Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Hi-Tech Mineral Industries Covai ... vs The Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory ... on 18 March, 2019

Author: M.Venugopal

Bench: M.Venugopal, S.Vaidyanathan

                                                            1

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Dated: 18.03.2019

                                                         Coram

                                   THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
                                                     AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

                                           W.A.Nos.1812 and 1813 of 2009

                      M/s.Hi-Tech Mineral Industries Covai (P) Limited,
                      S.F.No.46, Kottagoundenpatty Village,
                      Omalur Taluk, Salem District-636 304,
                      Rep. by its Managing Director,
                      Venkittapathy.P.          .... Appellant / Petitioner in W.A.No.1812 of 2009
                                                                                   in both matters

                                                           -vs-

                      1. The Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,
                         No.17, III Main Road,
                         Seethammal Colony,
                         Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018,
                         Rep. by its Secretary.

                      2. The Chairman,
                         Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                         800, Anna Salai,
                         Chennai-600 002.

                      3. The Executive Engineer/O&M/West
                         Salem Electricity Distribution Circle,
                         Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
                         Salem-5.

                      4. The Union of India,
                         Rep. by Secretary to Government,
                         Ministry of Law and Justice,
                         Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi.


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                             2

                      5. The Secretary to Govt. of India,
                         Ministry of Power,
                         Shram Shakti Bhavan, Rafi Marg,
                         New Delhi.

                      6. Official Liquidator,
                         No.29, Rajaji Salai,
                         II Floor, Chennai-1.                      ... Respondents/Respondents
                                                                                in both matters
                                 (R6 suo motu impleaded by this Court on 25.02.2019)
                      Prayer in W.A.1812/2009: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters
                      Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 11.11.2009 in W.P.No.6968 of
                      2008 and allow the present Writ Appeal as prayed for and thus render
                      justice.
                      Prayer in W.A.1813/2009: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters
                      Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 11.11.2009 in W.P.No.6969 of
                      2008 and allow the present Writ Appeal as prayed for and thus render
                      justice.
                                   For   Appellant    :          Mr.D.Shivakumaran
                                   For   R2 & R3      :          Mr.S.K.Rameshwar
                                   For   R4 & R5      :          Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy
                                   For   R6           :          Mr.Sridhar Bavisetty
                                                                 Deputy Official Liquidator

                                                            *****

                                                COMMON JUDGMENT

When these matters were taken up for hearing on 25.02.2019, this Court had passed the following interim order:

Learned counsel for the Appellant is directed to serve notice privately on Mr.G.Rajagopal, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing for R4 and R5, returnable by 04.03.2019.

http://www.judis.nic.in 3

2. It is seen from the records that this Court had appointed a Provisional Liquidator on 23.03.2015 in C.P.No.385 of 2014 and C.A.No.1141 of 2014. It is also seen from the records that on 15.11.2018, this Court, in which one of us was party, had permitted the learned Official Liquidator to utilize the services of ITCOT Consultancy and Services Limited for the purpose of conducting an inspection and thereafter auction.

3. In view of the recent development and also considering the fact that the company in question vests with the learned Official Liquidator, this Court suo motu impleads the learned Official Liquidator as party to the proceedings and permits the TNEB / TANGEDCO to serve notice on the learned Official Liquidator. Upon receipt notice, the learned Official Liquidator is expected to appear before this Court on 04.03.2019 at 02:15pm.

List this matter on 04.03.2019 at 02:15pm.”

2. Pursuant to the said order dated 25.02.2019, the learned Deputy Official Liquidator has entered appearance before this Court on 06.03.2019 and has sought time to get instructions regarding continuance of the present Writ Appeals before this Court.

3. Today, it is represented by the learned Deputy Official Liquidator that these Writ Appeals may be disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner-Company to re-agitate the issue in future, in case it comes out of liquidation.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4

4. In view of the above submission and taking into account the present outcome / status of the Petitioner Company, these Writ Appeals are disposed of and it is open to the Petitioner-Company / Official Liquidator to re-agitate the issue, if so warranted.

5. It is needless to mention here that the Official Liquidator can take effective steps to disburse the amount after adjudication on the application filed in Form-66 and other proceedings in accordance with law. No costs.

[M.V.,J.] [S.V.N.,J.] 18.03.2019 Index:Yes Internet:Yes Speaking Order: Yes ar http://www.judis.nic.in 5 To:

1. The Secretary, Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, No.17, III Main Road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018,
2. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
3. The Executive Engineer/O&M/West Salem Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Salem-5.
4. The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi.
5. The Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Power, Shram Shakti Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.
6. Official Liquidator, No.29, Rajaji Salai, II Floor, Chennai-1.

http://www.judis.nic.in 6 M.VENUGOPAL, J.

and S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

ar W.A.Nos.1812 and 1813 of 2009 18.03.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in