Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Kalaiah vs The Spl Land Acquistion Officer on 11 September, 2013

Author: S.Abdul Nazeer

Bench: S Abdul Nazeer

                          1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

     DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013

                      BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S ABDUL NAZEER

       WRIT PETITION NO.33843/2013 (LA-KIADB)

BETWEEN:

SRI KALAIAH
S/O BARAGANABORA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/O BASTIPURA VILLAGE
BELAGOLA HOBLI
SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 606.
                                     .... PETITIONER

(BY SRI ABHIJEET, ADV. FOR SRI V.SRINIVAS, ADV.)

AND:

1.     THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
       KIADB, METGALLI
       MYSORE - 570 001.

2.     EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       KIADB, RASTROTHANA BUILDING
       NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
       BANGALORE - 560 001.

3.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
       AND INDUSTRIES
       VIKASA SOUDHA
       REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
       BANGALORE - 01.
                                    .... RESPONDENTS
                              2


(BY SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R1 & 2
    SRI H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD, AGA FOR R3)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LA MIS.NO.35/2006 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND JMFC AT
SRIRANGAPATNA AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 21.3.2013 PASSED IN LA MISC.NO.35/2006 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND JMFC
AT SRIRANGAPATNA I.E., ANNX-E.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

                       ORDER

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. In an identical case in W.P.No.33841/2013 disposed of on 11.09.2013 (between Smt. Mariyamma vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer and Others), I have passed a detailed order dismissing the writ petition.

3. For the reasons set out in the said order, this writ petition is also dismissed. No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE ca