Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ram S/O. Shivaji Solanke vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 16 August, 2017

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                                                          1                              Cri.Appln. 3961/2017 


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3961 OF 2017.


                Ram Shivaji Solanke                                             .....       Applicant

                VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra                                      .....        Respondents
                  and another

                                               ......

                         Mr. U.S. Patil, Advocate for applicant
                         Mr. S.M. Ganachari A.P.P for respondent -State
                                                                   ......
                                               CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                                               DATE             : 16th AUGUST, 2017
                                                                  .....
PER COURT            :



                The applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with

Crime bearing No. 84 of 2017, registered at Pimpaldari Police Station,

District Parbhani.          The earlier application with similar prayers below

Exh.01 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 111/2017 came to be rejected

by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed Dist. Parbnhani

dated 21-07-2017.



2]               On the basis of complaint lodged by Umakant Birajdar,

Taluka Health Officer, Gangakhed, the aforesaid crime came to be

registered. It has been alleged in the complaint that, on 30-06-2017,




     ::: Uploaded on - 19/08/2017                                            ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:26:56 :::
                                                                           2                              Cri.Appln. 3961/2017 


the raiding party consisting of complainant and other officers visited

the clinic of the present applicant.                                 The said raiding party was

constituted to find out bogus medical practitioners.                                                 It has been

further alleged in the complaint that, when they reached at Clinic of

the applicant, applicant has closed his Clinic and left the place without

providing information of the clinic. After that raiding party prepared

panchnama and given notice to the applicant on 04.07.2017.

However, on 11.07.2017 again the raiding party visited the clinic of

the applicant. During the said visit of the raiding party, it was found

that, applicant was giving allopathy treatment to the patients, which

is not permissible.             Even on questioning the applicant, he has not

produced his Degree Certificate before the said raiding party. On the

basis of these allegations, the applicant apprehends his arrest at the

hands of police in the crime No. 84/2017 for the offence punishable

under section 15(2)(B) of Indian Medical Council Act and under section

33(2) of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners 1961 registered

against him.



3]                   The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that

applicant is registered Electropathy Practitioner.                                           He has his own

Clinic. He is ready to co-operate the Investigating Officer for carrying

out further investigation, if any.                               Applicant has fixed place of

residence and he is not likely to abscond.                                     There is no question of

tampering with the prosecution evidence. The offences alleged to




     ::: Uploaded on - 19/08/2017                                            ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:26:56 :::
                                                                           3                              Cri.Appln. 3961/2017 


have been committed by the applicant are not punishable with more

than five years imprisonment.



4)      The learned A.P.P. submits that there is prima-facie strong case

against the applicant.                Though he is registered medical practitioner

under Electropathy, he is practicing allopathy. During the course of

investigation statements of patients came to be recorded.



5)      On perusal of the complaint and in the given set of the

allegations, it appears that the custodial interrogation of the applicant

is not required. The offences alleged to have been committed by the

applicant are not punishable with                             imprisonment of more than five

years. Even the penal provisions of the Sec. 33(2) of the Maharashtra

Medical Practitioners Act, 1961 prescribes punishment                                                 for the first

offence and second or subsequent offence. Thus, by imposing certain

conditions the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on pre-arrest bail.

Hence the following order :-

                                               ORDER

I The application is hereby allowed. II. In the event of arrest, the applicant Ram Shivaji Solanke, in connection with crime No. 84/2017 registered with Pimpaldari Police Station Taluka Gangakhed Dist. Parbhani, be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount on the following ::: Uploaded on - 19/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:26:56 ::: 4 Cri.Appln. 3961/2017 conditions :

(a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner and make himself available as and when required by the investigating officer for the purpose of investigation.
(b) The applicant shall attend the concerned police Station twice in a week on every Monday and Friday between 09.00 to 11.00 a.m. till filing of the charge-sheet.

3. Application is accordingly disposed of.

[V.K.JADHAV, J.] YSK/ ::: Uploaded on - 19/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:26:56 :::