Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench

Satish Kumar Singh ( Sr. Citizen) vs Ut Th. Drug Inspector Baramulla on 2 December, 2022

Author: Sanjay Dhar

Bench: Sanjay Dhar

                                                                      Serial No. 106
                                                                      Before Notice.

      HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT SRINAGAR
                                                            CRM (M) No. 527/2022
                                                              CrlM No. 1474/2022

      Satish Kumar Singh ( Sr. Citizen)
                                                                    ...Petitioner(s)
             Through:     Mr Varut Kumar Gupta, Advocate
                          Mr. Imshan Ahad, Advocate.

                                        VERSUS
      UT th. Drug Inspector Baramulla
                                                                   ...Respondent(s)
             Through:     None.

CORAM:

          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

                                  ORDER

02.12.2022.

The petitioner has challenged complaint filed by the respondent against him before the court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Baramulla, alleging commission of offences under Section 18(a) (i) read with Section 27(d) and Section 18 A read with Section 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 as also order dated 23.03.2015 passed by the learned Principal Sessions, Judge, Baramulla whereby process has been issued against the petitioner.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the company Cachet Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd of which petitioner is alleged to be a Managing Director, has not been impleaded as party to the complaint. On this ground, it is urged that the complaint as against the petitioner is not maintainable. There appears to be merit in the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and as such, a case for grant of interim indulgence is made out.

Issue notice to the respondent. Notice be sent to the respondent through Mr. Sheikh Mushtaq, learned AAG. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall furnish a copy of the petition to Mr. Sheikh Mushtaq, learned AAG, who may file his response by next date of hearing.

Till next date of hearing before the Bench, the proceedings in the impugned complaint as against the petitioner shall remain stayed.

Xerox copy of the trial court record be summoned. List on 01.03.2023.

(Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 02.12..2022 Showkat