Madhya Pradesh High Court
Upendra Kumar Sullere vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 March, 2022
Author: Vishal Dhagat
Bench: Vishal Dhagat
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 16th OF MARCH, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 6219 of 2022
Between:-
UPENDRA KUMAR SULLERE S/O NAND KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUS
OPERATOR R/O OLD BUS STAND, AJAYGARH,
DISTRICT PANNA (MADHYA PRADESH).
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR DUBEY, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE
SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
MANTRALAYA VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL M.P.
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY SAGAR
DISTRICT-SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT
A U T H O R I T Y DISTRICT-SAGAR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR CHOURASIYA S/O S.C.
CHOURASIYA OCCUPATION: BUS OPERATOR R/O
KRISHNA COLONY, WARD NO 1, CHHATARPUR,
DISTRICT-CHHATARPUR(M.P.) (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI YASH SONI, GOVT. ADVOCATE)
T h is petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
Petitioner has filed this petition making following prayers :
"(i) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus detecting the respondents No. 2 to consider and decide the application/objection of the petitioner in the light of law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Ashish Kumar Vs. M.P. State Transport Appellate tribunal, reported in 2010 (3) MPLJ and cancel the permit of the respondent no.4.
Signature SAN Not (ii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in Verified the circumstances of the case, may also be granted to the Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR petitioner, together with the cost of this petition."
TIWARI Date: 2022.03.16 17:17:15 IST 2Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitting that respondents No. 2 be directed to decide petitioner's representation / objection.
Counsel for the State does not object to aforesaid proposition. In view of same, writ petition filed by petitioner is disposed off with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation preferred by petitioner in the light of judgment reported in 2010 (3) M.P.L.J. 60, Ashis Kumar Jain vs M.P. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior and others, within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
With aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. C.C. as per rules.
(VISHAL DHAGAT)
JUDGE
vkt
Signature
SAN Not
Verified
Digitally signed by
VINOD KUMAR
TIWARI
Date: 2022.03.16
17:17:15 IST