Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Stat Of H.P. And Others vs Himanshu Shekhar Chaudhary And Others on 27 April, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
                             SHIMLA
                                                                      LPA No. 32 of 2015
                                                     Date of decision: 27th April, 2015.




                                                                                       .
               Stat of H.P. and others            .....Appellants





                                 Versus
               Himanshu Shekhar Chaudhary and others
                                                  ...Respondents.





           Coram:

           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.





           Whether approved for reporting ?1 Yes.

           For the appellants:                       Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate
                                                     General with Mr. Anup Rattan and

                                                     Mr. Romesh Verma, Addl. AGs,

                                                     with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy
                                                     Advocate General.

     For the respondents:   Nemo.


_______________________________________________________

           Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th December, 2014, passed the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No. 9427 of 2014, whereby the writ respondents/ appellants have to consider the case of the writ petitioners/respondents herein, in terms of the judgment made by this Court in Chaman Singh versus State of H.P. and another decided on 29th August, 2014.

2. We have gone through the judgment made by the Writ Court. The Writ Court, i.e., the learned Single Judge has not determined the rights of the parties on merits.

1

Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:03:45 :::HCHP -2-

3. The impugned judgment is speaking one and is not working adversely against the appellants. Thus, we deem it proper not to issue notice in this appeal and .

dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, alongwith pending applications, if any.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.

April 27, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (cm Thakur) Judge.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:03:45 :::HCHP