Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Usha Somnath Gholap vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 October, 2018

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                    1                   ABA 1004.2018.odt

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1004 OF 2018

                  USHA SOMNATH GHOLAP 
                            VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 
                               ...
         Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhorde Vikram R 
            APP for Respondents: Mr. P K Lakhotiya
                               ...
                   CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                    Dated: October 01, 2018
                               ...
     PER COURT :-

     1.        The   applicant   is   seeking   pre-arrest   bail   in

     connection with crime No.I-114 of 2018 registered with

     Shirdi   police   station,   District   Ahmednagar   for   the

     offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 307

     of I.P.C.    His application bearing Cri.M.A. No.206/2018

     with similar prayer came to be rejected by the learned

     Additional  Sessions   Judge,   Kopargaon,   by  order  dated

     20.8.2018.



     2.      Learned   counsel   for   the   applicant   submits   that

     applicant   is   the   maternal   aunt   of   the   informant   and,

     though, the incident alleged to have been taken place on



     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                    ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::
                                       2                    ABA 1004.2018.odt

     22.5.2018   at   about   05.30   p.m.,   crime   came   to   be

     registered on 11.6.2018.  Learned counsel submits that,

     it   has   been   alleged   in   the   complaint   that   present

     applicant   caught   hold   hand/legs   of   the   victim   and

     thereafter   co-accused   Janabai   has   administered   the

     'Toilet Cleaner Harpic'.    Learned   counsel submits  that

     as   alleged   in   the   complaint,   co-accused   Janabai   was

     insisting the informant for marriage with her son and on

     her   refusal   allegedly   administered   the   poison   to   her.

     Learned   counsel   submits   that,   allegations   as   it   is

     appears to be very strange.   On 22.5.2018 when victim

     was taken to 'Pravara Hospital,' history of consumption

     of 'Toilet Cleaner Harpic' was given by her sister Rekha,

     who was present during the course of the said incident

     and   not   administration   of   the   'Toilet   Cleaner   Harpic'.

     Even, in the MLC intimation given to the police station,

     sub inspector of Police Station, Loni by the concerned

     Hospital,   history   of   consumption   of   compound   poison

     'Toilet   Cleaner   Harpic'   has   been   mentioned.     Learned

     counsel   submits   that,   in   all   probabilities   if   the   victim

     was forced to marry with the son of co-accused Janabai


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                       ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::
                                       3                   ABA 1004.2018.odt

     and if she was not ready for the same, the victim may

     consume   poison   in   order   to   protest   the   said   attempt,

     but, it is very unlikely on the part of the applicant to

     administer   her   poison   because   she   was   saying   no   to

     said   proposal.   Learned   counsel   submits   that,

     considering   the   character   of   the   allegations   and

     antecedents   of   the   applicant,   she   may   be   granted

     anticipatory bail.



     3.      Learned   A.P.P.   has   strongly   resisted   the

     application   on   the   ground   that,   name   of   the   present

     applicant   has   been   mentioned   in   the   FIR   with   the

     specific   role   ascribed   to   her.     There   is   no   delay   in

     lodging the complaint.   On 24.5.2018 statement of the

     victim   was   recorded   in   the   hospital   itself   and   after

     inquiry,   crime   came   to   be   registered   on   11.6.2018.

     Learned counsel submits that, the victim, applicant and

     other   co-accused   persons   are   closely   related.

     Allegations are severe in nature and the applicant and

     co-accused persons tried to administer the toilet cleaner

     harpic to the victim when she ran away from the house


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                      ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::
                                      4                   ABA 1004.2018.odt

     after saying no to their proposal of marriage.   Learned

     APP submits that the applicant and co-accused persons

     chased the victim, extended her beating and thereafter

     administered   the   toilet   cleaner   harpic,   forcibly.     The

     custodial   interrogation   of   the   present   applicant   is

     required.



     4.      On careful perusal of the investigation papers and

     after   going   through   the   allegations   made   in   the

     complaint, it appears that, informant, the applicant and

     other co-accused persons are closely related with each

     other.   There was a proposal of marriage of victim with

     the son of co-accused Janabai, who is the aunt of the

     informant   and   when   the   victim   said   no   to   the   said

     proposal, it has been alleged that aforesaid incident has

     taken place.   It further appears that, charge sheet has

     been   submitted   against   co-accused   Somnath   and

     Avinash   and   they  are   on   bail  after  arrest.     It  appears

     that,   the   applicant   is   the   maternal   aunt.     It   further

     appears that intimation has been given to the concerned

     police   station   by   the   hospital   authorities   wherein   the


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                     ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::
                                      5                   ABA 1004.2018.odt

     history is communicated as consuming of  toilet cleaner

     harpic  and   even   in  the   department  of  the   Medicine   of

     the said hospital, history to the effect of consuming of

     toilet   cleaner   harpic   has   been   recorded.     In   the

     Department   of   the   Medicine   of   the   said   hospital,

     reference has been given to the name of the real sister of

     the   informant   namely   Rekha,   who   has   given   said

     history.     Thus,   considering   the   character   of   the

     allegations   and   close   relations   and   the   fact   that   the

     applicant is a woman and her antecedents are clear, I

     am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to her.  In the given

     set   of   allegations,   custodial   interrogation   of   the

     applicant is not required since nothing remained to be

     seized   and   charge   sheet   has   been   submitted   against

     some of the accused persons. In view of the above, I am

     inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to applicant. Hence the

     following order :- 

                                 O R D E R

I. Application is hereby allowed.

II. In the event of arrest of applicant-Usha Somnath Gholap, in connection with Crime No.I-114/2018 aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::

6 ABA 1004.2018.odt registered at Shirdi Police Station, District Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 307 of IPC, she be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions :-

a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when required by the Investigation officer.

III. Application is disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ...

aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 02:36:54 :::