Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Sai Home Interiors And Exteriors vs Anandrathi Global Finance on 3 February, 2026

                                       -1-
                                                    NC: 2026:KHC:6317
                                                  WP No. 767 of 2026


             HC-KAR



                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                     BEFORE

                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

                      WRIT PETITION NO.767 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

            BETWEEN:

            1.    M/S. SAI HOME INTERIORS AND EXTERIORS
                  NO.129/18, 1ST A MAIN
                  PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM,
                  SUNKAL FARM ROAD,
                  OPP. AYYAPPA TEMPLE, ADUGODI,
                  BENGALURU-560030
                  REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRS OF
                  DECEASED PROPRIETOR-H.B. RAMESHBABU
                  i.e., PETITIONERS 2 TO 4.

            2.    H.Y. PAVITHRA
                  W/O LATE H.B. RAMESH BABU
                  AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

            3.    B.R. HITHESH,
Digitally
signed by         S/O LATE H.B. RAMESH BABU
SHILPABAI S       AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
Location:
HIGH        4.    B.R. TARUN,
COURT OF          S/O LATE H.B. RAMESH BABU
KARNATAKA
                  AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS,
                  SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY
                  HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER
                  PETITIONER NO.2

                  PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 ARE ALL
                  R/AT HOUSE NO.129,
                  I MAIN ROAD, LIG SUNKAL FARM,
                  CORPORATION NO.129-18
                           -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC:6317
                                    WP No. 767 of 2026


HC-KAR



    WILSON GARDEN,
    BENGALURU-560027.
                                          ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI PRADEEPA S.B., ADVOCATE)

AND:

ANANDRATHI GLOBAL FINANCE
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:
EXPRESS ZONE, A WING,
10TH FLOOR, WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY,
GOREGAON (EAST),
MUMBAI-400063, MAHARASHTRA
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER/
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
                                          ...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K.V. LOKESH, ADVOCATE)



     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE
A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTORARI TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED EX-PARTE POSSESSION ORDER DATED 29.11.2025
PASSED BY THE LEARNED 48TH ACJM IN CRL. MISC.7779/2025
VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND IMPUGNED E-AUCTION SALE NOTICE
DATED    22.12.2025 ISSUED    BY   THE   RESPONDENT-
INSTITUTION VIDE ANNEXURE-A; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF THE MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT-
INSTITUTION TO REGULARIZE THE LOAN ACCOUNT BEARING
NO.APPL00002981 VIDE ANNEXURE-D FOR PAYMENT OF
MONTHLY EMI.

       THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                 -3-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:6317
                                              WP No. 767 of 2026


HC-KAR



CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

                          ORAL ORDER

The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the possession order dated 29.11.2025 passed by the learned 48th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate in Crl.Misc.No.7779/2025 vide Annexure-H and e-auction sale notice dated 22.12.2025 issued by the respondent-Institution vide Annexure-A; and also sought a mandamus directing the respondent-Institution to regularise the loan account No.APPL00002981 vide Annexure-D for payment of monthly EMI.

2. This Court, by order dated 27.01.2026, granted an interim order directing the petitioners to deposit ₹4,00,000/- within a week, failing which the respondent shall confirm the sale proceedings. The petitioners have deposited ₹4,00,000/- and filed a memo to that effect.

3. Memo is taken on record.

4. Admittedly, the impugned order is an appealable order. The petitioners, without exhausting the efficacious remedy, filed this writ petition. In view of the proposition laid -4- NC: 2026:KHC:6317 WP No. 767 of 2026 HC-KAR down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Rikhab Chand Jain Vs. Union of India and Others1, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is not maintainable. Hence, I do not find any grounds to entertain the writ petition.

5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of reserving a liberty to the petitioners to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.

6. In the meanwhile, the respondent is directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners for a period of 60 days from today.

7. In view of disposal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Sd/-

(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2510