Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section

Section 21 in Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Sharing of Inter State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010

21. Power to Remove Difficulties.

(1)If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the provisions of these Regulations, the Commission, may by general or special order, direct the Implementing Agency, NLDC, CTU, RLDC, RPC, ISTS Licensees and Designated ISTS Customers, to take suitable action, not being inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, which appears to the Commission to be necessary or expedient for the purpose of removing the difficulties.
(2)The Implementing Agency, NLDC, CTU, RLDC, RPC, ISTS Licensees and Designated ISTS Customers may make an application to the Commission and seek suitable orders to remove any difficulties that may arise in implementation of these Regulations.
(3)Notwithstanding Sub-Regulations (1) and (2), if any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of these Regulations, the Commission may, by general or specific order, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, as may appear to be necessary for removing the difficulty.AnnexureI. Philosophy of Point of Connection Based Transmission Pricing Mechanism and Selection of the Hybrid MethodEfficient pricing of a commodity or service needs to reflect the marginal cost of utilization of the underlying resources that are used in the provision of that commodity or service. The 'operational' term here is 'utilization'. The pricing mechanism must therefore be able to capture the utilization, and charge for the resources being utilized.Utilization of the network is generally determined in terms of either average utilization or marginal utilization of the transmission assets. Pricing of transmission services based on average or marginal utilization of the network branches is known as Average Participation or Marginal Participation method respectively. These two methods have been compared and contrasted in detail in the literature. These methods are discussed in detail below.
1.1Marginal Participation Method. - Any usage based methodology tries to identify how much of the power that flows through each of the lines in the system is due to the existence of a certain network user, in order to charge it according to the adopted measure of utilization. To do so, the marginal participation method analyzes how the flows in the grid are modified when minor changes are introduced in the production or consumption of agent i. For each of the considered scenarios (for each season) the procedure can be considered as follows:a. Marginal Participation sensitivities Aij are obtained that represent how the flow in line j changes when the injection in bus i is increased by 1 MW. The increase in 1 MW has to be compensated by a corresponding increase in load or generation at some other bus or buses - called the slack bus(es).b. Total participations for each agent are calculated as a product of its net injection by its marginal participation. If net injection is considered positive for generators and negative for demands, the total participation of any agent i in line j is Aij(generationi - demandi).c. The cost of each line is allocated pro-rata to the different agents according to their total participation in the corresponding line.
1.2Average Participation Method. - The method of average participation works as follows: