Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Gopal Prasad Chouhan vs R. Prasanna on 12 August, 2022

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                  1

                                                                                              NAFR

                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                           Contempt Case (C) No.779 of 2022

        Gopal Prasad Chouhan, S/o Shri Maya Ram Chouhan, aged about 37
        years, working as Lecturer and posted at Govt. Higher Secondary
        School, Farsatoli, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.)
                                                                  ---- Applicant

                                              Versus

    1. R. Prasanna, Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural
       Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur
       (C.G.)

    2. Kartikey Goyal, Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Office at Sector-19,
       North Block Bhutal, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur
       (C.G.)

    3. Jitendra Yadav, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur,
       District Jashpur (C.G.)
                                                            (Contemnors)
                                                        ---- Respondents

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 12/08/2022

1. This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner alleging non- compliance of this Court's order dated 7-12-2021 passed in W.P.(S) No.6411/2011 (Gopal Prasad Chouhan v. State of Chhattisgarh and others).

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to give one opportunity to the respondents/contemnors to ensure compliance of order dated 7-12-2021 passed by this Court. Therefore, the petitioner shall make additional representation along with copy of 2 this order within ten days from today before the respondents and, in turn, the respondents shall ensure compliance of order dated 7-12- 2021 in its letter and spirit expeditiously.

3. With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma