Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr.Hemant Shrigopal Agarwal vs The Kanchan Nalanda Chs Ltd. on 18 September, 2008

  
 
 
 
 
 CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION



 

 CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
 

MAHARASHTRA STATE, MUMBAI
 

 
 

FIRST APPEAL NO. 69 OF 
2008                                       Date of filing : 17/01/2008
 

IN CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 09 OF 2004             
Date of order : 18/09/2008 
 

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM : MUMBAI SUBURBAN
 

 
 

Mr.Hemant Shrigopal Agarwal
 

R/at K-404, Sunder Nagar,
 

S.V. Road, Malad (W), Mumbai-400 064.   Appellant/org. 
complainant
 

            V/s.
 

The Kanchan Nalanda CHS Ltd.
 

Regd. Office at Plot No.12-B, K Unit,
 

Sunder Nagar, S.V. Nagar, Malad (W),
 

Mumbai  400 
064.                                                   Respondent/org. O.P.
 

 
             Corum : Justice Mr.B.B. Vagyani, Honble President
                            Shri S.R. Khanzode, 
Honble Judicial Member

            Present: Mr.Shivram Naik, Advocate for the appellant.

                                                - : ORAL ORDER :-

Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal order dated 06/12/2007 passed by Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Forum, the org. complainant has filed this appeal. 
The District Consumer Forum has given reasons on page-3 of the order, particularly first paragraph.  The complainant is a beneficiary.  The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 requires approval of the first person for filing consumer complaint.  No such approval was placed before the Forum below.  Therefore, the Forum below taking recourse to the legal provisions contained in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 dismissed the complaint.  The dismissal order does not suffer from any illegality.  No interference is called.  In the result, we pass the following order :-
            -: ORDER :-
1.         Appeal stands dismissed summarily.
2.         No order as to costs.
3.         Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.
                                   

             (S.R. Khanzode)                                                       (B.B. Vagyani)             Judicial Member                                                           President