Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Calcutta High Court

Mishra & Mishra (Agencies) Enterprises ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 14 January, 2009

Author: Soumitra Pal

Bench: Soumitra Pal

                                 WP No. 1804 of 2008

                             IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                           Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

                                       ORIGINAL SIDE




   MISHRA & MISHRA (AGENCIES) ENTERPRISES & ANR          Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant

         Versus

   UNION OF INDIA & ORS                                  Defendant/Respondent

For Plaintiff/Petitioner : Mr.Ramesh Chowdhury, Advocate.

BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date : 14th January, 2009.
The Court : Let affidavit of service filed in court today be kept with the records.
Despite service none appears on behalf of the respondent. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the notice of suspension dated 1st December, 2008 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Administration), Kolkata, respondent no.2 on the ground that the allegations made in the impugned notice are incorrect and the department while suspending the license of the petitioner under Regulation 20 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulation, 2004 did not follow the procedures as enumerated under Regulation 22 of the said Regulation. Further, it 2 has been submitted that the issue in question is covered by the judgement and order passed in W.P.No.195 of 2008 (Mishra & Mishra (Agencies) Enterprises & Anr. -vs- Union of India & Ors) which was decided on 25th March, 2008.
Having heard the learned advocate for the petitioner, as I find that the issue in question is covered by the judgement and order passed in W.P.No.195 of 2008 (Mishra & Mishra (Agencies) Enterprises & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors) the impugned notice dated 1st December, 2008 cannot be sustained and is, thus, set aside and quashed.
The writ petition is allowed.
No order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the appearing parties on priority basis.
(SOUMITRA PAL, J.) ssaha RO(ct)