Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 20, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Raja Murrugan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 5 July, 2024

Author: B.Pugalendhi

Bench: B.Pugalendhi

                                                                       WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and
                                                                        CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              Date : 05.07.2024

                                                 PRESENT

                                  THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                         CRL OP(MD) No.9399 of 2024
                                                   and
                                          WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024

                     Raja Murrugan                          ... Petitioner in both petitions
                                                       Vs

                     1.The Superintendent of Police,
                       Nagercoil,
                       Kanyakumari District.

                     2.The Law Department Secretariat,
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption,
                       No.293, MKN Road,
                       Alandur, Chennai – 600 016.

                                        ... Respondents in WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024


                     1.The State represented through
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Nesamani Nagar Police Station,
                       Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District
                       Crime No.15 of 2024.

                     1/19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and
                                                                           CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024


                     2.A.R.Kennady

                                                  ... Respondents in
                                                              CrlOP(MD)No.9399 of 2024

                                        For Petitioner   : Mr.K.H.Raja Murrugan

                                                              Party-in-person
                                        For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar
                                                              Addl.Public Prosecutor
                                                       [for respondents, except R2 in CrlOP]


                                  Prayer in CrlOP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 : Petition filed under
                     Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code to call for records pertaining
                     to the case in crime No.15 of 2024 dated 17.02.2024 on the file
                     Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Kanyakumari District and quash the
                     same insofar as the petitioner in concerned.


                                  Prayer in WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024: Petition filed under
                     Article 226 of Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus 1)
                     directing the 1st respondent not to disturb the trust and its functions
                     to function 24 hours in Nagercoil for providing the services of
                     volunteer sex between adult and with consent of male to male, male
                     to female and LGBTQ to any, female to female, counselling, oil bath
                     for 18 plus for both male and female, consensual sexual activity for
                     both men and women either through sex workers or members

                     2/19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and
                                                                         CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024


                     volunteering on their own, meeting and get together for its members,
                     Matrimony/living together services and pre-marital sex and open
                     new branches anywhere in Tamil Nadu and India and function and
                     also not to file any false cases on trustee or demand the trust to pay
                     money to function normally & (2) to direct the 1st respondent to
                     give compensation of Rs.5 Lakh to the petitioner for the loss
                     happened for the last 5 months in not able to run the trust and
                     provide its service to its members and public people got frustrated
                     mentally and physically and the trust is in debt of Rs.2 lakh as rent is
                     not paid and maintenance of the building was not done for the past
                     5 months.


                                                 COMMON ORDER


The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus 1) directing the 1st respondent not to disturb the trust and its functions to function 24 hours in Nagercoil for providing the services of volunteer sex between adult and with consent of male to male, male to female and LGBTQ to any, female to female, counselling, oil bath for 18 plus for both male and female, consensual sexual activity for both men and women either through sex workers or members 3/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 volunteering on their own, meeting and get together for its members, Matrimony/living together services and pre-marital sex and to open new branches anywhere in Tamil Nadu and India (2) sought for a diectios as against the police not to file any false cases (3) to direct the 1st respondent to give compensation of Rs.5 Lakh to the petitioner for the loss happened for the last 5 months in not able to run the trust and provide its service to its members.

2.The criminal original petition in CrlOP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.15 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police.

3.Since the petitioner in both cases are one and the same, both these petitions are taken up together and disposed of by this common order.

4.The case of the petitioner is that he is the founder of the trust namely Friends For Ever Trust, it is duly registered and its 4/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 registration number is Reg.No.147 of 2022 having office at Nagercoil. The main object of the trust is to promote adult recreation and other related activities. They are providing oil bath and sex related services to its members and its customers. The Inspector of Police, Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Nagercoil has conducted a search in the petitioner's trust premises on 17.02.2024, arrested the petitioner and registered the case in Crime No.15 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(2)(a),5(1)(a) and Sections 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 366 (A) and 342 IPC, Sections 5(1), 11(6), 12, 13(b), 14(1), 6, 7, 8 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

5.The petitioner was arrested and remanded into judicial custody on 17.02.2024 and was released on bail on 24.04.2024. The concern of this petitioner is that the act of the respondent police is against the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Budhadev Karmaskar Vs The State of West Bengal [in Criminal 5/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 Appeal No.135 of 2010]. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this criminal original petition to quash the FIR in Crime No.15 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police.

6.The petitioner claims that he is a practising advocate in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. He went to Nagercoil for weekend on 16.02.2024. His ex-wife and her parents with the help of an advocate and police have arranged a 17 years old girl to visit the trust on 17.02.2024. This girl came to his trust on 17.02.2024 at about 10.00am and within 20 minutes of her visit, the police entered into the trust, beaten the petitioner and others, seized their mobile phones, took photographs, also projected them as sex workers, abused and also registered a case. This criminal case according to him is a foisted one by sending a girl into the trust at the instance of his ex-wife. Therefore, this criminal case is liable to be quashed. 6/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024

7.This writ petition is filed based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Budhadev Karmaskar Vs The State of West Bengal [in Criminal Appeal No.135 of 2010] that consensual sex is a permitted one and they have to be treated with dignity, however, the police have treated them badly, assaulted them, taken photographs and also abused them. Therefore, necessary action has to be taken as against the concerned police officers and compensation has to be awarded to him.

8.The petitioner claiming to be a law graduate / advocate appeared as party- in person and has referred to paragraph No.11 of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court cited supra. He fairly states that his trust is providing services of oil bath and consensual sex between men and women through sex workers and to its members. A list of services offered in the trust is stated in the affidavit filed by the petitioner and the same is extracted hereunder: 7/19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 “1.Counselling.
2.Oil bath for 18 plus for both male and female, will include sexual intercourse based on their interest and safety condoms.
3.consensual sexual activity for both men and women either through sex workers or members volunteering on their own.
4.Meeting and get together for its members.
5.Matrimony / living together services by consensual arrangements and premarital sex. We wanted to provide safe place for all the members entering the trust premises and we co-operate with the local police in following the guidelines if any given.”

9.This Court is shocked that an advocate in robes claiming that he is running a brothel centre and filed this writ petition seeking some protection for running this brothel centre. Therefore, this Court has directed the petitioner to produce his enrollment certificate and law degree certificates in order to ascertain, whether he is actually an 8/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 advocate, studied law degree and has enrolled in any Bar Association and has passed over the cases. However in the afternoon when the matter has been called again, there was no representation for the petitioner on 03.07.2024 and therefore, these cases were listed for hearing under the caption for orders today. The petitioner party-in person is present before this Court today, but did not produce his degree certificates.

10.On the complaint of the local councillor to the Police, the Police after getting permission from the Magistrate conducted a search and found three women indulging in sexual activities in the petitioner's trust. One of the girls was a minor. The police recovered pamphlets, visiting cards, used and unused condoms. The police arrested this petitioner and others and also produced the minor victim girl before the learned Additional Mahila Court, Nagercoil, where her statement was recorded under Section 164 CrPC on 04.03.2024. The statement under Section 164 CrPC is also placed 9/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 before this Court. As per 164 CrPC statement of one of the victims, she is a minor, studied upto 10th standard and was in search of job. The petitioner has offered a job and abused her sexually and also made her to indulge in sex trade. As per the statement of the victim, it is the petitioner, who offered the job of doing oil massage as Rs.500/- per oil massage and also sexually abused her. In the criminal original petition filed on 12.06.2024 the petitioner has taken a stand that this minor girl has ben sent inside his trust at the instance of his ex-wife. In the writ petition filed on 13.06.2024 the petitioner took a different stand and has also enclosed the partnership application of the minor and attempted to project that she is aged above 18 years. The application was obtained from the said minor. The application is headed as “Oil Bath application form and friends for ever trust membership application form”. An undertaking has also been obtained from the applicant that she is agreeing and volunteering to adult activities including sex and others. The stand taken by petitioner in the writ petition and in the 10/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 criminal original petition are contrary to each other.

11.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that this petitioner has studied B.Tech in Kalasalingam college, Virudhunagar during the year 2009-2013. However they are not in a position to ascertain whether this petitioner has obtained any law degree. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is having an Bar Council identity card and his enrollment no is 2900/2022. He further submits that statement under Section 164 CrPC of the the victim girl has been recorded and it reveals the offence committed by the petitioner and the respondent police after completing the investigation has filed the final report as against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(2)(a), 5(1)(a) and Sections 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 366 (A) and 342 IPC, Sections 5(1), 11(6), 12, 13(b), 14(1), 6, 7, 8 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 before the 11/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Nagercoil.

12.This Court considered the rival submissions and perused the materials placed on record.

13.The purpose of law in society is to preserve the moral sanctity that regulates a society. Therefore, the legal profession is regarded as a noble profession as it is the upholder and protector of law. It is a service-oriented profession which aims to serve society. Lawyers are considered to be social engineers, who bring about social change and development. The law is essential to maintaining a just and equitable society, and lawyers play a critical role in upholding the law and ensuring that individuals and organizations are held accountable for their actions. Lawyers also provide a valuable service to their clients, helping them navigate complex legal systems and protecting their rights and interests. In addition, the legal profession has a long history of public service and advocacy.

12/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024

14.The Advocate Profession is still believed to be a noble profession. The petitioner claiming to be an Advocate started a trust with a sole object to provide sex and sex related services to its members and its customers and also proudly claims that he is providing oil bath and sex related services to its members and customers. The petitioner claims immunity in the strength of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Budhadev Karmaskar Vs The State of West Bengal [in Criminal Appeal No.135 of 2010].

15.The petitioner has not understood the context in which the above judgment has been rendered. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has taken the issue for the purpose of prevention of trafficking and rehabilitation of sex workers, who wish to leave sex work and the conditions conducive for sex workers, who wish to continue sex working as sex workers with dignity.

13/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024

16.In this case a poor minor girl has been exploited by the petitioner taking advantage of her position by offering Rs.500/- for doing oil massage. The child has been exploited by taking advantage of her poverty. The petitioner appears to be doing this business with the shield of an identity card, which is said to have been issued by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pudhucherry.

17.Every State is having different view with regard to running of brothel. The Tamil Nadu government in order to prevent the exploitation of women and trafficking of women, has enacted an Act, viz., the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956. This Act has been enacted with an aim to prevent the commercialisation of vices and the trafficking of females. This Act does not declare sex work as illegal. However it prohibits running of brothel centres. No doubt adults can have sex, but soliciting people and luring them into sexual activities are illegal. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above cited judgment has stated that voluntary sex work is not 14/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 illegal, but running brothel is unlawful.

18.The petitioner has openly made an advertisement that his trust is providing services of oil bath for both male and female including sexual intercourse, based on their interest and safety condoms, consensual sex activity for both men and women either through sex workers or members volunteering on their own and pre- marital sex.

19.What is very unfortunate in this case is that the person who is doing all these businesses claims to be an Advocate. Kanyakumari District is known for its 100% literacy in the district. From this district and that too in the name of advocate such activities are done. A few days back in another case it was reported that an advocate has been arrested for dacoity.

20.It is high time the Bar Council has to realise that the reputation of the Advocates in the society is getting decreased. At 15/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 least hereafter the Bar Council shall ensure that members are enrolled only from reputed institutions and restrict the enrollment from unreputed institutions from Andhrapradesh, Karnataka and other States.

21.Since the petitioner claims to be an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pudhucherry,

(i) the Bar Council shall ascertain the genuineness of the petitioner's enrollment and educational certificates and proceed further based on the genuineness, in accordance with law ;

(ii) the respondent police shall also find out the genuineness of the petitioner's educational certificates and to report the same to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu;

22.Though this criminal original petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.15 of 2024, the respondent Police claim that after investigation they have also 16/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 filed the final report. Therefore, this criminal original petition in CrlOP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 is liable to be dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the final report in the manner known to law or he can establish his case before the trial Court. Since the final report has been filed, the trial court shall take it on file and conclude the trial within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

23.Considering the nature of relief sought for in the writ petition and also considering the nature of offence in Crime No.15 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police, this Court is not inclined to grant any such mandamus as sought for by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition in WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 is also liable to be dismissed.

24.In the result, considering the nature of relief sought for, both these writ petition and criminal original petition are dismissed 17/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 with cost of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand] each, which shall be paid by the petitioner to credit of the the District Social Welfare Officer, Kanyakumari District within period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

05.07.2024 Index: Yes / No NCC: Yes/ No. To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Law Department Secretariat, Chennai.

3.The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption, No.293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai – 600 016.

4. The Inspector of Police, Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District Crime No.15 of 2024.

5. The District Social Welfare Officer, Kanyakumari District.

18/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 B.PUGALENDHI,J DSK WP(MD)No.13963 of 2024 and CRL OP(MD)No.9399 of 2024 Date : 05.07.2024 19/19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis