Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Mariamma Varghese @ Mariamma ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors on 4 August, 2015

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                           NAFR

              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                            WPS No. 4599 of 2014

     • Smt. Mariamma Varghese @ Mariamma Chacko W/o Late Shri T.A.
       Chacko Aged About 65 years R/o Udaya Society Sector -3, Tatibandh
       P.S. Tatibandh Distt. Raipur C.G.

                                                                  ---- Petitioner

                                     Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Affairs, Police
        Department Mahanadi Bhawan New Mantralaya, Raipur C.G.

     3. The Secretary, Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur,
        C.G.

     4. The Director General of Police, Raipur, District Raipur, Cg

     5. The Joint Director, Treasury Accounts & Pension Raipur Division
        Raipur C.G.

     6. The Superintendent Of Police Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G.

                                                              ---- Respondent

For Petitioner Shri Palash Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 04/08/2015

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the matter has already been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4523/2014 (Francis Xavier Beck and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and WP (S) No.1975/2015 (A.P. Tripathi and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and final orders have been passed in the said matters on 03.07.2015 and 16.07.2015 respectively, therefore, the present writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra).

2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, both the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra).

Sd/-

JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala