Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Raja Ram Paikra vs State Of Chhattisgarh 63 Wps/2522/2019 ... on 5 April, 2019

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                            1


                                                                              NAFR
                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                                   WPS No. 2360 of 2019
             Raja Ram Paikra S/o Kariya Ram Paikara Aged About s41 Years
             Posted As Lecturer Panchayat, Government Higher Secondary
             School Tuman, Block Kartala, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                    ---- Petitioner
                                         Versus
        1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural
           Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur,
           District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
        2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Korba, District- Korba,
           Chhattisgarh.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For State : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G. A. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/04/2019

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the increment granted to the Petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that he has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

2

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of, with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed off.

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy) Judge jyoti