Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section

Section 11 in University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2018

11. Web Master, Ministry of Human Resource Development for publication on the website of the Ministry, hosted by the National Information Center.

Annexure-IPay Matrix
Pay Band (Rs.) 15,600-39,100 37,400-67,000 67,000-79,000
Grade Pay (Rs.) 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 0
Index of Rationalization 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.72 2.72
Entry Pay (Rs.) 21,600 25,790 29,900 49,200 53,000 67,000
Academic Level 10 11 12 12A 14 15
Rationalised Entry Pay (Rs) 1 57,700 68,900 79,800 1,31,400 1,44,200 1,82,200
2 58,400 71,000 82,200 1,36,300 1,48,500 1,87,700
3 61,200 73,700 84,700 1,38,400 1,56,000 1,98,900
4 63,000 75,200 87,200 1,42,400 1,57,400 1,99,100
5 64,900 77,600 89,800 1,47,900 1,62,300 2,05,100
6 66,800 79,900 92,500 1,52,300 1,67,200 2,11,300
7 68,800 82,300 95,300 1,56,900 1,72,200 2,17,600
8 70,000 84,800 98,200 1,61,000 1,77,400 2,24,100
9 73,000 87,300 1,01,100 1,66,400 1,82,700  
10 75,200 89,900 1,04,100 1,71,400 1,88,200  
11 77,500 92,600 1,07,200 1,76,500 1,93,300  
12 78,800 95,400 1,10,400 1,81,800 1,96,000  
13 82,200 98,600 1,10,700 1,87,300 2,05,800  
14 84,700 1,01,200 1,17,100 1,92,800 2,11,000  
15 87,200 1,04,200 1,20,800 1,98,700 2,18,200  
16 89,800 1,07,300 1,24,200 2,04,700    
17 95,600 1,10,500 1,37,000 2,10,800    
Pay Band (Rs.) 15,600-39,100 37,400-67,000 67,000-79,000
18 95,300 1,13,800 1,31,700 2,17,100    
19 98,200 1,1,200 1,35,700      
20 1,01,100 1,20,700 1,39,800      
21 1,04,100 1,24,300 1,44,000      
22 1,07,200 1,26,000 1,48,300      
23 1,10,400 1,31,600 1,52,700      
24 1,13,700 1,36,800 1,57,900      
25 1,17,100 1,39,000 1,62,000      
26 1,20,000 1,44,100 ,1,69,900      
27 1,24,200 1,48,400 1,71,000      
28 1,27,000 1,52,000 1,77,100      
29 1,31,700 1,57,600 1,82,400      
30 1,35,700 1,62,200 1,87,900      
31 1,39,800 1,67,100 1,93,500      
32 1,44,000 1,72,100 1,99,300      
33 1,48,300 1,77,300 2,05,300      
34 1,52,700 1,82,600 2,11,500      
35 1,57,300 1,88,100        
36 1,62,000 1,93,700        
37 1,67,100 1,99,600        
38 1,71,000 2,06,500        
39 1,77,100          
40 1,82,400          
Appendix IITable 1Assessment Criteria and Methodology for University/College Teachers
S.No. Activity Grading Criteria
1. Teaching: (Number of classes taught/totalclasses assigned)x100% (Classes taught includes sessions ontutorials, lab and other teaching related activities) 80% & above –GoodBelow 80% but 70% &above-SatisfactoryLess than 70% - Not satisfactory
2. Involvement in theUniversity/College students related activities/researchactivities:(a) Administrative responsibilities such as Head, Chairperson/Dean/ Director/ Co-ordinator, Warden etc.(b) Examination and evaluation duties assigned by the college /university or attending the examination paper evaluation.(c) Student related co-curricular, extension and field basedactivities such as student clubs, career counselling, studyvisits, student seminars and other events, cultural, sports, NCC,NSS and community services.(d) Organising seminars/ conferences/ workshops, othercollege/university activities.(e) Evidence of actively involved in guiding Ph.D students.(f) Conducting minor or major research project sponsored bynational or international agencies.(g) At least one single or joint publication in peerreviewed orUGC list of Journals. Good - Involved in atleast 3 activitiesSatisfactory - 1-2activitiesNot-satisfactory -Not involved / undertaken any of the activitiesNote:Number of activities can be within or across thebroad categories of activities
Overall Grading:Good:Good inteaching and satisfactory or good in activity at Sl.No.2.OrSatisfactory:Satisfactory in teaching and good or satisfactory in activity atSl.No.2.Not Satisfactory:If neither good nor satisfactory in overall gradingNote:For the purpose of assessing thegrading of Activity at Serial No. 1 and Serial No. 2, all suchperiods of duration which have been spent by the teacher ondifferent kinds of paid leaves such as Maternity Leave, ChildCare Leave, Study Leave, Medical Leave, Extraordinary Leave andDeputation shall be excluded from the grading assessment. Theteacher shall be assessed for the remaining period of durationand the same shall be extrapolated for the entire period ofassessment to arrive at the grading of the teacher. The teacheron such leaves or deputation as mentioned above shall not be putto any disadvantage for promotion under CAS due to his/herabsence from his/her teaching responsibilities subject to thecondition that such leave/deputation was undertaken with theprior approval of the competent authority following allprocedures laid down in these regulations and as per the acts,statutes and ordinances of the parent institution.
Table 2Methodology for University and College Teachers for calculating Academic/Research Score(Assessment must be based on evidence produced by the teacher such as: copy of publications, project sanction letter, utilization and completion certificates issued by the University and acknowledgements for patent filing and approval letters, students' Ph.D. award letter, etc,.)
S.N. Academic/Research Activity Faculty of Sciences /Engineering /Agriculture/ Medical /Veterinary Sciences Faculty of Languages /Humanities / Arts /Social Sciences / Library /Education / Physical Education/Commerce / Management & other related disciplines
1. Research Papers in Peer-Reviewed or UGClisted Journals 08 per paper 10 per paper
2. Publications (other than Research papers)    
  (a) Books authored which are published by ;    
  International publishers 12 12
  National Publishers 10 10
  Chapter in Edited Book 05 05
  Editor of Book by International Publisher 10 10
  Editor of Book by National Publisher 08 08
       
       
  (b) Translation works in Indian and ForeignLanguages by qualified faculties    
  Chapter or Research paper 03 03
  Book 08 08
3. Creation of ICT mediated Teaching Learningpedagogy and content and development of new and innovativecourses and curricula    
  (a) Development of Innovative pedagogy 05 05    
  (b) Design of new curricula and courses 02per curricula/course 02 per curricula/course    
  (c) MOOCs    
  Development of complete MOOCs in 4 quadrants (4credit course)(In case of MOOCs of lesser credits 05marks/credit) 20 20
  MOOCs (developed in 4 quadrant) permodule/lecture 05 05
  Content writer/subject matter expert for eachmodule of MOOCs (at least one quadrant) 02 02
  Course Coordinator for MOOCs (4 creditcourse)(In case of MOOCs of lesser credits 02 marks/credit) 08 08
  (d) E-Content    
  Development of e-Content in 4 quadrants for acomplete course/e-book 12 12
  e-Content (developed in 4 quadrants) per module 05 05
  Contribution to development of e-content modulein complete course/paper/e-book (at least one quadrant) 02 02
  Editor of e-content for complete course/ paper/e-book 10 10
4. (a) Research guidance    
  Ph.D. 10 per degree awarded05 per thesis submitted 10 per degree awarded05 per thesis submitted
  M.Phil./P.G dissertation 02 per degree awarded 02 per degree awarded
  (b) Research Projects Completed    
  More than 10 lakhs 10 10
  Less than 10 lakhs 05 05
  (c) Research Projects Ongoing :    
  More than 10 lakhs 05 05
  Less than 10 lakhs 02 02
  (d) Consultancy 03 03
5. (a) Patents    
  International 10 10
  National 07 07
  (b) *Policy Document (Submitted to anInternational body/organisation like UNO/UNESCO/WorldBank/International Monetary Fund etc. or Central Government orState Government)  
  International 10 10
  National 07 07
  State 04 04
  (c) Awards/Fellowship  
  International 07 07
  National 05 05
       
       
6. *Invited lectures / Resource Person/ paperpresentation in Seminars/ Conferences/full paper in ConferenceProceedings (Paper presented in Seminars/Conferences and alsopublished as full paper in Conference Proceedings will be countedonly once)    
  International (Abroad) 07 07
  International (within country) 05 05
  National 03 03
  State/University 02 02
The Research score for research papers would be augmented as follows :Peer-Reviewed or UGC-listed Journals (Impact factor to be determined as per Thomson Reuters list) :
(i) Paper in refereed journals without impact factor - 5 Points
(ii) Paper with impact factor less than 1 - 10 Points
(iii) Paper with impact factor between 1 and 2 - 15 Points
(iv) Paper with impact factor between 2 and 5 - 20 Points
(v) Paper with impact factor between 5 and 10 - 25 Points
(vi) Paper with impact factor >10 - 30 Points
(a)Two authors: 70% of total value of publication for each author.
(b)More than two authors: 70% of total value of publication for the First/Principal/Corresponding author and 30% of total value of publication for each of the joint authors.
Joint Projects: Principal Investigator and Co-investigator would get 50% each.Note: • Paper presented if part of edited book or proceeding then it can be claimed only once.• For joint supervision of research students, the formula shall be 70% of the total score for Supervisor and Cosupervisor. Supervisor and Co-supervisor, both shall get 7 marks each.• *For the purpose of calculating research score of the teacher, the combined research score from the categories of 5(b). Policy Document and 6. Invited lectures/Resource Person/Paper presentation shall have an upper capping of thirty percent of the total research score of the teacher concerned.• The research score shall be from the minimum of three categories out of six categories.Table: 3 ACriteria for Short-listing of Candidates for Interview for the Post of Assistant Professors in Universities
S.N. Academic Record Score
1. Graduation 80% & Above = 15 60% to less than 80% = 13 55% to less than 60% =10 45% to less than 55% =05
2. Post-Graduation 80% & Above = 25 60% to less than 80% = 23 55% (50% in case of SC/ST/OBC (noncreamylayer)/PWD) to less than 60% = 20
3. M.Phil. 60% & above = 07 55% to less than 60% = 05
4. Ph.D. 30
5. NET with JRF 07
  NET 05
  SLET/SET 03
6. Research Publications ( 2 marks for eachresearch publications published in Peer-Reviewed or UGC-listedJournals) 10
7. Teaching / Post Doctoral Experience (2 marksfor one year each) 10
8. Awards  
  International / National Level (Awards given byInternational Organisations/ Government of India / Government ofIndia recognised National Level Bodies) 03
  State-Level(Awards given by State Government) 02
#However, if the period of teaching/Post-doctoral experience is less than one year then the marks shall be reduced proportionately.Note: (A)
(i) M.Phil + Ph.D Maximum - 30 Marks
(ii) JRF/NET/SET Maximum - 07 Marks
(iii) In awards category Maximum - 03 Marks
(B)Number of candidates to be called for interview shall be decided by the concerned universities.
(C){|
|-| Academic Score| -| 80|-| Research Publications| -| 10|-| Teaching Experience| -| 10|-| Total| -| 100|}
(D)Score shall be valid for appointment in respective State SLET/SET Universities/ Colleges/ Institutions only
Table: 3 BCriteria for Short-listing of candidates for Interview for the Post of Assistant Professors in Colleges
S.N. Academic Record Score
1. Graduation 80% & Above = 21 60% to less than 80% = 19 55% to less than 60% =16 45% to less than 55% =10
2. Post-Graduation 80% & Above = 25 60% to less than 80% = 23 55% (50% in case of SC/ST/OBC (noncreamylayer)/PWD) to less than 60% = 20
3. M.Phil. 60% & above = 07 55% to less than 60% = 05
4. Ph.D. 25
5. NET with JRF 10
  NET 08
  SLET/SET 05
6. Research Publications ( 2 marks for eachresearch publications published in Peer-Reviewed or UGC-listedJournals) 06
7. Teaching / Post Doctoral Experience (2 marksfor one year each) 10
8. Awards  
  International / National Level (Awards given byInternational Organisations/ Government of India / Government ofIndia recognised National Level Bodies) 03
  State-Level(Awards given by State Government) 02
# However, if the period of teaching/post-doctoral experience is less than one year then the marks shall be reduced proportionately.Note :
(A){|
|-| (i)| M.Phil + Ph.D| Maximum| -| 25 Marks|-| (ii)| JRF/NET/SET| Maximum| -| 10 Marks|-| (iii)| In awards category| Maximum| -| 03 Marks|}
(B)Number of candidates to be called for interview shall be decided by the college.
(C){|
|-| Academic Score| -| 84|-| Research Publications| -| 06|-| Teaching Experience| -| 10|-| Total| -| 100|}
(D)SLET/SET score shall be valid for appointment in respective State Universities/Colleges/institutions only.
Table 4Assessment Criteria and Methodology for Librarians
S.No. Activity Grading Criteria
1 Regularity ofattending library (calculated in terms of percentage of daysattended to the total number of days he/she is expected toattend) While attending in the library, the individual isexpected to undertake, inter alia, following items of work:• Library Resource andOrganization and maintenance of books, journals and reports.• Provision of Libraryreader services such as literature retrieval services toresearchers and analysis of report.• Assistance towards updating institutionalwebsite 90% and above –GoodBelow 90% but 80%and above – SatisfactoryLess than 80% - Not satisfactory
2. Conduct of seminars/workshops related to libraryactivity or on specific books or genre of books. Good - 1 National level seminar/ workshop + 1State/institution level workshop/Seminar Satisfactory - 1National level seminar/ workshop or 1 state level seminar/workshop + 1 institution level seminar/ workshop or 4 institutionseminar / workshop Unsatisfactory - Not falling in above twocategories
3. If library has a computerized database then ORIf library does not have a computerized database Good - 100% ofphysical books and journals in computerized database.Satisfactory - Atleast 99% of physical books and journals in computerizeddatabase. Unsatisfactory - Not falling under good orsatisfactory.ORGood - 100% Cataloguedatabase made up to dateSatisfactory- 90%catalogue database made up to dateUnsatisfactory -Catalogue database not upto mark.(To be verified in random by the CAS PromotionCommittee )
4. Checking inventoryand extent of missing books Good : Checkedinventory and missing book less than 0.5%Satisfactory -Checked inventory and missing book less than 1%Unsatisfactory - Did not check inventory OrChecked inventory and missing books 1% or more.
5. (i) Digitisation ofbooks database in institution having no computerized database.(ii) Promotion oflibrary network.(iii) Systems inplace for dissemination of information relating to books andother resources.(iv) Assistance incollege administration and governance related work including workdone during admissions, examinations and extracurricularactivities.(v) Design and offershort-term courses for users.(vi) Publications of at least one researchpaper in UGC approved journals. Good : Involved inany two activitiesSatisfactory : Atleast one activityNot Satisfactory : Not involved/ undertaken any ofthe activities.
Overall Grading Good : Good in Item 1and satisfactory/good in any two other items including Item 4.Satisfactory :Satisfactory in Item 1 and satisfactory /good in any other twoitems including Item 4.Not satisfactory : If neither good norsatisfactory in overall grading.
Note :(1) It is recommended to use ICT technology to monitor theattendance of library staff and compute the criteria ofassessment.(2) The Librarian must submit evidence of published paper,participation certificate for refresher or methodology course,successful research guidance from Head of Department of theconcerned department, project completion.(3) The system of tracking user grievances and the extent ofgrievances redressal details may also be made available to theCAS promotion committee.
Table 5Assessment Criteria and Methodology for Directors of Physical Education and Sports
S.No. Activity Grading Criteria
1 Attendance calculated in terms of percentage ofdays attended to the total number of days he is expected toattend. 90% and above –GoodAbove 80 but below90- Satisfactory.Less than 80 - Not satisfactory.
2. Organizing intra college competition Good - Intra collegecompetition in more than 5 disciplines. Satisfactory - Intracollege competition in 3-5 disciplines.Unsatisfactory - Neither good nor satisfactory.
3. Institution participating in externalcompetitions Good - National levelcompetition in at least one discipline plus State/District levelcompetition in at least 3 disciplines.Satisfactory- Statelevel competition in at least one discipline plus district levelcompetition in at least 3 disciplines.Or District levelcompetition in at least 5 disciplines.Unsatisfactory - Neither good nor satisfactory.
4. Up-gradation ofsports and physical training infrastructure with scientific andtechnological inputs.Development and maintenance of playfields andsports and physical Education facilities. Good/Satisfactory/Not-Satisfactory to beassessed by the Promotion committee.
5. (i) At least onestudent of the institution participating in national/ state/university (for college levels only) teams. Organizingstate/national/inter university/inter college level competition.(ii) Being invitedfor coaching at state/national level.(iii) Organizing atleast three workshops in a year.(iv) Publications of at least one research paperin UGC approved journal. Assistance in college administration andgovernance related work including work done during admissions,examinations and extracurricular college activities. Good : Involved inany two activitiesSatisfactory : 1activityNot Satisfactory : Not involved/ undertaken anyof the activities.
Overall Grading Good : Good in Item 1and satisfactory/good in any two other items including Item 4.Satisfactory :Satisfactory in Item 1 and satisfactory /good in any other twoitems.Not satisfactory : If neither good norsatisfactory in overall grading.
Note :(i)It is recommended to use ICT technology to monitor theattendance of sports and physical education and compute thecriteria of assessment.(ii)The institution must obtain student feedback. The feed-backsmust be shared with the concerned Director of Physical andEducation and Sports and also the CAS Promotion committee.(iii)The system of tracking user grievances and the extent ofgrievance redressal details may also be made available to the CASPromotion Committee.