Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

State of Madhya Pradesh - Section

Section 126 in M.P. Civil Court Rules, 1961

126.

(1)Arguments should be heard immediately after the evidence closes, and a case, unless it is long and complicated, should not, as a rule, be adjourned for arguments after all evidence has been adduced. If any adjournment is necessary, reasons, should be recorded by the presiding Judge and it should never be for any but a very brief period.
(2)Arguments should not, except for good reasons, be heard piecemeal and where it is found necessary to adjourn a case for the hearing of further arguments, the adjournment should ordinarily be to the next working day. A case once closed and adjourned for arguments should never be re-opened by allowing parties to produce evidence unless for good cause clearly established to the satisfaction of the Court and recorded. Such a re-opening should be very rarely allowed.