Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Ms Aiswarya Vilas Desai vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2012

Author: Ram Mohan Reddy

Bench: Ram Mohan Reddy

                           -1 -

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2012

                         BEFORE

        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

              W.P.No.26472/2012 C/W
            W.P.NO.29433/2012(EDN-AD)
W.P.NO.26472/2012

BETWEEN

MS AISWARYA VILAS DESAI
S/O VILAS DESAI,
AGED 18 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT,
R/O BO. 108, JJ APARTMENT,
NO. 1,OPP: VIJAY NAGAR CLUB,
VIJAYA NAGAR,
BANGALORE- 560 040
                                          ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI V.S.GUNJAL & SRI V.V.GUNJAL, ADV.,)


AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (HIGHER EDUCATION)
      M.S BUIDLING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
      BANGALORE- 560 001,
      BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION.

2.    DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
      OPPOSITE MAHARANI'S COLLEGE,
      PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001
      BY ITS DIRECTOR

3.    KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY
      1ST FLOOR, 18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD,
      MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE- 560 003,
      BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
                           -2 -

4.   THE VISVESVARAYA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
     BY ITS REGISTRAR,
     MACHE, BELGAUM- 590 018

5.   ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION
     SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE
     PRASANNA KUMAR BLOCK
     CENTRAL COLLEGE CAMPUS
     PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE
     BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR

     AMENDED AND ADDED BY VIDE
     ORDER DATED 8.8.2012.
                                          ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI R.OMKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2
    SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADV., FOR R3
    SRI BHARATH KUMAR, ADV., FOR R4
    SRI P.S.DINESH KUMAR, ADV., FOR R5)


      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO DEFINE THE TERM TECHNICAL
VACATION AND TO CONSIDER THE SUBJECT INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY AS TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL SUBJECTS AS
DESCRIBED BY THE AICTE VIDE ANNEXURE-F [UNDATED] FOR
THE YEARS 2012-13 AND HOLD THAT PETITIONER IS ENTITLED
FOR ADMISSION TO ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
COURSES WHO HAVE PASSED 10+2 EXAMINATION WITH
PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS BEING COMPULSORY SUBJECTS
ALONG    WITH    CHEMISTRY,     EXCLUDING   INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY AS ARBITRARY AND WHIMSICL INTERPRETATION
TO THE STUDY THE COURSE OF UNDER GRADUATE BE
PROGRAMME,      DECLARING     IT  AS   UNCONSTITUTIONAL
VIOLTING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER
AND THE STUDENTS SIMILARLY PLACED AND AS ARBITRARY,
ILLEGAL AND CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE
STUDENTS WHO HAVE STUDIED PRE-UNIVERSITY FOR
DURING ACADEMIC YEARS 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011,
2011-2012   AND    CONSEQUENTLY      DIRECT    THE   4TH
RESPONDENT TO RE-NOTIFY ANNEXURE-H TO INCLUDE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ONE OF TECHNICAL VOCATION
SUBJECT TO FOR DETERMINE THE ACADEMIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR PURPOSE OF ADMISSION TO B.E./B.TECH COURSES FOR
THE ACADEMIC YEARS 2010-13.
                            -3 -

W.P.NO.29433/2012

BETWEEN

1.    MR AAKASH
      AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
      S/O VIJAYEENDRA KAMALAPUR
      R/O FLAT NO.4, SANKULA SOCIETY,
      PLOT NO.15, SECTOR 42A,
      NERUL WEST,
      NAVI MUMBAI -400 706

      AND

      NO.422/14, 1ST PHASE, V STAGE,
      6TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, BEML LAYOUT,
      RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA,
      BANGALORE-560 098

      SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY FATHER
      VIJAYEENDRA KAMALAPUR
      S/O SHESHAGIRI RAO KAMALAPUR,
      R/O FLAT NO.4, SANKULA SOCIETY
      PLOT NO.15, SECTOR 42A,
      NERUL WEST,
      NAVI MUMBAI -400 706
                                             ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI V.V.GUNJAL & SRI S.BHAVANA, ADV.,)



AND

1.    KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY
      REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
      SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM
      BANGALORE-560 003

2.    STATE OF KARNTAKA
      THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (HIGHER
      EDUCATION), EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
      GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
      M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
      BANGALORE-560 001

3.    THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
      OPP. MAHARANIS COLLEGE, PALACE ROAD,
                            -4 -

     BANGALORE-560 001
     BY ITS DIRECTOR

4.   THE VISHWESHWARAIAH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
     MACHE, BELGAUM -590 114
     BY ITS REGISTRAR

5.   ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
     SOUTHERN REGION,
     HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE
     AT PRASANNA KUMAR BLOCK,
     CENTRAL COLLEGE CAMPUS,
     PLACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009
     BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR
                                       ... RESPONDENTS

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
ACCEPT THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SC.) AND RELATED
SUBJECTS AS TECHNICAL VOCATION AND TO CONSIDER THE
SUBJECT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALSO AS TECHNICAL
VOCATIONAL SUBJECTS AS DESCRIBED BY THE AICTE VIDE
ANNEXURE-F (UNDATED) FOR THE YEARS 2012-13 AND HOLD
THAT PETITIONER IS ENTITLED FOR ADMISSION TO
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY COURSES WHO HAVE
PASSED     10+2   EXAMINATION      WITH     PHYSICS    AND
MATHEMATICS BEING COMPULSORY SUBJECTS ALONG WITH
CHEMISTRY, EXCLUDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AS
ARBITRARY AND WHIMSICAL INTERPRETATION TO THE STUDY
THE COURSE OF UNDER GRADUATE BE PROGRAMME,
DECLARING IT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATING THE
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER AND THE
STUDENTS SIMILARLY PLACED AND AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL
AND CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE STUDENTS WHO
HAVE STUDIED PRE-UNIVERSITY FOR DURING ACADEMIC
YEARS 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 AND ETC.,


     THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

Since the common question of law and fact arises for decision making, with the consent of learned

-5 -

Counsel for the parties, petitions are clubbed together, finally heard and are disposed of by this order.

2. Petitioner a student having completed the Pre- University course applied for admission to the engineering course, and when denied admission on the premise that the subject Information Technology is a non-vocational technical subject and not equivalent or akin to Computer Science/Electronics, though the All India Council for Technical Education amended the eligibility norms by adding Technical Vocational subject without defining the said term, as also despite the order in W.P.NO.20992/2012 interpreting the term Technical Vocational to include Computer Science/Electronics, hence, this petition for a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to define the term Technical Vocational to include the subject Information Technology.

3. Sri P.S.Dinesh Kumar, learned standing counsel for the AICTE submits that though the term

-6 -

Technical Vocational includes Computer Science/Electronics, nevertheless, includes Information Technology is also one of the subjects.

4. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives for consideration in these petitions and are accordingly disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE PB