Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

M/S. Century Ventures vs Authorised Officer, Canara Bank, Bopal ... on 3 August, 2022

Author: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Bench: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

     C/SCA/12738/2022                           ORDER DATED: 03/08/2022




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
        R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12738 of 2022
===================================================
                M/S. CENTURY VENTURES
                          Versus
   AUTHORISED OFFICER, CANARA BANK, BOPAL BRANCH
===================================================
Appearance:
MR AS PANESAR(5390) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3
MR. URVESH K. GOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
===================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI

                           Date : 03/08/2022

                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr.A.S. Panesar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Urvesh K. Gor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.

2. Mr. Urvesh K. Gor, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bank, on instructions, submits that notice of 15 days will be issued to the petitioners before initiating any further steps against the petitioners.

3. In view of the above statement made by Mr. Urvesh K. Gor, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank, Mr. A.S. Panesar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Mon Aug 08 20:11:15 IST 2022

C/SCA/12738/2022 ORDER DATED: 03/08/2022

4. Permission as prayed for is granted. The present petition stands disposed of, as withdrawn.

5. This order is passed with the consent of learned counsels appearing for both the sides.

6. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated.

7. It is clarified that the Court has otherwise not assessed the merits of the matter.

(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) Pradhyuman Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Mon Aug 08 20:11:15 IST 2022