Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Deputy Executive Engineer vs Ashish P Dave on 16 December, 2014

Author: Anant S.Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave

        C/SCA/16131/2006                              ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16131 of 2006
                                  With
           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16132 of 2006
                                  With
           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16133 of 2006
                                  With
           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17858 of 2006
                                  With
           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17859 of 2006
                                  With
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6480 of 2007
                                  With
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6485 of 2007
                                  With
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6486 of 2007
                                  With
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6487 of 2007
                                  With
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7299 of 2007

================================================================
             DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER....Petitioner(s)
                             Versus
                  ASHISH P DAVE....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR KH BAXI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR NILESH SHAH , ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
============================================================
====

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE

                             Date : 16/12/2014


                           COMMON ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2 C/SCA/16131/2006 ORDER

Heard learned counsels for the parties Mr. Nilesh  Shah   for   the   workman   and   Mr.   K.H.Baxi   for   the  employer.  

Learned   counsel   for   the   workman   HAS   placed  reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of  Nagjibhai   Paljibhai   Zala   &   Ors   v.   State   of   Gujarat  reported   in   2011(2)   GLR   1592,   which   has   taken   into  consideration   decisions   of   the   Apex   Court   and  interpretation of word `reinstatement', which includes  continuity   of   service   unless   labour   court   has  expressly   refused   continuity   of   service.     In   the  present   case,   the   labour   court   has   not   expressly  refused   continuity   of   service   of   workman   and  accordingly   they   are   entitled   for   continuity   in  service.

Mr. Baxi, learned counsel for the employer seeks  time.

Stand over to 16th January, 2015.

(ANANT S.DAVE, J.) pvv Page 2 of 2