Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ram Sewak Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 21 April, 2025

Author: Samit Gopal

Bench: Samit Gopal





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:59365
 
Court No. - 64
 
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 825 of 2014
 

 
Revisionist :- Ram Sewak Yadav
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
 
Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjay Singh Sengar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Yogesh Kumar Vaish
 

 
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
 

1. List revised.

2. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.

3. Sri Yogesh Kumar Vaish, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State are present and have been heard.

4. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist Ram Sewak Yadav, against the judgement and order dated 11.03.2014 passed by Sessions Judge, Mahoba in Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 2012 (Ram Sewak Yadav vs. State) and order dated 07.05.2012 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba in Case No. 1651 of 2007 (F.I. vs. Ram Sewak Yadav), under Section 7/16 PFA ACt, P.S. Kabrai, District Mahoba.

5. As per office report dated 21.11.2023, a report from C.J.M. concerned was called for regarding execution of bailable warrant against the revisionist. In compliance of the said order, C.J.M. concerned vide letter dated 21.11.2023 informed that bailable warrant has not been executed against the revisionist because the revisionist has died. The said report has been sent after due enquiry.

6. Accordingly, the present revision stands abated.

7. The trial court records, if received, be sent back along with the communication of this order. Office to communicate this order to trial court concerned within two weeks.

(Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 21.4.2025 / Manoj