Allahabad High Court
Kiran Lata Singh vs State Of U.P. Through ... on 26 February, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 ALL 342
Bench: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD A.F.R. Reserved on 28.01.2021 Delivered on 26.02.2021 Court No. - 48 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 326 of 2020 Appellant :- Kiran Lata Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary,Department Of Basic Education And 5 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare (Sr. Advocate),Rajendra Singh Yadav,Satya Prakash Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avneesh Tripathi,Gagan Mehta,Jagannath Maurya,Nisheeth Yadav with Special Appeal Nos. 167 of 2020, 315 of 2020, 316 of 2020, 317 of 2020, 318 of 2020, 319 of 2020, 320 of 2020, 321 of 2020, 322 of 2020, 323 of 2020, 324 of 2020, 325 of 2020, 327 of 2020, 328 of 2020, 329 of 2020, 330 of 2020, 331 of 2020, 332 of 2020, 333 of 2020, 334 of 2020, 335 of 2020, 336 of 2020, 337 of 2020, 338 of 2020, 339 of 2020, 340 of 2020, 341 of 2020, 342 of 2020, 343 of 2020, 344 of 2020, 345 of 2020, 346 of 2020, 347 of 2020, 355 of 2020, 356 of 2020, 357 of 2020, 358 of 2020, 359 of 2020, 360 of 2020, 361 of 2020, 362 of 2020, 363 of 2020, 364 of 2020, 365 of 2020, 366 of 2020, 367 of 2020, 368 of 2020, 369 of 2020, 370 of 2020, 379 of 2020, 380 of 2020, 381 of 2020, 382 of 2020, 383 of 2020, 384 of 2020, 388 of 2020, 389 of 2020, 390 of 2020, 391 of 2020, 392 of 2020, 393 of 2020, 394 of 2020, 395 of 2020, 396 of 2020, 397 of 2020, 398 of 2020, 399 of 2020, 400 of 2020, 401 of 2020, 402 of 2020, 403 of 2020, 404 of 2020, 405 of 2020, 409 of 2020, 410 of 2020, 411 of 2020, 412 of 2020, 413 of 2020, 414 of 2020, 415 of 2020, 416 of 2020, 417 of 2020, 418 of 2020, 423 of 2020, 424 of 2020, 425 of 2020, 426 of 2020, 427 of 2020, 428 of 2020, 429 of 2020, 430 of 2020, 431 of 2020, 433 of 2020, 434 of 2020, 435 of 2020, 436 of 2020, 437 of 2020, 438 of 2020, 441 of 2020, 442 of 2020, 443 of 2020, 447 of 2020, 448 of 2020, 449 of 2020, 450 of 2020, 451 of 2020, 452 of 2020, 453 of 2020, 454 of 2020, 455 of 2020, 456 of 2020, 457 of 2020, 458 of 2020, 459 of 2020, 460 of 2020, 461 of 2020, 462 of 2020, 466 of 2020, 467 of 2020, 468 of 2020, 469 of 2020, 470 of 2020, 471 of 2020, 472 of 2020, 473 of 2020, 474 of 2020, 477 of 2020, 478 of 2020, 479 of 2020, 480 of 2020, 482 of 2020, 483 of 2020, 484 of 2020, 485 of 2020, 487 of 2020, 488 of 2020, 489 of 2020, 490 of 2020, 491 of 2020, 496 of 2020, 497 of 2020, 498 of 2020, 499 of 2020, 500 of 2020, 501 of 2020, 502 of 2020, 503 of 2020, 504 of 2020, 505 of 2020, 506 of 2020, 507 of 2020, 508 of 2020, 509 of 2020, 510 of 2020, 511 of 2020, 512 of 2020, 513 of 2020, 514 of 2020, 515 of 2020, 518 of 2020, 519 of 2020, 520 of 2020, 521 of 2020, 522 of 2020, 523 of 2020, 524 of 2020, 525 of 2020, 526 of 2020, 527 of 2020, 528 of 2020, 529 of 2020, 530 of 2020, 531 of 2020, 532 of 2020, 533 of 2020, 534 of 2020, 535 of 2020, 536 of 2020, 537 of 2020, 538 of 2020, 539 of 2020, 540 of 2020, 541 of 2020, 542 of 2020, 543 of 2020, 544 of 2020, 545 of 2020, 546 of 2020, 547 of 2020, 548 of 2020, 549 of 2020, 550 of 2020, 551 of 2020, 552 of 2020, 556 of 2020, 558 of 2020, 559 of 2020, 560 of 2020, 561 of 2020, 562 of 2020, 563 of 2020, 564 of 2020, 565 of 2020, 566 of 2020, 567 of 2020, 568 of 2020, 569 of 2020, 570 of 2020, 571 of 2020, 572 of 2020, 573 of 2020, 574 of 2020, 575 of 2020, 576 of 2020, 577 of 2020, 578 of 2020, 579 of 2020, 580 of 2020, 581 of 2020, 582 of 2020, 583 of 2020, 584 of 2020, 585 of 2020, 586 of 2020, 587 of 2020, 588 of 2020, 589 of 2020, 590 of 2020, 591 of 2020, 592 of 2020, 593 of 2020, 594 of 2020, 595 of 2020, 596 of 2020, 597 of 2020, 598 of 2020, 599 of 2020, 600 of 2020, 601 of 2020, 602 of 2020, 603 of 2020, 604 of 2020, 605 of 2020, 606 of 2020, 607 of 2020, 608 of 2020, 609 of 2020, 610 of 2020, 611 of 2020, 612 of 2020, 613 of 2020, 614 of 2020, 615 of 2020, 616 of 2020, 617 of 2020, 618 of 2020, 619 of 2020, 620 of 2020, 621 of 2020, 622 of 2020, 623 of 2020, 624 of 2020, 625 of 2020, 626 of 2020, 627 of 2020, 628 of 2020, 629 of 2020, 630 of 2020, 631 of 2020, 632 of 2020, 633 of 2020, 634 of 2020, 635 of 2020, 636 of 2020, 637 of 2020, 638 of 2020, 639 of 2020, 640 of 2020, 641 of 2020, 642 of 2020, 643 of 2020, 644 of 2020, 645 of 2020, 646 of 2020, 647 of 2020, 648 of 2020, 649 of 2020, 650 of 2020, 651 of 2020, 652 of 2020, 653 of 2020, 654 of 2020, 655 of 2020, 656 of 2020, 657 of 2020, 658 of 2020, 659 of 2020, 660 of 2020, 661 of 2020, 662 of 2020, 663 of 2020, 664 of 2020, 665 of 2020, 666 of 2020, 667 of 2020, 668 of 2020, 669 of 2020, 670 of 2020, 671 of 2020, 672 of 2020, 673 of 2020, 674 of 2020, 675 of 2020, 676 of 2020, 677 of 2020, 678 of 2020, 679 of 2020, 680 of 2020, 681 of 2020, 682 of 2020, 683 of 2020, 684 of 2020, 685 of 2020, 719 of 2020, 730 of 2020, 736 of 2020, 737 of 2020, 738 of 2020, 739 of 2020, 740 of 2020, 741 of 2020, 742 of 2020, 743 of 2020, 744 of 2020, 745 of 2020, 746 of 2020, 748 of 2020, 749 of 2020, 762 of 2020, 763 of 2020, 764 of 2020, 765 of 2020, 766 of 2020, 768 of 2020, 769 of 2020, 770 of 2020, 771 of 2020, 772 of 2020, 773 of 2020, 777 of 2020, 780 of 2020, 781 of 2020, 782 of 2020, 783 of 2020, 784 of 2020, 785 of 2020, 786 of 2020, 787 of 2020, 788 of 2020, 789 of 2020, 795 of 2020, 796 of 2020, 797 of 2020, 798 of 2020, 799 of 2020, 800 of 2020, 801 of 2020, 802 of 2020 and 6 of 2021 and with Special Appeals (Defective) No. 837 of 2020, 981 of 2020, 1000 of 2020, 1032 of 2020, 1034 of 2020, 1035 of 2020, 1036 of 2020, 1037 of 2020, 1039 of 2020, 1041 of 2020, 1042 of 2020, 1043 of 2020, 1044 of 2020, 1045 of 2020, 1046 of 2020, 1047 of 2020, 1048 of 2020, 1049 of 2020, 1050 of 2020, 1051 of 2020, 1052 of 2020, 1102 of 2020, 1107 of 2020, 1112 of 2020, 1116 of 2020, 1122 of 2020, 1146 of 2020, 1157 of 2020, 1159 of 2020, 1164 of 2020, 1165 of 2020, 1170 of 2020, 1171 of 2020, 1173 of 2020, 1176 of 2020, 1177 of 2020, 1179 of 2020, 1221 of 2020, 1235 of 2020, 1237 of 2020, 1241 of 2020, 1250 of 2020, 1251 of 2020, 1252 of 2020, 1253 of 2020, 1255 of 2020, 1256 of 2020, 1258 of 2020, 1259 of 2020, 1266 of 2020, 1284 of 2020, 1322 of 2020 and 26 of 2021. Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,J.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. (Delivered by Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari, J.) Heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, Sri H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, Sri Radha Kant Ojha, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, Sri Prabhakar Awasthi and Smt. Arti Raje, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/appellants. Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Rama Nand Pandey, Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Rajiv Singh is appearing for the State Government, Sri Ashok Mehta, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Gagan Mehta is appearing for the Agra University and Sri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel is appearing for the U.P. Education Board/Basic Shiksha Adhikari. The batch of appeals have been filed to assail the judgment dated 29.04.2020 whereby bunch of writ petitions were decided. The writ petitions were filed to challenge the order passed by the District Basic Education Officer by which the appointments of the petitioners/appellants on the post of Assistant Teacher were cancelled/terminated. It was alleged that appointments sought were based on fake or tampered mark-sheets/degrees of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE AND PREVIOUS LITIGATION The facts available on record and taken into consideration by the learned Single Judge, reflect that the education was made a saleable product by the Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra (for short "University") and thereby the candidates, who even did not appear in B.Ed. Examination, 2005 were conferred with the mark-sheet and degree. The other allegation is for tampering of marks apart from candidates having same roll numbers on the mark-sheets. The efface of the University came in the knowledge of the Court when a writ petition was filed by one Sunil Kumar bearing Writ Petition No. 2906 of 2013 on issuance of two mark-sheets to him by the University for B.Ed. Examination 2005. The learned Single Judge hearing the said writ petition directed the University to produce the tabulation sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. In pursuance to the direction aforesaid, the tabulation sheets were produced. It was not bearing signature of any authorized officer/person of the University. The learned Single Judge hearing the said writ petition passed an order on 28.02.2013 directing the Vice Chancellor of the University to file an affidavit in respect to the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The affidavit was sworn. The learned Single Judge observed cross list/tabulation sheets to be manufactured documents in absence of signature of the officer. It was admitted by the University that tabulation sheets/cross list are always signed by the authorized officer/person otherwise it cannot be accepted as genuine. In pursuance to the subsequent order dated 28.02.2013, the then Vice Chancellor Professor D.N. Jauhar filed an affidavit stating that a three member inquiry committee was constituted on the receipt of the complaint and information regarding manipulation and discrepancies in the mark charts. The committee found following discrepancies-:
(i) Font of computer printing on some pages are different from other pages;
(ii) Font quality on paper used in different pages defers;
(iii) The signature of authorized person of agency was also found different on different pages.
The learned Single Judge hearing the writ petition of Sunil Kumar passed another order on 23.01.2014 for impartial inquiry into the affairs of the University in regard to B.Ed. Examination, 2005. In pursuance to the order dated 23.01.2014, the State Government constituted a Special Investigation Team (For short "S.I.T."). The writ petition of Sunil Kumar was then treated to be a Public Interest Litigation, thus to be placed before the Division Bench. After referring the matter to the Division Bench, the record of said writ petition was not found traceable, thus matter could not be heard for further direction. The file was reconstituted in the year 2020 pursuant to the order of the Court. The S.I.T. constituted by the State Government submitted its report dated 14.08.2017 before this Court after the investigation. As per the report, the allegation of issuance of fake mark-sheets apart from tampered mark-sheets were found based on the material collected during the course of investigation/inquiry. After receipt of the report from the S.I.T., the University as well as the State Government decided to take action in the matter. The Director of Basic Education issued show cause notice to the petitioners/appellants. The show cause notice was challenged by a Writ Petition (A) No. 56739 of 2017 (Smt. Suryavati and 150 others Vs. State of U.P. and 24 others). An interim order was passed therein to continue the petitioners/appellants with payment of salary. The Court, however, allowed the Department to proceed in the matter in accordance to Rules. It was followed by large number of writ petitions. The Basic Shiksha Adhikari passed the order of termination pursuant to the show cause notice. It was challenged separately by maintaining a writ petition. The first writ petition for it was Writ A No. 20244 of 2018 (Santosh Kuamr and others Vs. State of U.P. and others). The said writ petition was dismissed by the judgment dated 20.09.2018. The judgment in the case of Santosh Kumar (supra) was challenged by maintaining an appeal where an interim order was passed. The University also proceeded in the matter and accordingly a notice was published in the news papers requiring the doubtful candidates to submit reply to the questionnaire supported by material. The validity of the show cause notice of the University was also challenged by Writ A No. 486 of 2020 (Tilak Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others). The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by its judgment dated 20.01.2020 with a direction to the University to proceed further in the matter. In pursuance to the show cause notice given by the University, majority of candidates, alleged to have fake mark-sheets, did not submit any reply and in few cases, reply was submitted with incomplete information and documents or after the last date for it. Only 18 candidates/students submitted proper reply along with documents. The University cancelled B.Ed. degree of 2823 candidates by the order dated 07.02.2020, who failed to submit reply. The order dated 07.02.2020 was passed during the pendency of the writ petition. It was brought on record by way of an affidavit by the University. The hearing of the writ petition commenced thereafter on different dates. The arguments were concluded on 06.03.2020 and thereupon the impugned judgment was pronounced on 29.04.2020. The learned Single Judge decided the batch of writ petitions with certain directions in paragraph 69 of the impugned judgment which has been assailed by the appellants herein. In few appeals, there is delay and in few appeals, an application to seek leave for appeal has been submitted. The application for condonation of delay so as the leave to appeal are allowed as otherwise no objection to it has been raised by the side opposite. It is looking to the fact that few appeals have been preferred within limitation, thus, would be decided on merits and judgments therein would apply on all the appeals and accordingly even leave to appeal is granted because the applicants are either effected by the impugned judgment or in their pending writ petitions they cannot get result unless judgment in question is set aside. Thus, prayed for leave and accordingly granted for the ends of justice. Accordingly, all the appeal were heard together. Before we proceed to refer to the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants, it would be material to refer judgment in the case of Tilak Singh & others Vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A 468 of 2020. The said writ petition was decided by the judgment dated 20.01.2020. It is without causing interference the show cause notice given by the University though certain formalities were interfered which were basically to have verification of documents through the Principal etc. but no interference in the material information sought by the University was caused rather a direction was given to the University to proceed in the matter in regard to the degrees which are alleged to be forged. The procedure given under Section 67 of U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 was not required to be applied for fake degrees though it was mandated for the tampered mark-sheet. All the facts narrated above are relevant and otherwise summarised by the counsel for the appellants. ARGUMENTS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS Learned counsel submits that the appellants were appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher after undergoing the selection as per U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973 (in short "Rules of 1973"). All the appellants were thus regular employees and even granted promotion during the intervening period. They could not have terminated from service without a departmental enquiry under the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1999 (In short "Rules of 1999"). They could not have been terminated from service only by serving a show cause notice. Learned Single Judge failed to consider this aspect of the matter. The show cause notice was even stayed in the set of another litigation initiated by Suryavati and 150 others (supra). During currency of the interim order, the respondents could not have proceeded to pass termination order. It is more so when there was no material with the State Government to infer B.Ed. degrees of the appellants either fake or tampered. The State Government could not have relied on the report submitted by the S.I.T. It was barely an opinion of the S.I.T. thus could not have been treated to be substantive piece of evidence. The report of the S.I.T. would be tested by the court in the criminal trial. Thus, the sole basis to terminate the services of the appellants was not made out. It is further urged that the learned Single Judge could not have decided the writ petition in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University to cancel the degrees finding it to be fake, as no opportunity was given to them to assail the order dated 07.02.2020. It is despite their request. The learned Single Judge decided the writ petition after taking adverse inference pursuant to the order of the University dated 07.02.2020 cancelling the degrees of the appellants. The Court should have given opportunity to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University. The learned Single Judge has even drawn a statement to classify the number of candidates obtained fake mark-sheets while others having tampered mark-sheets. The third category is of the candidates having mark-sheets with same roll numbers. The statement of candidates given in the judgment should not be relied as otherwise S.I.T. has given data on their own assumption. The appellants have challenged S.I.T. report in the case of Sunil Kumar (Supra) which petition was converted into Public Interest Litigation and is yet to be decided. The finding of the learned Single Judge that the appellants have not challenged the S.I.T. report is thus perversed. The learned Single Judge has relied the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra) though the said writ petition was against the show cause notice given by the University, thus dismissed. The judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra) has not decided any issue pertaining to the case rather directed the University to proceed further in the matter, thus no final decision was given holding certain mark-sheet to be fake or tampered. The learned Single Judge should not have relied on the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (Supra). The report of S.I.T. considered by learned Single Judge was based on superficial mathematical calculation. No supporting material exist to arrive at the calculation of eligible candidates for B.Ed. Examination, 2005 with the figures students actually appeared followed by declaration of the result of excess candidates. The S.I.T. had failed to take note of the judgment of Lucknow Bench in the case of Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College Vs. State of U.P. dated 06.04.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.399 (M.B.) 2007 wherein a direction was given to declare the result of additional students. The S.I.T. failed to take note of those students while making calculation of the studens appeared in the examination. Thus, there was no reason for the learned Single Judge to place reliance on the S.I.T. report. It is also submitted that even if the learned Single Judge was to proceed with a matter in reference to the order dated 07.05.2020 passed by the University cancelling the degrees, it should not have been in ignorance of the fact that out of total 3637 candidates, 814 candidates had submitted reply but while passing the order dated 07.02.2020, the University cancelled the degree of all the candidates without giving any reason. The order dated 07.02.2020 should not have been relied by the learned Single Judge. So far as finding regarding tampered mark-sheet is concerned, the judgment of learned Single Judge is in ignorance of the fact the candidates had no access to the record of the University to become instrument to tamper the mark-sheet. In fact mark-sheets were issued immediately with declaration of result. Thus, there was no occasion for any candidates to tamper the mark-sheet. The tampering of mark-sheets in fact did not effect even the candidature to seek appointments on the post of the Assistant Teacher as it was based on the selection test where all the candidates remained successful. It was also stated that if candidates were involved in tampering of the mark-sheets, their marks would not have been reduced whereas in many cases, marks of the candidates were less compared to the marks in the foil recovered by the S.I.T. Thus, allegation of tampering of mark-sheet was not even made out. The allegation of tampering of the mark-sheets is also without any basis as neither tabulation sheets were available nor original marks foil were recovered by the S.I.T. The record seized by the S.I.T. is lying with it or with the Registrar of High Court. The original marks foil may accordingly be called to consider the argument aforesaid. In view of above, termination order should have been interfered by the learned Single Judge. The denial of wages during the intervening period till the University passes the order after compliance of the procedure given under Section 67 of the State Universities Act, 1973 in regards to tampered mark sheets is also illegal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that if a direction is given to the University to pass an order in regard to tampered mark-sheets after following the procedure given under Section 67 of the Act, then appellants would have no grievance rather submitted that subject to the outcome of the order pursuant to it, the order of termination be governed. If the decision of the University comes adverse to them then they would not question their termination order but in case of favourable report, it should be interfered thus appropriate order for it may be passed. It is also submitted that the marks foil recovered by the SIT is not of all the papers of B.Ed. Examination rather is of two papers only. The aforesaid should not have been taken to be a decisive factor to hold mark-sheets to be tampered. Some of the counsel of the appellants even challenged the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University cancelling B.Ed. degrees of 2005 of 2823 candidates. It is submitted that the University proceeded to pass the order dated 07.02.2020 solely based on the report of SIT. It is by presuming admission of the allegation by the candidates in absence of reply to show cause notice containing a questionnaire. The University could not have cancelled the degrees only in reference to the report of SIT. Thus the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University may also be interfered. The learned counsel pressing the appeal for challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 submitted that an opportunity to challenge the said order was not given by the learned Single Judge, thus it has been challenged in these appeals. One set of the counsel appearing for the appellants, however, submitted that they do not prefer to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 in these appeals as for that separate writ petitions can be filed or even filed. The fact however remains that one set of the appellants have challenged the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University and accordingly, we need to decide the issue aforesaid, otherwise this judgment may be criticized alleging that despite a challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University, consideration of argument has not been made by us. Accordingly, we proceed to determine all the issues raised before us not only in reference to the challenge to the judgment of the learned Single Judge but the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University. No other arguments have been raised by the appellants other than what have been mentioned above. The written arguments have been submitted by the counsel but we are confining to the oral argument before this Court and otherwise the written arguments should have been confined to the oral argument made before this Court. The prayer of learned counsel for appellants is to set aside the termination order so as the judgment of learned Single Judge or pass any other appropriate order in the fitness of the case. The order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University may also be quashed. Learned counsel for the appellants have cited judgments to support their arguments which would be referred by this Court while recording finding on the rival submission of the parties. The prayer of learned counsel for appellants is to consider the documents submitted on the direction of this Court to show that the candidates were having required documents to show their admission in the college followed by payment of fee apart from issuance of admit cards for appearance in the examination followed by other documents to show their appearance in the examination. At this stage, it is also stated that University has passed an order to cancel remaining fake mark-sheets and degrees other than of two students by the order dated 27.07.2020. It is out of 814 students/candidates. ARGUMENTS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR SIDE OPPOSITE Per contra, the contest to the appeals has been made by the counsel appearing for the State and the University. The have supported the judgment of the learned Single Judge. It is submitted by the Senior Counsel appearing for the University that pursuant to the direction of this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), the University had initially constituted a Committee of three members. The Committee found that font of the cross sheet/tabulation sheet is different on certain pages. It is apart from the different font size in the cross sheet/tabulation register. The University, thus realized manipulation and malpractices in the B.Ed. examination of 2005. It decided to proceed against the officers involved in the manipulations. The matter was referred to SIT by the State Government for investigation followed by a report in the light of the direction in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra). On the receipt of the report from S.I.T., the State Government gave direction to University to proceed in the matter and accordingly the University decided to issue show cause notice to the candidates by publishing it in the newspaper requiring the candidates to submit their reply to the questionnaire with supporting material. The show cause notice was challenged by Tilak Singh and 495 other candidates. The writ petition was dismissed vide judgment dated 20.01.2020 with a direction to the University to proceed in the matter of fake mark-sheets without observing Section 67 of the Act of 1973 but for tampered mark-sheets, to proceed under Section 67 of the Act of 1973. The University accordingly proceeded in compliance to the judgment in the case of Tilak Singh (supra) as the judgment in the said case was not challenged thus attained finality. In pursuance to the notice published in the newspaper, reply was submitted only by 814 candidates within the time prescribed for it. It was out of 4766 candidates which was for fake degree as well as tampered. 2823 candidates did not send reply to show cause notice while 814 candidates sent the reply, however out of 814 also 796 candidates did not submit complete information sought in the show cause notice. Only 18 candidates submitted proper reply with material. The University thus proceeded to pass order dated 07.02.2020 holding that 2823 students are having fake degrees. It is thus incorrect to state that by the order dated 07.02.2020, all the degrees were declared fake, which includes the degrees of 814 candidates. It is also incorrect that the University has declared 2823 candidates to be fake based on the report of the SIT. In fact, the report of the SIT was the basis to initiate the action and accordingly proper questionnaire was prepared by the University to independently assess the allegations. The failure of the candidates to submit the reply was taken adverse. There was no reason for the candidates not to submit reply to the notice with relevant materials. The University proceeded in the matter pursuant to the direction of the Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). Thus there is no illegality in the order dated 07.02.2020. The appellants have not submitted any material even while filing the appeal and direction of this Court other than seven candidates those who had even submitted reply to the show cause notice. The learned counsel for the University has given details of all the students who could have appeared in B.Ed. Examination of 2005. It is by referring to the number of institutions recognized by the N.C.T. and the students to be admitted by each of the institutions. It is submitted that out of total 82 institutions having recognition from the N.C.T., each was entitle to admit 100 students, 50 percent through management quota and 50 percent through counselling or 15 percent through management quota and 85 percent through counselling. A controversy regarding quota through counselling came in reference to 25 self-financed/unaided colleges which was subject matter of litigation and pursuant to which, many self-financed/unaided colleges, were permitted to admit 135 students. The university however declared the final results keeping in mind the intake of each institution though 135 students appeared in many self-financed institutions. Thus, as per the direction of the Court in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra), by the judgment dated 06.04.2007, result of all the students, who appeared in the examination was declared. Taking aforesaid to be an input, it is submitted that maximum 9075 students could have appeared in the examination if it is figured out with 100 students for all the 82 colleges coming to 8200 with addition of 35 students for 25 self-financed/unaided institutions coming to 875 totalling to 9070. It is the maximum number of students though, admission was given to 8899 students. 8899 students appeared in the examination out of which 869 were those who were admitted in excess to the approved strength of 100 students pursuant to the direction of the Lucknow Bench. In fact, in all the self-financed/unaided institutions, total excess admission were 869 against 35 additional seats given to it. As against 8899 students appeared in the examination, the result of 8930 students was declared thereby it was in excess by 31 students. The marks foil recovered by the S.I.T. proves the fact aforesaid. The original marks foil was seen by the Court as well as counsel for the appellants during the course of argument. The tabulation chart/cross sheet of the University was however containing result of 12472 students. In the light of the fact aforesaid, even the counsel for the appellants have admitted that result in the tabulation sheet is in excess to students appeared in the examination even pursuant to the direction of Bench at Lucknow. The question however raised by them is that the excess students may not be the appellants but others. It is submitted that S.I.T. made report based on the record recovered by them from the University. The material recovered by the S.I.T. was input for the action and thereby University had issued show cause notice to verify the truth after giving an opportunity to the students. The students failed to send reply to the questionnaire with material. They were accordingly declared to be fake students as otherwise they would have given the reply to the questionnaire. It is more so when this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra) directed the University to proceed with the matter in regard to fake students and judgment in that case has already attained finality. Thus, the learned Single Judge has rightly drawn conclusion about the fake students and for that there is no basis to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020. The petitioners/appellants have not submitted any material or documents pursuant to questionnaire even while challenging the order of termination passed by the State Government or now the order dated 07.02.2020 other than by few. It is even while filing the appeal despite an opportunity for it. The documents have been filed only by few students who had otherwise submitted their reply pursuant to the show cause notice of the University. Thus, other than few students, who are maximum 18 in number, none has produced any material before the Court to show truthfulness of their appearance in the examination. Accordingly, no basis remains to cause interference in the order dated 07.02.2020 and the order passed by learned Single Judge. The University has even passed an order dated 27.07.2020 to declare 812 students to be fake out of 814 students. It is also stated that University has proceed to cause disciplinary inquiry against those involved in the racket. So far as the allegation of tampering of the mark-sheets is concerned, the University would proceed to take action after applying Section 67 of the Act of 1973. Learned counsel has even made a reference of the F.I.R. registered against those indulged in issuance of fake mark-sheets so as the tampered. The charge-sheet has also been filed pursuant to four F.I.Rs. It is also stated that a Committee under the Chairmanship of a retired Judge was constituted to fix the responsibilities of those officers involved in this case and accordingly respondents would proceed to take action against all those officers involved in this case. Learned counsel for the University further submits that during the course of hearing of the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), it was noticed that three bags of fake mark-sheets were found at the residence of Principal of one affiliated college of the University. The fact aforesaid was flashed even in the newspaper, thus, the conduct of the then officer of the University and the students is writ large. In view of the above, this Court may not cause interference in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge. Learned counsel appearing for the University has made further argument and it would be elaborately discussed during the course of consideration of the rival arguments to avoid repetition. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State has also supported the judgment of learned Single Judge. It is submitted that in pursuance to the direction of this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra), criminal racket involved in issuance of the fake and tampered mark-sheets came in the notice of the State Government. It may be when a writ petition was filed by Sunil Kumar showing two mark-sheets issued to him for B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The reference of the case to the S.I.T. was pursuant to the direction of the Court and accordingly State Government constituted 5 members to investigate the affairs of the University in reference to the B.Ed. Examination of 2005. The S.I.T. had given detailed report in reference to the material collected by it during the course of investigation. It could recover the material which includes marks foil to draw its report finding cases not only of tampering but issuance of the fake mark-sheets. It was also for issuance of mark-sheets to the students with same roll number. On the receipt of the report, the Government issued direction not only to the University but even to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari for appropriate action. The show cause notice was issued and when reply to it was not found satisfactory, passed the order of termination finding case of obtaining service based on the forged or tampered mark-sheets. The writ petition was then filed by the appellants but therein also, they failed to supply material to prove their appearance in B.Ed. Examination of 2005. Seven appellants have produced the material pursuant to the direction of this Court to show their appearances in B.Ed. Examination 2005. It is while three other failed to produce document to prove their appearance in the Examination 2005. This itself is enough to show that even the petitioners/appellants failed to produce any material before the Court to prove their appearance in the Examination of 2005 so as to challenge the allegation of obtaining fake mark-sheets. The racket was involved in this case has been admitted even by the appellants realising that as against the intake capacity of each college with additional seats permitted by the High Court, the total students could not have been 12,472. The question however raised is as to whether the excess students having forged mark-sheets are the petitioners/appellants or others. The argument aforesaid has been raised without realising that to prove genuineness of B.Ed. degree, appellants failed to produce material in reference to the show cause notice before the order of termination and even along with the writ petition. Thus, truthfulness of the allegation against the petitioners/appellants gets satisfied on the face of record. In view of the above, the challenge to the judgment may not be accepted. Learned Additional Advocate General has further submitted that for passing the order of termination, Regulations of 1999 were not required to be applied. The appointment taken based on the forged or tampered mark-sheets were void. The compliance of Regulation of 1999 is not envisaged in such cases rather for that the Government was not even required to issue a show cause notice. However, to provide an opportunity to submit the necessary documents to prove appearance in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005, a show cause notice was given. The order of termination was passed thereupon when appellant failed to give satisfactory reply supported with material. It is thus incorrect to state that the order of termination is simply based on the S.I.T. report. It is also submitted that merely for the reason that petitioners/appellants are in service for the last 10 to 15 years would not vitiate the action taken by the State as the foundation of appointment is based on forgery. Such appointments remain void ab-initio and thereby the learned Single Judge has rightly refused to cause interference in the order of termination. The learned Additional Advocate General cited the judgments to support the argument which would be referred at the time of discussion of rival submissions. Learned Additional Advocate General has further given reply to all the arguments raised by the learned counsel for appellants for challenge to the judgment of learned Single Judge which could also be referred at the time of dealing with the arguments to avoid bulkiness of the judgment. DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES BY THE COURT We have considered the rival submissions of the parties and scanned the matter carefully. It is a case where District Basic Education Officer passed an order of termination/cancellation of the appointments given to the appellants on the post of Assistant Teacher on the ground that appointments were sought based on fake or tampered mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The termination/cancellation of the appointments were after giving opportunity of hearing by serving a show cause notice. The order of termination/cancellation of appointments of the appellants was challenged by maintaining a writ petition. The learned Single Judge found appointment based on fake mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005 so as the tampered. The fact about issuance of fake or tampered mark-sheets came to the notice of the respondents when S.I.T. made investigation pursuant to the case registered on the direction of this Court in the writ petition filed by one Sunil Kumar (supra). The brief detail of the litigation thereupon has been given but needs to be reiterated for ready reference. The brief facts pertaining to the case show that on a writ petition filed by one Sunil Kumar (supra), this Court passed orders from time to time to direct the University not only to file affidavit but constitution of the investigation team by the State Government in regard to B.Ed. Examination 2005 conducted by the University. It is on finding manipulation in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. Pursuant to the direction of the Court, S.I.T. conducted investigation followed by a report. The F.I.R. was registered for offence under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 201 read with 120 I.P.C. and 13 (1) (d), 13 (2) and 13 (3) of Prevention of Corruption Act. The charge sheet in all the cases has been filed other than one. The judgment of learned Single Judge has been challenged by the appellants on the ground that non interference in the order of termination from the service is mainly in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University declaring 2823 degrees to be fake. It is without realising that the order dated 07.02.2020 was passed during the pendency of the writ petition. The appellants had no opportunity to challenge it. The judgment of learned Single Judge in reference to dismissal of the writ petition of 2823 candidates has been questioned on the aforesaid ground apart from many other grounds. We would be dealing with each of the arguments raised by the counsel for parties. The first argument raised by counsel for the appellant is in reference to the Regulation of 1999. It is stated that the order of termination has been passed without causing inquiry by applying the procedure given under the Rules of 1999. It is despite the fact that all the appellants were appointed under the Rules of 1973 and were permanent employees. Few of them were given promotion. The judgments to support the argument have also been referred. The argument in reference to Rules of 1999 has been raised without realising the foundation for passing the order of termination. The termination order is in reference to the appointments based on the forged and tampered mark-sheets. If appointment is sought based on the forged or tampered documents, then remains void and in those circumstances, the procedure given under the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1999 is not required to be applied. The main thrust of argument of the counsel for the appellants is without taking note of the aforesaid aspect. They have relied on the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Mahipal Singh Tomar Vs. State of U.P., 2013 (16) SCC 771. A perusal of the judgment shows altogether on different facts. Para 13 and 14 of the said judgment has been relied by the learned counsel for the appellants without taking note of the facts of that case. In the instant case, the appellants were served with the show cause notice and it is after considering their reply, if submitted, the order of termination was passed. It is in reference to the forged or tampered B.Ed. degree. The other judgment referred by the learned counsel for the appellants is in the case of Inderpreet Singh Kahlon Vs. State of Punjab and others, 2006 (11) SCC 356. In the said case, the entire selection process was cancelled said to be vitiated by corruption. The Court found that the evidence need to be adduced before the Court to prove that selection was tainted due to mass cheating. The case in hand is having distinguishable facts inasmuch as before passing the order, the respondents issued show cause notice on the petitioners/appellants and thereupon the order was passed. Sufficient material has been produced before the Court to show that appointment was secured based on forged and tampered mark-sheets, thus it was void. The judgment aforesaid provide no assistance to the appellants on the facts of this case. In fact, procedure given under the Rules of 1999 is to be applied if the appointment is not based on forged or tampered documents. As against the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the State has cited judgments directly applicable to the facts of the case. A reference of the judgment in the case of Union of India and another Vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh, (2018) 15 SCC 463 for it would be relevant. In the said case, the order of termination was passed without an opportunity of hearing. The Apex Court refused to cause interference in the order and thereby the judgment of the High Court was set aside by restoring the judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal holding termination to be legal. Para 19 and 20 of the said judgment are quoted herein for ready reference-:
"19. We shall now consider the efficacy of the reason so recorded in the office order. The recruitment procedure in relation to the post of Veterinary Compounder is governed by the statutory rules titled, Central Cattle Breeding Farms (Class III and Class IV posts) Recruitment Rules, 1969, as amended from time to time and including the executive instructions issued in that behalf. As per the stated dispensation for such recruitment, the appointment letter could be issued only by an authorised officer and after grant of approval by the competent authority. Nowhere in the Original Application filed by the respondent, it has been asserted that such prior approval is not the quintessence for issuing a letter of appointment.
20. For taking this contention forward, we may assume, for the time being, that the then Director Incharge H.S. Rathore, Agriculture Officer had the authority to issue a letter of appointment. Nevertheless, he could do so only upon obtaining prior written approval of the competent authority. No case has been made out in the Original Application that due approval was granted by the competent authority before issue of the letter of appointment to the respondent. Thus, it is indisputable that no prior approval of the competent authority was given for the appointment of the respondent. In such a case, the next logical issue that arises for consideration is: whether the appointment letter issued to the respondent, would be a case of nullity or a mere irregularity? If it is a case of nullity, affording opportunity to the incumbent would be a mere formality and non grant of opportunity may not vitiate the final decision of termination of his services. The Tribunal has rightly held that in absence of prior approval of the competent authority, the Director Incharge could not have hastened issuance of the appointment letter. The act of commission and omission of the then Director Incharge would, therefore, suffer from the vice of lack of authority and nullity in law."
Same view was taken by the Apex Court in the case of State of Bihar and others Vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad, (2019) 13 SCC 250. In the aforesaid case, the regularisation sought by the petitioner was not permitted as claim was based on forged appointment letters. The termination order was thus not interfered. Para 16 of the said judgment is quoted herein-:
"16. In the instant cases the writ petitioners have filed the petitions before the High Court with a specific prayer to regularize their service and to set aside the order of termination of their services. They have also challenged the report submitted by the State Committee. The real controversy is whether the writ petitioners were legally and validly appointed. The finding of the State Committee is that many writ petitioners had secured appointment by producing fake or forged appointment letter or had been inducted in Government service surreptitiously by concerned Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer by issuing a posting order. The writ petitioners are the beneficiaries of illegal orders made by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer. They were given notice to establish the genuineness of their appointment and to show cause. None of them could establish the genuineness or legality of their appointment before the State Committee. The State Committee on appreciation of the materials on record has opined that their appointment was illegal and void ab initio. We do not find any ground to disagree with the finding of the State Committee. In the circumstances, the question of regularisation of their services by invoking para 53 of the judgment in Umadevi (supra) does not arise. Since the appointment of the petitioners is ab initio void, they cannot be said to be the civil servants of the State. Therefore, holding disciplinary proceedings envisaged by Article 311 of the Constitution or under any other disciplinary rules shall not arise."
The same view was taken by the Apex Court in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority and another Vs. Karamjit Singh, AIR 2019 SC 1913; (2019) 16 SCC 782. The argument therein was in reference to the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The argument was not accepted by the Apex Court finding appointment to be illegal. The regularization sought by misrepresentation of fact. The judgment relied by the High Court in the case of Managing Director, ECIL Hyderabad, AIR 1944 SC 1074 was not approved. Para 6, 6.1, 6.2 and 7 are quoted herein-:
"6. In the present case, the Single Judge had held that "rightly or wrongly", the Respondent had obtained regularization, and was therefore entitled to a disciplinary enquiry. The Division Bench affirmed the Judgment of the Single Judge.
6.1. The High Court however failed to appreciate that the decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad (supra) is applicable to "employees" of Government Departments. Since the very appointment of the Respondent on regular basis was illegal, he could not be treated as an "employee" of the Appellant - Authority.
In Rupa Rani Rakshit & Ors. v. Jharkhand Gramin Bank & Ors., this Court held that service rendered in pursuance of an illegal appointment or promotion cannot be equated to service rendered in pursuance of a valid and lawful appointment or promotion.
6.2. The illegality of such an appointment goes to the root of the Respondent's absorption as a regular employee. The Respondent could not be considered to be an "employee", and would not be entitled to any benefits under the Regulations applicable to employees of the Appellant - Authority.
Therefore, the High Court erroneously placed reliance on the decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad (supra), which would not be applicable to the facts of the present case.
7. The question of holding disciplinary proceedings as envisaged under Article 311 of the Constitution, or under any other disciplinary rules did not arise in the present case since the Respondent was admittedly not an "employee" of the Appellant - Authority, and did not hold a civil post under the State Government. He was merely a daily wager on the muster rolls of the Appellant - Authority."
The judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Nidhi Kaim and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, (2017) 4 SCC 1 is also relevant. The medical examination was cancelled when it was found to be based on cheating, unfair means and leakage of question paper. It was held that "fraud unravels everything". The another judgment of the Apex Court relied by the learned counsel for respondents is in the case of Bank of India and another Vs. Avinash D. Mandivikar and others, (2005) 7 SCC 690. The judgment of the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala and others, (2004) 2 SCC 105 was cited in reference to Article 311 which was not held to be applicable in case appointment is procured based on false caste certificate. Such an appointment was not held to be an appointment in the eyes of law. The dismissal of person from service, thus, was not to attract Article 311 so as the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. The judgment aforesaid answers the question raised by the appellants in regard to the application of Rules of 1999 for passing the order of termination. The observance of the Rules of 1999 and Article 311 of the Constitution of India is not warranted in the cases where appointment was taken by fraudulent means. Para 15 of the said judgment is quoted herein for ready reference-:
"This apart, the appellant obtained the appointment in the service on the basis that he belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. When it was found by the Scrutiny Committee that he did not belong to the Scheduled Caste community, then the very basis of his appointment was taken away. His appointment was no appointment in the eye of law. He cannot claim a right to the post as he had usurped the post meant for a reserved candidate by playing a fraud and producing a false caste certificate. Unless the appellant can lay a claim to the post on the basis of his appointment he cannot claim the constitutional guarantee given under the Article 311 of the Constitution. As he had obtained the appointment on the basis of a false caste certificate he cannot be considered to be a person who holds a post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. Finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee that the appellant got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate has become final. The position, therefore, is that the appellant has usurped the post which should have gone to a member of the Scheduled Caste. In view of the finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee and upheld upto this Court he has disqualified himself to hold the post. The appointment was void from its inception. It cannot be said that the said void appointment would enable the appellant to claim that he was holding a civil post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. As appellant had obtained the appointment by playing a fraud he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own fraud in entering the service and claim that he was holder of the post entitled to be dealt with in terms of Article 311 of the Constitution of India or the Rules framed thereunder. Where an appointment in a service has been acquired by practising fraud or deceit such an appointment is no appointment in law, in service and in such a situation Article 311 of the Constitution is not attracted at all."
The same view has been taken by the Patna High Court in the case of Rita Misra and others Vs. Director, Primary Education, Bihar, AIR 1988 (Patna) 26 which is approved by the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha (supra). In view of the judgments referred to above, we find no substance in the first argument raised by the learned counsel for appellants. The procedure given under the Rule of 1999 was not required to be applied for an order of termination in reference to fake or tampered mark-sheets and degrees. The other issue raised by counsel for the appellants is about the delay in initiation of action. It is stated that appellants are serving with the respondents (Basic Education) for the last 10 to 15 years. Their services have been terminated ignoring the aforesaid. The issue of delay in passing the order of termination is of no substance. It is not only for the reason that the fraudulent affairs of the University came into notice to the High Court when the writ petition was filed by Sunil Kumar (supra) in the year 2013. The efface of the University in regard to B.Ed. Examination 2005 was investigated by the S.I.T. on the direction of the Court. It is on collection of material, the fact about issuance of fake mark-sheets apart from tampered came in notice of the State. The action was immediately initiated thereupon not only by the State but the University. The issue of delay has otherwise been considered by the Apex Court in the case of R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala and others, (2004) 2 SCC 105 therein the action was taken after 27 years. The Apex Court refused to accept the plea in the light of the fact that the appointments secured based on fraud is void. The writ petition therein was filed by the son to secure the pensionary benefits. The long service was not accepted as a ground to secure the pensionary benefits. Para 15 and 19 of the said judgment are quoted herein for ready reference-:
"15. This apart, the appellant obtained the appointment in the service on the basis that he belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. When it was found by the Scrutiny Committee that he did not belong to the Scheduled Caste community, then the very basis of his appointment was taken away. His appointment was no appointment in the eyes of law. He cannot claim a right to the post as he had usurped the post meant for a reserved candidate by playing a fraud and producing a false caste certificate. Unless the appellant can lay a claim to the post on the basis of his appointment he cannot claim the constitutional guarantee given under the Article 311 of the Constitution. As he had obtained the appointment on the basis of a false caste certificate he cannot be considered to be a person who holds a post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. Finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee that the appellant got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate has become final. The position, therefore, is that the appellant has usurped the post which should have gone to a member of the Scheduled Caste. In view of the finding recorded by the Scrutiny Committee and upheld upto this Court he has disqualified himself to hold the post. Appointment was void from its inception. It cannot be said that the said void appointment would enable the appellant to claim that he was holding a civil post within the meaning of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. As appellant had obtained the appointment by playing a fraud he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own fraud in entering the service and claim that he was holder of the post entitled to be dealt with in terms of Article 311 of the Constitution of India or the Rules framed thereunder. Where an appointment in a service has been acquired by practising fraud or deceit such an appointment is no appointment in law, in service and in such a situation Article 311 of the Constitution is not attracted at all.
19. It was then contended by Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the appellant that since the appellant has rendered about 27 years of service the order of dismissal be substituted by an order of compulsory retirement or removal from service to protect the pensionary benefits of the appellant. We do not find any substance in this submission, as well. The rights to salary, pension and other service benefits are entirely statutory in nature in public service. Appellant obtained the appointment against a post meant for a reserved candidate by producing a false caste certificate and by playing a fraud. His appointment to the post was void and non est in the eyes of law. The right to salary or pension after retirement flow from a valid and legal appointment. The consequential right of pension and monetary benefits can be given only if the appointment was valid and legal. Such benefits cannot be given in a case where the appointment was found to have been obtained fraudulently and rested on false caste certificate. A person who entered the service by producing a false caste certificate and obtained appointment for the post meant for Scheduled Caste thus depriving the genuine Scheduled Caste of appointment to that post does not deserve any sympathy or indulgence of this Court. A person who seeks equity must come with clean hands. He, who comes to the Court with false claims, cannot plead equity nor the Court would be justified to exercise equity jurisdiction in his favour. A person who seeks equity must act in a fair and equitable manner. Equity jurisdiction cannot be exercised in the case of a person who got the appointment on the basis of false caste certificate by playing a fraud. No sympathy and equitable consideration can come to his rescue. We are of the view that equity or compassion cannot be allowed to bend the arms of law in a case where an individual acquired a status by practising fraud."
The Apex Court refused to grant relief on compassion or equity even though the deceased had rendered 27 years of service. The prayer to substitute the order of dismissal by compulsory retirement or removal to protect pensionary benefits was not accepted therein. In view of the above, we do not find that mere rendering the service for more than 10 years can be a ground to set aside the order of termination. If the prayer is accepted, then it would mean endorsement of fake or tampered mark-sheets. The next question advanced by counsel for the appellants is in reference to an interim order passed by the Court in the case of Smt. Suryavati and 150 others (supra) on the show cause notice issued by the State Government. A perusal of the interim order goes against the appellants in view of the fact that learned Single Judge while protecting the salary of the appellants, allowed the respondents to proceed in the matter as per Rules and accordingly there was no restrain to proceed in the matter for passing the order of termination or cancellation of the order of appointment. If there would have been disobedience of the Court's order in the said writ petitions, the appellants could have moved for contempt. The fact is that no contempt petition was preferred. Thus, challenge to the order of termination in reference to the interim order passed by the Court in the case of Suryavati and 152 others Vs. State of U.P. and 24 others, Writ A No. 56739 of 2017 remains of no consequence. For ready reference, the operative portion of the order dated 29.11.2017 in the case of Suryavati and 152 others (supra) is quoted herein-:
"Reliance has been placed on the decisions rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 399 (MB) of 2007 (Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College Versus State of U.P. and others) decided on 6 April 2007 and in Service Single No. 3335 of 2001 (Akhtyar Ahmad Versus State of U.P. and others) decided on 7 August 2015.
Submission requires consideration.
Till the next date of listing, it will be open for the respondents to initiate proceedings against the petitioners for removal/termination in accordance with the Rules. Respondents, however, in the mean time are restrained from interfering in the functioning of the petitioners, they shall be entitled to their salary as and when due which shall abide by the outcome of the proceedings initiated against the petitioners."
It is not correct to state that respondents passed order of termination in defiance of the order quoted above. There was no restrain in passing the order of termination. It is also urged by the learned counsel for appellants that the report of S.I.T. was made basis for passing the order of termination whereas report is not final in nature rather would be subject matter of trial in criminal case. The fact aforesaid has been clarified by the learned Additional Advocate General for the State. The sequence of the events in reference to the earlier litigation has been given in the opening paras. It started with a writ petition filed by Sunil Kumar (supra). The S.I.T. was constituted by the State Government pursuant to the direction of this Court. The S.I.T. collected material in the course of inquiry/investigation. A report was then submitted. The basis for taking action is the material collected by the S.I.T. and not the report alone. It is thus incorrect to state that no material was available with the respondents to proceed in the matter. The fact about manipulation came in the notice of the High Court on filing of a writ petition by Sunil Kumar (supra), when he was given two mark-sheets of B.Ed. Examination, 2005. A direction and on the production of affidavit by the Vice Chancellor, this Court observed about manufacturing of tabulation sheets, thus, directed the State Government to refer the matter to CBCID. The S.I.T. was constituted thereupon. During the course of investigation, the marks foil were recovered to assess how many marks were given by the examiner to each of the candidates apart from the fact as to how many candidates appeared in the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The details of it has been given by the learned Single Judge. The result of 12472 students was declared whereas admission and appearance of the students in the examination was less than to it. The figure of students appeared in the examination revealed from the record. It is not only in reference to the intake capacity of each institution approved by the N.C.T. but subsequent judgment of Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra). Total 8899 students appeared in the examination out of which 869 were those who appeared pursuant to the direction of the Bench at Lucknow. The result of the examination thereupon was declared for 8930 students. The declaration of excess result of 31 students was again pursuant to the direction of the Bench at Lucknow. As against it, the mark-sheets were issued in favour of 12472 students. The fact aforesaid could not be disputed even by the counsel for the appellants other than to emphasize that S.I.T. did not take care of the judgment of the Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra). The argument aforesaid has been raised without realising that the S.I.T. had taken figure of additional 869 students in excess to the admission otherwise given by the colleges. It was pursuant to the interim order and judgment of Bench at Lucknow. It was admitted by the counsel for the appellants that fraudulent mark-sheets have been issued but how it can be said to be to the appellants and not to the others. The argument aforesaid is relevant because nobody could dispute about declaration of result of the students in excess to admission as well as the appearance in the examination. It is therefore only the tabulation sheet/cross list produced by the University was not containing signatures of any authorized officer/person and additional pages were in different font. The question remains as to how the appellants alone can be said to have obtained fake mark-sheets out of those whose name appeared in tabulation sheet in excess to the students appeared in the examination. The determination of the aforesaid issue is not difficult in view of the fact that even while filing the writ petitions to question the order of termination, the appellants did not submit relevant documents to show their admission in any of the colleges with payment of fee apart from all other material to prove relevant facts as otherwise submitted by few appellants now namely-:
(i) Surendra Kumar S/o Sri Mauji Lal
(ii) Rajiv Singh Yadav S/o Sri Ram Ladait Yadav
(iii) Sudeep Kumar S/o Sri Ajay Pal Singh
(iv) Smt. Reeta Gautam D/o Sri Ram Gautam
(v) Reeta Yadav D/o Sri Janki Lal Yadav
(vi) Anuradha D/o Sri Rajendra Singh
(vii) Rekha Lavania D/o Sri Vijendra Singh The documents aforesaid were submitted when Court asked the appellants to prove their case but other than few, none else could submit the documents rather if the documents in reference to Sarvesh Kumar Chaturvedi and Rajesh Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Sri Shankar Lal Chaturvedi, submitted by the Senior Counsel Sri Ashok Khare are perused, they are not of the nature submitted by other appellants named above. No material was submitted by the petitioners along with the writ petition to prove their admission in the college and appearance in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The documents submitted along with the writ petition were largely the mark-sheets and the degrees which have been considered to be fake. The majority of mark-sheets are not containing even the enrollment number. No reason has been given as to why other than 18 candidates, which includes candidates named above, did not file reply to the notice given by the University along with complete material if they were genuine candidates. The material was not submitted even in response to the notice given by the Basic Education Officer. It is otherwise a fact that name of the appellants did not find place in the marks foil.
The marks foil so recovered by the S.I.T. were called in the Court during the course of hearing even for perusal of counsel for the appellants. It was when they had shown their doubt about availability of the marks foil. The doubt was mainly raised by those counsel who have appeared for the students having the tampered mark-sheets. The original marks foil is material to show that appellants did not appear in the examination, thus are having fake mark-sheets. The marks foil was seen by the counsel for the appellants also. It is thus not correct to state that S.I.T. report alone was basis for passing termination order rather it is even the material collected during the course of investigation. There was no reason for the appellants not to produce relevant material while filing the writ petition to prove themselves to be genuine students. Learned counsel for appellants further stated that the basis to dismiss the writ petitions by the learned Single Judge is the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University to cancel the degrees. It is without a liberty to challenge the order. It is a fact that during the pendency of the writ petition, the University cancelled the degrees issued in favour of 2823 students who failed to submit reply along with material to prove their appearance in the examination after admission in any of the colleges. The impugned judgment however shows detail arguments of the appellants against the order dated 07.02.2020 and discussion of each issue thereupon. It is thus not correct to state that learned Single Judge did not allow challenge or arguments against the order dated 07.02.2020. Those candidates have challenged the order of termination without placing material to show their admission and appearance in the B.Ed. Examination 2005. The impugned judgment shows extensive arguments of the counsel for the appellants against the order dated 07.02.2020 without a formal challenge. The learned Single Judge has discussed all the arguments while passing the judgment. The order dated 07.02.2020 is not based on the S.I.T. report alone. The University called for the information in its show cause notice. 2823 students failed to submit reply to notice and even failed to place any material along with the writ petitions to prove their admission in the college apart from appearance in the examination. The questionnaire given by the University through its notice is as under-: 1
Nk=@Nk=k dk uke 2 Nk=@Nk=k dk LFkkbZ@i=O;ogkj dk irk] eks0 uacj ,oa vk/kkj dkMZ uacj% 3 Nk=@Nk=k ds firk dk uke% 4 izos'k ijh{kk dk vuqdzekad% 5 ftl egkfo|ky; esa izos'k fy;k mldk uke 6 izos'k dkmUlfyax vFkok izca/kdh; dksVs esa gqvk ¼LiLV mYys[k djsa½ 7 dkmUlfyax la[;k@izca/kdh; dksVs esa izos'k lwph esa LFkku ¼dkmUlfyax i= layXu djsa½ 8 egkfo|ky; esa izos'k ds le; izos'k 'kqYd Mªk¶V@udn tek djkus dk fooj.k Mªk¶V@jlhn la[;k -------------------@/kujkf'k----------fnukad ¼izek.k lfgr½ 9 egkfo|ky; esa LdkWyjf'ki izkIr dh n'kk esa fooj.kA Mªk¶V@jlhn la[;k -------------------@/kujkf'k----------fnukad ¼izek.k lfgr½ 10 ukekadu la[;k 11 eq[; ijh{kk ch0,M0 05 dk vuqdzekad 12 ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 eq[; ijh{kk ds ijh{kk dsUnz dk uke 13 ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 ijh{kk esa cSBus dk izos'k i= dh Nk;kizfr 14 ch0,M0 o"kZ 2005 dh ijh{kk esa lfEefyr gksus ds ckn vadrkfydk Lo;a izekf.kr dj layXu djsaA 15 ;fn vLFkkbZ izek.k i= fo'ofo|ky; }kjk fuxZr fd;k x;k gks rks izek.k i=ksa dh la[;k leLr vLFkkbZ izek.ki=ksa dh Nk;k izfr layXu djsaA 16 ewy mikf/k dk fooj.k dzekad la[;k 17 vU; dksbZ fooj.k@lwpuk ^^uksV&% mijksDr ls lacaf/kr lHkh vfHkys[kksa dh Loizekf.kr izfr;[email protected] vfuok;Z #i ls layXu djsaA layXuksa dh la[;k vadksa esa ------------------------------- ¼'kCnksa esa½------------------------ lacaf/kr egkfo|ky; ds izkpk;Z }kjk vxzlkj.k&% izekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh@Jherh@dqekjh--------------------- iq=@iq=h--------------------- fuoklh----------------------------- us egkfo|ky; esa o"kZ 2004&05 dkmUlfyax esustesaV ------------------------ ds varxZr fof/k lEer izosf'kr Nk=@Nk=k Fks@FkhA Jh --------------------- dks tks vadrkfydk fo'ofo|ky; }kjk tkjh dh x;h Fkh mlds -------- vad izkIr gq;s Fks rFkk lS)kfUrd esa ------------- Js.kh rFkk izk;ksfxd esa --------------- Js.kh FkkA Nk=@Nk=k ds gLrk{kj----------------- izkpk;Z fnukad ----------------------- gLrk{kj ,oa eqgj^^ No explanation has been given for non-submission of information sought by the University along with material, if candidates appeared in the B.Ed. Examination, 2005. The information sought in the questionnaire was not such which would not have been available if a candidate took admission in the college and appeared in the examination.
It is also urged that appellants had appeared in the selection test and stood in the merit, thus could not have been terminated. Mere appearance in the selection test for the post of Assistant Teacher and qualifying it would not make the candidates eligible for the post having fake or tampered mark-sheets. In absence of valid B.Ed. degrees, they were not eligible for appointment as B.Ed. course is an essential qualification for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher.
It is at this stage we are again considering the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University as few appellants have challenged the order aforesaid in these appeals. The order dated 07.02.2020 was passed by the University after issuance of show cause notice. It was not interfered by this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). The notice was published in the news papers where a questionnaire was given to each of the candidates to answer it and submit reply along with supporting material. 2823 candidates did not submit any reply to the notice and accordingly they were declared to be holder of fake mark-sheets. The degrees as well as mark sheets were thus cancelled. The order dated 07.02.2020 has been questioned by the appellants without supplying any material even along with the appeal other than seven candidates named in the earlier paragraph. It is despite an opportunity by the University and even by the State.
It is more so when name of such students came during the course of investigation as no record for their appearance in examination was found. The marks foil recovered in the investigation were not containing their names. The cross list/tabulation sheet was observed to be manufactured documents by this Court in the case of Sunil Kumar (supra) as it was not containing signature of any authorized officer/person and it was having different font. In fact there were addition of pages in the tabulation sheet and thereby it was containing the result over and above those appeared in the examination. The University conducted the inquiry and it is on the recommendation of the Committee that the order dated 07.02.2020 was passed. Why the reply to questionnaire was not given by the appellants could not be explained if they are genuine students. It was not submitted even while filing the writ petition. It goes against the appellants whose degrees have been cancelled holding it to be fake.
In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the arguments for challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020. We are alive of the situation that few writ petitions have been separately instituted to question the order dated 07.02.2020 and are pending but it does not affect the right of others to challenge it in the appeal. The order dated 02.07.2020 came on record during the pendency of the writ petition and extensive arguments were made even before the learned Single Judge, who recorded finding on each argument. No error in the finding has been shown other than to state that appellants were not permitted to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 though manifold arguments against the said order were made before the learned Single Judge. The argument of the appellants that learned Single Judge did not give opportunity to question the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University, thus cannot be accepted. The opportunity for it has otherwise been given by this Court in the appeal on the request of counsel for the appellants and otherwise arguments were even raised before the learned Single Judge also who has recorded its finding on each argument and has not been questioned. This virtually nullifies the argument of learned counsel for appellants to question the judgment in reference to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University.
The University has already taken decision in regard to other 814 students also which includes 18 those students who filed detailed reply and submitted material to support it. The copy of the order dated 29.07.2020 in reference to 814 students was placed on record by Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate along with written arguments. The direction of the learned Single Judge in regard to 814 candidates has been thus complied. They did not submit material along with the writ petition or the appeal for challenge to the order of termination other than few. It was submitted only by seven candidates pursuant to the direction in these appeals to show their admission in the college and appearance in the examination. The documents should have been filed otherwise for scrutiny by the State. The order dated 29.07.2020 has been kept in abeyance by the University pursuant to the interim order in these appeals. The interim orders are vacated; accordingly order would be revived.
The other argument of learned counsel for appellants is that the S.I.T. report is not final because a challenge to it has been made in the case of Sunil Kumar converted into a P.I.L. The argument aforesaid is of no relevance in view of the fact that this Court has passed a detailed judgment holding action of the respondents to be independent to the report. The material collected during the course of investigation has been used. There is no contest and denial regarding issuance of fake mark-sheets though it has been qualified as to how fake candidates can be appellants alone and not others. The argument aforesaid has already been dealt with by this Court. The S.I.T. report alone was not taken as a piece of evidence rather the material recovered by the S.I.T. is also basis for passing the order. Marks foil were otherwise perused by the counsel for the appellants on their request, as was called by this Court from the respondents. The name of fake candidates does not exist in the marks foil. In the majority of mark-sheets submitted by them does not even contain enrollment number. In view of the above, the appellants declared to be fake students should have produced material in their defence.
The impugned judgment of learned Single Judge is not otherwise based on the judgment of this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). It is however a fact that issue about the competence of the officer/council, apart from other issues, adjudicated therein and attained finality in absence of further challenge, thus relied upon by the learned Single Judge. The issues settled therein are not open for challenge in these cases. The learned Single Judge was aware of the fact that judgment aforesaid was against the show cause notice.
The argument has also been made by the counsel for the appellants that result of B.Ed. Examination 2005 was declared on two occasions, one prior to the judgment in the case of Shri Puran Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra) dated 06.04.2007 and another subsequent to it. The S.I.T. has not taken note of the aforesaid. The argument aforesaid has been raised without taking into consideration that as against 82 institutions, how many students could have been admitted pursuant to the intake capacity given by the N.C.T. to those institutions with actual figure of students. The material recovered by the S.I.T. has made the picture clear. The figure of total students was taken with addition to the students pursuant to the judgment of Bench at Lucknow in the case of Sri Puram Prasad Gupta Memorial Degree College (supra).
Learned counsel for the appellants has failed to refer the interim order passed in the said case from time to time while challenging number of the students taken by the S.I.T. and even while doing so, they could not come out with a figure as to how many students appeared pursuant to the judgment of Bench at Lucknow. In fact the effort of the appellants is only to confuse the Court. The learned Additional Advocate General appeared for the State clarified the picture after referring to the material collected by the S.I.T. as to how many students appeared in the examination.
An argument has been raised even in reference to the marks foil. It contains marks of only two papers, thus could not have been relied by the S.I.T. and this Court. The marks foil recovered during the course of investigation were called for perusal of the Court as well as counsel for the appellants. It is true that marks foil of only two papers have been recovered but therein also marks appeared in the mark-sheets were found different than what has been recorded in the marks foil, prepared based on the marks allotted by the examiner. They were sufficient to prove tampering of mark sheets and even the number of the students appeared in the examination.
At this stage, another argument was raised that the name of those appeared in the marks foil is to be treated as genuine candidates. The argument for it was raised by the counsel appearing for the candidates having tampered mark-sheets. The argument aforesaid is accepted for tampered mark-sheets. The name of 2823+814 students does not exist in the marks foil which was even examined by the Court on random basis in the presence of counsel for the appellants. Two candidates out of 814 students appeared as ex-students, thus, they are excluded from the list of fake students. They are Km. Anita Maurya D/o Bhola Singh and Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh. The case of seven candidates named in earlier paras needs to be considered separately for which necessary direction would be passed.
The counsel were invited to refer the name of any of the candidates whose mark-sheets/degree was declared to be fake. The name given by the counsel for the appellants were not found in the marks foil and it was perused not only for one institution but more than one on random basis. It is also that other than seven out of 814 students/candidates failed to produce any material to prove their appearance in the examination. In view of the above, their termination order are not interfered. The action of the State for 814 candidates is taken to be independent to the action of University. The learned Single Judge found that even mark-sheets produced by them do not contain enrollment number.
In view of the above, we do not find substance in any of the arguments raised on behalf of appellants/students whose mark-sheets/degrees were found to be fake and accordingly we do not find any reason to cause interference in the order of termination.
The issue now remains about the tampered mark-sheets. Learned counsel for appellants submits that University has yet to undertake exercise in reference to the tampered mark-sheets. Thus, the order of the learned Single Judge may be interfered. Whatever decision is taken by the University after applying the procedure given under Section 67 of the Act of 1973, the aforesaid would be acceptable to the appellants. Thus, their order of termination may be made subject to final outcome of the exercise yet to be taken by the University for tampered mark-sheets.
The counsel for University has raised no objection. The learned counsel for the State however made a contest. It is submitted that marks foil are sufficient to show tampering of mark-sheets.
It is however submitted that if any direction in reference to the request of the appellants is given, they should not be reinstated at this stage but their termination be made subject to final outcome of the exercise to be undertaken by the University.
In that case, issue regarding lessor marks in the tampered mark-sheets in few cases would also be considered by the University though so far as the State is concerned, they still support their the order of termination/cancellation of appointments as it is based on the material collected by the S.I.T. The marks folio show different marks than appeared in the mark-sheets. The tabulation sheets was also showing marks at variance to marks folio.
In view of the above, the respondent-State prayed to maintain order for termination of those involved in the tampering of mark-sheets. According to them, the fact about tampering gets established as one Sunil Kumar was issued two different mark-sheets containing different marks. It happened due to tampering of marks. The said Sunil Kumar then preferred the writ petition to challenge the issuance of two mark-sheets showing different marks. It is thereupon only the manipulation and malpractices played by the University came in the notice of the High Court. It is however admitted that the direction of the learned Single Judge in regards to tampered mark-sheets has not been challenged by the State.
In view of the above and as we find no error in the judgment to direct the University to proceed in the matter as per Section 67 of the Act of 1977 and making termination order subject to the outcome of the aforesaid, we accept the prayer of the appellants and for that to modify the direction only in regards to payment of salary of the intervening period.
In view of the above, we would pass appropriate order in the concluding paragraph for the tampering of mark-sheets.
No arguments in reference to the candidates given mark-sheets on one roll number has been made rather the appeal was filed by only those candidates who have been terminated holding their mark-sheets to be fake or tampered. Accordingly, limited to that extent, the judgment is rendered.
In the light of the discussion made above, we dispose of all these appeals with following directions substituting the judgment of learned Single Judge-:
(1) No interference is made in the order of termination/cancellation of appointment of those who obtained service based on fake mark-sheets other than those whose writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge. The direction aforesaid would apply not only to 2823 candidates whose mark-sheets/degrees were cancelled by the University by order dated 07.02.2020 but remaining 814 candidates also other than those excluded by the learned Single Judge and one Km. Anita Maurya D/o Bhola Singh of T.R.K. College, Aligarh and Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh of K.R.T.T. College, Mathura. This direction would further exclude seven other candidates, viz. (i) Surendra Kumar S/o Sri Mauji Lal; (ii) Rajiv Singh Yadav S/o Sri Ram Ladait Yadav; (iii) Sudeep Kumar S/o Sri Ajay Pal Singh; (iv) Smt. Reeta Gautam D/o Sri Ram Gautam; (v) Reeta Yadav D/o Sri Janki Lal Yadav; (vi) Anuradha D/o Sri Rajendra Singh; (vii) Rekha Lavania D/o Sri Vijendra Singh. The respondent-State and University are directed to reconsider the case of above named seven candidates in the light of the documents submitted by them pursuant to the liberty given by this Court in these appeals. It would be in coordination. Necessary exercise in regard to those candidates would made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If their admission in the college coupled with appearance in the examination is found proved, then the termination order would be recalled in reference to them. For a period of one month, those candidates would continue in service subject to outcome of the direction given above. List of 812 candidates out of 814 is enclosed as Schedule-I. Their order of termination of 812 candidates has been examined independently by the Court. It was not otherwise made dependent by the State to the order to be passed by the University for 814 candidates.
(2) So far as the challenge to the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the University is concerned, no interference therein is made. Extensive arguments against the said order were made even before the learned Single Judge without a formal challenge to it but arguments so made were then dealt with by the learned Single Judge. The finding recorded therein does not suffer from error and even no argument to challenge the finding has been made other than to state that no opportunity was given to challenge the order dated 07.02.2020 ignoring that extensive arguments were made by the learned counsel. The finding in regard to it has been recorded by this Court also.
(3) The judgment of learned Single Judge is interfered in regard to the direction to the concerned District Basic Education Officer to effect the recovery of benefits obtained pursuant to the interim order of the Court. The liberty given by the learned Single Judge to the District Basic Education Officer for recovery is set aside.
(4) So far as the termination orders in reference to tampered mark-sheets are concerned, as urged by the learned counsel for the appellants, the University is directed to complete the exercise, as directed by the learned Single Judge, after observance of the provisions of law referred in the judgment and otherwise directed by this Court in the case of Tilak Singh (supra). The order in reference to those candidates would be made within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The order of termination/cancellation of appointments would be governed by the outcome of the order passed by the University, as agreed by the learned counsel for the appellants. If the University hold mark-sheets to be genuine instead of tampered of any of the appellants, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments, those would stand set aside. However, if the University records a finding about any of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets, then the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would have effect but it would be from the date of the order passed by the University and accordingly for a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment by the University, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments of the candidates holding tampered mark-sheets is kept in abeyance. Those candidates would be allowed to work with payment of salary.
It is, however, made clear that in case any of the candidate fails to participate in the proceedings initiated by the University or delays it, this order would not be to their benefit and accordingly, the direction herein above would remain operative only for a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by the University. On the expiry of the period given above, the order of termination/cancellation of appointments would become effective and thereby the University is directed to complete the exercise within the period given above. In case any candidate fails to cooperate with them, then a separate order for it can be passed but University would not, in any case, delay the process and for that no extension would be given by this Court rather default of the University to comply the direction aforesaid would have consequences of stoppage of salary of those who have to take action and to pass order in pursuance to the direction of this Court. The Vice Chancellor of the University would monitor compliance of this order and in case of delay, he would not be entitle to salary. The University would be at liberty to make inspection of the marks folio lying with the Registrar, High Court or the S.I.T. for the purpose of verification, if so required and accordingly Registrar, High Court as well as S.I.T. is directed to cooperate with the University for it. (5) The list of 2823 students has been enclosed along with the impugned judgment and list of remaining 812 candidates is enclosed as schedule I to this judgment. All the appeals are disposed of with the aforesaid. द्वारा:- माननीय सौरभ श्याम शमशेरी, न्यायमूर्ति
1. यह मेरा सौभाग्य है, की मुझे मेरे भ्राता न्यायमूर्ति श्री मुनीश्वर नाथ भंडारी द्वारा लिखा गया, एक अर्थपूर्ण व सारगर्भित निर्णय को पढ़ने का मौक़ा मिला। मैं उनके द्वारा प्रश्नगत विषय पर दिये गये तथ्यात्तमक व विधिक विश्लेषण, निष्कर्ष व निर्देशों से पूर्ण रुप से सहमत हूँ और केवल ''भारत वर्ष में गुरु की महत्ता' व ''छल का प्रभाव' पर पूरक निर्णय दे रहा हूँ:-
भारत वर्ष में गुरु की महत्ता गुरुर्ब्रह्मा गुरुर्विष्णु र्गुरुर्देवो महेश्वरः| गुरु साक्षात परब्रह्मा तस्मै श्रीगुरवे नमः|| (गुरु ही ब्रह्मा है, गुरु ही विष्णु है और गुरु ही भगवान शंकर है।
गुरु ही साक्षात परब्रह्म है, ऐसे गुरु को मैं प्रणाम करता हूं।)
2. भारतीय समाज में गुरु के उच्च स्थान की परिकल्पना उपरोक्त श्लोक से सर्वविदित होती है, जहाँ उसको भगवान की प्रतिमूर्ति माना जाता है। शिक्षक, ब्रह्मा के रूप में, ज्ञान और बुद्धिमत्ता का निर्माण करता है, विष्णु के रुप में, विद्वता का परिक्षण करता है तथा महेश्वर के रूप में अज्ञान का संहार करता है। कबीर दास जी गुरु को भगवान से भी ऊपर मानते है,जब वो कहते हैं :
"गुरु गोविन्द दोऊ खड़े,काके लागू पाय।
बलिहारी गुरु आपने, गोविन्द दियो बताय"।
3. शैक्षिक प्रक्रिया की सफलता, बहुत कुछ शिक्षक पर निर्भर करती है, क्योंकि यही वो शिक्षक हैं, जो छात्रों में उद्देश्य का प्रत्यारोपण और चरित्र का निर्माण करते हैं, इसलिए शिक्षकों की गुणवत्ता, योग्यता व चरित्र का शिक्षण प्रणाली की क्षमता के लिये सर्वाधिक महत्ता है, जिससे छात्र भविष्य में एक ज़िम्मेदार नागरिक बन सके।
4. शिक्षक का व्यवसाय एक पवित्र व्यवसाय है, यह केवल जीविका चलाने का साधन मात्र नहीं है। शिक्षक, राष्ट्र निर्माण में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाते हैं। यह शिक्षक ही है जो न केवल ज्ञान प्रदान करते हैं, वरन् भविष्य के नागरिकों को ऐसे साँचें में ढालते हैं, जिससे उनको दिल व दिमाग़ की विशेषताओं के अतिरिक्त, देश के प्रति कर्तव्य, नितिपरायणता और निष्ठा का भी बोध हो।
5. शिक्षक,माता पिता के बाद, 'गुरु देवो भव' की तरह सुशोभित होते हैं, क्योंकि वो बालक में सांस्कृतिक लोकाचार, बौद्धिक उत्कृष्टता व अनुशासित होने का भाव जागृति करने में मुख्य कारक होते हैं।
6. महर्षि अरविंद ने शिक्षकों के सम्बन्ध में कहा कि ''शिक्षक राष्ट्र की संस्कृति के चतुर माली होते हैं। वे संस्कारों की जड़ों में खाद देते हैं और अपने श्रम से सींचकर उन्हें शक्ति में निर्मित करते हैं।'' उनका मानना था कि किसी राष्ट्र के वास्तविक निर्माता उस देश के शिक्षक होते हैं। एक विकसित, समृद्ध एवम् हर्षित राष्ट्र व विश्व के निर्माण में शिक्षकों की भूमिका ही सबसे अधिक महत्वपूर्ण होती है। (देखें - अविनाश नागरा बनाम नवोदय विधालय समिति (१९९७) २ एस सी सी ५३४, सुष्मिता वासु व अन्य बनाम बैलीगुनजें शिक्षा समिति (२००६)७ एस सी सी ६८०, महाराष्ट्र राज्य बनाम विकास साहेबराव राउनदले (१९९२)४ एस सी सी ४३५) ''छल का प्रभाव'
7. वर्तमान प्रकरण के तथ्य व परिस्थितियाँ, उपरोक्त वर्णित शिक्षक की समाज में महत्ता से पूर्ण रुप से विपरीत है। तथ्यों की पुनरावृत्ति न करते हुए, यह विदित है कि विश्वविद्यालय व कॉलेजों के अधिकारियों, कर्मचारियों व अन्य ने अपीलार्थीयों को सदोष अभिलाभ पहुँचाने के उद्देश्य के लिए छल व कपट करके कुटरचित दस्तावेज़ों का निर्माण किया और इन्हें फ़र्ज़ी शिक्षा स्नातक की अंकतालिका व डिग्री प्रदान करायी गयी, जिसके आधार पर इन्होंने सहायक शिक्षक के पद पर नियुक्ति प्राप्त कर ली। यह विधि की अतिसामान्य अभिधारणा है, कि कोई ऐसा कृत्य जिसका आधार छल या कपट या धोखाधड़ी हो तो वो प्रारंभ से ही शुन्य माना जायेगा। अत: यह नियुक्ति आरम्भ से ही शून्य है।
8. अपीलार्थीयों ने छल व कपट से शिक्षक बनकर न केवल छात्रों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ किया है, वरन् शिक्षक के सम्मान को ठेस भी पहुँचाई है। प्रकरण के तथ्यात्मक व विधिक विश्लेषण अपीलार्थीयों के प्रतिकूल है।
9. विधि की यह स्पष्ट व्यवस्था है कि 'धोखाधड़ी पवित्र कृत्य को भी निष्प्रभावी कर देती है' और 'धोखाधड़ी और न्याय कभी एक साथ नहीं रहते हैं।' दुवयपदेशन स्वयं में ही एक धोखा है ।
10. जब कोई व्यक्ति कूटरचित / जाली दस्तावेज़ों के आधार पर नियुक्ति प्राप्त करता है, तो वो कृत्य नियोक्ता के प्रति दुवयपदेशन व छल माना जायेगा और इसलिये, न तो उसके पक्ष में कोई न्यायसंगता उत्पन्न होगी और न ही नियोक्ता को विबंधन होगा, अगर बिना किसी जाँच के वो उसको सेवा से हटा दें और न हीं सेवा की अवधि की कोई प्रासंगिकता रहेगी । [देखें :- राम चन्द्र सिंह बनाम सावित्री देवी और अन्य, (२००३) ८ एस सी सी ३१९; जैनेन्दर सिंह बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य: (२०१२)८ एस सी सी ७४८; सुधाकर पाठक और अन्य बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य व एक अन्य, २०१९(१) ए.डी.जे. ५८९ (डी.बी.); बिहार राज्य व अन्य बनाम देवेन्द्र शर्मा 2019 एस सी सी ऑन लाइन एस सी 1360]
11. वर्तमान प्रकरण में जहां प्रारम्भ से ही छल, कपट व धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर पद प्राप्त किया हो, वो शिक्षक भविष्य में छात्रों को अच्छे संस्कार दे पायेंगे, इसकी संभावना नगण्य है। अपीलार्थीयों ने यह जानकारी होते हुए भी की उनकी डिग्री या अंकतालिका वास्तविक नहीं है और वो छल व कपट के द्वारा प्राप्त किया गया एक कुटरचित दस्तावेज है, उसको वास्तविक दस्तावेज के रुप में नियोक्ता को दे कर, पदनियोक्ति प्राप्त करी है, जैसा की पूर्व में उल्लेखित किया गया है, ऐसी नियुक्ति प्रारम्भ से ही शून्य मानी जायेगी। छल और धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर ली गयी नियुक्ति के कारण न केवल योग्य प्रत्यक्षी के अधिकार का हनन किया है वरन् आने वाली पीढ़ी के भविष्य पर भी कुठाराघात किया है।
12. इस न्यायालय के निर्देश पर गठित विशिष्ट अनुसंधान दल द्वारा दस्तावेज़ों व अन्य साक्ष्यों के आधार पर इस निष्कर्ष पर पहुँचना कि प्रकरण में बड़े स्तर पर धांधली हुई है तथा उन छात्रों को सूचीबद्ध करना जो फेक छात्र हैं, जिनकी अंकतालिका टैम्पर्ड या जिन्होंने प्रतिरुपण किया है, में कोई त्रुटि प्रतीत नहीं होती है, क्योंकि अपीलार्थी, विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा जारी करी गई प्रश्नावली के उत्तर के साथ, ऐसा कोई भी साक्ष्य न तो प्राधिकारी या न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रस्तुत कर पाये, जिससे उनकी डिग्री व अंकतालिका वास्तविक मानी जा सके। वर्तमान प्रकरण में नैसर्गिक न्याय के सिद्धान्तों का भी पूर्णतः परिपालन हुआ है, जबकि धोखाधड़ी के आधार पर नौकरी लेने वालों के प्रकरण में, इन सिद्धान्तों के परिपालन का अपवाद है। इस विशिष्ट अनुसंधान दल ने विश्वविद्यालय से वर्ष 2005 के शिक्षा स्नातक के संबंधित सभी उपलब्ध दस्तावेजों को एकत्र किया, उनका अध्ययन किया और सारणीबद्ध किया। सारणी के ध्यानपूर्वक परिशीलन से यह विदित होता है कि, यह सारणी विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा उपलब्ध दस्तावेज़ों के आधार पर, स्पष्ट रुप से शीर्षकों में विभक्त करके बनाई गयी है। ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं है, जिसके आधार पर विशेष अनुसंधान दल की रिपोर्ट पर संशय करा जा सके।
13. अत: अपीलार्थीयों को कोई भी राहत नहीं दी जा सकती है। मैं भ्राता न्यायमूर्ति द्वारा प्रश्नगत विषय पर दिये गये विधिक विश्लेषण, निष्कर्ष व निर्देशों से पूर्ण रुप से सहमत हूँ । Order Date-: 26.02.2021 Schedule-I S. No. ID Roll No. Name of Candidate Father's Name College Code College Name Recommendation
1. F4 5027134 VANDANA M. CHANDRA 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
2. F7 5027137 RAJESH KUMARI BRIJ LAL 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
3. F10 5027140 MEENA KUMARI KHOOB SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
4. F11 5027141 PRAMILA LODHI RAI SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
5. F19 5027149 SURESH CHANDAR KANHAIYA LAL 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
6. F23 5027153 DEVENDRA MANI SELEM SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
7. F24 5027154 RAJESH YADAV N.K. YADAV 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
8. F31 5027301 SANJAY PRATAP SINGH LALLU SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
9. F35 5027305 MANOJ KUMAR R. SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
10. F36 5027306 GURUPENDRA KASHYAP RAM SANEHI LAL 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
11. F37 5027307 DIGAMBER SINGH JAGDISH SINGH 27 AK COLLEGE, SIKOHABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
12. F46 5280087 MANOJ KUMARI GENDA LAL 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
13. F47 5280088 BHUP SINGH PATI RAM 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
14. F48 5280089 VIJAY SHANKAR SUMAN RAMDAS SUMAN 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
15. F57 5280117 ANIL KUMAR RAM KHILARI 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
16. F58 5280118 VINITA PAL HARI RAM PAL 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
17. F62 5280122 DEENDAYAL MUNNA SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
18. F63 5280123 SANDIP YADAV RANANJAY YADAV 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
19. F65 5280125 RUCHI SINGH RAJENDRA SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
20. F66 5280126 MANGAL SINGH SHIV DAYAL 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
21. F67 5280127 AKHILESH KUMAR SIDDH NATH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
22. F68 5280128 ALOOK RAJ VARSHNEY A.K. VARSHNEY 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
23. F69 5280129 ANEK SINGH SARNAM SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
24. F70 5280130 VIMAL PRATAP SINGH K.S. YADAV 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
25. F74 5280134 KAUSHAL KISHOR R.C. RATHORE 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
26. F78 5280138 PANKAJ MISHRA C.P. MISHRA 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
27. F80 5280140 RAM NIRANJAN SUMIRAM 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
28. F81 5280141 SANDIP KUMAR VARSHNEY M.C. VARSHNEY 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
29. F83 5280143 SHYAM VIHARI HARI SHANKAR 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
30. F84 5280144 SRI NIWAS SINGH PURAN SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
31. F85 5280145 SUJIT SINGH R.V. SINGH EIKARWAR 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
32. F86 5280146 VIJENDRA SINGH SARNAM SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
33. F88 5280148 MANISH KUMAR MAHAVIR SINGH 280 APS COLLEGE, BAJNA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
34. F92 5101087 SANDHYAYA YADAV RAVINDRA YADAV 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
35. F93 5101088 VAVESH KUMAR MALKHAN SINGH 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
36. F95 5101090 SATENDRA KUMAR VIR PAL SINGH 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
37. F111 5101121 UPENDRA KUMAR RAM SHANKAR 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
38. F112 5101122 NARENDRA KUMAR AJAY PAL SINGH 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
39. F138 5101148 BRIJESH KUMAR VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
40. F142 5101303 KUNJ VIHARI VERMA OM PRAKASH 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
41. F143 5101304 BRAJESH KUMAR NATHU RAM 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
42. F144 5101305 SAVITA RAM KHILARI SINGH 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
43. F148 5101309 SANTOSH KUMARI GIRIRAJ PRASAD 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
44. F150 5101311 RENU PAL MAHESH BABU PAL 101 ACADEMY OF MGT. & EXCELLENCE, GAILANA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
45. F158 5116132 SANTOSH KUMAR RAJENDRA PRASAD 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
46. F164 5116138 BABITA CHANDRA PAL 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
47. F168 5116142 RAM RATAN PREM CHAND 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
48. F205 5116305 RAJ KUMARI RAM KISHAN 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
49. F209 5116309 DEEPENDRA SINGH SATINDRA SINGH 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
50. F211 5116311 POONAM RATHORE RAM BARAN SINGH 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
51. F214 5116314 KAILASH BABU BABU LAL 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
52. F215 5116315 PAWAN KUMAR KRIPAL SINGH 116 ACMY INST OF MGT. & TECH., SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
53. F220 5243074 SURENDRA KUMAR MAUJI LAL 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
54. F221 5243075 SANDEEP KUMAR AJAY PAL SINGH 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
55. F222 5243076 RAJ VIR SINGH YADAV RAM YADAV 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
56. F223 5243083 POONAM SHAKYA R.P. SHAKYA 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
57. F225 5243085 JAGVIR SINGH SHIV SINGH 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
58. F228 5243088 SATYA PRAKASH RAMESHWAR DAYAL 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
59. F229 5243089 RANVIR SINGH ROSHAN SINGH 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
60. F234 5243094 SUMAN RAMESH CHANDRA 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
61. F235 5243095 VINEET KUMAR BHARTI MAHARAM SINGH 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
62. F247 5232116 ARUN PRATAP S. LAL 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
63. F248 5232117 NARENDRA PAL SINGH CHATURI SINGH 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
64. F249 5232118 VINESH KUMAR SHIV DAYAL 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
65. F253 5232122 KAVITA NARENDRA KUMAR 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
66. F254 5232123 UJAGER SINGH RAM SAHAYA 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
67. F255 5232124 DHARMENDRA KUMAR KANSHANA CHHATRA BHAN SINGH 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
68. F260 5232129 RAJESH KUMAR KHACHEROO LAL 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
69. F261 5232130 OM PRAKASH BAGHEL NARAYAN SINGH BAGHEL 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
70. F264 5232133 KM. SARITA VIDHYA RAM 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
71. F265 5232134 RENU RADHEY LAL VARUN 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
72. F271 5232140 KAPTAN SINGH DHARAM SINGH 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
73. F273 5232142 SANDEEP KUMAR RADHEY LAL 232 AGRA PUBLIC TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
74. F282 5279087 SACHIN GOYAL MAHENDRA PAL GOYAL 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
75. F283 5279088 SWATI KASHYAP RAM SANEHI LAL 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
76. F285 5279090 MANOJ KUMAR LOKPAL SINGH 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
77. F294 5279118 SIMAN LATA RAJENDRA PRASAD 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
78. F295 5279119 JITENDRA SINGH BHARAT SINGH 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
79. F299 5279123 AVADESH VERMA MUNSHI SINGH 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
80. F302 5279126 MANOJ BHUSHAN VARUN ROSHAN LAL 279 ALIGARH TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
81. F327 5172087 NARENDRA PRATAP SHAB SINGH 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
82. F328 5172088 DHARM PAL BANI PAL 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
83. F329 5172089 SUNIL KUMAR ATAR SINGH 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
84. F331 5172091 NARSH DURGA PRASAD 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
85. F333 5172093 ALOK YADAV UMESH CHANDRA 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
86. F340 5172308 BALWANT SINGH CHARAN SINGH 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
87. F344 5172312 NAVIN CHANDRA MAURYA RAM ACHAL MAURYA 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
88. F361 5281117 POOJA KANOJIA M.C. KANOJIA 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
89. F362 5281118 BHUVNESHWAR SINGH CHIRANJIT SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
90. F363 5281119 SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH LATA SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
91. F364 5281120 VIRESH KUMAR POKH PAL 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
92. F365 5281121 SURJEET KUMAR MAHAVIR SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
93. F366 5281122 ALKA SINGH PREM PAL SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
94. F368 5281124 YADVENDRA SINGH NIHAL SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
95. F369 5281125 RISHI KUMAR BANVARI LAL 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
96. F370 5281126 SATYA PRAKASH FATEH SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
97. F384 5281140 SHALINI SHANTI SWAROOP GUPTA 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
98. F397 5281303 RITU VARSHNEY LAJPAT RAJ VARSHNEY 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
99. F399 5281305 MITHILESH DEVI SINGH 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
100. F400 5281306 UMESH KUMAR RAM BHAROSE 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
101. F407 5281313 VISHNU KUMAR CHARAN DAS 281 ANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, KEETHAM AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
102. F418 5131090 RAM VIR SINGH JAI BAHADUR SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
103. F419 5131091 DHARMVIR SINGH GANGA RAM SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
104. F426 5131116 YATIN NARAYAN A.N. SHARMA 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
105. F429 5131119 HEMANT KUMAR GUMANI RAM 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
106. F439 5131129 SADHNA KUMARI SUMANT SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
107. F452 5131142 ANUJ KUMAR GAUTAM SHIV CHARAN LAL GAUTAM 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
108. F454 5131144 SURENDRA PAL SHRI RATI RAM 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
109. F455 5131145 OM VIR SINGH LAL BAHADUR SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
110. F459 5131302 REKHA MAHAVIR PRASAD 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
111. F461 5131304 VIKASH YADAV RAJ VIR SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
112. F462 5131305 GYANENDRA KUMAR BHOOP SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
113. F463 5131306 LAXMI CHANDRA BRIJ LAL 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
114. F464 5131307 GUDDU KUMAR BADRI PRASAD 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
115. F466 5131309 GOVIND KUMAR S. RAM 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
116. F467 5131310 JITENDRA BAHADUR SINGH J. SINGH 131 ANJALI INST. OF MGT. & SC., ETMADPUR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
117. F473 5120131 HARISH KUMAR PRAMOD KUMAR 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
118. F482 5120140 BHAWAN SINGH MANIK CHANDRA 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
119. F495 5120226 SHASHI MOHAR PAL SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
120. F497 5120228 UDAY VIR SINGH JAI SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
121. F501 5120232 PREM LATA H.S. SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
122. F502 5120233 SHASHI KALA HODIL SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
123. F503 5120234 SUMIT VERMA MADAN SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
124. F504 5120235 ANJANA RAJAK B.L. RAJAK 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
125. F505 5120236 RENU JAI SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
126. F507 5120238 ATUL SINGH BHADURIYA LAKHAN SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
127. F523 5120305 RAKESH KUMAR OM PRAKASH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
128. F524 5120306 RATAN KUMAR KAILASH CHANDRA MISHRA 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
129. F525 5120307 GHANSHYAM SINGH JAGDISH SINGH 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
130. F528 5120310 ABHISHEK MATHUR P.K. MATHUR 120 ARYAN INSTITUTE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
131. F534 5005304 MANJU RAM NATH 5 B.D. JAIN GIRLS COLLEGE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
132. F536 5005306 MEENAKSHI OMKAR SINGH 5 B.D. JAIN GIRLS COLLEGE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
133. F558 5017276 MADHU RANI RAMESH CHANDRA 17 B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
134. F559 5017277 SHOBHA MISHRA K.C. MISHRA 17 B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
135. F563 5017304 SANJU YADAV RAM VEER SINGH YADAV 17 B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
136. F566 5017307 RAJEEV KUMAR RAM SWAROOP SINGH 17 B.S.A COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
137. F581 5234095 DHARMENDRA SHARMA RAJEEV SHARMA 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
138. F585 5234116 LATA THAKUR MAHESH CHANDRA 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
139. F586 5234117 SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH JAI SINGH 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
140. F591 5234122 SACHENDRA KUMAR R.S. LAL 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
141. F592 5234123 JYOTI SHARMA B.P. PATHAK 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
142. F607 5234138 ASHISH KUMAR MISHRA RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
143. F615 5234146 CHANDRA PAL KISHORI LAL 234 BALMUKUND BAJARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ARTONI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
144. F621 5134089 MITHILESH HARI SINGH 134 BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
145. F626 5134094 KARM VIR SINGH SHIV RAM SINGH 134 BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
146. F629 5134301 DEEPAK SINGH AMAR SINGH 134 BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
147. F630 5134302 SHASHI PAL SINGH GANPATI SINGH 134 BON MAHARAJ, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
148. F640 5246089 MANJU YADAV R.S. YADAV 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
149. F644 5246093 GOPAL DUTT PANDEY GAURI SHANKER PANDEY 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
150. F650 5246118 ANITA HARI KISHAN 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
151. F654 5246122 SHIV KUMARI DAYA RAM 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
152. F655 5246123 MANJU CHAUDHARY BUDDSEN CHAUDHARY 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
153. F672 5246146 DINESH CHAND RAM NARESH SINGH 246 BRAJ RAJ SINGH COLLEGE, KUBERPUR, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
154. F688 5136096 ASHOK KUMAR BHIKA RAM 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
155. F699 5136305 GEETA YADAV JANGI LAL YADAV 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
156. F702 5136308 SHEN LATA GYAN SINGH 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
157. F705 5136311 MAN MOHAN CHITRAVANSHI V.K. CHITRAVANSHI 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
158. F707 5136313 PRAMILA SINGH S.B. SINGH 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
159. F713 5136320 REKH PAL SINGH NAWAB SINGH 136 C-IMPACT, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
160. F717 5008083 RAMVIR SINGH INDRA PAL SINGH 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
161. F719 5008085 PREETI CHAURASIA SURAJ NARAYAN CHAURASIA 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
162. F723 5008089 OM NARAYAN SINGH HUB LAL 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
163. F725 8008091 UMA KANT YADAV LAKHAN SINGH 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
164. F729 5008095 POONAM SALIG RAM 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
165. F740 5008106 SUNITA RAGHUNATH SINGH 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
166. F741 5008107 RAMKESH YADAV SADARAM SINGH 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
167. F748 5008304 SANGITA VERMA KISHOR KUMAR 8 D.S. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
168. F756 5030302 PRITI VERMA AMAR SINGH VERMA 30 DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
169. F757 5030303 JUGNU VERMA UDAL SINGH VERMA 30 DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
170. F760 5030306 PREETI SHARMA R.N. SHARMA 30 DAU DAYAL MAHILA VIDHYALAYA, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
171. F768 5275092 VED PRAKASH JAIN UDAI RAM JAIN 275 DEV EDUCATION COLLEGE, BARAHEN, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
172. F770 5216086 NEERAJ BHADAURIA K.K. SINGH 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
173. F777 5216093 KHUSHI RAMA LALA RAM 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
174. F778 5216094 JEEVAN LAL SENGAR KAMAN SINGH 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
175. F780 5216096 SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA H.P. SHARMA 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
176. F786 5216305 SATYAVIR SINGH JAI PAL SINGH 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
177. F788 5216307 DHARMENDRA SINGH ANEK SINGH 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
178. F789 5216308 MEENA KUMARI JAI SINGH 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
179. F793 5126308A NARESH KUMAR RAJENDRA PRASAD 216 DR. ISLAM MAZID TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
180. F797 5245092 HRADESH KUMAR RAM PRAKASH SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
181. F798 5245093 SHWETA SINGH SIKARWAR RAMESH KUMAR SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
182. F799 5245094 SATYA BEER RAM RATAN 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
183. F802 5245116 SEEMA TOMAR N.S. TOMAR 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
184. F803 5245117 DHEERAJ RATHORE RAMESHWAR RATHORE 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
185. F804 5245118 PRITI RATHORE RAMESHWAR RATHORE 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
186. F808 5245122 JAY DAYAL SINGH KANCHAN SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
187. F810 5245124 NEERAJ KAUSHIK G.C. KAUSHIK 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
188. F817 5245131 SHAIL BALA GAJENDRA SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
189. F818 5245132 GAYATRI DEVI SAXENA S. CHANDRA 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
190. F824 5245138 KALPANA RAMPHER SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
191. F825 5245139 SEEMA JAGDISH SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
192. F826 5245140 BAVITA SATYAVEER SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
193. F830 5245144 RENU SHARMA S.P. SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
194. F832 5245146 SUNIL KUMAR SUBAY SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
195. F833 5245147 ROHIT MALIK N. SINGH MALIK 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
196. F834 5245148 MANOJ KUMAR BIPIN KUMAR 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
197. F840 5245154 HARI BHAN SINGH KHEM SINGH 245 F.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
198. F863 5123067 SHAILENDRA KUMAR CHATTAR SINGH 123 FAIYAZ HUSSAIN, NIDHOLI KALAYAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
199. F890 5123304 ROSHAN ARA F.M. KHAN 123 FAIYAZ HUSSAIN, NIDHOLI KALAYAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
200. F893 5075031 BHOOPENDRA SINGH SHER SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
201. F903 5075041 MEERA CHOTTE LAL YADAV 75 FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
202. F959 5075131 SEEMU R.P. TIMORI 75 FAIZ-E-ALAM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
203. F961 5075133 SARVESH kUMAR RUSTAM SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
204. F962 5075134 HENA DEVI RAJENDRA KUMAR 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
205. F963 5075135 NAND LAL SHARMA P.S. SHARMA 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
206. F969 5075141 SUBODH KUMAR SHRI KRISHAN LAL 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
207. F970 5075142 SANJAY DIWAKER RAJ BAHADUR 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
208. F971 5075143 VIRENDRA SINGH HARGYAN SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
209. F972 5075144 MANOJ KUMARI PREM SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
210. F973 5075145 KRISHNA BIR SINGH HARISHANDRA 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
211. F974 5075146 INDRAPAL SINGH SURESH KUMAR 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
212. F975 5075147 GULVER SINGH MAKHAN SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
213. F977 5075149 VARSHA RANI MUNSHI SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
214. F984 5075306 RANJEET BHARTI RAJ BAHADUR BHARTI 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
215. F987 5075309 DEVENDRA KUMAR SINGH BHAGWATI PRASAD 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
216. F991 5075313 SOM DUTT RAMJI LAL 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
217. F993 5075315 ARJUN SINGH SAVIDIYA BABOO RAM 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
218. F994 5075316 SATISH KUMAR MANIK SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
219. F996 5075318 HEMLATA MANIK CHAND 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
220. F997 5075319 GYANENDRA SINGH SHANTI SWAROP JADON 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
221. F998 5075320 CHANDRISH RANA GURUDAYAL SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
222. F999 5075321 DINESH KUMAR BABOO LAL 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
223. F1000 5075322 REENA KUMARI RAJ KUMAR 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
224. F1002 5075324 KUSUM KASHYAP PRATAP SINGH 75 FAIZ-E-AM MODERN DEGREE COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
225. F1015 5195116 BABLI RAM SEWAK 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
226. F1017 5195118 AJAY KUMAR YADAV GODHAN SINGH YADA 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
227. F1018 5195119 SUNIL KUMAR RAM SEWAK YADAV 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
228. F1020 5195121 NAMRATA YADAV KRISHNA VIR SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
229. F1021 5195122 BANDANA SHARMA S.R.SHARMA 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
230. F1022 5195123 UMESH KUAMR HAKIM SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
231. F1024 5195125 DHARMENDRA KUMAR HARI OM VERMA 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
232. F1025 5195126 PRIYNKA ARUN A.K.MAHESHWARI 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
233. F1028 5195129 SALINI R. SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
234. F1032 5195133 RAM LAKHAN SINGH ATAR SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
235. F1034 5195135 JASWANT SINGH S.P. SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
236. F1035 5195136 SHRINESH KUMAR INDRAJEET SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
237. F1036 5195137 SANDEEP KUMAR HOTI LAL 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
238. F1037 5195138 BED PRAKASH JAGDISH PRASAD 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
239. F1039 5195140 ARCHANA MEVA RAM 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
240. F1040 5195141 ANJALI PARASHAR K.P. PARASAR 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
241. F1042 5195143 RAM PRAKASH SISHODIYA RADHEY SHYAM 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
242. F1043 5195144 YASHODA KUAMRI HUKUM SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
243. F1044 5195145 SURESH CHAND MOTI LAL 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
244. F1045 5195146 BHOOP SINGH HAKIM SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
245. F1047 5195148 MUKUL KUMAR LAXMI SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
246. F1048 5195149 VISHAL SINGH AMAR SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
247. F1049 5195150 OM PRAKASH SINGH FAGUNI SINGH 195 GAGAN COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
248. F1050 5014063 SADHANA S.S.YADAV 14 GANJDUNDWARA COLLEGE, GANJDUNDWARA Remain in the "Fake" category
249. F1063 5014305 ZEENAT ARSHI ABDUL MAZID 14 GANJDUNDWARA COLLEGE, GANJDUNDWARA Remain in the "Fake" category
250. F1065 5194087 MANOJ KUMAR KUWAR PAL SINGH 194 GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
251. F1067 5194089 PRAVENDRA KUMAR SHISHUPAL SINGH 194 GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
252. F1069 5194091 DINESH CHANDRA RAM RATAN 194 GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA, NAGLA PARSI, DADU, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
253. F1076 5086088 AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH J.P. PATHAK 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
254. F1077 5086089 SUNITA DEVI NEM SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
255. F1086 5086116 RANJANA SRIVASTAVA R.S.SRIVASTAVA 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
256. F1089 5086119 VINOD KUMAR MUNNA LAL 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
257. F1093 5086123 JAI PRAKASH MAGH SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
258. F1094 5086124 DHARMENDRA KUAMR VERMA MADAN LAL VERMA 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
259. F1095 5086125 NAM SINGH LAL SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
260. F1096 5086126 SHALINI KULSHRESHTHA P.K. KULSHRESHTA 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
261. F1097 5086127 GEETA RAMVIR SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
262. F1098 5086128 SHAILJA SINGH R.P.SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
263. F1099 5086129 SANGITA YADAV D.S.YADAV 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
264. F1100 5086130 DHARMENDRA CHAUDHARY HARDEV SINGH CHAUDHARY 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
265. F1104 5086134 AMIT YADAV R.P.SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
266. F1105 5086135 BHAWANA YADAV R.S.YADAV 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
267. F1107 5086137 SANGITA MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
268. F1108 5086138 SUNITA KUMARI JAGDISH SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
269. F1109 5086139 VIJENDRA SINGH OM PRAKASH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
270. F1110 5086140 OM PRABHA KAMAL SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
271. F1111 5086141 ANIL KUMAR RAM NIWAS 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
272. F1112 5086142 BABITA PANDEY J.P. PANDEY 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
273. F1116 5086146 SHASHI WALA DHANI RAM 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
274. F1117 5086147 HEMENDRA SINGH SOHORAN SINGH 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
275. F1118 5086148 MAHESH KUMAR SHIV VINOD KUMAR 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
276. F1120 5086150 SUSHMA RAJENDRA KUMAR 86 GYAN MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
277. F1121 5155089 PANKAL KUMAR RAVINDRA KUMAR 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
278. F1130 5155118 BHARTI VERMA A.K.VERMA 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
279. F1131 5155119 RAJINI HUBBLAL 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
280. F1132 5155120 ANUJ KUMAR SHIV CHARAN SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
281. F1137 5155125 MAMTA KUMARI KHEM KARAN SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
282. F1138 5155126 ROHINI SINGH VIJAY PAL SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
283. F1142 5155130 PRAMOD KUMAR SOBRAN SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
284. F1144 5155132 PRAMILA FAUJDAR G.S.FAUJDAR 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
285. F1149 5155137 YAVNESH KUMAR SINGH A.K.SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
286. F1155 5155143 PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SHIV NANDAN YADAV 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
287. F1163 5155302 PRAMOD KUMAR RAM CHAND 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
288. F1164 5155303 GEETA ML 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
289. F1165 5155304 PREM SINGH ML 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
290. F1166 5155305 MEENAKSHI SINGH RISHIPAL SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
291. F1167 5155306 CHANDRA PAL KHYALI RAM 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
292. F1168 5155307 SUVARNA SINGH BAGHEL C.B.SINGH BAGHEL 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
293. F1169 5155308 APARNA SINGH C.B. SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
294. F1170 5155309 KAVITA KHAIR AMAR SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
295. F1173 5155312 LOKESH BABU MAKHAN SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
296. F1176 5155315 VIJENDRA KUMAR BHEO DEV SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
297. F1181 5155320 NAVEEN KUMAR RAJ KUMAR 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
298. F1183 5155322 ANITA MAHARAJ SINGH 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
299. F1184 5155323 UPENDRA KUMAR SHIVDAS SAGAR 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
300. F1185 5155324 JYOTI PATHAK ASHOK KUMAR PATHAK 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
301. F1186 5155325 RITU VERMA RADHEY SHYAM 155 IIMT, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" category
302. F1187 5204086 KM. PANKAJ INDER PAL SINGH 204 J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
303. F1191 5204090 VINEET KUMAR RAM KRISHNA 204 J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
304. F1193 5204092 INDU PRABHA YOGENDRA KUMAR 204 J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
305. F1194 5204093 YATENDRA KUMAR YADAV JANAK SINGH YADAV 204 J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
306. F1195 5204094 RANU PONWAR SHYAMVIR SINGH 204 J.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
307. F1199 5204303 RANVEER SINGH DAYA RAM 204 J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
308. F1200 5204304 SUBODH KUMAR B.R. CHANDRODAY 204 J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
309. F1201 5204305 SUMAN KUMAR CHAUHAN RAJVIR SINGH 204 J.S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SIKOHABAD, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
310. F1258 5265049 TIWARI SHAILESH RAM SAHAY TIWARI 256 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
311. F1268 5265059 RAJESH KUMAR HAR DAYAL SINGH 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
312. F1274 5265065 SATYAVIR SINGH RANJEET SINGH 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
313. F1278 5265069 UMESH BABU BHIKAM SINGH 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
314. F1290 5265081 YADUVIR SINGH RAJVIR SINGH 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
315. F1297 5265088 CHANDRA VIR SINGH CHHONKAR GANPATI RAM 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
316. F1355 5265149 SUBASH BABOO GIRESH BABOO 265 JAY MURTI COLLEGE, NAGLA, BALL, SIRSAGANJ, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
317. F1358 5019304 NEEL MANI SHARMA D.S. PANDEY 19 K.R. GIRLS COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
318. F1374 5129094 TARUN PRATAP SINGH CHAUHAN RAM PRAKASH SINGH CHAUHAN 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
319. F1407 5129127 NARENDRA KUMAR SUMAN SHYAM SINGH 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
320. F1433 5129305 AJAY KUMAR ASHOK KUMAR 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
321. F1436 5129308 RAKSHA RAM RAM LAL 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
322. F1437 5129309 DINESH KUMAR RATAN SINGH 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
323. F1438 5129310 SUMAN LATA KUSHWAHA HANUMAN KUSHWAHA 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
324. F1439 5129311 INDRISH KHAN AHLKAR KHAN 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
325. F1440 5129312 RAKESH KUMAR BHAGEL DEVI SINGH BHAGEL 129 K.R. TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
326. F1458 5223018 JAYPAL SINGH KUNTAL BHOMSAIN 223 KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
327. F1499 5223059 ARVIND KUMAR RANA HARI SINGH RANA 223 KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
328. F1561 5223124 SATYA PAL SINGH INDRAJEET SINGH 223 KEHRIMAL GAUTAM SMARAK MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
329. F1588 5193085 ANKIT KUMAR M.S. VERMA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
330. F1590 5193087 SHASHI RAM SANAHI 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
331. F1595 5193092 SWETA DAUNERIA DAYA SHANKER DAUNERIA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
332. F1603 5193117 SEEMA RAY BRIJ KISHOR RAY 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
333. F1605 5193119 SUNEETA SHARMA G.S. SHARMA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
334. F1610 5193124 REKHA DHARAM SINGH 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
335. F1612 5193126 MITHLESH KUMARI RAJPUT RAM DAS RAJPUT 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
336. F1615 5193129 SARITA CHAURASIA BHAGWAN DAS 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
337. F1616 5193130 ARCHANA SURESH CHANDRA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
338. F1621 5193135 NEELAM CHAUHAN MAHIPAL SINGH 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
339. F1622 5193136 PROEETI MISHRA A.K. MISHRA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
340. G1623 5193137 SANGEETA DEVI JAWAHER LAL SINGH 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
341. F1632 5193146 SUNITA SHAKYA MUNNI LAL 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
342. F1633 5193147 MAMTA GANGA SINGH 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
343. F1635 5193149 PUSHPA SRIVASTAVA R.K. SRIVASTAVA 193 KHER KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, KHER, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
344. F1638 5024302 NEERAJ KUMARI UMA SHANKAR SHANKALA 24 KR. R.C.M. COLLEGE, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category
345. F1645 5188088 PRATIBHA SARSWAT R.B. SARSWAT 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
346. F1656 5188117 HITESH KUMAR SINGH CHHTRA PAL SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
347. F1657 5188118 MANGAL SAIN OMKAR SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
348. F1659 5188120 RAJESH KUMAR SHRIPAL SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
349. F1660 5188121 VIJENDRA SINGH NATRAPAL SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
350. F1662 5188123 VIJAY SINGH RAM KHILARI 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
351. F1663 5188124 PUSHPENDRA SINGH RAM DAS 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
352. F1668 5188129 SOHAN RANA U.S. RANA 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
353. F1669 5188130 VIMAL SHARMA R.P. SHARMA 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
354. F1672 5188130 SHIVA KANT TIWARI R.P. TIWARI 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
355. F1674 5188135 SHASHI KALA RAVI SHANKER MISHRA 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
356. F1679 5188140 MEENA KUMARI M.I. SAGAR 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
357. F1691 5188303 MAHESH CHAND SHARMA UMA SHANKAR SHARMA 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
358. F1692 5188304 RAVINDRA KUMAR VERMA SUGREEV SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
359. F1694 5188306 SEEMA DEVI BALBIR SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
360. F1696 5188308 ANJU YADAV KAYAM SINGH 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
361. F1697 5188309 SEEMA YADAV RAM KISHOR 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
362. F1700 5188312 ROHITASHWA KUMAR VISHAMBHAR 188 KRISHNA COLLEGE OF SPORTS AND EDUCATION, BAMROLI KATRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
363. F1714 5147116 NARESH KUMAR KALI CHARAN 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
364. F1715 5147117 CHETAN ARYA BHARAT SINGH VERMA 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
365. F1717 5147119 RAGINI SINGH NATHI LAL 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
366. F1720 5147122 SAUBHAGY KANWAR C.P. SINGH 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
367. F1725 5147122 SAUBHAGY KANWAR C.P. SINGH 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
368. F1726 5147127 NEELAM KUMARI JADISH CHANDRA 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
369. F1729 5147131 VIPIN SINGH YADAV DILIP SINGH YADAV 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
370. F1746 5147148 SUSHIL SARSWAT S.N. SARASWAT 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
371. F1751 5147304 SARSWATI DIWALI LAL VERMA 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
372. F1752 5147305 SUMITA GAUTAM R.C. GAUTAM 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
373. F1763 5147316 SATISH CHANDRA BALVIR SINGH 147 KRISHNA COLLEGE, BAMROLI KATARA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
374. F1769 5189088 SHYAM JEEVAN CHHOTE LAL 189 M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
375. F1771 5189090 ANGURI DEVI JAY PAL SINGH 189 M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
376. F1779 5189098 MUKEHS KUMAR JAI SRI GOVIND 189 M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
377. F1784 5189304 SHASHI KUMARI BAL KISHAN 189 M.D. COLLEGE, LAWERS COLONY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
378. F1808 5126096 KUSHAL PAL SINGH RAM SINGH 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
379. F1836 5126141 CHANDRA PAL SINGH NARAYAN SINGH 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
380. F1846 5126301 LAXMI DUBEY K.N. DUBEY 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
381. F1847 5126302 VIMAL KUMAR SAVRAM 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
382. F1848 5126303 GOVIND KUMAR SHARMA RAM JI LAL 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
383. F1851 5126306 KAMAL NAYAN SINGH TORAM SINGH 126 MEGH SINGH DEGREE COLLEGE, AVIDGARH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
384. F1865 5237086 NEELAM SHARMA RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
385. F1875 5237118 RADHA SHARMA OM PRAKASH SHARMA 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
386. F1877 5237120 REETA YADAV RAGHUVIR SINGH YADAV 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
387. F1881 5237124 VANDANA SRIVASTAVA R.S. SRIVASTAVA 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
388. F1882 5237125 REEKHA KUMARI KHEM KARAN SINGH 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
389. F1885 5237128 MACHALESH RAJA RAM 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
390. F1886 5237129 MOHAN DEVI RAM SAROOP 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
391. F1887 5237130 REKHA KUMARI MANIK CHAND 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
392. F1890 5237133 CHAMELI DATA RAM 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
393. F1891 5237134 ANITA HORI LAL 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
394. F1896 5237140 MEENA BIHARI LAL 237 MOTHER TERISA WOMEN COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
395. F1907 5011077 MAHESH KHUBI RAM 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
396. F1908 5011078 AJAY KUMAR SHARMA C K SHARMA 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
397. F1909 5011079 NEERU VINOD KUMAR 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
398. F1912 5011082 SANDHYA SAXENA RAM SANEHI SAXENA 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
399. F1913 5011083 MANOJ KUMAR NEK RAM SINGH 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
400. F1916 5011102 RAJESH RAM DAS 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
401. F1917 5011103 SANDHYA MALKHAN SINGH 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
402. F1919 5011105 RENU SHARMA G.D. SHARMA 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
403. F1923 5011109 ATIVEER KAPTAN SINGH 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
404. F1931 5011303 RAJESH VERMA NARAYAN SINGH 11 P.C.BAGLA COLLEGE, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
405. F1968 5146085 DHARMENDRA SINGH GYANENDRA SINGH 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
406. F1989 5146306 PANKAJ KUMAR SATYA PRAKASH 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
407. F1990 5146307 BALVEER SINGH SAHAB SINGH 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
408. F1991 5146308 ANITA SARVAN SINGH 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
409. F1993 5146310 RAJVIR SINGH SURAJ PAL 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
410. F1994 5146311 REETA LAJJA RAM 146 R.B. DEGREE COLLEGE, NARAICH, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
411. F1997 5002301 PRABHAT ARYA S.C. ARYA 2 R.B.S. COLLEGE, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
412. F2034 5145132 PRASHANT YADAV PARMANAND YADAV 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
413. F2038 5145136 ASHU BHART SINGH 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
414. F2052 5145303 RENU KATIYAR S.C. KATIYAR 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
415. F2057 5145308 DINESH KUMAR HUKUM SINGH 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
416. F2058 5145309 RISHI KUMAR RAJVIR SINGH 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
417. F2059 5145310 DHARMBIR SINGH JAWAHAR SINGH 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
418. F2063 5145314 PUSHPENDRA SINGH NATHU SINGH 145 R.K. COLLEGE OF SYSTEM & MANAGEMENT, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" category
419. F2066 5102251 ANAND KUMAR VED RAM 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
420. F2067 5102252 AKHAND PRATAP SINGH NATHU SINGH RATHORE 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
421. F2071 5102256 KARAN SINGH BAL KUKAND 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
422. F2073 5102258 LOKENDRA VERMA K.C. VERMA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
423. F2074 5102259 SONU SHARMA BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
424. F2078 5102263 HARENDRA PAL SINGH LAXMAN SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
425. F2081 5102266 MOHD. MUSTEEN MOHD. IDRIS 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
426. F2082 5102267 SHIVENDRA SINGH TEJ SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
427. F2084 5102269 RUPENDRA SINGH CHHONKAR MAHAVIR SINGH CHONKAR 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
428. F2086 5102271 SHIVENDRA SINGH TEJ SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
429. F2087 5102272 RUPENDRA SINGH CHHONKAR KAPTAN SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
430. F2090 5102275 LAKENDRA KUMAR RAMESH CHANDRA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
431. F2094 5102279 SUBHASH CHAND BHARAT SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
432. F2095 5102280 ANJALI VISHNU NARAYAN 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
433. F2096 5102280 ANJALI VISHNU NARAYAN 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
434. F2097 5102282 MAMTA SINGH PORAN SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
435. F2100 5102285 DAKASH KUMARI BHARDWAJ JAI PRAKASH BHARDWAJ 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
436. F2101 5102286 UMA KUMARI JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
437. F2102 5102287 REKHA LAVANIA VIJENDRA SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
438. F2103 5102288 ALPNA SHARMA REEMESH CHANDRA SHARMA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
439. F2107 5102292 MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA CHANDRA PAL SHARMA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
440. F2109 5102294 SHIV KUMAR YADAV VIJAY PAL YADAV 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
441. F2111 5102296 DINESH KUMAR DEVI CHARAN GUPTA 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
442. F2115 5102300 SARITA RANI VIJENDRA SINGH 102 R.K. GUPTA MEM. INST. OF TECH. & MGT. AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
443. F2116 5207084 YOGESH KUMAR DHARDHAR SHARMA 207 R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
444. F2119 5207087 MANORAMA YADAV RAM PRAKASH YADAV 207 R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
445. F2121 5207089 RAVI CHAUHAN KRISHNA AVATAR SINGH 207 R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
446. F2122 5207090 SUSHILA AVAD NARAYAN 207 R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
447. F2124 5207092 DISHA VARSHNEY DIPENDRA KUMARI 207 R.S.S. COLLEGE BALDEV, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
448. F2129 5233087 MITHLESH GYA PRASAD 223 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
449. F2135 5233118 SUMAN LATA MEGH SINGH 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
450. F2137 5233120 REENA KUMARI R.S.VARSHNEY 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
451. F2138 5233121 REENA INDAULIA GORDHAN SINGH 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
452. F2139 5233122 SNEHLATA GAUTAM R.A.GAUTAM 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
453. F2146 5233129 NEETU SINGH GOPI CHAND 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
454. F2150 5233133 MANJU VIDYARTHI R.C.VIDYARTHI 233 RADHAKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
455. F2176 5222089 ANIL KUMAR DWARIKA SINGH 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
456. F2179 5222092 SANJAY KUMAR AJAB SINGH 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
457. F2190 5222122 0 0 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
458. F2199 5222131 ARVIND KUMAR JAGDISH SINGH 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
459. F2200 5222132 RAKESH BABU LAL 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
460. F2202 5222134 MANOJ KUMAR HAMRAJ SINGH 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
461. F2203 5222135 ANIL KUMAR KESHAV DEV 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
462. F2204 5222136 TARUN KUMAR SURESH CHAND 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
463. F2205 5222137 SUBHASH CHANDRA KHACHER MAL 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
464. F2215 5222147 RAVI PRAKASH MATADIN 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
465. F2221 5222223 KUMMED BABU RAM SEWAK 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
466. F2232 5222234 ASLAM MOHD RAFEEK 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
467. F2239 5222241 NIHAL SINGH TETRA PAL SINGH 222 RAGHUVEER SARAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
468. F2262 5277120 ANIL YADAV TARA CHAND YADAV 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
469. F2264 5277122 MONIKA RAJPUT C.M.RAJPUR 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
470. F2265 5277123 VIJAY KUMARI MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
471. F2266 5277124 DHRAM VEER SHARMA SITA RAM SHARMA 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
472. F2267 5277125 VINOD KUMAR SINGH VIRENDRA SINGH 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
473. F2270 5277128 MOHAN LAL SHARMA SEWA LAL SHARMA 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
474. F2274 5277132 SUBHANA PARVEEN ISLAM MUDDIN 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
475. F2293 5277301 SANJAY KUMAR PRATAP SINGH 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
476. F2294 5277302 HAMBIR SINGH P.S.SHIKAWAR 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
477. F2296 5277304 NEEROO AJAY VEER SINGH 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
478. F2297 5277305 KAMAL SINGH CHANDRA PAL SINGH 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
479. F2305 5277313 KALPANA MAURYA JAI PRAKASH MAURYA 277 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
480. F2307 5104084 PREM SINGH RAJENDRA SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
481. F2309 5104086 KALPANA MISHRA K.C.MISHRA 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
482. F2323 5104121 REENA MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
483. F2324 5104122 ASHISH PAL GANGWAR DRAGPAL SIINGH GANGWAR 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
484. F2325 5104123 SAVITA PAL SINGH MAHESH CHAND BAGHEL 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
485. F2327 5104125 JODHAN SINGH HARDAN SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
486. F2328 5104126 SUNIL KUMAR P.D. YADAV 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
487. F2330 5104128 AMIT SINGH SANJAY SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
488. F2331 5104129 HEMANT KUMAR SARASWAT KESHAV DEV 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
489. F2333 5104131 HARENDRA SINGH LOKMAN SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
490. F2336 5104134 RAGHUVENDRA PRATAP SINGH R.B.SINGH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
491. F2337 5104135 VANDANA SUDHIR KUMAR 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
492. F2338 5104136 BHOOP SINGH BEHERI LAL 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
493. F2339 5104137 PREM CHANDRA OM PRKASH 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
494. F2343 5104141 VIRENDRA PRATAP MISHRA MAHENDRA PAL 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
495. F2346 5104144 SUBODH KUMAR YOGESH KUMAR 104 RAJIV ACADEMY FOR TECH & MGT., MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
496. F2368 5185124 SADHANA SINGH D.P. SINGH 185 RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
497. F2392 5185148 MANJU RANI KUSHWAHA NATHU SINGH KUSHWAHA 185 RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
498. F2394 5185150 MAYA PRAKASH CHANDRA PAL SINGH 185 RAMESHWARI DEVI KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, PATHOLI, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
499. F2396 5210082 SACHIN R.K.GUPTA 210 S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
500. F2397 5210083 OMVEER SINGH SOVRAN SINGH 210 S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
501. F2401 5210087 MANJU TOMAR RAM NIWAS TOMAR 210 S.M.DEGREE COLLEGE, PALI DUNGRA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
502. F2402 5210088 JATIPAL SINGH HARVIR SINGH 210 S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
503. F2403 5210089 RAM BAHADUR SINGH SAGAR SINGH 210 S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
504. F2404 5210090 SEEMA YADAV V.S. YADAV 210 S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
505. F2420 5210160 SURENDRA PAL SINGH RAM SAHAY 210 S.M. DEGREE COLLEGE PALI DUNGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
506. F2421 5007087 SNEH LATA R.C. CHAUHAN 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
507. F2422 5007088 BIJENDRA SINGH RAM DAS 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
508. F2423 5007089 KASHMIRI SON PAL 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
509. F2424 5007090 SUSHIL KUMAR RAM CHARAN LAL 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
510. F2428 5007094 RAJESH KUMAR DULI CHAND 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
511. F2435 5007116 JITENDRA SINGH CHANDEL UDAY VIR SINGH CHANDEL 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
512. F2437 5007304 HARIYENDRA KUMAR MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
513. F2438 5007305 SANDEEP KUMAR CHETAN BACHCHU SINGH 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
514. F2439 5007306 SATENDRA KUMAR RAMHARI SHARMA 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
515. F2445 5007312 HARVENDRA KUMAR GYAN SINGH 7 S.R.K. COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
516. F2480 5650085 BRAJ RAJ SINGH HAKIM SINGH 650 S.S. COLLEGE, SIKANDRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
517. F2487 5009112 RAJEEV KUMAR SHIV RAJ SINGH 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
518. F2490 5009115 ARCHANA SAGAR R.K. SAGAR 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
519. F2491 5009116 HARI PRASAD GAJJRAJ SINGH 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
520. F2492 5009303 YOGENDRA SINGH RAMVIR SINGH 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
521. F2497 5009308 NEELIMA JADON KAMAL SINGH JADON 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
522. F2499 5009310 VIVEK KUMAR MALKHAN SINGH 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
523. F2500 5009311 HEMA RANI KISHAN CHAND 9 S.V. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
524. F2511 5231091 MANJU RANI PHOOL SINGH 231 SANT RAMKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, BALKESWAR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
525. F2512 5231092 SUSHMA KUMARI PRITAM ISNGH 231 SANT RAMKRISHAN KANYA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, BALKESWAR, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
526. F2515 5074054 JAGAT SINGH MAHANAND SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
527. F2518 5074057 ABHISHEK KUMAR SHIV SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
528. F2523 5074062 PUNEET KUMAR SINGH MAHAVIR SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
529. F2527 5074066 UDAI PRATAP SINGH CHHOTEY SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
530. F2529 5074068 SURESH KUMAR MALANI SAVAL DAS 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
531. F2539 5074078 ADITYA KUMARI GANGA SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
532. F2541 5074080 KALPANA NAURANGI LAL 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
533. F2547 5074086 VIMLESH RAM BHAROSE LAL 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
534. F2562 5074110 CHANDRA BAN SINGH KHAZAN SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
535. F2564 5074112 SALINI OM PRATAP SINGH 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
536. F2565 5074113 REKHA KUMARI MUNNA LAL YADAV 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
537. F2566 5074114 CHANDRA MOHAN SHARMA KHEM CHAND SHARMA 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
538. F2567 5074115 RAVI SHANKER KASHI RAM 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
539. F2580 5074128 JAYAMALA KUSHWAHA ASHOK KUMAR 74 SARVODAYA MAHAVIDHYALYA, CHAUMUHA, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
540. F2619 5221117 SUSHMA RANI RAJ PAL SINGH 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
541. F2620 5221118 RAJESH BHASKER R.N. BHASKER 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
542. F2622 5221120 SATISH CHANDRA YADAV SURENDRA SINGH YADAV 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
543. F2658 5221306 VISHAMBAR SINGH DURG SINGH 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
544. F2659 5221307 RAM PRASAD SONKAR FAUHDAR SONKER 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
545. F2666 5221314 SHASHI PRABHA MATHUR NATHU RAM MATHUR 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
546. F2667 5221315 SHUSHILA BISHAMBHAR DAYAL 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
547. F2669 5221317 RAJESH SAGAR BABU LAL SAGAR 221 SHANTINIKETAN COLLEGE, TEHRA, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" Category
548. F2672 5087085 PUNIT KUMARI LAL SINGH 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
549. F2673 5087086 SUDHIR KUMAR CHANDRA SINGH 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
550. F2675 5087088 NISHAN SINGH SOHAN LAL 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
551. F2677 5087090 SHAKUNTALA MAN SINGH 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
552. F2686 5087118 SANGRAM SINGH RAGHUVIR SINGH 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
553. F2687 5087119 VIBY DAHARMPAL SINGH TOMAR 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
554. F2690 5087122 MITHLESH KUMARI CHUNILAL 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
555. F2703 5087135 PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
556. F2709 5087141 NUTAN KUMARI JAGDISH PRASAD SAHA 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
557. F2715 5087147 KOMAL SINGH RAM LAL 87 SHIVDAN SINGH INSTITUTE OF MGMT. & TECH., ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
558. F2728 5079301 BRAJESH KUMARI SAHAB SINGH 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
559. F2729 5079302 RAJ KUMARI BRIJENDRA SINGH 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
560. F2730 5079303 JAYCHANDRA SINGH HAMIR PAL SINGH 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
561. F2735 5079308 NIRAJA DIXIT K.M. DIXIT 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
562. F2745 5079318 RADHA RANI MANIK CHAND 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
563. F2746 5079319 LAXMINARAYAN VARSHNEY JAGDISH PRASAD VARSHNEY 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
564. F2747 5079320 VIKASH SARASWAT AVNISH CHANDRA SARASWAT 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
565. F2749 5212087 DHARMENDRA KUMAR HORI LAL 212 SHRI JEE BABA COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
566. F2754 5212092 SHASHI BHUSHAN MOHAN LAL 212 SHRI JEE BABA COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
567. F2770 5149116 PREM SINGH BABU LAL 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
568. F2771 5149117 MAMTA CHAUDHARY GOVIND SINGH FAUJDAR 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
569. F2773 5149119 SUNIL KUMAR AZAD SINGH 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
570. F2774 5149120 ANIL KUMAR JAGJIT SINGH 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
571. F2775 5149121 LALITA YADAV JAYPAL YADAV 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
572. F2777 5149123 SHELENDRA SINGH BRAJESH TOMAR 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
573. F2805 5149302 ALDRIL MURARI LAL 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
574. F2808 5149305 SANTOSH KUMAR SURESH CHANDRA 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
575. F2810 5149307 PRIYANKA RAJN PAL SINGH 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
576. F2812 5149309 RAJESH KUMAR MAN SINGH 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
577. F2815 5149312 SURENDRA SINGH MANGELAL 149 SHRI KRISHAN YOGIRAJ MAHAVIDHYALA, RATIBHANPUR, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
578. F2820 5225086 MAMTA YADAV M.L. YADAV 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
579. F2821 5225087 LAKHAN SINGH BHAGWAN SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
580. F2822 5225088 DIVAKER GUPTA SATISH CHANDRA GUPTA 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
581. F2831 5225118 MANOJ KUMAR RAJENDRA SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
582. F2833 5225120 SAURABH BISHNOI N.K. BISHNOI 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
583. F2836 5225123 ANOOP KUMAR KISHOR KUMAR 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
584. F2839 5225126 SANTOSH KUMAR MAHAVIR SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
585. F2840 522127 SHASHI KANT MOURYA RAJARAM MOURYA 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
586. F2842 5225129 SUNITA TRIVEDI K.N. TRIVEDI 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
587. F2843 5225130 ALOK GOEL MAHENDRA PAL GOEL 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
588. F2844 5225131 NABAB SINGH SUBEDAR SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
589. F2846 5225133 MAHESH CHANDRA RAM SANEHI 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
590. F2847 5225134 MANOJ SINGH MOHAN SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
591. F2848 5225135 SHESH CHANDRA ISHWAR DAYAL 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
592. F2849 522136 VIRENDRA SINGH ****** SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
593. F2850 522137 DALVEER SINGH BASDEV SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
594. F2852 522139 MANISH KUMAR SINGH YADAV SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
595. F2855 522142 JYOTI S.P. KHAIR 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
596. F2857 522144 NEELAM OM PRAKASH SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
597. F2858 5225145 KAVITA JADON OM PRAKASH JADON 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
598. F2861 5225148 REKHA YADAV K.V. SINGH 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
599. F2863 5225150 MONA GUPTA GOPAL GUPTA 225 SHRI RADHAGOVIND MAHAVIDHYALAYA, HERA PUR GOPI, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
600. F2870 5239092 SADHNA SIKARWAR GULAB SINGH SIKARBAR 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
601. F2887 5239126 GUDDI RAM SHYAM VERMA 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
602. F2888 5239127 REKHA RANI RATAN KUMAR 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
603. F2890 5239129 GYANENDRA KUMAR BHUP SINGH 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
604. F2891 5239130 MEENA KUMARI MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
605. F2894 5239133 SUNITA CHANDRA BHAN 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
606. F2895 5239134 MITHLESH KUMARI RAM SINGH ARYA 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
607. F2896 5239135 GULAN SINGH RAM SINGH ARYA 239 SIR M.U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
608. F2897 5239136 RASHMI VERMA R. K. VERMA 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
609. F2899 5239138 PUSH LATA MAHVIR SINGH 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
610. F2900 5239139 DEVENDRA SHARMA BHIMSEN SHARMA 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
611. F2901 5239140 MOHD. KALEEM KHAN MOHD MANSHUR KHAN 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
612. F2904 5239143 KUNWAR SINGH RAGHUVIR SINGH 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
613. F2907 5239146 SONIA SINGH JAGDISH PRASAD 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
614. F2908 5239147 BABLU RAM AVATAR 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
615. F2909 5239148 NIRMALA RAM DAS 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
616. F2911 5239150 ANJANA AJAYVIR SINGH 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
617. F2912 5239208 KAILASH RANCHOR SINGH 239 SIR M. U. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
618. F2913 5201083 DEEPA MAHARAJ SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
619. F2914 5201084 POONAM KUMARI NATHUR RAM 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
620. F2917 5201087 SURVATI NATTHU SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
621. F2918 5201088 PREM PAL SINGH SUNDER LAL 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
622. F2925 5201116 ANIL KUMAR SINGH SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
623. F2926 5201117 PRAVEEN KUMAR UPADHYAY M.S. SHARMA 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
624. F2927 5201118 MAHESH CHANDRA RAM NATH SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
625. F2929 5201120 SURBHI YADAV SATISH KUMAR YADAV 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
626. F2930 5201121 DEVENDRA SINGH KUMAR PAL SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
627. F2932 5201123 SUSHIL KUMAR GYAN PRASAD 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
628. F2938 5201129 NARENDRA KUMAR R.C. VERMA 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
629. F2939 5201130 CHANDRA PRAKASH YADAV DEVAN SINGH YADAV 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
630. F2943 5201134 ANIL KUMAR BHAN LAL GUPTA 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
631. F2945 5201136 SUNIL KUAMR YADAV AKBAR SINGH YADAV 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
632. F2946 5201137 MANOJ KUMAR S.L. VERMA 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
633. F2947 5201138 MANOJ KUMAR KANCHI LAL 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
634. F2948 5201139 BHUVNESHWAR PRAKASH SINGH NARENDA KUMAR 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
635. F2949 5201140 ARCHANA KUMAR SUKHRAM SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
636. F2956 5201147 OM HARI K.P. SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
637. F2957 5201148 MANOJ VERMA MITTAL VERMA 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
638. F2958 5201149 RAM SINGH POORAN SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
639. F2959 5201150 SHUKVIR SINGH PRATAP SINGH 201 SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, ALIPUR BARBARA, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" category
640. F2960 5077080 ANOOP SINGH DESHRAJ SINGH 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
641. F2965 5077085 RAJENDRA SINGH NARAYAN SINGH 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
642. F2966 5077086 GEETA RANI TEERAK PAL 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
643. F2967 5077087 NEERAJ KUMAR SHARMA RAMESHCHANDRA SINGH 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
644. F2969 5077089 PRASOON RATOR R.S. RATHOR 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
645. F2971 5077091 CHETANYA KUMAR J.P. SHARMA 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
646. F2978 5077154 ANEETA SHARMA SHRI CHANDRA SHARMA 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
647. F2980 5077156 KULDEEP VERMA BADAN SINGH 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
648. F2983 5077159 TEJ PAL SINGH KHERI SINGH 77 SMT. GOMTI SMARAK VIGYAN MAHAVIDHYALA, PARSON, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
649. F2991 5148084 PREM PAL BHOOP SINGH 148 SMT. LONGSHREE DEVI COLL, NAGLA AAL, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
650. F3002 5148095 SACHIN KUMAR SUKHPAL SINGH 148 SMT. LONGSHREE DEVI COLL, NAGLA AAL, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
651. F3043 5082161 PAWAN KUMAR CHAUHAN RAMESH CHANDRA CHAUHAN 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
652. F3044 5082162 HARENRA SINGH BABU RAM 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
653. F3045 5082163 MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH BRAJ RAJ SIGH CHAUHAN 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
654. F3046 5082164 JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH B.R. SAGAR 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
655. F3047 5082165 NEETU SINGH BABU RAM SAGAR 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
656. F3054 5082306 AMIT KUMAR VARSHNEY BANWARI LAL VARSHNEY 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
657. F3055 5082307 VIMLESH KUMARI RAJA RAM 82 SRI FAROOQ HUSSAIN (P.G.) COLLEGE, NIDHAULI KALAN, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
658. F3063 5227084 AJAY KUMAR SINGH AMAR PAL SINGH 277 SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
659. F3066 5227087 NARENDRA SINGH RAGHUVEER SINGH 277 SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
660. F3067 5227088 ANAND KUMAR SAKYA RAM LAL SAKYA 277 SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
661. F3068 5227089 BIJENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM CHARAN SINGH GAUTAM 277 SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
662. F3069 5227090 PRITI VERMA LALARAM VERMA 277 SRI GIRRAJ MAHARAJ COLLEGE, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
663. F3093 5181122 NIDHI SHARMA JAGDISH SHARMA 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
664. F3094 5181123 LAXMI ARYA BANWARI LAL 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
665. F3099 5181128 VINIT SINGH CHETRAM SINGH 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
666. F3102 5181131 RUPENDRA KUMAR ASHOK SINGH 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
667. F3103 5181132 SURAJ SINGH P.D. YADAV 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
668. F3105 5181134 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH MAHI PAL SINGH 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
669. F3109 5181138 HARENDRA RADHA CHARNA 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
670. F3123 5278088 SATYANDRA KUMAR GYAN SINGH 278 SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
671. F3124 5278089 SARIKA AMAR SINGH 278 SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
672. F3125 5278090 SANJAY KUMAR CHOOTE LAL 278 SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
673. F3126 5278091 RAMESH SINGH POTHI RAM 278 SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
674. F3127 5278092 SHEEM KHITOLIYA PRABHU DAYAL 278 SRI POORAN PRASAD GUPTA MEMORIAL DEGREE COLLEGE, SIKANDRA HIGHWAY, AGRA Remain in the "Fake" category
675. F3142 5197116 GAURAV SINGH NARENDRA PAL SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
676. F3145 5197119 BIRENDRA SINGH SARDAR SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
677. F3146 5197120 BANTI SHER SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
678. F3147 5197121 HARI MOHAN SINGH BACHCHU SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
679. F3148 5197122 GYNENDRA PRATAP SINGH JAGDISH SINGH YADAV 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
680. F3149 5197123 AMIT SINGH JITENDRA SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
681. F3151 5197125 SATISH KUMAR RAJENDRA SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
682. F3153 5197127 AJAY KUMAR SINGH SHYAM SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
683. F3168 5197142 VIMLESH YADAV NEM SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
684. F3169 5197143 RAM SHANKER SINGH AWADH NARAYAN 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
685. F3170 5197144 KULWANT KUMAR SINGH H.S. SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
686. F3171 5197145 TEJ VEER SINGH GOPAL SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
687. F3174 5197148 RAJ VIR SINGH DORI LAL 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
688. F3175 5197149 SANDHYA AMAR SINGH 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
689. F3178 5197308 MANOJ KUMAR PARIHAR R.S. PARIHAR 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAYA, SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" category
690. F3189 5240117 SUSHIL KUMAR RAJ BAHADUR 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
691. F3195 5240123 ARVIND SRIVASTAVA RAM GOPAL SRIVASTAVA 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
692. F3200 5240128 MAMTA KUMARI RAGHUNATH 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
693. F3209 5240137 SUMAN SHARMA G.S. SHARMA 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
694. F3210 5240138 ANIL KUMAR BALVIR SINGH 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
695. F3211 5240139 KRISHAN KUMAR DESH RAJ SINGH 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
696. F3214 5240142 GANESH CHANDRA PREETAM LAL 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
697. F3216 5240144 SANGITA SINGH S.P. SINGH 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
698. F3219 5240147 YOGENDRA SINGH RAM SHANKAR 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
699. F3221 5240149 VISHNU KUMAR RAM JI LAL SAVITA 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
700. F3222 5240150 UMESH KUMAR CHATRA PAL SINGH 240 SRI SURAJ SINGH MEMORIAL COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" category
701. F3224 5242086 VISHRAM SINGH A KUMAR 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
702. F3225 5242087 VIKAS CHANDRA NAWAB SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
703. F3227 5242089 MUKESH BABU MAHAVIR SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
704. F3228 5242090 HARI CHANDRA SINGH DHANI RAM 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
705. F3235 5242116 VANDANA JAGDISH BABU 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" category
706. F3236 5242117 BABITA KUMARI MANIK CHAND 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
707. F 3237 5242118 UDAYA PRATAP SINGH SUNHARI LAL 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
708. F3238 5242119 JITENDRA SINGH CHANDRA BHAN 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
709. F3239 5242120 VIVEK KUMAR DORI SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
710. F3240 5242121 SARLA KUMARI JALIM SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
711. F3241 5242122 SARVESH KUMAR SINGH POKH PAL SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
712. F3243 5242124 DEOKI PRASAD BHUDEV SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
713. F3253 5242134 NIRJA RANI J.P. SINGH 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
714. F3257 5242138 CHAMPA AGARWAL RAM NIWAS AGARWAL 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
715. F3260 5242141 RAVINDRA KUMAR VERMA RAM SWAROOP VERMA 242 SURYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, FARAH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
716. F3270 5010069 BEENA JAIPAL SINGH 10 T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
717. F3272 5010071 PRIYANKA RANI HEM SINGH 10 T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
718. F3276 5010303 SUSHILA KUMARI KOMAL SINGH 10 T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
719. F3277 5010304 KRISHAN LATA YADAV KAMAL SINGH YADAV 10 T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
720. F3279 5010306 SEEMA VERMA RAJ VIR SINGH 10 T.R.K. COLLEGE, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
721. F3286 5209068 SUKRITI TIWARI RAM CHANDRA TIWARI 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
722. F3289 5209071 ASHOK KUMAR LAKHAN SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
723. F3290 5209072 RAJNISH SHARMA GAURI SHANKER SHAMRA 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
724. F3291 5209073 PRATIBHA PUSHKAR R.C. PUSHKAR 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
725. F3292 5209074 DHARVENDRA SINGH GYANENDRA SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
726. F3298 5209080 JITENDRA SINGH MAHENDRA SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
727. F3300 5209082 PUSHPENDRA KUMAR AMOL SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
728. F3301 5209083 RAHUL YADAV OM PRAKASH YADAV 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
729. F3312 5209094 PUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAGDISH SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
730. F3317 5209138 LALITA SINGH J.P. SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
731. F3318 5209139 PRATIBHA SINGH J.P. SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
732. F3319 5209140 MEENA RANI BRAJ LAL 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
733. F3321 5209142 MANJU SHARMA R.P. SHARMA 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
734. F3323 5209144 PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH MOHAR SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
735. F3326 5209147 JAI NARAYAN GUPTA MUNNI LAL 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
736. F3328 5209149 CHANDRA PRATAP SINGH B.R. SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
737. F3334 5209306 ARUN KUMAR SHARMA RAJENDRA KISHORE SHARMA 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
738. F3336 5209308 KUSUM LATA R.NIWAS 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
739. F3337 5209309 RAM PRATAP SINGH NATHU SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
740. F3339 5209311 SATYA PRAKASH SINGH MAHAVIR SINGH 209 USHA EDUCATION INSTITUTE, FAREH, MATHURA Remain in the "Fake" Category
741. F3342 5200083 SUNIL KUMAR SUKHDEV SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
742. F3343 5200084 SARVESH KUMAR HEERA LAL 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
743. F3345 5200086 SANTOSH AJEET SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
744. F3346 5200087 VIPIN KUMAR RAMAKANT MISHRA 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
745. F3347 5200088 AVINASH KUMAR SHARMA HARI DATT SHARMA 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
746. F3350 5200091 KAVITA R.R. SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
747. F3357 5200116 LAXMI YADAV ARTI YADAV 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
748. F3358 5200117 SEEMA CHAUDHARY RAJEEV CHAUDHARY 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
749. F3359 5200118 HARIOM SIYA RAM SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
750. F3360 5200119 VIJAY PAL SINGH RAGHUVIR SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
751. F3362 5200121 SHASHI JAISHWAL MANIKCHAND 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
752. F3366 5200125 SATENDRA KUMAR MAHENDRA KUMAR SHARMA 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
753. F3367 5200126 DEVENDRA KUMAR SRI RAM PAL 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
754. F3368 5200127 SATENDRA KUMAR GOPAL SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
755. F3369 5200128 SUNIL SHARMA RAM AVATAR 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
756. F3373 5200132 DUSHYANT SINGH CHITRA SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
757. F3374 5200133 LOKENDRA SINGH MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
758. F3375 5200134 RAM NIWASH BABU RAM 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
759. F3376 5200135 LALITASH SANT RAM YADAV 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
760. F3377 5200136 NARENRA PAL SINGH BHOLA SHANKAR 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
761. F3378 5200137 PUSHPA YADAV KISHAN LAL 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
762. F3379 5200138 KULDEEP KUMAR SANTOSH KUMAR 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
763. F3382 5200141 KAMLA DEVI DAYA RAM 200 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
764. F3383 5200142 ANURADHA KULSHRESTAH P.L. KULSHRESTHA 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
765. F3391 5200150 ASHA KUMARI SHRI RAM DAYAL 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
766. F3392 5200307 SHIV NANDAN SINGH RAM SARAN 200 V.K. JAIN COLLEGE, SORON ROAD, KASGANJ Remain in the "Fake" Category
767. F3394 5071080 VIKITA MINRAJ SINGH 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
768. F3398 5071084 KM. PINKY SIYA RAM 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
769. F3399 5071085 SANTOSH KUMARI RAM PRASAD 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
770. F3413 5071123 PREM LATA BHOOP SINGH 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
771. F3419 5071129 KUSHU LATA BHURE LAL 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
772. F3420 5071130 URMESH KUMARI BISHRAM SINGH 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
773. F3424 5071134 PRATHAMA RAM SINGH 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
774. F3425 5071135 ASHA RAJPUT JHUMAK LAL 71 VIRANGNA AVANTI BAI MAHILA MAHAVIDHYALAYA, UDDAITPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
775. F3442 5196084 ABHILASHA SHARMA ANIL KUMAR SHARMA 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
776. F3447 5196089 DHIRENDRA PAL SINGH VIRENDRA SING 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
777. F3448 5196090 BITTAN DEVI SEETA RAM 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
778. F3462 5196308 VIRENDRA PAL SINGH HAJARI LAL 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
779. F3464 5196310 MANOJ CHAUHAN K.S. CHAUHAN 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
780. F3465 5196311 VISHNU KUMAR SINGH JASVIR SINGH 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
781. F3479 5176052 RAJESH PRATAP SINGH RAVINDRA PAL SINGH 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
782. F3481 5176054 VED VATI VERMA POORAN SINGH 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
783. F3482 5176055 DHARMENDRA PRAKASH DIXIT RAM SEVAK DIXIT 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
784. F3484 5176057 RAM KUMARI DWIVEDI RAJ KUMAR 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
785. F3486 5176059 OM PRAKSH NATTHU RAM 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
786. F 3237 5176061 RAVINDRA KUMAR BALAK RAM 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
787. F3489 5176062 JAI CHANDRA SINGH RADHA SHYAM 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
788. F3490 5176063 DEVENDRA SINGH INDAL SINGH 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
789. F3494 5176067 YADU NATH SINGH ATAR SINGH 176 ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLLEGE, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
790. F3503 5194085 UMA SHANKAR SINGH RAGHUVEER SINGH 194 GRAMODHAR MAHAVIDHYALA,NAGLA PARSI DADU ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
791. F3510 5181120 RAJKUMAR GOPAL SINGH 181 SRI JAGVIR SINGH CHAUHAN SMRATI MAHAVIDHYALAY, ALIPUR, ETAH Remain in the "Fake" Category
792. F3512 5197302 RAJEEV KUMR BABU RAM 197 SRI RADHARANI MAHAVIDHYALAY,SIKANDRARAO, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
793. F3516 5196014 GAURAV VARSHNEY ARVIND KUMAR VARSHNEY 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
794. F3517 5196017 SUNIL KUMAR SURESH CHANDRA 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
795. F3518 5196019 MINTU SINGH RAM CHARAN 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
796. F3519 5196022 ARPITA GUPTA HARI OM GUPTA 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
797. F3522 5196028 GURU DAYAL SINGH 0 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
798. F3524 5196030 SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH NARAYAN SINGH 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
799. F3527 5196036 DINESH KUMAR YADAV MAHENDRA SINGH YADAV 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
800. F3529 5196040 TARA CHANDRA RAM PRASAD 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
801. F3532 5196058 INDRA JEET SHANKER LAL 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
802. F3536 5196048 HEM LATA 196 VIVEKANAND COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
803. F3552 5079038 REETA GAUTAM RAM SHANKAR 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
804. F3553 5079063 RAM KUMAR MAHAVEER SINGH 79 SHIVDAN SINGH SMRITI COLLEGE, IGLAS, ALIGARH Remain in the "Fake" Category
805. F3557 5172306 SARAD KUMAR SINGH SURENDRA KUMAR 172 AMARDEEP COLLEGE, FIROZABAD Remain in the "Fake" Category
806. F3577 5045118 SURENDRA SINGH TOPI SINGH 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
807. F3578 5045119 GAJENDRA SINGH RAM DAYAL SINGH 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
808. F3600 5045141 AZAD GULSHAN BANU ALLAH BUX 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
809. F3606 5045147 VINOD KUMAR PURAN SINGH 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
810. F3607 5045148 ALKA TODI SINGH 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
811. F3534 5045012 ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA KESHAV PRASAD SRIVASTAVA 45 PRAMOD MAHAVIDHYALAYA, MEHRARA, HATHRAS Remain in the "Fake" Category
812. F3636 5243082 ANURADHA RAJENDRA SINGH 243 ADARSH KRISHNA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, BHOOP NAGAR, MAINPURI Remain in the "Fake" Category (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.) (Munishwar Nath Bhandari , J.) Order Date-: 26.02.2021 Piyush/Ashish Pd./Nirmal