Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Gujarat High Court

Jarar Osaman Vandha vs State Of Gujarat & on 16 March, 2017

Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt

Bench: S.R.Brahmbhatt, A.J. Shastri

                   R/CR.MA/7149/2017                                                ORDER




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 7149 of
                                    2017
                                     In
                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1276 of 2015

         ==============================================================
                          JARAR OSAMAN VANDHA....Applicant
                                       Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondents
         ==============================================================
         Appearance:
         THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant
         MS HANSA B.PUNANI APP for the Respondent No. 1
         ==============================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                       Date : 16/03/2017

                                          ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT) The applicant-prisoner has taken out this application for seeking temporary bail on account of he is suffering from left kidney calculus. The medical certificate dated 08.03.2017 to that effect is produced on record. The same indicates that the say of the applicant-prisoner is correct that he is suffering from calculus in left kidney and certificate to that effect also reveals that he is treated.

As against this, the jail remark-sheet produced on record indicate that temporary bails granted to him on 29.12.2016 to 12.01.2017 and again Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 11:07:41 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/7149/2017 ORDER on 31.01.2017 to 14.02.2017. On both the occasions, the ailment of self was pleaded.

We are of the considered view that as the treatment of calculus in left kidney is being given to the applicant-prisoner / patient, the same be continued properly and there is no need to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant-prisoner to enlarge him on bail.

The jail authorities are directed to take all the precautions and permit all the treatment to the applicant-prisoner for giving relief in the ailment. The present rejection may not come in way of the applicant-prisoner, in case, if medical condition deteriorates and warrants any further treatment outside the purview of the present treatment.

With these observations, the present application is rejected. Rule discharged. The applicant-prisoner be informed accordingly.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) Pankaj Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 11:07:41 IST 2017