Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 13, Cited by 0]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Bharat Swabhiman Nyas vs Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise ... on 27 January, 2022

Author: Dilip Gupta

Bench: Dilip Gupta

          CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                             NEW DELHI
                           PRINCIPAL BENCH - COURT NO. 1

                   SERVICE TAX APPEAL NO. 52849 OF 2016
     (Arising out of Order-in-Original No. 32-33/COMMR/DDN/2016 dated 13.07.2016
     passed by the Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax,
     Commissionerate, Dehradun)

     M/s. Bharat Swabhiman (Nyas)                                    .... Appellant
     Rajiv Bhawan, Patanjali Yogpeeth-II
     Maharishi Dayanand Gram, Near Bahadrabad
     Haridwar-249405

                                       VERSUS

     Commissioner Customs, Central Excise &                           ....Respondent
     Service Tax, Dehradun,
     E-Block, Nehru Colony, Haridwar Road
     Dehradun


     APPEARANCE:

     Shri B.L. Narasimhan with Ms. Poorvi Asati, Advocates for the Appellant
     Shri Anup K. Thapliyal, Authorized Representative of the Department

     CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA, PRESIDENT
            HON'BLE MR. P. V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)


                                                     Date of Hearing: 14.09.2021
                                                     Date of Decision: 27.01.2022


                          FINAL ORDER NO. 50060/2022


     JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA:


            M/s. Bharat Swabhiman (Nyas) 1 has filed this appeal to assail

     the order dated 13.07.2016 passed by the Commissioner, Customs,

     Central Excise & Service Tax, Commissionerate, Dehradun 2 confirming

     the demand of service tax with interest and penalty.

     2.     The appellant is a trust registered under the Registration Act,

     1908. It was constituted on 05.01.2009 with an aim to carry out




1.   the appellant
2.   the Commissioner
                                          2
                                                                            ST/52849/2016

     charitable objects, which amongst others included yoga education and

     training for achieving a disease-free and healthy India.

     3.       The appellant is also registered under section 12AA read with

     section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 3. The appellant claims that in

     order to fulfill its objectives, it engaged itself in organizing residential

     as well as non-residential yoga camps to propagate yoga training and

     vedic knowledge for which it received donations from its members.

     4.       An enquiry was, however, conducted in connection with non-

     payment of service tax on such membership donations, on freight

     charges paid by the appellant, and on the amount by the appellant for

     hiring    motor   vehicles.   Ultimately,      a   show   cause      notice    dated

     06.04.2014 was issued to the appellant for the period January 2009 to

     March 2013 proposing demand of service tax with interest and penalty

     under the category of 'club or association service', 'goods and

     transport agency service' and 'rent-a-cab operator service'. This show

     cause notice is pending adjudication.

     5.       Two more show cause notices dated 31.03.2015 and 05.01.2016

     were issued to the appellant for the subsequent periods 2013-14 and

     2014-15, based on the allegations made in the first and the second

     show cause notice, respectively. The appellant filed detailed replies to

     the second and the third show cause notices. These two show cause

     notices were adjudicated upon by the Commissioner by a common

     order     dated   13.07.2016.    The     demand      of   service     tax     of   Rs.

     4,83,52,583/-     was   confirmed       with   respect    to   the    membership

     donations and freight charges paid by the appellant but the demand of




3.   the Income Tax Act
                                       3
                                                                     ST/52849/2016

     service tax of Rs. 61,66,706/- was dropped. The gist of the findings of

     the Commissioner are as follows:

           (i)    The second and third show cause notice have been

                  correctly issued under the provisions of section 73(1A) of

                  the Finance Act, 1994 4 as the allegations made by the

                  Department against the appellant were made known to the

                  appellant in the first show cause notice, which had invoked

                  the provisions of the Finance Act as applicable during the

                  pre and post-negative list period;

           (ii)   The   amount   of   contribution     (membership    donations)

                  received from the members is directly relatable to various

                  privileges assured to the members and thus, the said

                  amount of contribution is liable to service tax. The decision

                  of    Gujarat High Court in Sports Club of Gujarat

                  Limited vs. Union of India 5 is not applicable to the

                  present case in as much as the same dealt with the

                  provisions of the Finance Act prior to 30.06.2012;

           (iii) Explanation 3 to section 65B(44) of the Finance Act treats

                  an unincorporated association or body of persons and its

                  members as distinct persons. Further, the appellant is

                  obliged to provide stated facilities to members in lieu of

                  donations and thus, is liable to pay service tax on the

                  same;

           (iv) Only specific charitable activities are exempted under

                  Notification dated 20.06.2012 and the activities of the




4.   the Finance Act
5.   2013 (31) STR 645 (Guj.)
                                            4
                                                                              ST/52849/2016

                  appellant are not covered under the scope of the said

                  exemption;

          (v)     The appellant, by virtue of payment of freight charges, is a

                  person liable to pay service tax and the freight amount is

                  liable to Service Tax under "transport of goods by road

                  service'; and

          (vi) The categories of persons liable to pay service tax under

                  reverse charges in terms of rule 2(1)(d)(i)(B) of the
                                                     6
                  Service Tax Rules, 1994                includes an association of

                  persons. A trust qualifies to be an association of persons

                  and thus, the Appellant is liable to pay service tax under

                  'goods and transport agency' service.

     6.   Shri    B.L.   Narasimhan,       learned       counsel   appearing      for   the

     appellant    assisted    by    Ms.    Poorvi    Asati,     made      the    following

     submissions:

          (i)     The    show      cause   notices       have   failed   to   invoke    the

                  applicable provisions of law. The Department can issue a

                  statement        of demand or show cause notice for a

                  subsequent period provided the grounds relied upon for

                  the subsequent period are the same as mentioned in the

                  earlier show cause notice. In the present case, the second

                  show cause notice has not mentioned any grounds on

                  which the demand has been proposed and, therefore, the

                  pre-requisite condition of grounds being same cannot be

                  verified;




6.   1994 Rules
                                       5
                                                                     ST/52849/2016

     (ii)    The second and third show cause notices, while proposing

             the demand of service tax on the amount received post

             01.07.2012, neither invoke nor mention the charging

             provisions i.e. section 66B and section 66B(44) of the

             Finance Act;

     (iii) The demand of service tax on membership donations is not

             sustainable as the activities of the appellant are exempt

             under Notification dated 26.09.2016 from 01.07.2012 to

             20.10.2015;

     (iv) The       activities   of       the   appellant   are   exempt   under

             Notification dated 20.06.2012 w.e.f. 21.10.2015;

     (v)     The doctrine of principle of mutuality is also applicable in

             the present case;

     (vi) The appellant is not liable to pay service tax on the freight

             amount paid by it; and

     (vii) Interest is not recoverable and penalty is not imposable.

7.   Shri    Anup    K.    Thapliyal,      learned   authorized   representative

appearing for    the      Department has,          however, the    justified the

impugned order and in this connection placed various paragraphs of

the order.

8.   The submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the

appellant and the learned authorized representative appearing for the

Department have been considered.

9.   The issue that arises for consideration is regarding the demand

of service tax on the donations received by the appellant from its

members and on freight charges paid by the appellant under the

reverse charge mechanism.
                                    6
                                                                   ST/52849/2016

10.   Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the demand of

service tax on membership donation is not sustainable as the activities

of the appellant are exempt under Notification dated 26.09.2016 from

01.07.2012 to 20.10.2015 and under Notification dated 20.06.2012

w.e.f. 21.10.2015.

11.   It would, therefore, be appropriate to first reproduce the

Notification dated 26.09.2016 and it is as follows:

              "Notification No. 42/2016-S.T. dated 26-Sep-2016

                    Whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that in
            the period commencing on and from the first day of July,
            2012 and ending with the 20th day of October, 2015
            (hereinafter referred to as the said period) according to a
            practice that was generally prevalent, there was non-levy of
            service tax on the services by way of advancement of Yoga
            provided by entities registered under section 12AA of
            Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and this service was
            liable to service tax, in the said period, which was not being
            paid according to the said practice.

                   Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
            by section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944),
            read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994),
            the Central Government hereby directs that the service tax
            payable under section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, on the
            service by way of advancement of Yoga provided by entities
            registered under section 12AA of Income-tax Act, 1961 (43
            of 1961) in the said period, but for the said practice, shall
            not be required to be paid."

12.   The appellant is registered under section 12AA of the Income

Tax Act and the education and training in yoga provided by the

appellant is towards the activity of advancement of yoga. Thus, as

both the conditions are satisfied by the appellant, the membership

donations collected by the appellant would be exempt from payment of

service tax for the period from 01.07.2012 to 20.10.2015.

13.   The appellant is also entitled to exemption from payment of

service tax under the Notification dated 20.06.2012 w.e.f. 21.10.2015.

The relevant extract of the said Notification is reproduced below:
                        7
                                                        ST/52849/2016

 "Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. dated 20-June-2012

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of
section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994)
(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and in supersession
of notification number 12/2012-Service Tax, dated the 17th
March, 2012, published in the Gazette of India,
Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide
number G.S.R. 210(E), dated the 17th March, 2012, the
Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in
the public interest so to do, hereby exempts the following
taxable services from the whole of the service tax leviable
thereon under section 66B of the said Act, namely :
...........

4. Services by an entity registered under section 12AA of the Income tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) by way of charitable activities;

...........

2. Definitions.

For the purpose of this Notification, unless the context otherwise requires,-

(k) "charitable activities" means activities relating to-

(i) public health by way of -

(a) care or counseling of (i) terminally ill persons or persons with severe physical or mental disability, (ii) persons afflicted with HIV or AIDS, or (iii) persons addicted to a dependence-forming substance such as narcotics drugs or alcohol, or

(b) public awareness of preventive health, family planning or prevention of HIV infection;

(ii) advancement of religion or spirituality;

(iii) advancement of educational programmes or skill development relating to,-

(a) abandoned, orphaned or homeless children;

(b) physically or mentally abused and traumatized persons;

(c) prisoners; or

(d) persons over the age of 65 years residing in a rural area;

(iv) preservation of environment including watershed, forests and wildlife; or

(v) advancement of any other object of general public utility up to a value of, -

8

ST/52849/2016

(a) eighteen lakh and seventy five thousand rupees for the year 2012-13 subject to the condition that total value of such activities had not exceeded twenty five lakhs rupees during 2011-12;

(b) twenty five lakh rupees in any other financial year subject to the condition that total value of such activities had not exceeded twenty five lakhs rupees during the preceding financial year;"

(emphasis supplied)
14. An amendment was made in the aforesaid Notification dated 20.06.2012 by Notification dated 21.10.2015 in paragraph 2 (ii) and is as follows:
"(ii) in paragraph 2, .........
(b) in clause (k), in sub-clause (ii), for the words religion or spirituality, the words religion, spirituality or yoga shall be substituted."

(emphasis supplied)

15. The definition of 'charitable activity' in the Notification dated 20.06.2012 was amended to include activities relating advancement of yoga.

16. It is, therefore, clear that the twin conditions that the entity must be registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act and activities must be carried out by way of charitable activities stand satisfied.

17. The next issue that remains to be decided is whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the freight amount paid by it on a reverse charge mechanism.

18. 'Goods transport agency' service has been defined in section 65(26) of the Finance Act to mean any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment notes, by whatever name called. In the present case, consignment notes 9 ST/52849/2016 have not been issued and so the activities cannot be said to be covered under 'goods transport agency' services.

19. In this connection it would be useful to refer to the decision of the Tribunal in Bhoramdeo Sahakari Shakhar Utpadam Karkhana vs. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Raipur 7, wherein it has been held that service tax can be levied only if consignment notes are issued.

20. Thus, service tax liability could not have been fastened on the appellant under the reserve charge mechanism.

21. It would, therefore, not be necessary to examine the other contentions raised by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant.

22. The order dated 13.07.2016 passed by the Commissioner, therefore, cannot be sustained. It is, accordingly, set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Order Pronounced on 27.01.2022) (JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA) PRESIDENT (P. V. SUBBA RAO) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shreya

7. 2019 (10) TMI 1416 - CESTAT, New Delhi