reputation of the Plaintiffs and their products sold under the
trade mark HARPIC;
ii. Using the depiction of the Plaintiffs' product or any other ... reputation of the Plaintiff and its product sold
under the trade mark HARPIC.
iii. Using any other indicia whatsoever to associate with/
depict the Plaintiffs
sold by the respondent
(hereafter 'Reckitt') under its trademark 'Harpic'.
2. HUL claims that the impugned advertisement and the impugned
videos ... manufacturing of a
well-known toilet cleaner under the trademark 'Harpic' in India, since
the year 2001. Reckitt claims that Harpic
Odomos.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.2
(Harpic v. Domex) (hereinafter "Domex-I")
53. The Court was, in this ... India) Pvt. Ltd (Reckitt) alleged that the
aforesaid advertisement disparaged its product Harpic, which was also
a toilet cleaner. Reckitt disputed HUL's claim
carrying on a business of manufacture, purchase and sale of Lizol / Harpic. For the assessment year in question, the Assessee-Opposite Party has charged ... deposited the tax on the sale of Harpic and Lizol treating the same are covered under Schedule-II, Part-A, Entry
Mosquito Mats,
Coils and Vaporizers; and (ii) Mortein Insect
Killers; (iii) Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor
Cleaners; and (iv) Dettol Antiseptic Liquid ... specifically classifiable under the Second
and the Third Schedule; (iii) Harpic Toilet Cleaner
and Lizol Floor Cleaner are classifiable under
toilet cleaner sold by the Plaintiffs
under the Mark 'HARPIC', glass and house cleaner under the Mark 'COLIN'
and disinfectants under ... Dresses for sale of the Plaintiffs' Products
under the Marks, 'HARPIC' ' ', 'COLIN' ' '
'LIZOL
Zydus Wellness Products Ltd vs Dabur India Limited on 22 December, 2022
Author: Prathiba M
Register of
Trademarks by removal, therefrom, of the word mark "HARPIC
DRAINXPERT". The impugned mark stands registered in favour of
Respondent ... Bansal's case is that the impugned word mark "HARPIC
DRAINXPERT" of Respondent 1 is similar to earlier trade marks
lying near
the bathroom and in the bathroom there was a Harpic bottle. He had also stated that
the deceased was of stubborn nature ... report projected that the poison used was organo
phosphorus pesticide and not Harpic. He has submitted that the learned Judge has
committed grave error
various
health and hygiene products under different brands i.e., DETTOL, HARPIC,
VEET, LIZOL, DISPRIN, DUREX, MORTEIN.
2
2. This suit has been filed ... respect of the registered trademark "HARPIC"
including the "HARPIC" bottle shape and cap. The petitioner complains of
infringement under the Trademarks
