Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C.P.Nijitha Mahalakshmi vs M/S.Rsb Transmission (I) Ltd on 21 April, 2021

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                                C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 21.04.2021

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016

                      C.P.Nijitha Mahalakshmi                                         ...Appellant

                                                            Vs

                      1.M/s.RSB Transmission (I) Ltd.,
                        D.No.G.23, G.24, SIPCOT Industrial Park,
                        Katrambakkam, Irugattukottai,
                        Sriperumbudur,
                        Kancheepuram District - 602 105
                        (Was set exparte in the Trial Court)

                      2.TATA AIG GI.. Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                        Sampson Towers, 2nd Floor,
                        No.403-L, Pantheon Road,
                        Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.                                 ...Respondents
                      Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                      Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 01.03.2016
                      made in MACT O.P.No.2775 of 2013 on the file of the II Judge, Motor
                      Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Court of Small Causes), Chennai.
                                  For Appellant      :      Ms.P.T.Salim Fathima
                                  For Respondents :         R1 – Exparte before Tribunal
                                                            Mr.E.Rajadurai for R2
                                                            for Mr.N.Vijaya Raghavan

                      1/8


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                    C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016

                                                  JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation under the impugned Award dated 01.03.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Court of Small Causes, Chennai in MCOP.No.2775 of 2013.

2.The Appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal has preferred this Appeal seeking for enhancement.

3.The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned Award are as follows:

                                       Particulars                Amount
                             Transportation, nourishing food            Rs.50,000
                             and miscellaneous expenditure

                             Medical expenses                      Rs.1,21,000
                             Future medical expenses                    Rs.10,000
                             Attender charges                           Rs.10,000
                             Damages for pain, suffering and            Rs.50,000
                             trauma

                      2/8


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                    C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016


                                          Particulars                Amount
                             Disability                                Rs.75,000
                             Loss occurred to the petitioner         Rs.2,00,000
                             on account of the inability to
                             participate dance programme
                             and proper marital alliance
                             Loss of amenities                         Rs.20,000
                             Total                                 Rs.5,36,000/-


4.Heard Ms.P.T.Salim Fathima, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr.E.Rajadurai, learned counsel for the second respondent. R1 remained ex-parte before the Tribunal, hence notice to R1 is dispensed with.

5.The Appellant/claimant has sustained the following injuries:

(a)Tibia Proximal (L)
(b)Fraceturn involving inter articular tibia, fracture is malunited.
(c) ORIF plate and screws with widening of tibia with condyles, healed painful keloid in left aspect of knee and post traumatic stiffness (L) knee ROM 0-7 deg., as per the disability certificate issued by the Doctor who has examined as PW2.
3/8

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016

6.The Doctor who examined the Appellant/claimant has also observed that the Appellant/claimant will have difficulty in driving two and four wheeler due to her limping as a result of injuries sustained by her due to the accident.

7.The Tribunal under the impugned Award has awarded an overall compensation of Rs.5,36,000/- under various heads.

8.This Court is of the considered view that excepting for granting a lesser compensation of Rs.10,000/- towards future medical expenses, the overall compensation awarded by the Tribunal is a just compensation. Insofar as the future medical expenses is concerned and after giving due consideration to the fact that the Appellant/claimant will have difficulty in driving two and four wheeler as a result of the injuries sustained by her, the same will have to be enhanced to Rs.30,000/- from Rs.10,000/- fixed by the Tribunal. Excepting for this modification, there is no scope for any interference with regard to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under various other heads.

4/8 http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016

9.For the foregoing reasons, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned Award is enhanced to Rs.5,56,000/- instead of Rs.5,36,000/- fixed by the Tribunal as detailed hereunder:

                                          Particulars             Award            Enhanced/
                                                                  Amount           modified
                                                                                   amount
                             Transportation, nourishing food       Rs.50,000         Rs.50,000
                             and miscellaneous expenditure

                             Medical expenses                    Rs.1,21,000       Rs.1,21,000
                             Future medical expenses               Rs.10,000         Rs.30,000
                             Attender charges                      Rs.10,000         Rs.10,000
                             Damages for pain, suffering and       Rs.50,000         Rs.50,000
                             trauma
                             Disability                            Rs.75,000         Rs.75,000
                             Loss occurred to the petitioner     Rs.2,00,000       Rs.2,00,000
                             on account of the inability to
                             participate dance programme
                             and proper marital alliance
                             Loss of amenities                     Rs.20,000         Rs.20,000
                             Total                             Rs.5,36,000/- Rs.5,56,000/-


10.In the result, the appeal is partly allowed. The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the modified amount awarded by this Court together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date 5/8 http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016 of claim till the date of deposit after deducting the amount already deposited if any to the credit of MCOP.No.2775 of 2013 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal shall transfer the amount lying to the credit of MCOP.No.2775 of 2013 to the bank account of the Appellant through RTGS within a period of one week thereafter. No costs.

21.04.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order pam 6/8 http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016 To

1.The II Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Court of Small Causes), Chennai.

2.The Section Officer V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.

7/8 http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

pam C.M.A.No.1338 of 2016 21.04.2021 8/8 http://www.judis.nic.in