Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shri Parasmal Jain on 14 January, 2016

R.P. No.350/2015
14.01.2016

Shri R.L. Jain, learned Senior Counsel with Ku. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard.

This review petition has been filed for reviewing the order dated 14/11/2014, passed in I.T.A. No.360/2007 and other connected matters. This Court considering the CBDT Circular dated 24/10/2005, dismissed the appeal relying on the judgment in the case of Commissioner of I.T. v/s Ram Kishore, reported as 2013 (II) MPJRSN 1.

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that vide F.No.279/Misc/142/2007-IT, Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes issued another Circular on 10/12/2015 vide Circular No.21/15 exceeding monetary limits for filing of appeals up to Rs.20,00,000/- and as per Clause - 10, the circular issued by the CBDT will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits may be withdrawn/not pressed.

In view of the aforesaid, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review of order is made out.

I.A. No.8257/2015, for condonation of delay and review petition have no merit and are accordingly dismissed.

(P.K. Jaiswal)                                 (D.K. Paliwal)
   Judge                                          Judge



pn/
 R.P. No.351/2015
14.01.2016

Shri R.L. Jain, learned Senior Counsel with Ku. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard.

This review petition has been filed for reviewing the order dated 14/11/2014, passed in I.T.A. No.351/2007 and other connected matters. This Court considering the CBDT Circular dated 24/10/2005, dismissed the appeal relying on the judgment in the case of Commissioner of I.T. v/s Ram Kishore, reported as 2013 (II) MPJRSN 1.

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that vide F.No.279/Misc/142/2007-IT, Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes issued another Circular on 10/12/2015 vide Circular No.21/15 exceeding monetary limits for filing of appeals up to Rs.20,00,000/- and as per Clause - 10, the circular issued by the CBDT will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits may be withdrawn/not pressed.

In view of the aforesaid, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review of order is made out.

I.A. No.8261/2015, for condonation of delay and review petition have no merit and are accordingly dismissed.

(P.K. Jaiswal)                                 (D.K. Paliwal)
   Judge                                          Judge



pn/