Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Section 12] [Entire Act]

State of Andhra Pradesh - Subsection

Section 12(2) in Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 2006

(2)The Returning Officer shall then examine the nomination papers and shall decide on all objections which may be made at the time to any nomination and may either on such objection or on his own motion after such summary enquiry as he thinks necessary, reject any nomination on any of the following grounds, name1y -
(i)that the candidate is ineligible for election as a Member or Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Member of Mandal Praja Parishad and Member of Zilla Praja Parishad under sections 17, 18, 19, 19A, 19B, 20A, 155, 156, 183 and 184 of the Act; or
(ii)that the name of the candidate is not registered in the electoral roll of the Gram Panchayat, Mandal Praja Parishad or Zilla Praja Parishad;
(iii)the name of the proposer is not registered in the electoral roll of the Gram Panchayat in the case of Sarpanch, in the electoral roll of the concerned ward in the case of Member, Gram Panchayat and in the electoral roll of the concerned territorial constituency in the case of Member, Mandal Praja Parishad and Member, Zilla Praja Parishad; or
(iv)that the candidate or his proposer has failed to comply with any of the provisions of rules 8, 9(3) and 10,
(v)that, in case the office is reserved for any community or women, the candidate does not belong to that community or is not a women, as the case may be; or
(vi)that the signature/thumb impression of the candidate or the proposer in the nomination paper is not genuine:
Provided that the nomination of a candidate shall not be rejected merely on the ground of any incorrect description of his name or of the name of his proposer, or of any other particulars relating to the candidate or his proposer as entered in the electoral roll, if the identity of the candidate or proposer, as the case may be, is otherwise established beyond reasonable doubt.