Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

State of Madhya Pradesh - Section

Section 35 in The M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993

35. No confidence motion against President and Vice-President of Zila Panchayat.

(1)On a motion of no-confidence being passed by Zila Panchayat by resolution passed by a majority of not less than three-fourth of the [elected members] [Substituted by M.P. Act No. 32 of 1994 (w.e.f. 7-10-1994).] present and voting and such majority is more than two-third of the total number of [elected members] [Substituted by M.P. Act No. 32 of 1994 (w.e.f. 7-10-1994).] constituting the Zila Panchayat for the time being the President or the Vice-President against whom such motion is passed shall cease to hold office forthwith.
(2)Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or the rules made thereunder, President or Vice-President shall not preside over a meeting in which a motion of no-confidence is discussed against him. Such meeting shall be convened in such a manner as may be prescribed and shall be presided over by an officer of the Government as the prescribed authority may appoint. The President or Vice-President as the case may be, shall have right to speak at or otherwise to take part in the proceeding of the meeting.
(3)No-confidence motion shall not lie against the President or Vice-President within a period of :-
(i)[two and half year] [Substituted by M.P Act No. 18 of 2007 (w.e.f. 4-7-2007).] from the date on which the Zila President or Vice- President enter their respective office;
(ii)six months preceding the date on which the term of office of the President or Vice-President as the case may be, expires;
(iii)[six months] [Substituted by M.P Act No. 18 of 2007 (w.e.f. 4-7-2007).] from the date on which previous motion of no-confidence was rejected.
(4)[ If the President or Vice-President, as the case may be, desires to challenge the validity of the motion carried out under sub-section (1), he shall within fifteen days from the date on which such motion was carried, refer the dispute to the State Government, which shall decide it, as far as possible, within forty-five days from the date on which it was recovered by it, and its decision shall be final.] [Inserted by M.P. Act No. 2 of 1997 (w.e.f. 7-1-1997).]