Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Naina vs State on 20 January, 2020

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur

Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
     S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 872/2020

Naina s/o Shri Heera Banjara, aged about 35 years, R/o Jelod,
Police Station Raipur, District Bhilwara (Raj.).
        (At present lodged in District Jail, Dungarpur).
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State of Rajasthan
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Rakesh Matoria
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.



        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order 20/01/2020 The present bail application (bail jump) has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 187/2001, Police Station Sadar, District Dungarpur for the offences under Sections 5, 6, 8 & 9 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter, Temporary Migration and Export Regulation) Act, 1995.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is facing trial for the aforesaid offences. He was granted bail earlier but since he was not aware of the dates of the learned trial court because he went outside the State for earning his livelihood and therefore, he could not come present before the learned trial court on the date fixed for his appearance, therefore, he jumped (Downloaded on 21/01/2020 at 08:50:39 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLMB-872/2020] the bail. The petitioner is ready to submit his bail bonds and shall continue to appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing fixed by the trial court and shall not jump the bail again.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced, this Court thinks it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. However, it is made clear that last opportunity is granted to the present petitioner in the case and if he commits default in appearing before the learned trial Court on the date fixed and will jump the bail again, no leniency will be granted to him in the future.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Naina s/o Heera Banjara be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 187/2001, Police Station Sadar, District Dungarpur provided he furnishes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees: One Lac Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is also required to comply with the order passed under Section 446 Cr.P.C.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 141-Inder/-

(Downloaded on 21/01/2020 at 08:50:39 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)