been filed by the claimant in MCOP. No.56 of 1995, claiming enhanced compensation. CMA. Nos.1331, 1337 and 1333 of 1998 have been filed ... Judgment of the Tribunal, exonerating the Insurance Company with reference to MCOP Nos.1260/94, 55/95 and 56/95 respectively.
3. Dr.Premachandran
filed by the Insurance Company against the Award and Decree made in MCOP Nos.670 of 2004 and 687 of 2004 dated ... each but restricted their claim to Rs. 7,00,000/- each in MCOP No. 670 of 2004 (CMA No. 3139 of 2007) and MCOP
Inter Departmental, Motor Accident Claims Committee (in short called as "MCOP Committee") would take a different view and consequently, an appeal would ... filed or when the MCOP Committee, accepts the opinion of the panel counsel, the matter would be placed before the next Committee, called as Finance
National Insurance company which figured as the third respondent in the MCOP is the appellant.
2. The respondents 1 and 2 herein claiming ... dependents of deceased Krishnasamy, had filed the MCOP on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Erode making the following averments
Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the order and decree in MCOP.No.4422 and 4423 of 2007 dated 29.07.2011 on the file ... deceased Swapna and her elder sister Sundari who is the Petitioner in MCOP.No.4423 of 2007 /appellant in CMA.No.1908 of 2012 were
Late Mohan
No.1323, Vasantha Nagar
Nadukuthagai, Thirunindravur-602 024
(Claimants in MCOP No.45/2017
MACT, Vellore and
MCOP No.2730/2016,
MACT, Chennai ... MCOP No.4614/2017, MACT, Chennai)
9. A. Narayanan, S/o. Adhimoolam,
C/o. D.J. Minerals Pvt. Ltd.,
No.15, EdaiyankodumanThangal,
Pulipakkam Post, Chengalpat
Claimants to enhance the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.100/2003 dated 27.02.2004 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Chief ... vehicles are the joint tortfeasors.
17. Driver of Maruthi car has filed MCOP.No.37/2003 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
1999. The first respondent (owner of the vehicle) in the above said MCOP has filed C.M.A.No.73 of 2002. The second respondent ... Insurer) in the MCOP has preferred C.M.A.No.948/2002. The claimants before the Tribunal have been arrayed as respondents
Claims Tribunal [Special Sub Judge No.2, Small Causes Court], Chennai, in
MCOP Nos.6456 & 6455 of 2014, the Insurance Company ... respondent in the abovesaid MCOPs have preferred this two Civil
Miscellaneous Appeals viz., CMA Nos.1853 & 1956 of 2019, respectively,
praying to set aside
Tribunal, is the appellant in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. The petitioners in MCOP (claimants) are the respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal. The owner ... vehicle, who figured as the first respondent in the MCOP, is the fourth respondent in the appeal.
2. Respondents 1 to 3 herein had filed
