Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Arepalli Gangaraju, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 July, 2025

S
.L-

           lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

                         (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIO,N)
                   TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY,

                         TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                        :PRESENT:
         THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

                          WRIT PETITION NO: 16075 OF 2025
      Between :                                                    5r
      Arepalli Gangaraju, S/o. Venkanna, Male, aged 75 years, R/o. D. No.4-

      102, Ramanujapuram village, Koyyalagudem MandaI, Eluru District (Ernst

      West Godavarl' District).

                                                                        ...Petitioner
                                           AND
         1. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its the Principal Secretary,

            Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
            Guntur District.

         2. Ramanujapuram Grama Pachayat, Rep by its The Panchayat
            Secretary, Koyyalagudem MandaI, EIuru District (Erns{ West

            Godavari District).

        3. The District Collector, EIuru, Eluru District (Ernst West Goc'avari

            District).

        4. The Revenue DivisionaI Officer, Jangareddigudem, EIuru District

            (Ernst West Godavari Distri|ct).
        5. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Koyyalagudem Mandal, Eluru

            District (Ernst West GodJavari District).

        6. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its the Principal Secretary,
            Panchaya{ Raj, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

                                                                ...Respondents
        Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying

that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
Court may be pleased to issue 'a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the

action of the respondents'in trying'to acquire my house site which was an
extent of 150 Sq. Yards out of 445`Sq. Yards in Grama Kantam situated at
Ramahujapuram Village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, Eluru District (Ernst West

Godavari District) by 2nd respondent without following Provision of Andhra

Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act,1994 and Land Acquisition Act,1894, without

giving any notice, for an extent of'150 Sq. Yards out of 445 Sq. Yards in
Grama      Kantam       situated   at .Ra+manujapuram' Village,                 Koyyalagudem

MandaI, Eluru District (Ernst We`st Godavari District) and set aside the

illegal proceedings of 2nd respondent, under Land Acquisition Act with
'lntention to wrongful loss to the petitioner on the ground of Road

extension, as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, violative of Article 300-A

and 21 of the Constitution of India,;..

lANO: 1 OF2025:

      Petition   under      Section   15,1         CPC   is   filed   praying    that   in   the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the ,
High Court may be pleased to direct to 2nd Respondent not to acquire my

property i.e., house site which was.I ancestral, without due course of law for
an extent of 150 Sq. Yards ou.I,in.Qf 445 Sq. Yards in lGrama KantamJ in

Ramanujapuram Village, Koyyalagudem MandaI, EIuru District (Erns{ West

Godavari    District)     under    Lancl ,:'Acquisition        Act,   pending     disposal    of

WP.No.16075 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.

      The petition coming on fo`[:-.hearing, upon perusing'the Petition and

the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated
o3.07.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gandham
Sr Prasad, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP. for Revenue for the
Respondent and of Sri Y.Koteswarar Rao, Standing Counsel for the
                                        •.\.--.




                                       + .-_?.i+
 Respondent No.2 and of GP for`Panchayat Raj for the Respondent No.6,
the Court made the following;

ORDER:

`` £fAI request of the learned Government Pleader for the respondents, for getting instruc,lions, post next week.

Interim order granted earlier stands extended till the next date of hearing." #fi` rf? # # -4j SD/-P.VINQD kl ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// SECTI . FoL J`uvlv I ,lI1 I r`[`JIO I r`Ar{ To,

1. One CC to Sri. Gandham Sr Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 2: Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh. |[OUT]

3. One CC to Sri Y.Koteswara lRaol Standing Counsel [OPUC]

4. One spare copy MM \r* \-,\ I+ .\ J =\ `~.J-.-v` / HIGH COURT NV,J DATED: 22/07/2025 POST NEXT WEEK ORDER WP.No.16075 of 2025 E*N g€n±h¢rty*a INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED i=C=l 2 9 "l 2tl25 J `:I .=-y,-+.

®