Forums, Revision Petitioner had
re-opened the entire issues re-agitating the matter, attacking the Suit
Promissory Note and the decree passed on merits ... reached the finality in the earlier litigation, the
same cannot be re-agitated by filing another Application. Submitting that the
fraud committed upon the Court
because it does not
confer a right on a party to re-agitate the matter.
14. To appreciate the heart of the controversy ... matter in one way
will not allow the parties to re-agitate the matter again at a
subsequent stage of the same proceeding. The facts
According to the learned counsel, the respondent is not entitled to re-agitate the very same issues, by taking up a fresh ground that ... issues have become final and as such, it cannot be re-agitated by way of a separate suit and Section 11 CPC bars any such
established by the decree in the suit, the matter cannot be re-agitated at a subsequent stage in execution proceedings. The only ground on which ... matter can be allowed to be re-agitated thereafter is that the person who is sought to be made liable as a partner
that a question which is once decided can
never be re-agitated. There are certain classes of cases
like disputes regarding wage structure, service conditions ... management after a particular date is one
which cannot be re-agitated in a subsequent case if it has
already been decided finally
which concerned the original order of detention, they could not be re-agitated since they were disposed of by the earlier decision. In para ... held that the petitioner could not be permitted to re-
agitate the same questions, it not being his case that any new circumstances had
arisen
thus evident that another effort made by the opponent to re-agitate that very question regarding pecuniary jurisdiction of the Trial Court, proved abortive. Thereafter ... said earlier, again that question was sought to be re-agitated before the Trial Court by application, Ex.101, and that was not allowed
Court after considering the same passed the Judgment. The petition cannot re-agitate the same. The allegations made in para 9 of the petition ... Order, dated 25th February, 2002 and, therefore, the Petitioners cannot re-agitate the same in the Contempt Petition No. 140 of 2002. The Corporation also
2008after
contest. In all these applications also, the defendants re-agitated the issue of
benami and wanted to exclude those properties purchased in their names ... only in the final decree, it
was open to him to re-agitate the same issues even in final decree proceeding.
18. In a preliminary
which has already been tried and
decided earlier against him. The re-agitation may or may not
be barred as res judicata ... re-agitation may or may not be barred as res
judicata. But if the same issue is sought to be re-
agitated, it also amounts
