SBI as BC, on the same terms and conditions regarding fee, remuneration structure etc. as applicable in SBI.

11. While consolidation exercise of Associate Banks with the SBI was in progress, vide circular dated 12.4.17 issued by SBI, it was decided that Customer Service Points (for short 'CSP') of well established National BCs should only be engaged henceforth and in exceptional cases individual BCs can be engaged on the case to case basis with the prior approval from the Circle Management Committee. Vide circular dated 18.5.17 regarding existing individual BCs, the Administrative and Business Office were requested to carry out detailed review immediately and explore the feasibility of converting them as CSPs of National BCs. Vide yet another circular dated 19.5.17 issued by the SBI in order to further strengthen the process of engagement of individual BCs, the existing instructions on engaging individual BCs were (65 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] modified. It was provided that selection of individual BCs in future shall be done by Selection Committee at Corporate Centre. That apart, in respect of renewal of existing individual BCs, it was provided that the Circles should review the performance of individual BCs and arrange to re-engage them as CSPs of corporate BCs before 31st October, 2017.

12. Aggrieved by the aforesaid circulars dated 12.4.17 and 19.5.17, the respondents Nitin Kumar and others, in all 68 in number, preferred a writ petition being S.B.C.Writ Petition No.6462/17 before this court, claiming the reliefs as under:

"(a) The respondents may be directed to continue the petitioners on the post of Business Correspondent (BC) directly as are/were continuing for last many years and

(b) The respondents may be directed not to terminate the services of the petitioners so as to replace contractual employees by other set of employees.

(c) The order dated 18.05.2017 & 19.05.2017 Annex-11 providing for getting the services of the petitioners through private contractor/placement agency/corporate companies may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(d) That the costs of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.

(e) That any other appropriate writ or order or direction which is favourable to the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted to the petitioner."

13. During the pendency of the said petition, vide circular dated 17.10.17 issued by the SBI, the aforesaid e-circulars dated 12.4.17 and 19.5.17 were withdrawn and therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners in the writ petition referred supra regarding withdrawal of their existing engagement did not survive. However, the petitioners therein insisted for the reliefs (a) & (b) referred supra. The learned Single Judge of this court opined that for the above two reliefs, no writ can be issued granting such (66 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] declaration and the petitioners should approach the appropriate forum/authority in accordance with law for declaration sought by them and accordingly, the writ petition preferred was dismissed vide order dated 16.11.17, as having become infructuous.

14. After dismissal of the writ petition as aforesaid, the SBI issued a circular dated 16.2.18, enforcing its decision regarding corporatization of individual BCs and accordingly, it was clarified that National BCs have been asked to provide CSPs at the locations where individual BCs were working, whose codes were being deactivated on expiry of their agreements. It was further directed that erstwhile/existing individual BC, who may be willing to work as CSP of National BCs, the benefit of their existing business may be passed on to his new code.

15. In these circumstances, aggrieved by the insistence of the appellants for engagement of individual BCs as CSP of National BCs, the respondents including the individuals, those whose earlier writ petition was dismissed by this Court as aforesaid, filed fresh petitions claiming the relief as under :

"(a) The respondents may be directed to continue the petitioners on the post of Business Correspondent (BC) directly as are/were continuing for last many years, and

(b) The respondents may be directed not to terminate the services of the petitioners so as to replace contractual employees by other set of employees.

(c) The action of the Respondents in corporatization of individual business correspondents may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(d) That the costs of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.

(e) That any other appropriate writ or order or direction which is favourable to the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted to the petitioner."

(67 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018]

16. The respondents contended before the learned Single Judge that under RBI Notification/Guidelines the engagement of individual BCs has not been discontinued and therefore, the action of the appellants herein, in disengaging/terminating existing individual BCs and insisting for their corporatization is illegal and arbitrary. It was contended that the respondents were rendering their services for last so many years with dedication and loyalty, to the utmost satisfaction of the appellants and they have invested their hard money and valuable time only with legitimate expectation that their services shall continue directly with the appellants. Relying upon various decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it was contended that one set of contractual employees cannot be replaced by another set of contractual employees and thus, the action of the appellants in disengaging individual BCs and insisting their engagement through National BCs is per se illegal. The respondents contended that the decision of the appellants would frustrate the very purpose of the Scheme introduced by RBI to extend/outreach the banking facility to the rural folk, while giving attention on individual/family basis, which could not be catered in appropriate manner by corporate entities.

Precisely, the respondents contended that the action of SBI in indulging in corporatization of individual BCs runs contrary to the Guidelines issued by the RBI from time to time.

17. On behalf of the appellant Bank, it was contended before the learned Single Judge that the respondents herein, have indulged in mis-statement and concealment of material facts in not disclosing the factum of dismissal of earlier writ petition preferred by them claiming the similar reliefs, by the learned Single Judge of this court, vide order dated 16.11.17. It was contended that the (68 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] agreement entered into between the parties contains arbitration clause and thus, for the resolution of the dispute raised, the respondents were under an obligation to invoke the arbitration clause in the contract and the writ petition preferred was not maintainable. According to the appellants there was no master and servant relationship existed between the parties and the contract for service entered into between the parties having come to an end, could not be directed to be continued. The appellants contended that the Guidelines issued by the RBI permitting Banks to engage BCs cannot be enforced and thus, discontinuation of the individual BCs on expiry of the agreement entered into between the parties, cannot be faulted with. It was contended that by virtue of provisions of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the specific performance of the contract cannot be enforced where compensation can be an adequate relief, which arises only when there is challenged to the termination/cancellation of the contract.

18. After due consideration of the rival submissions, the learned Single Judge opined that the earlier writ petition preferred by the respondents was dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate remedies against the future actions putting their arrangement to peril, in accordance with law and thus, in absence of adjudication on merits, the same cannot operate as res judicata. Learned Single Judge observed that the question pertains to livelihood of the respondents herein and thus, their right to agitate the action, diminishing their rights protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be denied and they are entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction. Taking into consideration, the terms and conditions of the engagement of the respondents as BCs and the procedure adopted for their (69 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] engagement, which includes issuance of advertisement, eligibility criteria etc., the learned Single Judge opined that there exists employer and employee relationship between the BCs and the Bank. The learned Single Judge observed that eligibility of individual like retired persons, owner of kirana stores, medical/fair price shops would not have any effect on the nature of work performed by the respondents being the contractual appointees. Relying upon the decisions cited at Bar, learned Single Judge opined that one set of contractual employees cannot be replaced by another set of contractual employees unless their conduct and performance is under the cloud. The learned Single Judge opined that such contractual employee could be replaced by regularly selected employees by the employer and further, if the scheme or project, in which, such employees are working itself comes to an end. Learned Single Judge arrived at the conclusion that the placement of the individual BCs under the corporates would expose them to exploitative tendencies of a corporate entity, particularly in the light of the fact that the corporate entity would not have any stake in the institution and thus, the institutional welfare of its employees would never be its prerogative. Accordingly, while allowing the writ petitions preferred by the respondents, they have been extended the relief as indicated above. Hence, these appeals.

19. Mr. R.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants contended that the learned Single Judge has seriously erred in holding that the earlier writ petition preferred by the respondents was not adjudicated on merits and therefore, the order passed therein cannot operate as res judicata. Drawing the attention of the Court to the order dated 16.11.17 (70 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B.C.Writ Petition No.6462/17, learned counsel submitted that the identical reliefs claimed by the respondents in the earlier writ petition were specifically noticed by the learned Single Judge and the respondents were non suited observing that in respect of those reliefs, no writ can be issued and the petitioners should approach the appropriate forum/authority in accordance with law for declaration sought by them. Learned counsel would submit that the claim of the respondents that their services may not be terminated having not been entertained by the learned Single Judge, the fresh writ petitions filed claiming the identical reliefs, were obviously barred by principle of res judicata.

20. Learned senior counsel submitted that after merger of SBBJ in SBI, pursuant to the undertaking given, the respondents entered into fresh agreement with the appellant SBI, which was to remain in force for the specified term and therefore, the respondents cannot claim the renewal of the agreement as a matter of right. Drawing the attention of the court to clause 4 of the agreement, which provides for relationship between the parties, learned senior counsel submitted that the SPs engaged as an independent service provider were never intended to be agent of the Bank except in respect of transactions/services which give rise to Principal Agent relationship by implication. It was specifically agreed upon that the SP engaged shall never hold out or represent himself/herself as agent or employee of the Bank. Learned counsel referred to clause 6 of the agreement to show that the SPs engaged were to be paid fees and commission and not the salary, as contended on behalf of the respondents. Drawing the attention of the court to clause 8 of the agreement, (71 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] learned Senior Counsel pointed out that bank as well as the concerned Service Provider were entitled to terminate the agreement by giving one month's notice in writing. Learned counsel submitted that the process adopted for selection of SPs in no manner can be equated with the regular selection process adopted by the Bank for regular recruitment of the posts in the cadre and thus, the contention of the respondents before the learned Single Judge that they have been engaged after due process of selection, is absolutely misconceived. Learned counsel submitted that without examining the issue whether the respondents have been at all engaged by the Bank as contractual employee and there exists master and servant relationship between them, the learned Single Judge while assuming them to be contractual employees proceeded to hold that one set of contractual employees cannot be replaced by another set of contractual employees unless their conduct and performance is under cloud. Learned counsel would submit that none of the respondents were recruited against any cadred post and thus, the view taken by the learned Single Judge that contractual employee could be replaced by only regularly selected employees by the employer, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, is ex facie erroneous. Learned counsel submitted that the SBI is not under an obligation to follow earlier system adopted by the SBBJ in engaging BCs and thus, the policy decision taken to ask National BCs for providing CSPs at the location where individual BCs were engaged, cannot be faulted with. Learned counsel submitted that taking into consideration the interest of the existing BCs, it is specifically provided that if they are willing to work as CSP of National BCs, they may do so and in that event, (72 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] their existing business shall be passed to their new code and thus, no prejudice whatsoever is likely to be caused to the existing BCs. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that once the policy decision is taken by the Bank, the same cannot be assailed by filing writ petition before this court. Learned counsel submitted that the circular issued by the RBI permits engagement of inter alia the Companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956 as BCs and thus, the policy decision taken by the Bank in conformity with the RBI circular which was not impugned before the learned Single Judge, cannot be questioned. Relying upon a Bench decision dated 11.10.17 of Gujarat High Court in the matter of 'Gulamrasul Habibhal Badi & 65 Vs. State Bank of India (SBI) & 3' (LPA No.1146 of 2017 in Special Civil Application No.12965 of 2017 and other connected matters), learned Senior Counsel submitted that after due consideration of all the relevant aspects, it has been categorically held by the Gujarat High Court that the individuals engaged as BCs cannot be considered to be the employees of SBI as they were engaged only as service provider for running business on commission basis. The Court held that there was no employer and employee relationship between the petitioners therein and the respondent-Bank and thus, according to the learned counsel the controversy raised stands set at rest by the decision of Gujarat High Court in Gulamrasul Habibhai Badi's case (supra).

21. On the other hand, Mr. Ravi Bhansali, Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents contended that as per RBI circular, it was never intended to discontinue the system of engagement of individual basis rather, the Banks have been permitted to engage Companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956 excluding (73 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] NBFCs in addition to the individuals/entities permitted earlier, subject to the compliance with the guidelines and thus, the action of the appellant Bank in doing away with engagement of BCs on individual basis and insisting for their engagement as CSP of National BCs, is ex facie arbitrary. Learned counsel submitted that on engagement, the commission is paid to BCs, in proportion to the amount collected and therefore, if the alleged policy decision of the Bank for engagement of the respondents individual BCs, as CSP of National BCs is given effect to, the major portion of the commission earned by them would go to corporate BCs, which is ex facie unfair and unreasonable. Learned counsel submitted that the services of the respondents were found satisfactory and therefore, extension was granted to them from time to time and thus, without there being any justifiable reason, the decision of the Bank in placing the respondents in the hands of the National BCs is unjust and improper. Learned counsel fairly submitted that as per the terms of the agreement, the respondents were engaged as SP and not as employees of the Bank, but if the veil is lifted to find out the true nature of the engagement, it reveals that for all intent and purposes, the respondents were working under the direct control of the appellant Bank and were discharging the same duties which are being discharged by the regularly recruited employees of the Bank and thus, the finding arrived at by the learned Single Judge regarding the existence of master and servant relationship between the Bank and the respondents cannot be faulted with. Learned counsel would submit that the respondents have never claimed regularisation in service rather, they claimed that their existing contractual engagements should not be discontinued and they may not be compelled to serve the (74 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] Bank through National BCs and thus, nothing turns on the question that the respondents have not been engaged against the cadre posts.

22. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record.

23. Indisputably, the BC model has been introduced by the RBI to offer Banking Services to the unBanked and excluded segment of population of the country specially those living in rural areas. The Banks were permitted to formulate a policy for engaging BCs with the approval of their Board of Directors. It was specifically laid down that due diligence may be carried out on the individuals/entities to be engaged as BCs prior to their engagement, covering the aspects inter alia such as (i) reputation/ marketing standing; (ii) financial soundness; (iii) management and corporate governance; (iv) cash handling ability and (v) ability to implement technology solutions in rendering financial services. Obviously, engagement of the BCs for financial inclusion of rural population involves huge risks and therefore, it was made imperative that the Bank shall carry out due diligence exercise for ensuring the protection of the customers.

24. It is pertinent to note that besides the individuals like retired bank employees, retired teachers etc., the owners of kirana/medical/fair price shops, PCOs, Small Saving Scheme Agents of Government of India/Insurance Companies, NGOs, MFIs, Cooperative Societies registered under the State Acts or Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, Post Offices, Companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956, excluding the NBFCs were also included in the eligibility zone for engagement as BCs. Under the Scheme, the decision to engage the BCs in the (75 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] categories specified is left to the discretion of the Bank concerned and it is not obligatory upon the Bank to engage individual BCs in preference to other entities. The guidelines issued in no manner suggests that individuals engaged shall have a different status as BCs vis-a-vis other entities engaged such as NGOs, Cooperative Societies, Companies etc. That apart, as per the BC model introduced, a BC can be a BC for more than one Bank, at the point of customer interface, a retail outlet or a sub-agent of a BC, shall represent and provide banking services of only one bank. Suffice it to say that the permissibility of engagement of individual as BC is not restricted to one bank.

25. It is true that pursuant to the advertisement issued by the appellant-Bank inviting applications from eligible candidates, the respondents applied for selection as BCs and on being declared successful in interview, were engaged as BCs by executing the agreement. But then, a bare perusal of the agreement executed between the respondents individually and the appellant-Bank makes it abundantly clear that the respondents were engaged as SP and not as contractual employees. The nature of services to be provided by the SP engaged as aforesaid were also specified in clause 1.2 of agreement. It cannot be disputed that some of the duties casted upon the SPs engaged are akin to the duties performed by the employees of the Bank but on that account their engagement as SPs shall not stand converted into the engagement as contractual employees of the Bank.

26. As a matter of fact, the relationship between the parties to the agreement has also been specifically dealt with under clause 4 of the agreement, which makes it plain that the SP shall act as independent service provider and shall not be deemed to be the (76 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] agent of the Bank except in respect of transactions/services which give rise to Principal Agent relationship by implication. SP has been cautioned not to hold out or represent himself/herself as agent or employee of the Bank. Further, it was also specially provided that the SP shall not be entitled to claim permanent absorption or any other claim or benefit against the Bank and the relation shall be principal to principal basis.

27. Under clause 5 of the agreement, the responsibility of complying with the provisions of all applicable laws concerning or in relation to rendering of services by SP envisaged under the agreement has also been fastened upon the SP engaged and they are required to maintain all necessary licenses, permissions, approvals from relevant authorities under the applicable laws throughout the currency of the agreement.

28. Coming to the nature of payments to be made by the Bank to the SP for the services rendered, it is specifically provided under clause 5.1 that the SP shall be paid fees and commission in the manner detailed in the Schedule B annexed to the agreement subject to deduction of income tax whenever required under the provisions of Income Tax Act by the Bank. All other taxes including Service Tax, Duties and other charges which may be levied are also agreed to be borne by the SP. The cost of field devices i.e. equipments required for carrying on SP activities at customer service point is also required to be borne by the SP from his own sources.

29. Thus, apparently, the agreement entered into between the parties was a contract for service and not a contract of service.

30. As laid down by a Full Bench of this court in the matter of 'Akhil Raj Rajya Hand Pump Mistries Sanghathan & Anr. vs. State (77 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] of Rajasthan & Ors.', 1994 (1) WLC 1, there is a clear distinction between a contract of service and contract for service. A contract of service does give rise to a relationship of master and servant but a contract for service does not give rise to such a relationship. The distinction in two concepts, though fine and subtle is nonetheless real. It is easy to distinguish one concept from other though it may be difficult to formulate the distinction precisely.

31. There cannot be any quarrel with the proposition that the court can always lift the veil to find out true fact situation so as to do complete justice between the parties to the lis. But, in the instant case, as discussed hereinabove, under the Scheme, it is not only the individuals but other entities may also be engaged as BCs and the status of an individual engaged as BC vis-a-vis other entities engaged as BC, is not different and thus, it is difficult to accept that in respect of individual BCs engaged, there exists a master and servant relationship, which obviously cannot be recognized for other entities engaged. Moreover, the unequivocal terms and conditions incorporated in the agreement entered into between the parties regarding the nature of the services to be rendered by BCs, the mode of payments for services rendered, the term of engagement & termination and the responsibility fastened on the BCs engaged, clearly indicate that the contract between the appellant Bank and the respondents was a contract for service and not a contract of service giving rise to master and servant relationship. Thus, the conclusion arrived at by the learned Single Judge merely on the basis of procedure adopted for their engagement which includes issuance of advertisement, eligibility criteria etc. that there exists employer and employee relationship between the BCs and the Bank, without examining the terms and (78 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] conditions of the agreement in their entirety, in our considered opinion, is erroneous and cannot be sustained.

32. The learned Single Judge has observed that one set of contractual employees cannot be replaced by another set of contractual employees unless their conduct and performance is under cloud. But in the instant case, it was not even the case set out by the respondents that while terminating their engagement as BCs, other individuals were being engaged by the Bank as BCs. To the contrary, the grievance of the respondents was that their engagement as individual BCs should not be terminated, they should be continued as BCs, engaged directly with the Bank and should not be insisted upon for their engagement through National BCs. A fortiori, having arrived at the conclusion that there exists no master and servant relationship between the Bank and the respondents engaged as BCs, for the parity of reasons assigned, the question of substitution of one set of contractual employees by another set of contractual employees also does not arise.

33. The learned Single Judge has erred in arriving at the conclusion that the respondents contractual employees, could be replaced only by regularly selected employees inasmuch as, admittedly, the posts of BCs were never the cadred posts either in SBBJ or in SBI and therefore, the question of filling of such posts by way of regular selection, does not arise.

34. Further, the term of the respondents' engagement as individual BCs having come to an end, this court can neither direct the respondents to extend the term of the contract nor such contract for service could be directed to be enforced by this court, invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is open for the respondents to accept or (79 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018] not to accept their engagement through National BCs or sue the respondents by availing appropriate remedy available under the law for breach of the contract, if any. It is pertinent to note that clause 11 of the last agreement entered into between the parties, a copy whereof is placed on record, any or all disputes, controversies and conflicts arising out of the agreement in connection with the agreement or the performance or non performance of the rights and obligation set forth or the breach termination invalidity of interpretation thereof, shall be referred to arbitration in terms of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and therefore, it is also open for the respondents to raise the dispute invoking arbitration clause incorporated in the agreement as aforesaid.

35. Coming to the conclusion arrived at by the learned Single Judge regarding the decision of this court in Writ Petition No.4304/18 preferred by some of the respondents viz. Ashish Kumar and others, suffice it to say that while dismissing the writ petition as infructuous on account of withdrawal of the circulars dated 12.4.17 and 19.5.17 vide circular dated 17.10.17 issued by the SBI, the learned Single Judge declined to entertain the petition in respect of the reliefs (a) and (b) referred supra, stating that no writ can be issued granting such declaration and the respondents herein should approach the appropriate form/authority in accordance with law for declaration sought for and thus, the fresh petition filed by the respondents who were petitioners in the earlier writ petition, claiming the relief (a) and (b) in respect whereof, the learned Single Judge had earlier declined to entertain the petition, was not maintainable.

(80 of 80) [SAW-1063/2018]

36. In view of the discussion above, we are not agreeable to the conclusions arrived at by the learned Single Judge while allowing the writ petitions preferred by the respondents and therefore, the impugned judgments cannot be sustained and deserve to be set aside.

37. In the result, the special appeals are allowed. The judgments under appeal dated 31.5.18/1.6.18/20.6.18 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court are set aside. The writ petitions preferred by the respondents are dismissed. No order as to costs.

                                             (DINESH MEHTA),J                           (SANGEET LODHA),J

                                   Aditya/




Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur