Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Khema Yadav vs Ravi Mittal on 15 July, 2024

Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas

            Neutral Citation
            2024:CGHC:25375




                                                                         Page 1 of 1

                                                                             NAFR
                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                              CONT No. 1090 of 2023
       Smt. Khema Yadav W/o Vinod Kumar Yadav Aged About 30 Years
       Occupation Assistant Grade 3, Posted At Ekikrit Bal Vikas Project
       Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.)
                                                                 ---- Applicant
                                        Versus
       1.   Ravi Mittal Collector, District Jashpur (C.G.)
       2.   Sushree Fabiola Xalxo Project Officer, Ekikrit Baal Vikas Project
            Kansabel District Jashpur (C.G.)
                                                            ---- Respondents

For Applicant : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale & Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 15.07.2024

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that order passed by this Court on 10.10.2023 (Annexure C/1) in WPS No. 8102/2023 (Smt. Khema Yadav Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) has been complied with and the respondents have tendered unconditional apology for delay in compliance of the order passed by this Court.

2. Considering the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the respondents that they have already complied with the order passed by this Court and also considering the unconditional apology tendered by them in delayed compliance of the order passed by this Court, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, therefore, the Contempt proceeding initiated against the respondent is closed.

3. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun