Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Tarsem Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Another on 3 December, 2018

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

CWP No.6082 of 2016                                                          -1-

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                          CHANDIGARH


                                              CWP No.6082 of 2016
                                              Date of decision: 03.12.2018


Tarsem Kumar
                                                                 ...Petitioner
                                          Versus

State of Haryana and others
                                                                 ...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI


Present: Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate,
         for the petitioner.

                      ***

Ritu Bahri, J.

Petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 22.04.2015 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.3, whereby his services have been terminated. He is seeking further direction to the respondents to take him back in service in view of the order dated 17.02.2016 passed by this Court in CWP No.20558 of 2015, titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others (Annexure P-4).

Upon notice, reply on behalf of the respondents has been filed, wherein it has been stated that as per certificate dated 22.12.2017 (Annexure R-2), the petitioner had joined as Lab Technician on 01.04.2015 and continued his duty till 30.06.2015. After this, he did not join. With regard to the direction given in Rina Rani's case (supra), it is stated that the petitioner had never applied for re-employment after passing of the said judgment.

Written statement, in this case, was filed on 09.01.2018 and till 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 29-12-2018 11:25:09 ::: CWP No.6082 of 2016 -2- date, no replication has been filed. Keeping in view the certificate/information dated 22.12.2017 (Annexure R-2), the petitioner had continued till 30.06.2015 and his services were never terminated on 22.04.2015.

In view of the said fact, no case for quashing of the impugned order dated 22.04.2015 (Annexure P-3) is made out.

Dismissed.


                                                            (RITU BAHRI)
03.12.2018                                                     JUDGE
ajp

                      Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
                      Whether reportable        : Yes/No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 29-12-2018 11:25:09 :::