Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur
Gehlod Singh Sansi S/O Shri Surjya Sansi vs State Of Rajasthan Through Principal ... on 24 May, 2019
Author: Alok Sharma
Bench: Alok Sharma
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH
ORDER
1. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2322/2019)
1. Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Girraj Prasad Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
Village And Post Kyarda Kalan, Tehsil Khandar, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.).
2. Narendra Bairwa S/o Shri Jagaram Bairwa, R/o Village Soankachh, Post Khandewala,
Tehsil Khandar, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.).
3. Hemraj Bairwa S/o Shri Nagaram Bairwa, R/o Village Talada, Post Doongri, Tehsil
Malarn St. Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.).
4. Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Chiranji Lal Sharma, R/o Village Ramsar, Post
Khedlakhurd, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa (Raj.).
5. Girraj Bairwa S/o Baddu Ram Bairwa, R/o Ekat, Post Ekat, Tehsil Sapotara, Distt.
Karauli (Raj.).
6. Tika Ram Meena S/o Hari Singh Meena, R/o Kalaguda, Tehsil Sapotara, Distt. Karauli
(Raj.).
7. Pappu Lal Yogi S/o Ramgilas Yogi, R/o Village Kalagudha, Tehsil Sapotrara, Distt.
Karauli (Raj.).
8. Mausam Bai Meena D/o Harikesh Meena, R/o Village And Post Kachrojjo, Tehsil
Sapotrara, Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
9. Brijkishore Meena S/o Ratti Ram Meena, R/o Village Post Phulwara, Tehsil Bamanwas,
District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
10. Sardar Singh Meena S/o Girraj Prasad, R/o Village And Post Dabra, Tehsil Sapotrara,
Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
11. Roopchand Yogi S/o Manohar Lal, R/o Village And Post Karanpur, Tehsil Mandrayal,
Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
12. Ramraj Meena S/o Chuttan Lal, R/o Village And Post Rodhai, Tehsil Mandrayal, Distt.
Karauli (Raj.).
13. Banaye Singh S/o Sita Ram Gurjar, R/o Village And Post Maharajpura, Tehsil
Mandrayal, Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
14. Mansingh Bairwa S/o Lohare Lal, R/o Village And Post Dhoreta, Tehsil Mandrayal,
Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
15. Anil Singh Tanwar S/o Guman Singh Tanwar, R/o Mukam Post Koliwala Imloha,
Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)
16. Irfan Khan S/o Asgar Khan, R/o Mukam Post Raipur Patan, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana,
Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
17. Norang Lal Bhardwaj S/o Ramavtar Sharma, R/o Mukam Post Biharipur, Tehsil
Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
18. Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shankar Lal Yadav, R/o Mukam Post Mindla Rajpur, Tehsil
Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
2
19. Mohan Lal Gurjar S/o Devki Prasad, R/o Mukam Post Rahiya Ka Bas, Ghasipur,
Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
20. Vikram Singh S/o Dhoop Singh Gurjar, R/o Village Post Bhagatpura, Gudla, Tehsil
And Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
21. Bhoor Singh S/o Bagatwar Singh, R/o Bhatiyo Ka Bass Post, Tehsil Lathi And Distt.
Jaisalmer (Raj.).
22. Tanerao Singh S/o Khet Singh, R/o Village Achalpura, Tehsil Pokran And Distt.
Jaisalmer (Raj.).
23. Mohan Lal Bheel S/o Prahlad Lal Bheel, R/o Village And Post Anwa, Tehsil Dooni,
Distt. Tonk (Raj.)
24. Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Kalu Ram Meena, R/o Village And Post Tokrawas, Tehsil
Dooni, Distt. Tonk (Raj.).
25. Vijay Singh Sankhla S/o Shri Bheru Singh, R/o Village Babri Khera, Post Kochola,
Tehsil Hindoli, Distt. Bundi (Raj.).
26. Dinesh Kumar Prajapat S/o Prahlad Kumhar, R/o Village And Post Devdawas, Tehsil
Duni, Distt. Tonk (Raj.).
27. Jai Singh Narnoliya S/o Narsingh Natholiya, R/o Village And Post Pacheri, Tehsil
Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
28. Anil Kumar Dangi S/o Manroop Singh, R/o Village Dhana, Post Khetri Nagar, Tehsil
Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
29. Kishna Ram S/o Tejaram, R/o Village And Post Moriyana, Tehsil Degana, Distt.
Nagaur (Raj.).
30. Dal Chand Jatoliya S/o Dawat Ram Jatoliya, R/o Raigaron Mohalla, Village Pisangan,
Distt. Ajmer (Raj.).
31. Narendra Singh Naruka S/o Narayan Singh Naruka, R/o Village And Post Jethana,
Tehsil Pisangan, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.).
32. Ravi Prakash S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, R/o Bassi Mohalla, Pisangan, Distt. Ajmer
(Raj.).
33. Narendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Kishan Lal Gurjar, R/o Village Ghooghra, Near R.t.o.
Office, Ajmer, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.).
34. Ramesh Chand S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Gurjar, R/o Village And Post Pai, Tehsil Deeg,
Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
35. Mahesh Chand Agrawal S/o Shri Giriraj Prasad, Village And Post Papda, Tehsil
Pahadi, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
36. Suresh Chand S/o Hari Singh, R/o Village Piprali, Post Maliki, Tehsil Pahadi, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj.).
37. Baljeet Singh S/o Udal Singh, R/o Village And Post Olanda, Tehsil Pahadi, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj.).
38. Prem Singh Meena S/o S/o Surgyani, R/o Village Badsu, Post Jahadu, Tehsil
Kathumar, Distt. Alwar (Raj.).
39. Baldev Ram S/o Andaram, R/o Village Bedas Kala, Post Menda,, Tehsil Degana, Distt.
Nagaur (Raj.).
40. Ramswaroop Khandoliya S/o Shimbhuram, R/o Sesada, Tehsil Riabadi, Distt. Nagaur
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
3
(Raj.).
41. Missa Ram S/o Ratana Ram, R/o Village And Post Mugadda, Tehsil Riabadi, Distt.
Nagaur (Raj.).
42. Neta Ram S/o Shri Ramnarayan, R/o Village And Post Medas, Tehsil Riabadi, Distt.
Nagaur (Raj.)
43. Omaram S/o Shri Jeevanram, R/o Rohisa, Tehsil Riabadi, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
44. Suva Lal S/o Ganesh Ram, R/o Village And Post Mewda, Tehsil Degana, Distt. Nagaur
(Raj.).
45. Swaroop Garhwal S/o Pusa Ram, R/o Village And Post Mandal Jodha, Tehsil Degana,
Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
46. Ramsagar Meena S/o Morpal, R/o Heidaripura, Tehsil Uniara, Distt. Tonk (Raj.).
47. Moti Ram S/o Jagga Ram, R/o Village And Post Gigaliya, Tehsil Makrana, Distt.
Nagaur (Raj.).
48. Manoj Kumar Hari Ram Garhwal, R/o Mukam Post Shyampura, Tehsil
Dataramgarh, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)
49. Shrawan Kumar S/o Dana Ram, R/o Mukam Post Gokulpura, Tehsil And Distt. Sikar
(Raj.).
50. Balveer Singh S/o Baghirath Singh, R/o Mukam Post Paldi, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt.
Sikar (Raj.).
51. Nandkishore Mehla S/o Bhagwana Ram, R/o Mukam Post Khudi Badi, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
52. Dilsukh Dhaka S/o Ghasi Ram, R/o Mukam Post Harsawa, Tehsil Fatehpur, Distt.
Sikar (Raj.)
53. Ramesh Chand S/o Trilok Chand, R/o Mukam Post Kalwa, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt.
Sikar (Raj.)
54. Banwari Lal S/o Sewaram, R/o Mukam Post Phagediyon Ki Dhani, Nechwa, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar (Raj.).
55. Rohitash Kaswa S/o Harpal Singh, R/o Mukam Post Kumas Jatan, Tehsil Laxmangarh,
Distt. Sikar (Raj.)
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
2. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 23343/2018)
Gehlod Singh Sansi S/o Shri Surjya Sansi, aged about 33 years, R/o Village Alipura, Post Chan,
Tehsil Tonk District Tonk Raj.
- - -Petitioner
Versus
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
4
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj
Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad Tonk.
3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Todaraisingh, District Tonk.
- - -Respondents
3. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 24497/2018)
1. Arjun Lal Nagar S/o Shri Babu Lal Nagar, aged about 36 years, R/o Village and Post Jalwara,
Tehsil Kishanganj, District Baran (L.D.C. Gram Panchayat Kankarda).
2. Jai Kishan Meena S/o Shri Mool Chand Meena, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Kundi, Post
Sakarawda, Tehsil Kishanganj, District Baran (L.D.C Gram Panchayat Bajrangarh).
3. Radhey Shyam Meena S/o Jagannath Meena, aged about 37 year, R/o Village swarooppura,
Tehsil Kishanganj, District Baran (L.D.C. Gram Panchayat Kishanganj).
4. Brijmohan Nagar S/o Laxmichand, aged about 48 years, R/o Vill. Ranibarod, Tehsil Kishanganj,
District Baran (L.D.C. Gram Panchayat Shobhagpura).
5. Ghanshyam Sahariya S/o Laxman Lala, aged about 43 years, R/o Chhatarganj, Tehsil
Kishanganj, District Baran L.D.C. Gram Panchayat Badipura).
6. Bhanwarlal Sahariya S/o Babu Lal Sahariya, aged about 36 years, R/O Chhatarganj, Tehsil
Kishanganj, District Baran (L.D.c Gram Panchayat Simlod)
7. Rajesh Sahariya S/o Bhanwar Lal, aged about 35 years, R/o Village Durjanpura, Tehsil
Kishanganj, District Baran (L.D.c Gram Panchayat Gatti)
8. Shiv Kumar Sahariya S/o Ramdayal, aged about 30 years, R/o Nayagaon, Tehsil Kishanganj,
District Baran (L. D.C. Gram Panchayat Bhanwargarh)
9. Girraj Sahariya S/o Ghasilal, aged about 28 years, R/o Rampurtodiya, Tehsil Kishanganj
District Baran (L.D.C. Gram Panchayat Pachlawada).
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj
Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Additional Commissioner and Joint Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
4. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 24501/2018)
1. Bhupesh Kumar Sharma son of Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, aged about 38 years, by caste
Brahmin, resident of near Bahadurpur Road, Gurjar Mohalla, Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.).
2. Jumma Khan S/o Shri Ramzan Khan, aged about 36 years, b/c Mev, resident of village and post
Neekutch, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
3. Lala Ram Meena S/o Shri Gyarasi Ram, aged about 46 years, b/c Meena, resident of Meena
Mohalla, Near Fort, Ramgarh, District Alwar.
4. Shehrun Khan son of Shri Sher Khan, aged about 33 years, b/c Mev, resident of village
Kajakpur, Post Bahadurpur, Tehsil and District Alwar.
5. Mool Raj S/o Shri Chandrajeet, aged about 36 years, by caste Oadh Rajput, resident of village
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
5
Jodauli, Post Milakpur, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
6. Zakir Hussain S/o Shri Nimman Khan, aged about 46 years, by caste Mev, resident of village
Piparoli, Post Ramgarh, District Alwar.
7. Aarti Khatri W/o Shri Somnath, aged about 34 years, by caste Khatri, resident of village Garhi,
post Neekutch, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Secretary and Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J. L. N. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar.
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Ramgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
5. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kishangarhbas, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
- - -Respondents
5. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 24621/2018)
1. Asha Ram Meena S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Sabiyapura, Post
Inayati, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.)-322218.
2. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Ram Khiladi Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village
Jeerota, Post Jeerota, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.)-322203.
3. Hemraj Singh S/o Hargyan Gurjar, Village And Post Kapuramalooka, Tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur.
4. Saudan Singh S/o Shyama Jatav, Gram Nagla Kulvariya, Post Saadpura,tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur
5. Rashal Singh Gurjar S/o Lakhan Singh, Village And Post Adada, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur
6. Mohan Singh Gurjar S/o Manohari Gurjar, Village Madanpur, Post Seeloti, Tehsil
Karauli, District Karauli
7. Bal Kishan S/o Bhagvan Singh Meena, Gram Peepri, Post Milakpur, Tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur.
8. Rajveer Singh S/o Uday Bhan Singh, Gram And Post Soopa, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur
9. Brij Lal Mahawar S/o Chet Ram Mahawar, Gram And Post Baglai, Tehsil Bajirpur
(Gangapur) District Sawai Madhopur
10. Banay Singh S/o Valli Ram, Village Pidawali, Post Khohra, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur
11. Surendra Singh Yadav S/o Sukhlal Yadav, Village Kansli, Tehsil, District Jaipur
12. Pyare Lal S/o Leela Ram, Gram Chimanpura, District Jaipur
13. Harfool Singh Raigar S/o Mangal Ram Raigar, Village Jahidpura Nangal Panditpur
District Jaipur
14. Gangaram Gurjar S/o Boduram Gurjar, Village Ramsinghpura District Jaipur.
15. Rajkumar Hotla S/o Rohitashv Kumar Hotla, Village Sangteda, District Jaipur.
16. Suresh Kumar Harijan S/o Roshan Lal Harijan, Village Kalyanpura Kalan, District
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
6
Jaipur.
17. Sandeep Kumar Yadav S/o Babulal Yadav, Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Neem Ka
Thana, Sikar
18. Ashok Kumar Aarya S/o Jamman Lal Aarya, Village Gopipura Chaturbhuj,
District.jaipur
19. Ravindrajeet S/o Shyonarayan, Village Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur
20. Kamlesh Yadav S/o Totaram Yadav, Village Ramgarh Chhadra, District Jaipur
21. Dilip Singh Meena S/o Indrajeet Singh Meena, Village And Post Kirwada, Tehsil
Todabhim, District Karauli
22. Rajesh Kumar Harsana S/o Kailashi Ram Gurjar, Village Post Bisura, Tehsil
Todabhim, District Karauli
23. Aasha Jangid W/o Yogesh Jangid, Plot No 28, Bal Vihar Colony, Goner Road, Jaipur
24. Haricharan Lal Meena S/o Bholya Ram Meena, Village Khirkhidi,post
Manderu,tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli.
25. Mahesh Kumar Bairva S/o Narayan Bairva, Gram Bhandpura, Post Garhhimmat
Singh Tehsil Mahva, District Dausa
26. Jai Krishn Sharma S/o Laxminarayan Sharma, Village Post Patoli, Tehsil Mahva,
District Dausa
27. Sarbat Singh Gurjar S/o Tikam Singh Gurjar, Gram Post Tighriya, Tehsil Todabhim,
District Karauli
28. Roop Singh Saini S/o Kishori Lal Saini, Village Post Tata Kuva, Todabhim, District
Karauli
29. Rajkumar Meena S/o Badri Prasad Meena, Gram Khidkhidi, Post Manderu,tehsil
Todabhim, District Karauli.
30. Rajesh Sharma S/o Amar Chand, R/o Fatehpur Kalan, PostMudoti, Tehsil Nagar,
Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
31. Radhey Shyam S/o Amar Singh, R/o Gram Gangwak, Tehsil Nagar, Dsitt. Bharatpur
(Raj.).
32. Chatar Singh S/o Eshwar Das, R/o Village And Post Jhanjhar, Tehsil Nagar, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj.).
33. Rakesh Chand Gupta S/o Jagdish Prasad, R/o Gram Udaipur, Niham, Post Budli,
Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
34. Atar Singh S/o Bhoorya Lal, R/o Village Khesti, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
35. Shyam Lal S/o Santu Lal, R/o Village Raipur Khurd, Post Bhatpura, Tehsil Nagar,
Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
36. Rajaram S/o Jagdish, R/o Village Pendaka, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
37. Rajesh Kumar S/o Devi Ram, R/o Village Mundiya, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur
(Raj.).
38. Samay Singh S/o Son Pal, R/o Semli, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Shivcharan S/o Harsahay, R/o Bajri Khedi, Jhanjhar, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur
(Raj.).
40. Rajesh Kumar S/o Mohan Singh, R/o Akbarpur, Mundiya, Tehsil Nagar, Distt.
Bharatpur (Raj.).
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
7
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
6. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 26566/2018)
Sanjay Kumar Son Of Shri Gopi Chand Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Brahmin,
Resident Of Village Berla Post Jairoli Panchayat Samati Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
- - -Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar,
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Tijara, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
- - -Respondents
7. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 254/2019)
1. Sahun Khan Son Of Shri Satul Khan, Aged About 34 Years, By Caste Mev, Resident Of Village
Dabri, Tehsil Govindgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
2. Iqwal Khan Son Of Shri Bashir Khan., Aged About 37 Years, By Caste Mev, Resident Of Village
Sem Lakhurd, Tehsil Govindgarh, District Alwar.
3. Hetram Meena S/o Shri Kishan Meena, Aged About 37 Years, By Caste Meena, R/o VPO
Jodhpura, Tehsil Laxman Garh, Distt. Alwar.
4. Babulal Meena S/o Shri Sholaram Meena, Aged About 33 Years, By Caste Meena R/o Vpo
Badhka, Tehsil Laxman Garh, District Alwar.
5. Prem Chand Jat, S/o Shri Badri Prasad, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Village Nagla
Bas Guman, Tehsil Laxmangarh Distt. Alwar.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan.)
2. Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Prishad, Alwar.
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Laxman Garh, District Alwar (Rajasthan)
- - -Respondents
8. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.795/2019)
1. Kamlesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ram Nath Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village And Post
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
8
Barod, Tehsil Khandar, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.).
2. Vijay Bhan Singh S/o Shri Shri Bhan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Jindpura, Post
Khanua, Tehsil Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
3. Ramveer S/o Ram Prasad, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vill Burana, Post Daulatgarh, Tehsil
Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. Bhojpal S/o Shyam Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Pana, Post Nagla Tehriye Mafi,
Tehsil Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
5. Magan Singh S/o Shri Dhan Singh Meena, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Khatipura, Post
Kakaraua, Tehsil Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
6. Dharmveer Singh S/o Shri Ranveer Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o V&P Jatmasi, Tehsil
Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
7. Hari Chand S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Baseri, Post Andhiyari, Tehsil
Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
8. Sanjay Singh S/o Jugal Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vill. Behrarekh Pura Post Andhiyari,
Tehsil Roopwas Dist.Bharatpur.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Shri Ramavatar Meena, Chief Executive Officer, bharatpur, District Bharatpur.
4. Ms. Divya Rathore, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Roopwas, District Bharatpur.
- - -Respondents
9. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2700/2019)
1. Rajendra Singh Naruka S/o Shri Chhitar Singh, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Rajpoot, R/o Village
Kalwadi, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar.
2. Shobha Ram Meena S/o Shri Ram Singh Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Sedu Ka
Nagla, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar.
3. Ram Naresh Singh S/o Shri Navab Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Adouli, Tehsil Laxman
Garh, Distt. Alwar
4. Lala Ram Dhobi S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Dhobi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Sonkhri, Tehsil
Kathumar, District Alwar.
5. Jitendra Ram S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Kanuja, Tehsil Raipur, Distt.
Pali
6. Sampat Lal S/o Shri Chima Ram Ji, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Vpo Relda, Baya Sendara Tehsil
Raipur, Distt. Pali.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Alwar
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kathumar, District Alwar (Raj.)
5. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Raipur, District Pali (Raj.)
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
9
- - -Respondents
10. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2823/2019)
1. KishanLal Yogi Son Of Shri Shravan Nath, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Yogi, Resident Of
Village Guddha Kishore Dan,tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.).
2. Raghuveer Yogi Son Of Shri Laxman Prasad Yogi, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Yogi,
Resident Of Village Garhbasai,tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar.
3. Girraj Prasad Jat S/o Shri Panchuram Jat, Aged About 43 years, By Caste Jat, R/o Vpo Vijaypura,
Tehsil Thanagazi, Distt Alwar.
4. Jafruddin S/o Shri Miharu, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Mev R/o Vpo Khohari Khurd, Tehsil
Tijara, District Alwar.
5. Rajendra Prasad Bheemwal S/o Shri Ghanshyam Das Bheemwal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Village Pinan, Tehsil Reni Distt. Alwar.
6. Bagga Ram S/o Shri Mehar Chand, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Ood(Obc) R/o Village Jaloki
Tehsil Padampur, Distt. Shri Ganganagar.
7. Buddha Lal S/o Shri Ramdhan Koli, Aged About 45 Years, By Caste Koli R/o Vpo Sili Bavdi,
Tehsil Thanagazi Distt. Alwar.
8. Nitesh Kumar S/o Shrimishra Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Mithiyabas, Post Tapukra,
Tehsil Tijara, Distt. Alwar.
9. Vikram Singh S/o Shri Suraj Bhan, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Aslimpur Tehsil Tijara,
Distt. Alwar.
10. Lal Singh S/o Shri Ghani Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Piplana Tehsil Tijara Distt.
Alwar.
11. Bijendra Singh S/o Shri Ramhet Bairva, Aged About 34 Years, By Caste Bairva R/o Village
Salampur, Post Divli, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt. Alwar.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J. L. N. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar.
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Thanagazi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
5. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samati Laxman Garh Distt. Alwar.
6. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samati Tijara Distt. Alwar.
7. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samati, Raisingh Nagar Distt. Shriganganagar.
- - -Respondents
11. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5872/2019)
1. M.p. Raj Meena S/o Shri Batti Lal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Jodli,
Tehsil Sapotara, Distt. Karauli (Raj.).
2. Mahesh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Ram Babu Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Berkhda,
Tehsil Mahwa, Distt. Dausa (Raj.).
3. Bahadur Singh S/o Baniya Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Chilaachauhd,
Tehsil Bari, Distt. Dholpur (Raj.).
4. Dheeraj Kumar Meena S/o Shri Braj Bhushan Rawat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village - Tarva,
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
10
Post Rahrai, Tehsil Sarmathura, Distt. Dholpur (Raj.).
5. Pankaj Goutam S/o Shri Meghraj Goutam, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Post Dahikheda, Tehsil
Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan
6. Mohmmad Shahid S/o Mohmmad Hanif, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nai Samaj Mandir Ke
Samne, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
7. Shambhu Kailash Meena S/o Badri Lal Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Mahalpur,
Post Rengarh, Tehsil Mangrol, District Baran, Rajasthan.
8. Rakesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Devkaran Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Gujran, Post
Baisar, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
9. Surendra Kumar Panwar S/o Keshri Lal Panwar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jagjeevan Ram
Colony, Near Samudayik Bhavan, District Baran, Rajasthan.
10. Sandeep Patidar S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Patidar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Shri Krishna
Super Market, Bypass Road, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
11. Santram Gurjar S/o Sh. Raghunath Singh Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Kardiya
(Sherpur), Tehsil Pidawa, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
12. Mukesh Kumar Patidar S/o Sh. Purilal Patidar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Khanpuriya,
Tehsil Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
13. Mahesh Kumar Nagar S/o Sh. Janki Lal Nagar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Front Of Power
House, Salotiya Road, Sunel, Tehsil Pidawa, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
14. Suresh Chand Mehta S/o Jamana Lal Mehta, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Haripura, Post
Jalwara Via Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan.
15. Azharuddin S/o Ramjani, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 50, Ramjani, Village And Post Roteda,
Tehsil Keshorai-Patan, Via Kapren, District Bundi, Rajasthan.
16. Rajendra Kumar Meghwal S/o Heera Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Shubham Colony, Tehsil
Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
17. Jagdish Regar S/o Heera Lal Regar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Raithal, Tehsil Mangrol,
District Baran, Rajasthan.
18. Hemant Kumar Sharma S/o Radhey Shyam Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village
Rampura, Tehsil Gangdhar, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
19. Vikram Lal Meghwal S/o Nagga Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bhadka, Tehsil
Gangdhar, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
20. Prahlad Nagar S/o Shri Prabhu Lal Nagar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village/post Bhilwara
Neecha, Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
21. Mahendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o
Village/post Mundkya, Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
22. Man Singh Meena S/o Shri Ram Narayan Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village/post
Godiyamehar, Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
23. Morpal Verma S/o Shri Hajari Lal Verma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Nawabpura, Post
Hanyakhedi, Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
24. Prem Kumar Malav S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Malav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Khankara,
Post Kadeyanohar, Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
25. Surendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Braj Mohan Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village
Morkhundana, Post Phused, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota, Rajasthan.
26. Devkishan Bairva S/o Shri Gopal Lal Bairva, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Umarthana,
Tehsil Chhabada, District Baran, Rajasthan.
27. Guddi Tanwar W/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village/post
Sapdawas, Tehsil Sikram, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
11
28. Ram Singh Bairva S/o Shri Madan Lal Bairva, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Manpura,
Post Shanshani, Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan.
29. Pramod Kumar Goyal S/o Shri Om Prakash Goyal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Baniyo Ki
Pole, Holi Ka Khunt, Indra Market, Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
12. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6098/2019)
1. Raj Mohan Meena Son Of Shri Badri Lal Meena, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Meena,
Resident Of Village Kadi Jhhopadi, Post Kunktakala, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai
Madhopur (Raj.).
2. Mukesh Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Mahaveer Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of
Village Kanwarpura, Post Namana, Tehsil Bundi, District Bundi.
3. Indra Beda W/o Shri Hanuman Ram Godara, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Godara, R/o Vpo
Bugarda, Tehsil Jayal, Distt. Nagaur.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nagaur.
5. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Bijoliya, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan).
6. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Jayal
- - -Respondents
13. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7500/2019)
1. Keshari Singh S/o Fatehsingh, By Caste Jat, R/o Gram Khipapura, Post Jagar, Tehsil Hindaun,
District Karauli.
2. Samay Singh Meena S/o Parasram Meena, R/o Nagla Meena, Karauli (Raj.).
3. Govind Jatav S/o Bharosi Jatav, R/o Sadhu Mohalla, Badhan Karsauli, Tehsil Hindaun, District
Karauli.
4. Jai Singh S/o Ummed Singh Rajput, R/o Rajput Colony, Ghonsla, Karauli.
5. Bhura Singh Solanki S/o Bhagwat Singh Solanki, R/o Main Market Near Primary School,
Mahoo Ibrahimpur, Karauli.
6. Piyush Kumar Dattatrey S/o Suresh Chand Dattatrey, R/o Dattatrey Sadan, Jhareda Road,
Hindaun, District
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
12
Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
14. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7605/2019)
1. Rajendra Kumar Sharma S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o - Tehsil Hindoli, District
Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village Development Officer Cum Panchayat
Secretary, Gram Panchayat Lambakoh, Panchayat Samiti Talera, Distt. Bundi.
2. Bhagwati Singh S/o Mangu Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o - Village - Chhapawada, Post
Bajar, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village
Development Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kethooda, Panchayat Samiti
Talera, Distt. Bundi.
3. Ramesh Banjara S/o Laxmi Chand Banjara, Aged About 36 Years, R/o - Village And Post Dabi,
Via Namana, Near Panchayat Bhawan, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of
Village Development Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Barad, Panchayat
Samiti Talera, Distt. Bundi.
4. Sanjay Kumar Kushwah S/o Kanhiya Lal Kushwah, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village
Bhopatpura, Post Nottara Bhopat, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional
Charge Of Village Development Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Alfa Nagar,
Panchayat Samiti Talera, Distt. Bundi.
5. Brahmanand Meena S/o Ganpat Lal Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o - Village Ladpur, Tehsil
Talera, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village Development Officer
Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Suwansa, Panchayat Samiti Talera, Distt. Bundi.
6. Lokesh Kumar Gouttam S/o Ram Swaroopji, Aged About 32 Years, R/o -Village Thikriyakala,
Tehsil Talera, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village Development
Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Jamitpura, Panchayat Samiti Talera, Distt.
Bundi.
7. Ramprasad Gochar S/o Motilal Gochar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o - Village And Post
Thagariya, Tehsil Indragarh, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village
Development Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Babai, Panchayat Samiti Keshav
Rai Patan, Distt. Bundi.
8. Ramraj Meena S/o Hiralal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o - Village Chharakwara, Post Mayaja,
Tehsil Keshav Rai Patan, District Bundi. At Present Holding Additional Charge Of Village
Development Officer Cum Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Radi, Panchayat Samiti Keshav
Rai Patan, Distt. Bundi.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer Cum Member Secretary, Zila Parishad, Bundi.
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Talera, District Bundi.
5. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Keshav Rai Patan, District Bundi.
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
13
- - -Respondents
15. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7693/2019)
1. Ramkesh Meena Son Of Shri Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Kamoda
Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur.
2. Vishram Gurjar S/o Shri Kalu Ram Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Sumel, Tehsil Bamanwas, District, Jaipur.
3. Subhash Chand Bunkar Son Of Shri Roodaram Bunkar, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of
Village Bahadurpura, Tehsil Viratnagar, Jaipur.
4. Om Prakash Choudhary Son Of Shri Biradoo Ram Choudhary, Aged About 37 Years, Dhani
Chhatariyali Tehsil Shahpura, Jaipur.
5. Shimbhu Dayal Gurjar, Son Of Shri Durga Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dhani Lal
Kali, Tehsil Virat Nagar, Bhabaro, District, Jaipur.
6. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Shri Sukhdev Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Ramyawala,
Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District, Jaipur.
7. Babu Lal Sharma S/o Prahlad Sahai Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Chharsa,
Jaipur.
8. Guman Mal Choudhary S/o Kalyan Mal Chudhary, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Sheshma
Mohalla Hatupura, Jaipur.
9. Kalli Devi Meena W/o Shri Rajpal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Shankotada, Tehsil
Jamwaramgarh, District, Jaipur.
10. Surendra Singh S/o Shri Kheem Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village And Post Rajiyawas,
Tehsil Beawar, District, Ajmer.
11. Vijay Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Shera Ki Bawadi,
Delwara, Tehsil Beawar, District, Ajmer.
12. Kishore Singh S/o Shri Virendra Singh, R/o Ward No. 11, Post Kabara, Beawar, District,
Ajmer.
13. Kamaruddin S/o Shri Ramjan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Suhawa Tehsil
Beawar, District, Ajmer.
14. Deepak Mewara S/o Shri Ashutosh Mewara, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sangidas Haveli Ke
Pass, Phalodi (Rural), Jodhpur.
15. Mukesh Chand Saini S/o Shri Shyoji Ram Saini, R/o Dhani Nowadi Bhilan Guhala, Neem Ka
Thana, District, Sikar.
16. Siya Ram S/o Shri Joga Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Bedawari Kallan P.s. Medta
District, Nagaur.
17. Jagdev S/o Ratan Lal Kumawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, V And P Puranabas
Neem Ka Thana District, Sikar.
18. Mahesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Soni, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Tangar Mohalla,
Bhawani Mandi, Jhalawar.
19. Man Singh Son Of Shri Narvar Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Pagariya Tehsil
Pachpahad, District, Jhalawar
20. Shyam Lal Son Of Shri Udai Ram, Aged About 35 Years, Village Buradiya Kala, Tehsil
Pachpahad PS Dag District, Jhalawar.
21. Layakat Khan S/o Shri Isha Khan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. 33 Village Silarpur,
Mew Tijara, Palpur District, Alwar.
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
14
22. Ram Karan S/o Shri Man Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Bhuraka Post, Jaluki Tehsil
Nagar, District, Bharatpur.
23. Nitesh Kumar S/o Shri Mishri Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Mithiyawas Post
Tapookada, Tehsil Tijara, District, Alwar.
24. Jafarrudin S/o Shri Miharoo, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Khohari Khurd, Tehsil Tijara,
District, Alwar.
25. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Hoshiyar Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ilakhar Post Kishanpura,
Tehsil Khetari, District, Jhunjhunu.
26. Mahendra Kumar Jat S/o Shri Bhairun Ram Jat, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Khoralad Khani
Tehsil Shahpura, District, Jaipur.
27. Ramswaroop Bandarwal S/o Shri Sohan Lal, R/o Bagori Bhonawas Post Bhonawa Tehsil
Kotputali, District, Jaipur.
28. Om Prakash Choudhary S/o Shri Chotu Ram Jat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward N. 13,
Lacchalawali Ki Dhani, Radawas Jaipur.
29. Sadhu Ram Yadav S/o Shri Onkar Mal Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 456, Mallaya Wali
Dhani, Kareeri, Jaipur.
30. Phoola Ram Yadav S/o Shri Deen Dayal Yadav, R/o Ward No. 11, Post Bagawas Ahiran, Tehil
Kotputali, Ladakawas, Jaipur.
31. Matadeen Meena S/o Surgyani Meena, R/o Village Nithara Post Let Ka Bas Tehsil Shahpura,
District, Jaipur.
32. Satyaveer Gurjar S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Bilawari, Tehsil
Pachpahad, District, Jhalawar.
33. Deep Chand S/o Prabhu Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Suliya Tehsil Pachpahad,
District, Jhalawar.
34. Arti Meena S/o Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Pahladpura, Tehsil
Lalsot, District, Dausa.
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati
Raj Department , Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Secretary (Administration) Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
- - -Respondents
16. (S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.798/2019)
1. Jubair Khan S/o Samsoo, aged about 33 years, R/o Udaka, Bharatpur (Raj.)
2. Mukesh Chand S/o Deviram Yadav, aged about 38 years, R/o Asuka Bharatpur (Raj.).
3. Gajendra Singh S/o Babulal, R/o Nangla Bhattki, Tehsil Kaman, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
4. Kunwar Pal S/o Tukkiram, R/o Badipur, Tehsil Kaman, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
5. Sahun Khan S/o Sahab Khan, R/o Bhandara, Tehsil Kaman, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
- - -Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Secretary, Panchayati
Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad Bharatpur.
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM)
15
3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kaman, Bharatpur (Raj.)
- - -Respondents
Date of Order: May 24, 2019.
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. Vigyan Shah ] for the petitioners.
Mr. Y.S. Jadaun ]
Mr. Akshit Gupta ]
Mr. Namo Narayan Sharma]
Mr. Banwari Sharma ]
Mr. G.S. Gouttam ]
Ms. Suman Sharma ]
Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma]
Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal ]
Mr. Kamlesh Sharma ]
Mr. Rajaram Cahudhary ]
Mr. Pukhraj Chawla ]
Mr. Pradeep Kalwania, GC for respondents.
Mr. Shantanu Kumawat on behalf of
Dr. Ganesh Parihar, AAG for respondents.
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Senior Advocate with
Mr. R.D. Meena, for the interveners.
BY THE COURT:
These petitions raising a common issue of law do not entail any adjudication of disputed question of facts, and therefore are being addressed and decided by this common judgment. SBCWP No.2322/2019, Mukesh Kumar Sharma & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and others, will be adverted to as (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 16 the lead case for referring to the underlying facts, where necessary.
The petitioners are all clerks Grade-II under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Establishments under Zila Parishads and holders of ministerial subordinate posts in the Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (hereafter `the Rules of 1996').
Section 78 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereafter `the Act of 1994') speaks of appointment of Secretary and other staff. Clause (a) of sub-section 1 thereof provides that there shall be for every Panchayat a Secretary, who shall be appointed in the prescribed manner. Clause (b) thereof provides that every Panchayat may with the previous approval of the Panchayat Samiti appoint such other staff as may be necessary for carrying out the duties imposed on it by or under this Act on such conditions of service as may be prescribed.
Rule 258 of the Rules of 1996 speaks of the category of the posts. The posts of Village Level Worker-cum-Panchayat (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 17 Secretary (VLW-cum-PS) and Clerk Grade-II fall separately as distinct posts under the Ministerial and Subordinate posts in Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishad service. Rule 277B of the Rules of 1996 inter alia provides the procedure and method for direct recruitment for the post of VLW-cum-PS on the one hand and Clerk Grade-II on the other. These two posts are to be filled up by direct recruitment through a competitive examination conducted by the Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board in accordance with the rules. Rule 266 of the Rules of 1996 deals with distinct and different academic qualifications inter alia for recruitment to the post of Clerk Grade-II (LDC) and VLW-cum-PS. While the academic qualification for the post of Clerk Grade-II is Senior Secondary from a recognized board or its equivalent examination, the academic qualification for the post of VLW-cum-PS is Graduate or qualification declared equivalent thereto by the Government. The requisite professional qualification with regard to computer certificate is however similar for both the posts of VLW-cum-PS and Clerk Grade-II.
The VLW-cum-PS has a statutorily defined role (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 18 description under Section 78 of the Act of 1994 and Rule 331 of the Rules of 1996. The role description of Clerk Grade-II is administratively determined from time to time by the State Government. The roles are wholly distinct. In fact pay scales of the two posts in issue are also distinct and so is the source of payment of salaries.
The case of the petitioners is that albeit they are appointed as Clerks Grade-II in various Panchayats, vide orders dated 24- 6-2014, 11-9-2014, 23-3-2015 and 4-8-2017, by the administrative department, it was provided that where the post of VLW-cum-PS was vacant for reason of non posting of an incumbent thereto or the incumbent being on long leave, the charge of the said post be given to Clerk Grade-II of the Gram Panchayat concerned for the purpose of managing its affairs. These administrative orders are stated to be rooted in the autonomy of the Panchayati Raj Institutions mandated by Article 243-G and 243-H of the Constitution of India. It has been submitted that even otherwise for the efficiency in public interest in the administration of Gram Panchayat a Clerk Grade- II posted in Panchayat concerned ought to be given additional (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 19 charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS, wherever the incumbent VLW-cum-PS has not been posted or when posted is on long leave as he can constantly engage in the requisite work day to day.
It has been submitted that vide circular/ order dated 17- 5-2018 the State Government however passed an administrative order providing that in the event of a vacancy of VLW-cum-PS in a Gram Panchayat obtaining for any reason, the additional charge of the said post be given to another VLW-cum-PS of a Panchayat in the vicinity and not to an employee or other staff including the Clerk Grade-II in the said Panchayat. The said order was challenged in SBCWP No.8787/2018, titled Pratap Singh Damor Vs. State of Rajasthan, before the Principal Seat of this court. Vide order dated 22-6-2018, the effect and operation of the order dated 17-5-2018 was stayed. Subsequently, however during the pendency of the writ petition, the State Government vide order/ circular dated 26-6-2018 withdrew the impugned order dated 17-5-2018 and continued its earlier orders dated 24-6-2014 and 29-7-2015, whereby additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS was to be given to the Clerk (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 20 Grade-II in the same Panchayat. Further vide order dated 15-9- 2018 the "incharge" arrangement was reiterated for the Clerk Grade-II. Writ petition No.8787/2018, was in the circumstances got dismissed as infructuous on 26-9-2018.
The petitioners submit that however the State Government subsequent to disposal of Pratap Singh Damor's writ petition as infructuous passed another order/ circular dated 5-10-2018, reiterating exactly its earlier order dated 17-5-2018, and directed that the additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS in a Panchayat be handed over only to a VLW-cum-PS in another Panchayat in the vicinity and not to the other staff in the concerned Panchayat including the Clerk Grade-II. It has been submitted that the impugned order is wholly arbitrary, unreasonable, destructive of the autonomy of the Panchayati Raj Institutions mandated under Article 243G and 243H of the Constitution of India, deleterious to the efficiencies of administration in the Panchayats and hence contrary to public interest.
Reply to petition has been filed. It has been submitted that (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 21 the petitions are entirely misdirected, as they do not agitate any alleged contravention of any legal or fundamental rights of the petitioners or state a case of the respondents failing to discharge any statutory duty owed to them. The petitioners instead seek to, without any legal foundation, impugn an administrative order of the State Government, which is neither even remotely arbitrary nor has any adverse bearing on their rights as Clerk Grade-II relating to their salary, job description or career prospectus. It has been submitted that the decision of the State Government to hand over the charge of the post of VLW-cum- PS in a Pnachayat, when the post is vacant for reason of long leave to VLW-cum-PS at other Panchayat in the vicinity is an administrative decision, which it empowered to take, in its discretion to determine as to how the functions of the Panchayats are best conducted in public interest and in accordance with law. The petitioners have no manner of right to demand that they be given charge of another distinct and separate post in the Panchayat, which statutorily requires higher academic qualifications and has a statutorily defined job description/ obligation. It has been submitted that Rule 331(3) of the Rules of 1996 visualizes a VLW-cum-PS being incharge of (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 22 more than one Panchayat and details the manner of discharge of the work by him in more than one Panchayat when occasion arises. The current arrangement of "incharge" VLW-cum-PS is thus statutorily embedded. It has been further submitted that Section 78(1)(a) of the Act of 1994 provides that a Panchayat Secretary shall be appointed in every Panchayat. Consequently a Clerk Grade-II in any Panchayat, in any case whatsoever, cannot in any circumstance act as a VLW-cum-PS in absence of the VLW-cum-PS for any reason including the long leave of the incumbent.
The reply further states that no doubt the order dated 17- 5-2018, impugned in SBCWP No.8787/2018, Pratap Singh Damor (supra), was indeed withdrawn and the said petition was accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Yet that situation did not restrain the State Government in law to resort to its reservoir of executive and administrative powers in consonance with the Act of 1994 and the Rules of 1996, as has been done vide the impugned order dated 5-10-2018. The order has also specifically stated that additional charge of VLW-cum-PS when vacant not be given to any other staff of the said Panchayat. It (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 23 has been in the facts submitted that the petitions are wholly without merit, lacking absolutely in legal foundation and are deserving of dismissal.
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the petition and reply thereto.
Statutorily under the Act of 1994 and the Rules of 1996 the two posts of VLW-cum-PS on the one hand and Clerk Grade-II on the other are wholly unrelated and distinct. The educational qualification for the post of VLW-cum-PS is graduation, while that for the post of Clerk Grade-II is Senior Secondary. Pay scales for these two posts are different and drawn from different funds. The functions of the post of VLW- cum-PS are statutorily prescribed in terms of Section 78(2) of the Act of 1994 and Rule 331(3) of the Rules of 1996. Rule 331 of the Rules of 1996 visualizes that a Secretary of a Panchayat can be incharge of more than one Panchayat.
Aside of aforesaid the decision of the State Government vide its impugned order dated 5-10-2018 to give "additional (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 24 charge", is an administrative order. It has not been shown to suffer arbitrariness or prejudice the petitioners' legal or fundamental rights. Besides, I am also of the considered view that under Section 78(1)(a) of the Act of 1994 it is mandatory to appoint in the prescribed manner in every Panchayat a Secretary--redesignated now a VLW-cum-PS. This obligation entails ensuring a VLW-cum-PS so appointed with reference to his academic and other qualification under Rule 266 of the Rules of 1996. Rule 331(3) of the Rules of 1996 visualizes a VLW-cum-PS of a Panchayat holding additional charge of such a post in another Panchayat in the vicinity. To jettison the aforesaid legal structure and claim, as the petitioners have, that clerks Grade-II of a Panchayat be given as a right additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS in a Panchayat, when vacant is a stretch and altogether without any legal foundation. The claim is wholly unsustainable. Past practice, vide earlier state Government's orders, is of no avail and in any event if an erroneous administrative order has earlier been passed, law confers no right on a beneficiary to assert its perpetuation in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or otherwise. The executive has inherent powers to review its (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 25 administrative decisions.
These petitions are in fact an outstanding illustration of what inter alia ails the administration of justice in courts. Frivolous and baseless petitions wagering on a beneficial order, even if interim, occasioned by the institutional incapacity of the courts to, at the outset exparte scrutinize merits of a case at all times for reason of docket over load and overarching work pressure must be nipped in the bud. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of A. Shanmugam Vs. Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Patipalanai Sangam [(2012) 6 SCC 430] has held that experience reveals that a large number of cases are inter alia filed on false claims to cause delay in the administration of justice and this can only be adequately taken care of if the courts adopt realistic approach in granting restitution and visiting the petitioner with appropriate costs. Relying on the judgment in the case of Ramrameshwari Devi Vs. Nirmala Devi [(2011) 8 SCC 249] the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that "unless wrongdoers are denied profit or undue benefit from frivolous litigations, it would be difficult to control frivolous and uncalled-for litigations. False averments of facts (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 26 and untenable contentions are serious problems faced by courts and the other problem is that litigants deliberately create confusion by introducing irrelevant and minimally relevant facts and documents. The court cannot reject such claims, defences and pleas at the first look and requires some time, at time years, before the court is able to see through, discern and reach to the truth." Dissuading of frivolous petitions including by way of appropriate costs in some manner is the idea writ large in the judgment of the Apex Court referred to above.
Consequently the petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.5000/- each to be paid by each of the petitioners in all the writ petitions. 80% of the costs be paid to the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority Jaipur (RSLSA) and 20% thereof to the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association Jaipur. The costs be paid within a period of 90 days from today--the limitation for a DB Special Appeal (Writ) being 60 days. In the event of non payment of costs, as directed, by each of the petitioners within three months from today, the concerned Gram Panchayat/ Zila Parishad/ wages/ salary Payment authority shall deduct the amount of costs from the salary of each of (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) 27 the petitioners and deposit the same with the RSLSA Jaipur and the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association Jaipur, in the proportion aforesaid, within one month following.
The connected petitions agitating the same issue adjudicated in the petition above, are for reasons detailed therein also baseless and similarly dismissed with costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by each of the petitioners therein to the RSLSA Jaipur and the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association Jaipur in the proportion as directed aforesaid. Non payment of costs will entail recovery in the manner stated.
A copy of this order be placed in each of the connected petitions.
(Alok Sharma), J.
arn/ (Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 03:51:11 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)