Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/4 vs Rajesh Kemprai And 3 Ors on 28 June, 2022

Author: Achintya Malla Bujor Barua

Bench: Achintya Malla Bujor Barua

                                                                   Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010146262021




                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/342/2021

         MUNINDRA BARMAN AND 9 ORS.
         S/O LT. NARENDRA NATH BARMAN, R/O HOUSE NO. 25, FLAT NO. 3(C),
         GAURAV ROSE BAY, MADHUBAN NAMGAHR PATH, BAMUNIMAIDAN,
         GUWAHATI-781021

         2: SUBASH THAKURIA
          S/O LT. KRISHNA KANTA THAKURIA
          R/O VILL-BAIRAGI
          P.O. AND P.S.-PATACHARKUCHI
          DIST-BARPETA
         ASSAM
          PIN-781326

         3: APURBA NATH
          S/O LT. GOURHAI NATH
          R/O HOUSE NO. 7
         ASEB ROAD
          P.O.-ULUBARI
          NEAR SHIV HOTEL
          GUWAHATI-781007
          DIST-KAMRUP (M)

         4: UPENDRAJIT DAS
          S/O LT. ADITYA CH. DAS
          R/O HOUSE NO. 35
          EAST JYOTINAGAR
          BYELANE NO. 3
          P.O.-BAMUNIMAIDAN
          GUWAHATI-781021
          DIST-KAMRUP(M)

         5: MD. ARIF HUSSAIN
          S/O LT. MOKBUL HUSSAIN
          C/O DR. NEKIB HUSSAIN
                                                    Page No.# 2/4

R/O HOUSE NO. 1
BYELANE NO. 3
BISHNUJYOTI PATH
HATIGAON
GUWAHATI-781038
DIST- KAMRUP(M)

6: MANIK DUTTA
 S/O LT SRIKANTA DUTTA
 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
 PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPTT.
 GUWAHATI ROAD DIVISION GHY-1

7: SIMANTA KUSUM SARMAH
 S/O LT BIRESWAR SARMAH
 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
 P.W.D.
 RANGIA
 N.H. DIVISION RANGIA

8: JAMINI KUMAR BARMAN
 S/O LT BHOGIRAM BARMAN
 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
 PWRD
 GUWAHATI CITY DIVISION NO. II
 GHY-21

9: NEWTON DEORI
 S/O SRI PROFULLA DEORI
 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
 PWRD
ASSAM
 CHANDMARI GHY-3

10: CHANDAN DEKA
 S/O SRI RAMEN MOHAN DEKA
 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
 PWRD
ASSAM
 CHANDMARI
 GHY-

VERSUS

RAJESH KEMPRAI AND 3 ORS.
COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT (PWRD), GROUND FLOOR,
BLOCK B, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
                                                                               Page No.# 3/4


            2:BIRAJ TALUKDAR
             CHIEF ENGINEER
             PWD (BORDER ROAD AND NEC WORKS)
             PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS) DEPARTMENT
             OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
             PWD (BORDER ROAD AND NEC WORKS)
             CHANDMARI
             GUWHATI-781003
             GUWAHATI-3

            3:M. RAHMAN
             DEPUTY SECRETARY
             ESTT-II BRANCH
             PWRD
             DISPUR
             GUWAHATI-781006

            4:RAJ CHAKARBORTY
             COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
            ASSAM
             PUBLIC WORKS (B AND NH) DEPTT.
             PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND NH DEPT
             BLOCK B
             GROUND FLOOR
            ASSAM SECRETARIAT
             DISPUR
             GUWAHATI-78100

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R1-R3)




                                 BEFORE
            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA

                                         ORDER

Date : 28.06.2022 This contempt petition is instituted alleging willful and deliberate violation of the direction contained in paragraph 15 of the judgment dated 17.12.2020 in WP(C)/4529/2019 and other related writ petitions.

2. The direction was that the B.Tech degrees of the writ petitioners therein are to be Page No.# 4/4 construed to be valid B.Tech degrees inasmuch as the degrees were obtained from an Institute called IASE or other equivalent Institutes whose degrees were otherwise found to have been not valid, would stand validated if such degree holders successfully appear in a subsequent examination to be held by the AICTE. On the aforesaid proposition of law, the direction of this Court was issued.

3. Mr. P Nayak, learned counsel for the respondents contemnors brings it to the notice of the Court that there is a subsequent judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Limited v. Rabi Sankar Patro and others reported in (2018) 2 SCC 298 wherein in paragraph 26.2 it had been provided that the successful attempt at the AICTE conducted examination ought to have been done in the first attempt itself and only in such occasion, the benefit given in the earlier judgment dated 22.02.2018 in Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Limited v. Rabi Sankar Patro and others reported in (2018) 2 SCC 298 would be available.

4. It is stated that some of the petitioners have not cleared the AICTE conducted examination in the first attempt and therefore, the earlier benefits of their degrees being validated would not be available.

List tomorrow i.e. on 29.06.2022.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant